>> I like "won with fewest kills" instead as discussed elsewhere.
>> The real kicker: Fewest kills (which is basically the "summoner award")
>> or Fewest monsters that died?

> I had the latter in mind. In my opinion, it's more fun to ask for an
> Elyvilon special than for a summoner special.

>>> [*] All of these might be instead (or in addition) used for clan scoring.
>>> Especially something like
>>> 200/100/50 most versatile clan
>>> 200/100/50 most gods won
>>> 200/100/50 win with fewest kills (a milder form of pacifist)

>> I think those are reasonable.

> I think I have a better idea: the 200/100/50 boni are absolute. It might
> be more interesting to have a bonus that applies across the board:
> +10 for every new skill 27 title reached (does not need to be a win)
> +20 for every won game with a new god (only games without god changes)

>>> If we remove the special wins here. I think it's more interesting for clan
>>> play if the first win etc. are not counted and instead questions like "Who
>>> of us is gonna try the Kiku win?" are emphasised.

>> I disagree; I think your individual performance should reflect well on
>> your clan. This didn't seem broken last year.

> This has advantages and drawbacks. I don't think we can change the fact
> that players with more time on their hands will get more points. Nor do we
> want to. But for clans, it might be useful to reduce the special points
> from individual players... Just a thought.