curious ruling
Henrik Isaksson
possess the bomb when the action resolves (after being Masked, or if the Bomb was transferred or
destroyed somehow). [RTR 19960221]
Another minion really cannot play mask on a bemb-destroy action, right, making part of above ruling
obsolete. What if two minions both have a bomb? Can they then mask back and forth, or is it the same
case as, for example, beast and theo bells rush actions?
/Henrik Isaksson
LSJ
>
> When taking the action to burn a location, the action will fail if the acting minion does not
> possess the bomb when the action resolves (after being Masked, or if the Bomb was transferred or
> destroyed somehow). [RTR 19960221]
>
> Another minion really cannot play mask on a bemb-destroy action, right, making part of above ruling
> obsolete.
Right.
> What if two minions both have a bomb? Can they then mask back and forth, or is it the same
> case as, for example, beast and theo bells rush actions?
The latter.
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/
Ben Peal
> Another minion really cannot play mask on a bemb-destroy action, right,
> making part of above ruling obsolete. What if two minions both have a bomb?
> Can they then mask back and forth, or is it the same case as, for example,
> beast and theo bells rush actions?
Even if it works the way you hope it works, Bomb is still not good.
:)
- Ben Peal, Prince of Boston
fu...@mindstorm.com
reyda
> Henrik Isaksson wrote:
>> Another minion really cannot play mask on a bemb-destroy action,
>> right, making part of above ruling obsolete. What if two minions
>> both have a bomb? Can they then mask back and forth, or is it the
>> same case as, for example, beast and theo bells rush actions?
>
> Even if it works the way you hope it works, Bomb is still not
> good.
i know what you may think but i played a bomb deck with mucho success in the
past.
basically it was a !gangrel deck. computer hack, if blocked play flesh of
marble. dodge for your first strike, then blur, strike with disguised weapon
bomb for 5 damage, strike with another disguised weapon for 5 damage, laugh
loudly.
it was pretty funny to play with this ! requires only 10 flesh of marble and
10 bombs. did i mention i even burned a location once ?? =)
legbiter
Hmmm, do you still have the deck-list? i would LOVE to feature this in
the October !Gangrel NL.
arpeges
> Hmmm, do you still have the deck-list? i would LOVE to feature this in
> the October !Gangrel NL.
Nasty !
reyda
> "reyda" <true_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> basically it was a !gangrel deck. computer hack, if blocked play
>> flesh of marble. dodge for your first strike, then blur, strike
>> with disguised weapon bomb for 5 damage, strike with another
>> disguised weapon for 5 damage, laugh loudly.
>> it was pretty funny to play with this ! requires only 10 flesh of
>> marble and 10 bombs. did i mention i even burned a location once
>> ?? =)
>
> Hmmm, do you still have the deck-list? i would LOVE to feature this
> in the October !Gangrel NL.
the deck is dismantled bu i'll do it again especially for you =)
reyda
Ben Peal
Why pay 1 blood for Wolf Claws when you can pay 1 pool to cause them
to play S:CE instead?
;)
The deck does sound like a lot of fun, though. :)
reyda
you forgot the mighty psyche =)