Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Byzar vs. Camarilla Segregation

12 views
Skip to first unread message

Jozxyqk

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 9:41:30 AM12/16/09
to
Byzar relevant text:
"If Byzar would be burned, put a burn counter on him and move him to torpor
instead."

Judgment: Camarilla Segregation relevant text:
"Any Methuselah may burn this card by burning a non-Camarilla vampire he or
she controls during his or her master phase."

Does it satisfy the burn clause of J:CS if Byzar goes to torpor and gains a
counter?

I assume yes.

LSJ

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 10:52:34 AM12/16/09
to

Correct.

Similar to Set's Cursing an Ilomba:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad/msg/5417f23c4c1c8b93

yourself

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 1:38:03 AM12/17/09
to
ooh I guess Byzar can make Recalled to the Founder suck it too the ^_^

Keith Bonneau

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 12:20:54 PM12/17/09
to
On Dec 17, 1:38 am, yourself <return.to.innoce...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ooh I guess Byzar can make Recalled to the Founder suck it too the ^_^

Would you then be able to Golcanda him and still gain the pool even
though he only moves to torpor?

Chris Berger

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 12:33:52 PM12/17/09
to

Golconda doesn't burn the target, it removes them from the game.

0 new messages