Newsgroups: rec.games.mud.diku
From: hatc...@crl.com (Mitchell M. Tse)
Date: 1995/07/30
Subject: Re: Medievia
In article <3vfek7$...@panix2.panix.com>, Pete <pe...@panix.com> wrote: Why, yes, I have seen the code, when we released it, and believe me, when >Mitchell M. Tse (hatc...@crl.com) wrote: >: Just to satisfy you, I shall provide you with not one, but three proofs. > Depends on if the person has seen the code or not. Medievia started, it was pretty much stock Merc, and no matter what state it is in now, it's just stripping and replacing of stock code, in other words, it was based on the original Merc and hence Diku. Dude, you can't take a 100 line program from someone and each week, change >: 2. Medievia has midgaard and other areas from Diku and Merc. If you have No, but Midgaard isn't just a public domain area, it's an area that came >: ANY part of Merc or Diku, then you are Merc and/or Diku based. > If I have a public domain area that merc/diku also uses, I am with the original DikuMud. And even though they may have since junked it, they started with it. >: 3. Get onto the mud and type 'help merc'. If you get a nice page giving > If I decide to add 'help merc' to my mud written from scratch im you're either 1. using part of Merc Mud (read the licenses, note it says you can't make money on any PART of the mud) or 2. you're plagiarizing or 3. quoting it, with appropriate annotation. Since I saw no direct quotation with no appropriate annotation, I have > I think the license suffers the same ambiguity problem as this post. And I feel your post shares the same sentiments with Vryce's intentions: Exploitation Hatchet of Merc/Envy Muds You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||