Question on War Ghoul ability

[Andreas Nusser]

Hi,

I do not know if this has been asked before but wat happens if Player A
plays an Entrancement on Player's B War Ghoul.

Has player B the option to burn his War Ghoul before?

Cardtext: Ghoul with 5 life. 4 strength, 0 bleed.
When War Ghoul enters play, burn an ally or retainer you control. She
can enter combat with any ready vampire controlled by another Methuselah
as a (D) action. She may prevent 1 damage each round. Tap and burn War
Ghoul to burn any location; you cannot use this ability during combat.

If, what happens to Entrancement?

thanks

Andreas

[Sten During]

Should work, and Entrancement should flunk, ie failed action cause of
lack of legal target. I even think you could tap a Neighborhood Watch
Commander to add to the insult :)

Sten During

[Mike]

"Sten During" <ya...@netg.se> wrote in message
news:42f747d2$0$18649$1472...@news.sunsite.dk...

I would have ruled the reverse actually. Surely the War Ghoul isn't entering
or leaving play, just changing controllers, and therefore there is no window
to activate the 'burn ally or retainer' text a second time?

Regards,

Mike

[Mike]

"Mike" <mi...@vekn.org.uk> wrote in message
news:42f74b32$0$24050$ed26...@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net...

Doh, ignore me, you're obviously referring to 'tap to burn any location'.
Too little sleep, need more caffeine... :P

Regards,

Mike

[Johannes Walch]

if you wouldn´t have been too lazy to start a quick search you would
have discovered this:

>> can one tap and burn an untapped WarGhoul to burn any
>> location in play
>> when someone anounces an entrancement against said Ghoul?
>
> They're different actions, but actions nonetheless.
>
> Yes, the War Ghoul can be tapped after declaration
> and before resolution
> (during the "choose blockers" step, for instance).
>
> Top-posting makes converstations more difficult on the
> newsgroup, by >theway.
>
>--
>LSJ (vtes...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
>Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar:
>http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes /

[David Zopf]

"Johannes Walch" <johanne...@vekn.de> wrote in message
news:dd7m5g$4kp$1...@news01.versatel.de...

> if you wouldn´t have been too lazy to start a quick search you would have
> discovered this:
>
> >> can one tap and burn an untapped WarGhoul to burn any
> >> location in play
> >> when someone anounces an entrancement against said Ghoul?
> >
> > They're different actions, but actions nonetheless.
> >
> > Yes, the War Ghoul can be tapped after declaration
> > and before resolution
> > (during the "choose blockers" step, for instance).
> >
> > Top-posting makes converstations more difficult on the
> > newsgroup, by >theway.
> >

Heh.
Its funny that you criticized Andreas for being lazy, but you top-posted
your reply, _and_ left in the quote from the search noting how annoying that
is. Its the sort of thing that takes the teeth out of internet etiquitte
commentary...

DZ
AW

[Johannes Walch]

David Zopf wrote:
> Heh.
> Its funny that you criticized Andreas for being lazy, but you top-posted
> your reply, _and_ left in the quote from the search noting how annoying that
> is. Its the sort of thing that takes the teeth out of internet etiquitte
> commentary...

In this case it愀 not really top-posting, because I was citing another
post and NOT top-posting to the actual post.

Just to be equally nit-picky :)

--
johannes walch

[Daneel]

On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 16:14:20 +0200, Johannes Walch
<johanne...@vekn.de> wrote:

> David Zopf wrote:
>> Heh.
>> Its funny that you criticized Andreas for being lazy, but you
>> top-posted your reply, _and_ left in the quote from the search noting
>> how annoying that is. Its the sort of thing that takes the teeth out
>> of internet etiquitte commentary...
>

> In this case it´s not really top-posting, because I was citing another

> post and NOT top-posting to the actual post.
>
> Just to be equally nit-picky :)

Well, in that case, you still failed to quote the relevant text you were
replying to... ;-)

--
Bye,

Daneel