Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?)
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  19 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
jeff_kuta  
View profile  
 More options Jan 24 2005, 7:39 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: "jeff_kuta" <jeff_k...@hotmail.com>
Date: 24 Jan 2005 16:39:18 -0800
Local: Mon, Jan 24 2005 7:39 pm
Subject: Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?)
Anyone got the lowdown?

Jeff


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Joshua Duffin  
View profile  
 More options Jan 24 2005, 10:22 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: "Joshua Duffin" <jtduf...@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:22:01 -0500
Local: Mon, Jan 24 2005 10:22 pm
Subject: Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?)

"jeff_kuta" <jeff_k...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:1106613558.496050.51320@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...

> Anyone got the lowdown?

I'm afraid this may not be 100% reliable, since I left before the finals
started (not being in them).  Some New Englander probably ought to have
better (and more complete) info, having been there.  :-)

In the Jersey qualifier, I believe the finalists order going into the finals
was:

Jason Bubalis
Ben Peal
Scott Gomes
Nick Watkins
Peter Kapsalis

It's possible, though, that I got one or more of these finalists wrong, and
quite likely that the order isn't correct.  ;-)

Since there were 17 players, and 1 of them (Ben) was already qualified,
there should be 4 newly qualified people from the event, meaning all of the
finalists qualify.  (There was speculation ahead of the third round that if
Ben didn't make the finals, it would be an especially brutal final round
since one of the finalists wouldn't get qualified, so everyone would have to
fight tooth and nail not to come in fifth.  Sadly, or happily depending on
your point of view, that did not come to pass.)

Josh

braved the elements and came up cold


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
p...@lightlink.com  
View profile  
 More options Jan 25 2005, 10:42 am
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: p...@lightlink.com
Date: 25 Jan 2005 07:42:41 -0800
Local: Tues, Jan 25 2005 10:42 am
Subject: Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?)
I heard tale that Ben won.

-Peter


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
fudjo  
View profile  
 More options Jan 25 2005, 12:44 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: "fudjo" <fu...@optical.mindstorm.com>
Date: 25 Jan 2005 09:44:56 -0800
Local: Tues, Jan 25 2005 12:44 pm
Subject: Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?)

Joshua Duffin wrote:
> In the Jersey qualifier, I believe the finalists order going into the
finals
> was:

> Jason Bubalis
> Ben Peal
> Scott Gomes
> Nick Watkins
> Peter Kapsalis

1. Jason Bubalis
2. Ben Peal
3. Scott Gomes
4. Peter Kapsalis
5. Nick Watkins

Seating order was:

Jason Bubalis (aka Snapcase) (Rock Cats)
Peter Kapsalis (Nos Princes toolbox, fight heavy)
Nick Watkins (Obf-Dem bleed with Protean)
Ben Peal (Nos/!Nos ani-obf weenie Raven Spy wall)
Scott Gomes (!Tor Palla Grande tap 'n bleed)

Jason seemed to have gotten a slow start out of the gate in the
finals,
not quite getting the Souls of the Earth that he would have liked.  A
Creepshow Casino or an Unlicensed Taxi Cab would've been a big help,
too,
as Peter was inclined to 2nd Trad and not let more than two Rock Cats
hit the table.  On top of this, the bleed pressure from Scott was
pretty
heavy, and Jason had to go upstream to deal with Jost and Co.

Nick got an early bleed or two through on me, but I was able to get
the
Raven Spy picket set up, along with a couple of Sniper Rifles, and I
was
able to shut down Nick's attack.  Peter opted to lay off Nick for
most of
the game, in the hopes that Nick could do something to me, but Nick
mostly
chose to hunt and farm off of Blood Dolls in order to work on getting
more
minions out.  In the meantime, I bled Scott for a couple every turn,
a
fair number of those bleeds getting bounced to Jason.

