Cheers
Sutekh_23
"A minion cannot use more than one card or effect to gain additional strikes per
round of combat." [6.4.3]
What about the "this additional strike card does not count against
this vampire`s additional strike effect limit for this round"??
As I see it you should be able to use AK-47 additional after using
both of this cards:
Hell-for-Leather, Combat, anarchAnimalism/Celerity/Obtenebration, C ,
[TR]
Requires an anarch. Only one Hell-for-Leather may be played at a given
Discipline each combat.
[ani] Strike: dodge, with an additional strike.
[cel] Additional strike (that doesn't count against the limit).
[obt] Play if this anarch is ready and the opposing minion is not. The
opposing minion's controller burns 2 pool.
Quickness, Combat, 1 blood, Celerity, R , [Sabbat:R, SW:R, FN:PA]
[cel] Additional strike.
[CEL] As above, but this additional strike card does not count against
this vampire`s additional strike effect limit for this round. A
vampire may only play one Quickness each round.
-----
AK-47, Equipment, 5 pool , R , [LotN]
Weapon. Gun.
2R damage each strike, with an optional maneuver each combat.
When bearer strikes with this gun, he or she gets an optional
additional strike this round, only usable to strike with this gun.
True, unless the card breaks those rules (which are the 2 cards I am
referring to)
You still comply with the cardtext of the AK by striking with it, or
are "not counted towards additional strike limits" cards somewhat
misleading?
Cheers
Sutekh_23
Very good.
> You still comply with the cardtext of the AK by striking with it, or
> are "not counted towards additional strike limits" cards somewhat
> misleading?
Not misleading at all. Explicit, even.
So, what was the question, then?
the question is the same as it was from the start, do "non
restrictive" adittionals allow you to access the inherent additional
from the AK? Like
> > Not misleading at all. Explicit, even.
>
> > So, what was the question, then?
>
> the question is the same as it was from the start, do "non
> restrictive" adittionals allow you to access the inherent additional
> from the AK? Like
You answered your own question above (card text).
-witness1
The rulebook seems to say the latter, but even if that is true, is the
AK an exception to this, because gaining the optional additional
strike happens as part of the resolution of the AK's strike?
Obviously, the question only applies to using the AK (or Kpist) after
using a different strike first and then additional striking with Hell
for Leather (cel) or Quickness (CEL) or something else (?) that
doesn't count against the limit.
Essentially this is the same question as "If I play HFL or Quickness
at CEL, may I play Blur/Pursuit/cel Acrobatics afterwards?"
The answer is yes. So yes for AK47...
> Essentially this is the same question as "If I play HFL or Quickness
> at CEL, may I play Blur/Pursuit/cel Acrobatics afterwards?"
>
> The answer is yes. So yes for AK47...
Except that, as Chris points out above, it isn't the same as that.
It's the same as "If I play HFL or Quickness at CEL, may I strike with
(whatever), see what my opponent does in response to that (ie, resolve
that strike), *then* play Blur/Pursuit/cel Acrobatics after resolution
of that first additional strike."
Which hasn't been answered, because LSJ's apparent implications, and
most of the answers given in the thread so far, seem to ignore that
distinction, and say yes, despite the rulebook explicitly saying
"Additional strikes are announced (gained) and performed (used) only
after the first pair of strikes are completed." (6.4.3) Which could
be interpreted as "you can't generate them before then." It could
also be interpreted as "You only get one chance to generate them."
The clarification that's being missed is on the rulings page - however
the link from it is broken. "# If you have any pending (additional)
strikes, wait until those strikes are resolved before gaining further
additional strikes (if you are allowed to use more than one additional-
strike-gaining effect in a round). [LSJ 20001206]"
So yes, after HFL allows you to add. strike with an AK47, you can use
the additional strike it gives you. Provided that's still the proper
ruling, which it seems to be.
- D.J.
- D.J.
But it is not the same question. It's a similar question to "can I
play a strike, then use Quickness, then play another strike, then play
Blur (presumably after replacing the strike and drawing into the
Blur". The answer, according to the rulebook, appears to be no - it
says that additional strikes can only be played after the first strike
resolution of the round. If that is true (and it's possibly a little
vague, so that sequence might be legal, but I don't think it is...),
then there's a question of whether or not AK is an exception to that.
