Deck Name : Weenie DBR ECQ Paris
Author : Marius Iscru
Description :
1st in finals with 2 GW 7.5
1.5 VP in finals
Crypt [14 vampires] Capacity min: 1 max: 3 average: 1.5
------------------------------------------------------------
1x Watenda 3 obf Malkavian:2
1x Christine Boscacci 2 dom vic Pander:2
1x Marciana Giovanni, 2 dom Giovanni:2
1x Mustafa Rahman 2 dom Tremere:2
1x Ohanna 2 dom Malkavian:2
1x Samson 2 dom !Ventrue:2
1x Anarch Convert 1 Caitiff:0
1x Antoinette DuChamp 1 cel pre Caitiff:2
1x Huang, Blood Culti 1 pro Pander:2
1x Igo the Hungry 1 pre pro Caitiff:1
1x March Halcyon 1 for Pander:2
1x Nik 1 cel Caitiff:1
1x Royce 1 dom Pander:2
1x Smudge the Ignored 1 Caitiff:1
Library [60 cards]
------------------------------------------------------------
Action [19]
14x Bum's Rush
5x Graverobbing
Combat [21]
10x Concealed Weapon
11x Dragon's Breath Rounds
Equipment [12]
12x Saturday-Night Special
Master [8]
2x Dreams of the Sphinx
1x Golconda: Inner Peace
3x Information Highway
1x Jake Washington (Hunter)
1x Powerbase: Montreal
Wow.
A weenie dominate deck without a single +bleed or bleed bounce card.
I love this game.
HG
I'd love to hear more about this tournament and the finals. I guess
Scourge of the Enochians didn't come out?
Were the rushes used forward, backward, crosstable, or a mix? It
seems like Graverobbing would only work if the player was tapped out,
and that seems relatively unlikely, but maybe I'm underestimating.
I'm guessing the Golconda was used as pool gain on a graverobbed
vampire?
It's a testament to good game design (and the power of weenies) that
so many old cards are still playable today.
Ira
My list of that type of deck is almost equal, but I use more Jake
Washington and 1 Mylan.
Ira: my experience with the deck is that you don't get blocked doing
Graverobing because you hit vamps as soon as they come up, or people
fear blocking you.
Golconda is a classic here.
Jake is very funny in this deck because you can't use Obedience on him
and he truly becomes a vampire hunter here.
My question is: how did the winning player dealt with obvious table
hate and specially the matchup vs Imbued.
Vincent?
No. His grand-prey had one in the deck, but it didn't show up.
> Were the rushes used forward, backward, crosstable, or a mix? It
> seems like Graverobbing would only work if the player was tapped out,
> and that seems relatively unlikely, but maybe I'm underestimating.
A mix.
I guess players forgot how dangerous a weenie DBR is.
I had it on my table as my grand-prey (playing aim and chain). My prey
was so scared of me that he didn't want to go forward. Unfortunately,
he was the only one who could really outswarm the weenie DBR as he was
playing assamite horde with Taste of Death. My mistake was maybe to
get 3 vampires out with dom? If I had kept them uncontrolled, he would
have felt more confident and kill the weenie dbr.
I think there was also a lack of communication, but people are afraid
to say "we must oust the weenie dbr" because they fear a retributive
rush.
>
> Vincent?- Masquer le texte des messages précédents -
>
> - Afficher le texte des messages précédents -
Thanks.
I don't know how I forgot to use Watenda in my deck... Mistake
corrected.
I'd include at least 1 copy.
Alf
Of course waiting to graverob a 5+ cap, thats the whole ponite of the
deck, stealing the big uns.
I have never played my similiar deck without graverobbing at least one
bigger vamp.