[LSJ] Priscus vote to burn a Fee Stake
François
A referendum to burn a Fee Stake is called. Are Priscus
sub-referendum's votes affected by the clause "In that referendum,
non-anarch titles are worth 1 fewer votes", as in Free States Rant ?
Thank you,
François
LSJ
No.
Defender of Ra
Why did you rule this way LSJ? I don't exactly have a dog in this
fight, but I wanted to understand the logic since you made the
following ruling:
***
dhart...@san.rr.com (Dan Harting) wrote in message
<news:366bfade.01070...@posting.google.com>...
> LSJ <vtes...@white-wolf.com> wrote:
> > James Coupe wrote:
> > > Gomi no Sensei <g...@best.com> writes
> > > >(b) All Prisci cast 1 fewer vote during the Prisci sub-vote; the Prisci
> > > >abstain unless Gratiano is out, and the Prisci block is worth 3 votes
> > > >as normal.
> > > This is correct, so far as I can tell.
> > Correct. The title "Priscus" is worth 1 vote in the Priscus
> > sub-referendum.
> > It is worth 1 less vote in that sub-referendum during the Free States
> > Rant.
> Just curious - I don't mean to be annoying:
> How many votes does Genevieve have during a Free States Rant?
> (0 of each?)
The title is worth 1 less. Nothing is said about the special ability.
So she has 1 in the main referendum (special ability), and zero in
the Prisci sub-referendum.
> How many votes does a Regent have during a Free States Rant?
> (3?)
Yes.
Kushiel
> Why did you rule this way LSJ? I don't exactly have a dog in this
> fight, but I wanted to understand the logic since you made the
Free States Rant contains the special text needed to affect the prisci
sub-referendum. Fee Stakes don't.
John Eno
LSJ
Correct.