Jason's Rock Cat attacks on Scott took their toll, and I eventually
ousted Scott.  Jason was unfortunately down to 4 pool by that point,
and I ousted him the following turn.  Peter came close to ousting
Nick (down to 1 pool, I believe), but Nick rallied and farmed from
Blood Dolls enough.  After that Peter wasn't able to get much going
on Nick, and Nick still couldn't get anything going on me.  I wasn't
particularly interested in sending my vampires into Peter's wood
chipper, so the game timed out.  Me 2.5, Peter 0.5, Nick 0.5

The winning deck:

Deck Name:  Nevermore
Created By:  Ben Peal
Description:  This deck started as an experiment in defending against
stealth-bleed decks without the aid of bleed bounce.  The idea is to
get out obf-ani weenies, who then employ lots of Raven Spies.  You
can't expect to block everything (especially early on, when you're
most vulnerable), but your predator will end up having to spend a lot
of stealth cards to get each action to succeed, to the point where
their hand will be stripped of sufficient stealth after one action
and they'll have to wait until they draw more stealth before making
another run.  In the meantime, you can recoup any pool lost by
farming
from Blood Dolls.  You're also looking to get bleed retainers and
Sniper Rifles, as well as additional weenies.  You eventually oust
your prey with weenie bleeds.

CRYPT (12 cards) [avg=3.92]

1 x Christianus Lionel (6): OBF ANI pot
1 x Nigel the Shunned (5): ANI POT obf
1 x Cicatriz (5): obf ani pot
1 x Josef (4): obf ani obt
1 x Shannon Price, the Whisperer (3): obf ani
1 x Calebros, The Martyr (5): ANI obf pot
1 x Gemini (5): OBF ani pot obt
1 x Laurent de Valois (4): obf ani dom
1 x Clarissa Steinburgen (3): obf ani
1 x Krid (2): obf
1 x Panagos Levidis (3): obf ani
1 x Hanna Redmonds (2): obf tha

LIBRARY (90 cards)

1 x Shanty Town Hunting Ground
1 x Information Network
1 x The Labyrinth
1 x Nosferatu Bestial

1 x The Barrens
1 x KRCG News Radio
1 x The Rumor Mill, Tabloid Newspaper
1 x Dummy Corporation
6 x Blood Doll
6 x Life in the City

1 x Carlton Van Wyk (Hunter)
1 x J.S. Simmons Esq.
1 x Tasha Morgan
3 x Sniper Rifle
2 x .44 Magnum
2 x Leather Jacket
2 x IR Goggles
9 x Wake with Evening's Freshness
9 x Forced Awakening

1 x Forgotten Labyrinth
1 x Elder Impersonation
3 x Spying Mission
4 x Swallowed by the Night
2 x Lost in Crowds
4 x Cloak the Gathering
3 x Faceless Night
3 x Domain of Evernight

15 x Raven Spy
4 x Instinctive Reaction

Many thanks to David Lapp and Jester's Playhouse for organizing and
hosting the qualifier!  Many thanks to the players who braved the
snow!  Many thanks to White Wolf for the prize support!  I'll see
about getting the official stats from David Lapp so they can be
posted here.

Speaking of the prize support, there was a new promotional card
given out to the attendees:

Retribution
Master

Choose a minion who successfully bled you for more than 1 pool
since your last turn.  The chosen minion takes 3 unpreventable
damage.  A Methuselah can only play one Retribution in a game.

"Atrocities committed by any one of us strengthens the fear that
we all use as weapons."  - Kemintiri, Follower of Set

LSJ, when does this card become tournament legal?

> Since there were 17 players, and 1 of them (Ben) was already
qualified,
> there should be 4 newly qualified people from the event, meaning all
of the
> finalists qualify.  (There was speculation ahead of the third round
that if
> Ben didn't make the finals, it would be an especially brutal final
round
> since one of the finalists wouldn't get qualified, so everyone would
have to
> fight tooth and nail not to come in fifth.  Sadly, or happily
depending on
> your point of view, that did not come to pass.)

After thinking about this some more, I think I remember reading
somewhere
that all finalists of a qualifier get to qualify, regardless of the
size
of the qualifier.  Can anyone corroborate this?
- Ben Peal
    fu...@mindstorm.com

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ben Swainbank  
View profile  
 More options Jan 25 2005, 4:13 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: "Ben Swainbank" <bswainb...@hotmail.com>
Date: 25 Jan 2005 13:13:47 -0800
Local: Tues, Jan 25 2005 4:13 pm
Subject: Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?)

fudjo wrote:

> The winning deck:

> Deck Name:  Nevermore
> Created By:  Ben Peal

<snip>

Nice.