Additional Strikes: Some cards and effects allow a minion to make
additional strikes during the current round of combat. Additional
strikes are announced (gained) and performed (used) only after the
first pair of strikes are completed. The acting minion decides whether
or not to gain additional strikes before the opposing minion, as
usual. Additional strikes are handled by having another choose strike
phase and resolve strike phase in which only the minions with
additional strikes may play strike cards. All additional strikes take
place at the same range. This is repeated as necessary. A minion
cannot use more than one card or effect to gain additional strikes per
round of combat.
Additional strikes are announced (gained) and performed (used) only
after the first pair of strikes are completed.
Does this mean you can not gain additional strikes after the second
strike?
Does this mean you can not gain additional strikes unless both minions
make a strike? Or if there are three initial strikes (winged second)
"# If you have any pending (additional)
strikes, wait until those strikes are resolved before gaining further
additional strikes (if you are allowed to use more than one
additional-
strike-gaining effect in a round). [LSJ 20001206]"
> Does this mean you can not gain additional strikes unless both minions
> make a strike? Or if there are three initial strikes (winged second)
No.
-witness1
Brandon
It is my understanding that you can not gain additional strikes if you
have strikes pending.
The wording could be as simple as that, although it must be after
initial strikes.
Matt
Nope; you've got it backward.
There are any number of "generate additional strikes, declare them,
and resolve them" steps in a round, provided a minion can keep
generating "does not count" strikes. But you need to finish resolving
a batch of pending additional strikes before you generate more.
Hence, the initially-proposed Dodge - HFL to strike with AK-47 -
AK-47's inherent additional to strike with AK-47 chain works. And
works if you tack a Quickness in there, too.
But if you initially strike with the AK, and the other minion does
something then generates an additional that (for some reason) you
expect to be a S:CE, you can't play your HFL and Quickness just to
cycle them, as you've already got a pending additional strike.
At least, that's how I understand it.
- D.J.
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/index.php?line=outline only has one time
slot in which you can gain additional strikes. You repeat announce
strike and resolve strike for each pair, but you don't repeat "gain
additional strikes", according to that text.
--
James Coupe
PGP Key: 0x5D623D5D YOU ARE IN ERROR.
EBD690ECD7A1FB457CA2 NO-ONE IS SCREAMING.
13D7E668C3695D623D5D THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION.
There is no such thing as the "additional strike's phase" there is
only a source of additional strikes, and you can only have one source
of additional strikes per round.
If you use the AK-47 then you get a Mandatory additional strike that
can only be used with the AK-47, which is interesting because if you
struck hands then did an inferior blur and struck with the AK-47 then
you would set up a contradictory effect to the rules by card text.
You would have used your single source of additional strikes (i.e.
Blur) but then you have added an effect which gives you a mandatory
additional strike as there is no "may" in AK-47's card text. AK-47
has "queued" a second source of additional strikes. You can not use
the second source of additional strikes as you are limited to only
one.
Does that make sense?
Comments Welcome,
Norman S. Brown, Jr
XZealot
Archon of the Swamp
While you're right that there's no "may" in AK-47's card text, there
is the word "optional." So there is no rules contridiction here.
Brandon, to answer your question, here are a variety of examples:
1) Legal:
1st strike: AK-47
2nd strike: AK-47
play Quickness
3rd strike: whatever you want (could be AK-47 again)
2) ILLEGAL:
1st strike: AK-47
play Quickness (you can't gain additional strikes while you have
additional strikes pending. Compare to #1 above)
2nd strike: AK-47
3rd strike: whatever you want (could be AK-47 again)
3) Legal:
1st strike: Hell-for-Leather at ani for dodge and an additional strike
2nd strike: AK-47
3rd Strike: AK-47
4) Legal:
1st strike: Hands
play pursuit
2nd strike: Hands
play Quickness
3rd strike: Hands
5) ILLEGAL:
1st strike: Hands
play pursuit
play quickness (you can't gain additional strikes while you have
additional strikes pending. Compare to #4 above)
2nd strike: Hands
3rd strike: Hands
6) ILLEGAL:
1st strike: Hands
play quickness
play pursuit (you can't gain additional strikes while you have
additional strikes pending. Compare to #4 above)
2nd strike: Hands
3rd strike: Hands
7) LEGAL, and the most confusing:
1st strike: AK-47
play Quickness (this is OK if you give up the additional strike that
the AK grants, since it's optional. Compare to #2 above)
2nd strike: whatever you want (could be AK-47 again)
(only 2 additional strikes total)
So, in #7, if the opposing vamp had 1 blood and you wanted to cycle
your quickness, you could, but only if you give up the optional
additional strike that the AK-47 gives.
I hope this helps, and I hope I didn't make any mistakes with my
examples. :) I feel pretty confident about them...
