Player c tells player d, that'll he'll let player d withdraw from the
game...
What would happen if player d successfully withdrew?
1.) player a is ousted and player c gets 6 pool...
2.) player a is ousted at the same time as player d withdraws so nobody
get's the 6 pool...
3.) Player a starts throwing things at player c; cups, pennies,
counters, beer cans, etc...
4.) player b laugh hystically...
5.) Never would happen, would have broke the deal anyways.
If you attempt to withdraw, then brinkmanship was called and passed...
Are you subject to the same condition? From the text, only Methuselah
forced to withdraw from the game by the card will get ousted by it...
--
Direct access to this group with http://web2news.com
http://web2news.com/?rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
... and a VP (for ousting a), correct.
> If you attempt to withdraw, then brinkmanship was called and passed...
> Are you subject to the same condition? From the text, only Methuselah
> forced to withdraw from the game by the card will get ousted by it...
Correct.
Although if that current attempt to withdraw succeeds, the brinksmanship
will still oust its controller.
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/
But the withdrawal is successful first, right? It has to be in order for
the condition of Brinksmanship to fire off. So you successfully withdraw
and then the Brinksmanship ousts the controller of the brinksmanship, who
has already withdrawn, so it should be a moot point.
?
If the Brinks's controller has already withdrawn, Brinks is no longer
in play, and there is nothing to answer.
The question was:
If A attempts to withdraw and then on B's turn, B puts Brinks in play,
what happens when A's turn rolls around again?
Answer:
If A fails to withdraw: nothing. A simply takes his turn as normal.
If A succeeds in withdrawing: B is ousted.
>> If you attempt to withdraw, then brinkmanship was called and passed...
>> Are you subject to the same condition? From the text, only Methuselah
>> forced to withdraw from the game by the card will get ousted by it...
>
>Correct.
>
>Although if that current attempt to withdraw succeeds, the brinksmanship
>will still oust its controller.
does this mean that when Brinksmanship is in play and I begin my turn with
less than a full hand, I can simply choose to withdraw on my own instead
of being forced to do so by the Brinksmanship, and thus not be subject to
its effect?
--
charles lechasseur - bunsen...@yahoo.com
No. It means that if Brinksmanship is NOT in play and you begin your turn
with less than a full hand, you can simply choose to withdraw on your own
instead of being forced to do so by the Brinksmanship, and thus not be
subject to its effect even if it is put into play before your next untap.
... and A must attempt to withdraw again (and succeed or be ousted
unless Brinkmanship is somehow removed).