> Retribution
> Master

> Choose a minion who successfully bled you for more than 1 pool
> since your last turn.  The chosen minion takes 3 unpreventable
> damage.  A Methuselah can only play one Retribution in a game.

> "Atrocities committed by any one of us strengthens the fear that
> we all use as weapons."  - Kemintiri, Follower of Set

Oh. Sure. NOW you post it.

Are you sure you didn't get any more of those "special promo cards"
that trash my Vampires? :)

-Ben Swainbank


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dasein  
View profile  
 More options Jan 25 2005, 5:06 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: "Dasein" <dasein2...@hotmail.com>
Date: 25 Jan 2005 14:06:56 -0800
Local: Tues, Jan 25 2005 5:06 pm
Subject: Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?)

> Deck Name:  Nevermore
> Created By:  Ben Peal

cool stuff. I've Seen people try to make similar things but not very
successfully.

> LIBRARY (90 cards)

> 1 x Shanty Town Hunting Ground
> 1 x Information Network
> 1 x The Labyrinth
> 1 x Nosferatu Bestial

> 1 x The Barrens
> 1 x KRCG News Radio
> 1 x The Rumor Mill, Tabloid Newspaper
> 1 x Dummy Corporation
> 6 x Blood Doll
> 6 x Life in the City

Hmm seems like the kind of deck that could do well with a couple of
Perfectionists. While they aren't trifles like the LitC, they can give
you blood over a number of turns; with a few weenies out making actions
at stealth and with blood dolls, could give you a good return over
time.
Apart from that, looks like a great deck. Good to see the Instinctive
Reactions.

I've thought of making a similar kind of thing but with fatter guys
like Kurt Densch, and Neighbourhood Watch Commander. Weenies are
probably a better way to go.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Retribution promo card (was Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?))" by Frederick Scott
Frederick Scott  
View profile  
 More options Jan 25 2005, 5:14 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: "Frederick Scott" <nos...@no.spam.dot.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:14:55 -0700
Local: Tues, Jan 25 2005 5:14 pm
Subject: Retribution promo card (was Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?))

"fudjo" <fu...@optical.mindstorm.com> wrote in message

news:1106675096.365064.98890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...

> Speaking of the prize support, there was a new promotional card
> given out to the attendees:

> Retribution
> Master

> Choose a minion who successfully bled you for more than 1 pool
> since your last turn.  The chosen minion takes 3 unpreventable
> damage.  A Methuselah can only play one Retribution in a game.

> "Atrocities committed by any one of us strengthens the fear that
> we all use as weapons."  - Kemintiri, Follower of Set

Interesting.  Seems like another flip of the finger at weeny bleeders.
Each player can, once per game during his master phase, cause three
damage to a minion that bleeds him for more than one sometime during
the previous turn.

Other than that, I'm not sure if it means much.  A "sort of" Archon
Investigation.  Much easier to use but much less powerful when it goes
off.

Fred


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Peter D Bakija  
View profile  
 More options Jan 25 2005, 5:58 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: Peter D Bakija <p...@lightlink.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:58:55 -0500
Local: Tues, Jan 25 2005 5:58 pm
Subject: Re: Retribution promo card (was Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?))

Frederick Scott wrote:
> Other than that, I'm not sure if it means much.  A "sort of" Archon
> Investigation.  Much easier to use but much less powerful when it goes
> off.

I think it is a nice little card that swings the game in the direction
towards what David was looking for in his DI/AI thread, and works better
than AI does.

It is *much* easier to play, doesn't cost pool, and will pretty much always
have a target (bleeds of 2+ occur with much greater regularity than bleeds
of 4+). And it hurts small vampire bleed decks much more than "superstar"
decks.

I think this card will see a lot of play. I mean, it isn't, like, game
ending or anything, but I can see one of these in many, many decks, and it
sending vampires to torpor on a regular basis.

