"Calvin":
>>> 7 Using a photoelectric photometer, astronomers can measure the
>>> number of pulses per second generated by a star pulse. This measure is
>>> proportional to what other property of stars?
>> Magnitude / Brightness
Magnitude is expressed using an inverse logarithmic scale, so it can't
be proportional to anything that is proportional to brightness.
>> I don't believe rotational speed is correct but feel free to correct me.
Dan Tilque:
> The question is very poorly phrased.
It certainly is. "A star pulse" doesn't mean anything. I answered
brightness because I guessed "star pulse" was an error for "star" and
the "pulses per second" being counted were being generated within the
photometer and not anywhere else.
> It could be refering to either pulsars (neutron stars) or Cepheid
> variables.
Mmm, no.
> Pulsars are very rapidly rotating former stars that have a "bright spot"
> (bright in the radio range, that is). This spot is not aimed directly at
> Earth, but rather rotates in and out of our direction. So it effectively
> generates pulses that we see. They rotate so rapidly that the pulse rate
> ranges from a few milliseconds to a few seconds. So for these, the pulse
> rate corresponds exactly to their rotation rate.
That's true, but the question did refer to a photometer, indicating
that we were talking about light, not radio waves. Most pulsars do not
a visible flashing light. On another point, pulsars typically have a
rotation rate on the order of once per second, so "pulses per second"
doesn't fit.
> Cepheid variables are large stars that pulse radially (they actually
> expand and contract), but their periods are measured in days...
So that certainly didn't fit with "pulses per second" either.
> Another poorly phrased aspect of the question is that it implies that
> this relationship applies to all stars, whereas both pulsars and
> Cepheids are a very small fraction of the stars we see.
But it wasn't ever about pulsars and Cepheids; you just assumed it was.
--
Mark Brader "I suppose that the distances from us [to the
Toronto stars] vary so much that some are two or three
m...@vex.net times as remote as others." -- Galileo