Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Everywhere Man

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Steven Jones

unread,
Sep 27, 2009, 9:41:09 PM9/27/09
to
Anyone seen this 'The Batman' episode? There's one superpower that won't
make it into an RPG anytime soon. There's nothing to disrupt game balance
like unlimited extra lives.

Rob Kelk

unread,
Sep 27, 2009, 9:50:42 PM9/27/09
to

I didn't see the episode... Isn't "unlimited extra lives" just
Unkillable 2 in GURPS terms, maybe with some level of Regeneration to
speed the return process?

--
Rob Kelk Personal address (ROT-13): eboxryx -ng- tznvy -qbg- pbz
"There's always somebody who's going to hate your work, no matter
how good it is. DON'T LET HIM CHASE YOU AWAY FROM WRITING, BECAUSE
THAT WAY HE WINS." - Robert M. Schroeck, 18 July 2006

Steven Jones

unread,
Sep 28, 2009, 1:08:46 AM9/28/09
to
What happens in the episode is that a friend of Bruce's built a device that
allows him to make clones of himself, instantly. These clones can also be
vanished at will, provided you're wearing the device. He made a clone to
serve as a lab partner but the clone rebelled and locked up the original and
the clone became an art thief, also making lots more clones of himself.
Each clone is a bit more evil than its parent. This cloning process also
works on objects touched by someone wearing the device. A character could
theoreticaly make a whole party of adventurers from clones of himself.

Bent C Dalager

unread,
Sep 28, 2009, 3:53:01 AM9/28/09
to
On 2009-09-28, Steven Jones <stev...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
> What happens in the episode is that a friend of Bruce's built a device that
> allows him to make clones of himself, instantly. These clones can also be
> vanished at will, provided you're wearing the device.

So far it sounds like Duplication at some sufficiently excessive
level.

> He made a clone to
> serve as a lab partner but the clone rebelled and locked up the original and
> the clone became an art thief, also making lots more clones of himself.
> Each clone is a bit more evil than its parent.

The dupes not necessarily being loyal sounds like a serious nuisance
limitation on Duplication. Some other limitation may be a better fit,
depending on the details. Temporary Disadvantage: Split Personality
perhaps.

> This cloning process also
> works on objects touched by someone wearing the device.

Same as above, only built as an Affliction.

This is probably going to get incredibly expensive, but then that's
what super villains are for.

> A character could
> theoreticaly make a whole party of adventurers from clones of himself.

This is exactly what Duplication does.

Since it's a device working the miracle it can be modelled as tech or
magic, sidestepping the point cost issue entirely of course (unless
you want it as Signature Gear).

Cheers,
Bent D
--
Bent Dalager - b...@pvv.org - http://www.pvv.org/~bcd
powered by emacs

Steven Jones

unread,
Sep 28, 2009, 4:18:56 AM9/28/09
to
It IS signature gear for this guy. Without it, he's just another shy
techno-nerd. With it, he's the Everywhere Man.

Bent C Dalager

unread,
Sep 28, 2009, 6:36:25 AM9/28/09
to
On 2009-09-28, Steven Jones <stev...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
> It IS signature gear for this guy. Without it, he's just another shy
> techno-nerd. With it, he's the Everywhere Man.

In that case, it's either Duplication with Gadget and other
limitations, or else you just have to come up with a $ price for the
thing and calculate its Signature Gear cost.

Charlton Wilbur

unread,
Sep 28, 2009, 10:02:33 AM9/28/09
to
>>>>> "RK" == Rob Kelk <rob...@deadspam.com> writes:

RK> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:41:09 +1000, "Steven Jones"
RK> <stev...@aapt.net.au> wrote:

>> Anyone seen this 'The Batman' episode? There's one superpower
>> that won't make it into an RPG anytime soon. There's nothing to
>> disrupt game balance like unlimited extra lives.

RK> I didn't see the episode... Isn't "unlimited extra lives" just
RK> Unkillable 2 in GURPS terms, maybe with some level of
RK> Regeneration to speed the return process?

I've played such a character before, in fact. It winds up not being a
game balance problem because that's 150 points[1] you're not spending on
super-move or shooting laser beams from your eyes.

So yeah, you can't be killed, but you're giving up a lot of potential
cool powers in order to definitively prevent something that might happen
twice or three times in a campaign. It might be unbalanced in terms of
some abstract concept of "effectiveness," but as far as screen time
goes, it's a major sacrifice.

Charlton

[1] Unkillable 2, 100 points; Regeneration (Fast), 1 hp/minute, 50
points.

--
Charlton Wilbur
cwi...@chromatico.net

David Johnston

unread,
Sep 28, 2009, 12:40:08 PM9/28/09
to

That's a Gadget, not Signature Gear.

David Lamb

unread,
Sep 28, 2009, 2:13:59 PM9/28/09
to
Charlton Wilbur wrote:
> So yeah, you can't be killed, but you're giving up a lot of potential
> cool powers in order to definitively prevent something that might happen
> twice or three times in a campaign. It might be unbalanced in terms of
> some abstract concept of "effectiveness," but as far as screen time
> goes, it's a major sacrifice.

If somebody has a power like that, wouldn't the player tend to push
things to make death for that character more frequent? Taking big risks
to do relatively mundane things? E.g. enter the containment chamber to
heroically fix the radioactive steam leak?

WDS

unread,
Sep 28, 2009, 2:25:10 PM9/28/09
to

In my experience, yeah. At a convention I once played in an event where
we were a group of goofy wizard associates and one guy was a skeleton.
He was quite destructible but the wizard just reanimated him when he got
smashed. Several of my friends also played the same event and sometimes
the player would get into the whole "smash me and I'll just get up"
thing and had a lot of fun and were very active. Others just didn't
seem to get it and played him as the otherwise wimpy character he was.

David Johnston

unread,
Oct 16, 2009, 1:45:33 PM10/16/09
to
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:18:56 +1000, "Steven Jones"
<stev...@aapt.net.au> wrote:

>It IS signature gear for this guy.

No, it's a Gadget.

David Johnston

unread,
Oct 16, 2009, 1:45:56 PM10/16/09
to
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:45:33 GMT, David Johnston <da...@block.net>
wrote:

Sorry for the double post.

0 new messages