Peter D Bakija
p...@lightlink.com
http://www.lightlink.com/pdb6

"How does this end?"
"In fire."
Emperor Turhan and Kosh


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Retribution promo card (was Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results(?))" by Frederick Scott
Frederick Scott  
View profile  
 More options Jan 25 2005, 6:18 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: "Frederick Scott" <nos...@no.spam.dot.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:18:20 -0700
Local: Tues, Jan 25 2005 6:18 pm
Subject: Re: Retribution promo card (was Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results(?))

"Peter D Bakija" <p...@lightlink.com> wrote in message
news:BE1C395F.1CD1A%pdb6@lightlink.com...

> Frederick Scott wrote:

>> Other than that, I'm not sure if it means much.  A "sort of" Archon
>> Investigation.  Much easier to use but much less powerful when it goes
>> off.

> I think it is a nice little card that swings the game in the direction
> towards what David was looking for in his DI/AI thread, and works better
> than AI does.

Could you summarize for me?  (I'm too lazy to go read the whole thread.)

> It is *much* easier to play,

Ah, "*much* easier" - with asterisks.  I stand corrected.  :-)

> doesn't cost pool, and will pretty much always have a target (bleeds
> of 2+ occur with much greater regularity than bleeds of 4+).

On the other hand, it doesn't save you the pool as you pay its non-cost.
If the bleed is 2, that's OK.  If it's over 3, you'd rather use A.I.
But I agree with your comment about the relative frequency of the smaller
bleeds.

> And it hurts small vampire bleed decks much more than "superstar"
> decks.

Depends.  If the "superstar" is running on low blood, that could make
for a bigger "ouch" to the bleeder - especially since you have your
entire turn to go diablerize it.  OTOH, again, probably much easier to
catch a weeny than a superstar on low blood.

> I think this card will see a lot of play. I mean, it isn't, like, game
> ending or anything, but I can see one of these in many, many decks,
> and it sending vampires to torpor on a regular basis.

I'm thinking it might be most often seen in combat rush decks to use
against predators and maybe even bounced grandpredators.  Save the
former a precious rush with a single master card.  (Though possibly
too risky as a hand jamming master card, I don't know.)

Otherwise, it's just another really general kind-of-good master card
that will always be on the cusp of making the cut (or not) depending
on available master card space, the local metagame, and one's
preferences.

Fred


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?)" by The Lasombra
The Lasombra  
View profile  
 More options Jan 25 2005, 6:48 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: The Lasombra <TheLasom...@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:48:44 -0500
Local: Tues, Jan 25 2005 6:48 pm
Subject: Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?)
On 25 Jan 2005 09:44:56 -0800, "fudjo" <fu...@optical.mindstorm.com>
wrote:

>The winning deck:
>Deck Name:  Nevermore
>Created By:  Ben Peal

Notice 4 B and C from the FAQ.

Over 450 Tournament Winning Decks are archived here:
By date:
http://www.thelasombra.com/decks/twd.htm

By average capacity:
http://www.thelasombra.com/decks/capacity-twd.htm

By clan:
http://www.thelasombra.com/decks/clan-twd.htm

To get your deck added to the archive, do the following:

1) Schedule a standard constructed deck tournament thru the following
V:EKN event calendar:
http://206.65.59.246/vtes/calendar/addevent.tpl

2) Notice that storyline tournament winning decks are not archived on
this page.

3) Type up a tournament report and post it to the Usenet newsgroup:
rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

4) Include the following information in your report:
a) Name of Event
b) location of event
c) date of event
d) number of players in attendance at event
e) the correct full name of the winning player
f) the entire correct contents of the deck

5) After reading your report, I will verify that it was on the
official schedule, and if it had 10 or more players in attendance, I
will add the deck to the archive with no additional work on your part.

Claim your 15 minutes of fame.

Carpe noctem.

Lasombra

http://www.TheLasombra.com/decks/twd.htm

Carpe noctem.

