To pass the bridge thai shall awnser questions three. Three shall be
the number of questions to awnser. Bridge Keeperof monty Python's
holy grail (DUH!)
Situation 1
Minion A does an action and Minion B plays a Forced awakening to
block.
Minion A and B enter combat as a result of a block. Minion A plays
Form of Mist at superior to continue the action. There are no new
blocks and the action resolves succesfull. Does minion B Have to burn
1 blood for Forced Awakening for not succesfull blocking?
Situation 2
Minion A does an action and Minion B blocks.Minion A and B enter
combat as a result of a block. Minion A plays Form of Mist at superior
to continue the action. Minion B plays cats guidance at inferior to
Untap. Is this allowed?
Situation 3
Minion A is acting and enters combat with minion B. Minion A plays
coma + amarant, minion B is really scewed and gets burned. A bloodhunt
burns minion A. Minion A plays an abandoning the flesh. Is this
possible? In other words is a bloodhunt caused by amaranth still in
combat, since Abandoning the flesh can not be played as an
actionmodifier? (same goes for reform body)
Thanks in advance.
Oortje
No, because he successfully blocked.
> Situation 2
> Minion A does an action and Minion B blocks.Minion A and B enter
> combat as a result of a block. Minion A plays Form of Mist at superior
> to continue the action. Minion B plays cats guidance at inferior to
> Untap. Is this allowed?
Yes.
> Situation 3
> Minion A is acting and enters combat with minion B. Minion A plays
> coma + amarant, minion B is really scewed and gets burned. A bloodhunt
> burns minion A. Minion A plays an abandoning the flesh. Is this
> possible? In other words is a bloodhunt caused by amaranth still in
No.
> combat, since Abandoning the flesh can not be played as an
> actionmodifier? (same goes for reform body)
The bloodhunt it conducted independently of the surrounding combat and action.
No combat cards, action modifiers, or reaction cards may be played.