The graphical notation of the move sequence showing the
colours of the basic ko stones:
[W:Kw] B:Kb W:Lw B:Lb W:Kb B:Kw W:Lb B:Lw W:Kw
Kw | X O O O O O X X X O
Kb | O O X X X O O O O O
Lw | X X X O O O O O X X
Lb | O O O O X X X O O O
***
With superko rules B:Lw is prohibited. WLOG, let the values
of the kos be V(Kw) = V(Kb) <= V(Lw) = V(Lb). So if B:Kb
instead, then W wins Lb, e.g., B:Lw and we have a regular
ko fight for Lw. W tenukis, B symmetrically tenukis, W:Lw,
etc. Very likely W is going to win such a symmetry break.
If V(Kb) = V(Lw), then everything is a little more tricky.
W should aim for V(Kb) < V(Lw).
--
robert jasiek
http://www.snafu.de/~jasiek/rules.html
If you don't recognise that your mane-go strategy is a failure,
this doesn't seem credible. Not very likely, either.
Cheers, V(La)
Robert Jasiek wrote:
>
> Coming back to modified mane-go starting from a tengen ponnuki,
> I shall present a winning strategy for Taiwanese professionals.
<snip|snip>
> If you don't recognise that your mane-go strategy is a failure,
> this doesn't seem credible. Not very likely, either.
Some are crying "failure, failure" but fail to give convincing
strategies. Now that I have offered a precise description of why my
strategy for black is a failure (or at least not refined enough),
you also do not accept the counter-strategy for white? So now
the failure is worth crying "failure, failure"? One thing or the
other must be wrong, but you have to decide! So, please, what is
wrong with the strategies for Ing ko or superko? I consider them
good advice for professionals. And it is easy enough to construct
big kos in mane-go. Surely you will present us a neat, credible,
and likely strategy for white that does not rely on 4 kos and does
not contain dull moves.
Does someone want to play a tengen ponnuki mane-go game under Ing ko
or superko rules against me? I do not mind to try any colour.
--
robert jasiek
http://www.snafu.de/~jasiek/