Lasombra

http://www.TheLasombra.com
Your best online source for information about V:TES.
Now also featuring individual card sales and sales
of booster and starter box displays.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Retribution promo card (was Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results(?))" by Peter D Bakija
Peter D Bakija  
View profile  
 More options Jan 25 2005, 7:17 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: Peter D Bakija <p...@lightlink.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:17:29 -0500
Local: Tues, Jan 25 2005 7:17 pm
Subject: Re: Retribution promo card (was Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results(?))

Frederick Scott wrote:
> Could you summarize for me?  (I'm too lazy to go read the whole thread.)

In a few scentences:

David surmised that if Archon Investigation was playable on *any* bleed (as
opposed to just you being bled), it would see more play, and if it saw more
play, it would have more of an effect on the game (i.e. people would be a
lot more afraid of bleeding for more than 3 than they currently are). I
countered with the idea that, while his heart was in the right place, I
don't think that more wide spread AI useage is a good way to make it
happen--AI doesn't actually harm S+B decks (but it does really harm other
deck types that don't need hosing), and cross table random burning of
vampires is likely something we want less of, rather than more.

> On the other hand, it doesn't save you the pool as you pay its non-cost.
> If the bleed is 2, that's OK.  If it's over 3, you'd rather use A.I.
> But I agree with your comment about the relative frequency of the smaller
> bleeds.

Completely true. But from experience, AI is a real hinderance in your
deck--you spend a lot of time holding on to it if you have it, and when you
do get to play it, it usually doesn't save you, it just gives you a bit of
spiteful satisfaction (I've rarely been saved from being ousted by playing
AI, if ever. I've rarely seen anyone get saved from being ousted by playing
AI. Usually, it just saves you for another action or two, and makes you
happy 'cause you burned someone. And then you get ousted anyway).
Retribution, however, being a lot easier to play (and free), is going to see
a lot of action. I don't think it will save you either, but it will also see
play earlier in the game, and possibly help early.

> Depends.  If the "superstar" is running on low blood, that could make
> for a bigger "ouch" to the bleeder - especially since you have your
> entire turn to go diablerize it.  OTOH, again, probably much easier to
> catch a weeny than a superstar on low blood.

Likely. I don't think, really, that Retribution is going to keep people from
bleeding, but as it is going to be very playable, it'll give you a lot more
satisfaction, especially as you are more likely to be able to play it early.

> I'm thinking it might be most often seen in combat rush decks to use
> against predators and maybe even bounced grandpredators.  Save the
> former a precious rush with a single master card.  (Though possibly
> too risky as a hand jamming master card, I don't know.)

Very likely. But I think as it is so kind of universal, it'll probably show
up in a lot of decks that have a spare slot here and there. Once this card
gets in circulation, I suspect it will se a lot of play. I don't know if it
will make much difference to the environment, but I think it wil certainly
get a lot of play.

> Otherwise, it's just another really general kind-of-good master card
> that will always be on the cusp of making the cut (or not) depending
> on available master card space, the local metagame, and one's
> preferences.

Likely.

Peter D Bakija
p...@lightlink.com
http://www.lightlink.com/pdb6

"How does this end?"
"In fire."
Emperor Turhan and Kosh


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?)" by fudjo
fudjo  
View profile  
 More options Jan 25 2005, 10:19 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: "fudjo" <fu...@optical.mindstorm.com>
Date: 25 Jan 2005 19:19:06 -0800
Local: Tues, Jan 25 2005 10:19 pm
Subject: Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?)

The Lasombra wrote:
> Notice 4 B and C from the FAQ.

> <snip>

> 4) Include the following information in your report:
> a) Name of Event
> b) location of event
> c) date of event
> d) number of players in attendance at event
> e) the correct full name of the winning player
> f) the entire correct contents of the deck

Location of Event:  Jester's Playhouse, Northfield, NJ
Date of Event: 1/22/05

I think the official name of the event (for part A) is the
East Central Regional Qualifier, as opposed to the Northeast
Regional Qualifier at TotalCon, and as opposed to the Mid-Atlantic
Qualifier in the DC area.  :)

I've been waiting for the full report from David Lapp.  :)
- Ben Peal
    fu...@mindstorm.com


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
fudjo  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26 2005, 8:34 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: "fudjo" <fu...@optical.mindstorm.com>
Date: 26 Jan 2005 17:34:39 -0800
Local: Wed, Jan 26 2005 8:34 pm
Subject: Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?)
Yeah, Perfectionists could be a good addition.  The deck is fairly
master-light, so I'm sure I could find room for a couple.  Maybe drop a
couple Life in the City.