Ira
AK-47 [LotN:R]
Cardtype: Equipment
Cost: 5 pool
Weapon. Gun.
2R damage each strike, with an optional maneuver {each combat}. When
After looking at the outline that James mentioned, it seems like there
is only one opportunity to gain additional strikes per round.
i.e. a: round begins, b: set range, c: Strike
1. Announce Strikes
2. Resolve Strikes
3. Option to gain additional strikes
4. "Resolve steps 1-2 above for each additional strike. [6.4.3.3]"
then presses, etc.
This seems to indicate that if you opt for additional strikes, you are
chained into steps 1-2 for each strike, otherwise it should say
something like "repeat C(strikes) for each additional strike." So then
after you finish steps 1-2 for each additional strike, return to step
4 and presses.
> If you use the AK-47 then you get a Mandatory additional strike that
> can only be used with the AK-47, which is interesting because if you
> struck hands then did an inferior blur and struck with the AK-47 then
> you would set up a contradictory effect to the rules by card text.
> You would have used your single source of additional strikes (i.e.
> Blur) but then you have added an effect which gives you a mandatory
> additional strike as there is no "may" in AK-47's card text. AK-47
> has "queued" a second source of additional strikes. You can not use
> the second source of additional strikes as you are limited to only
> one.
Here's the link to WW's card text for AK-47:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/index.php?line=Cardlist_A#AK_47
Interestingly, it says you gain an "optional additional strike this
round, only usable to strike with this gun."
And if I decline that additional strike in favor of Blur at CEL,
Quickness at CEL, and HFL at cel, can I gain 4 additional strikes?
3 more AK-47's and an RPG later(say it's round 2), your opponent has
received 14 damage. How about some Target: Vitals now? 24 damage? Ow..
Why am I using AK-47 again?
Correct.
Correct.
Ira, this is not legal as you are using two sources of additional
strikes, Hell-for-Leather at ani and the AK-47's add strike.
LSJ can you clarify?
Correct. The ani version doesn't say the additional doesn't count against the
limit, so it counts against the limit.
> 7) LEGAL, and the most confusing:
> 1st strike: AK-47
> play Quickness (this is OK if you give up the additional strike that
> the AK grants, since it's optional. Compare to #2 above)
> 2nd strike: whatever you want (could be AK-47 again)
> (only 2 additional strikes total)
>
> So, in #7, if the opposing vamp had 1 blood and you wanted to cycle
> your quickness, you could, but only if you give up the optional
> additional strike that the AK-47 gives.
Hmm. Question: Let's assume Ira's #7 above - I strike AK-47, opt not
to gain that additional strike, and play Quickness. I then strike
AK-47 with Quickness's add'l strike. Since I have just struck with
the AK-47, and haven't used a "counts" source of additional strikes,
does that 2nd AK-47 strike also give me the option of an additional
strike, like the first one did?
In other words, does denying to take the option the first time it's
presented somehow keep it from being presented again?
(I believe that AK-47, Quickness to strike AK-47, then AK-47 enabled
additional strike for a third AK-47, should be legal, but I want to
confirm.)
- D.J.
Yes.
> In other words, does denying to take the option the first time it's
> presented somehow keep it from being presented again?
No.
> (I believe that AK-47, Quickness to strike AK-47, then AK-47 enabled
> additional strike for a third AK-47, should be legal, but I want to
> confirm.)
Confirmed.
So, does that also means that, in a given round, you get just only and only
one
"gain additional strikes" window phase, that occours just after the first
pair of (canonical) strikes are completed ?
And therefore you can't use/play other effects that gives you (furthers)
additionals strike *after* you already resolved an additional strike ?
thanks
Emiliano, NC Italy
No. Indeed, the above explicitly says that is not the case and that the exact
opposite is true.
Thanks for the good catch - that's just a lesson to me to quote card
text when I reference cards! :) Sorry for my mistake.
In that example, I intended for the Hell-For-Leather to not count
against additional strikes, and thus be the cel version.
Ira
Ok, so you can go on gainining additional(s) after *any* strike
(even additional ones) are completed.
I find rulebook is a bit confusing here then:
"Additional strikes are announced (gained) and performed (used) *only after
the first* pair of strikes are completed."
I would suggest a reword of that, to better explain that you can gain
strike just *not* only after "the first pair of strike is resolved", but
after
*any* pair of strike is resolved
just my two cents
Emiliano
So long as you don't alredy have more additional strike pending, yes.
> I find rulebook is a bit confusing here then:
Yes. That ambiguity has been pointed out.