- Ben Peal
  fu...@mindstorm.com


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
fudjo  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26 2005, 8:33 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: "fudjo" <fu...@optical.mindstorm.com>
Date: 26 Jan 2005 17:33:00 -0800
Subject: Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?)
.

Ben Swainbank wrote:
> Oh. Sure. NOW you post it.

> Are you sure you didn't get any more of those "special promo cards"
> that trash my Vampires? :)

So Monday night at the weekly games in Boston, Ben Swainbank's
advanced
Beckett bled me with a Computer Hacking for 2, completely oblivious
to the
existence of Retribution.  I tagged Beckett with Retribution, causing
Ben to
discard his hand, and triggering the Fame on Beckett.  Ben's hand
size was then
reduced to...er...I think 4, due to his Gehenna events.  Retribution
indeed.  >:)

  - Ben Peal
    fu...@mindstorm.com


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Colin Strauss Riggs  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26 2005, 11:54 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: "Colin Strauss Riggs" <Aris...@gmail.com>
Date: 26 Jan 2005 20:54:00 -0800
Subject: Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?)
"fudjo" <fu...@optical.mindstorm.com> wrote in message

news:1106675096.365064.98890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...

liked.

Again Ben! Congrats, wish I could have made it. Nice deck idea, btw.

But I would really like to see the Rock Cat deck list and some
explanation of how it got first seed. Unless I'm misreading
something... Also, why sit in front of the Palla Grande deck,
and prey on the fight heavy deck?

Colin Strauss Riggs


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John Flournoy  
View profile  
 More options Jan 27 2005, 1:58 am
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: "John Flournoy" <carne...@gmail.com>
Date: 26 Jan 2005 22:58:38 -0800
Local: Thurs, Jan 27 2005 1:58 am
Subject: Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?)

And the very next night at our weekly game, Eric Chiang pulled the 'I
know none of you has even HEARD of this card, so John's vampire goes to
torpor - now I eat him' trick. Cuuuurseeees!

>   - Ben Peal
>     fu...@mindstorm.com

-John Flournoy

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Joshua Duffin  
View profile  
 More options Jan 27 2005, 12:23 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: "Joshua Duffin" <jtduf...@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:23:39 -0500
Local: Thurs, Jan 27 2005 12:23 pm
Subject: Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?)

"John Flournoy" <carne...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:1106809118.356716.173090@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...

Matt and I were really hoping to do this at our usual game this week,
but instead no one could make it out to play, and the surprise was
ruined by the power of the internet.  Ah well.  :-)

Josh

you're sittin' on a gold mine, trebek!


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
captainh...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Jan 27 2005, 1:42 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: captainh...@gmail.com
Date: 27 Jan 2005 10:42:21 -0800
Local: Thurs, Jan 27 2005 1:42 pm
Subject: Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?)

> But I would really like to see the Rock Cat deck list and some
> explanation of how it got first seed.

Swept first two games (both were 4 player tables); 3rd game timed out.

> Also, why sit in front of the Palla Grande deck,
> and prey on the fight heavy deck?

Had no idea what deck Scott was playing.  Had no idea the fight heavy
deck was packing as much intercept as it was.  Had I known either, I
would have sat in front of the pot/ani deck.  The idea was to get as
far as possible from Ben's uber intercept for as long as possible.  It
was a poor choice, but meh.

__
-Snapcase


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
captainh...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Feb 2 2005, 11:04 am
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
From: captainh...@gmail.com
Date: 2 Feb 2005 08:04:23 -0800
Local: Wed, Feb 2 2005 11:04 am
Subject: Re: Atlantic Region NAQ Results (?)
Forgot to put the decklist in the last post:
http://captainhead.tripod.com/cockrat.html

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google