ANNOUNCEMENT: Pinchy's personal original fantasy art web site unveiled! Have a look! Comment!
Chris Simpson
Pinchy wrote:
> Anouncing the opening of my personal original fantasy art web site!
> Everyone is welcome to come and have a look, especially cute chicks and Sean
> Reynolds.
>
> Look at my artwork and tell me what you think. Do you love it? How much do
> you love it? How much better is it than other art work, such as that for 3E?
> What's so fantastic about it? Why do you love it so much?
>
> I think it's the best fantasy artwork around. The good news is there's more
> to come depending on demand.
>
Not really my thing.....
Pinchy
Pinchy
Chris Simpson <Chr...@mho.net> wrote in message
news:395043D...@mho.net...
>
>
> Pinchy wrote:
>
> > Anouncing the opening of my personal original fantasy art web site!
> Not really my thing.....
That's OK Chris, I didn't expect blind news group reader's to reall enjoy it
anyway. I am thinking about converting the web site over to brail. I'll let
you know when I do.
Pinchy
Thanks to all those who stopped by to have a peek.
--
Pinchy
--
Pinchy <noe...@syet.com> wrote in message
news:3950...@duster.adelaide.on.net...
> Anouncing the opening of my personal original fantasy art web site!
Azrael
printed copies of the pics to people on ebay!
Keep up the good work ;)
azrael
Pinchy
news:7rd45.74$Df6....@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net...
Cheers Azrael, that's very nice of you to say. Unfortunately for your ebay
idea I must draw your attention to the copyright clause at the bottom of the
web page. I have reported you to ebay already and police are moving in on
your location as we speak.
I do have the original artwork and higher detailed versions of my drawings
incase anyone wants to talk ebay with me one day, but unfortunately for you
you'll be spending most of your time picking up the soap for Bubba in cell
block H. Nothing personal.
--
Pinchy
Azrael
The police were lenient on me. When they found out I donated all of the
proceeds to the "Help a talentless retarded artist" Foundation, they decided
to let me go, seeings how the money will benefit you inevitably.
I'm just joking anyway Pinchy. If you are gonna post your art on the web and
advertise it like you did, you are gonna have to expect some kind of smart
ass response. And I was happy to oblige..
azrael
Varsil Savai
>Anouncing the opening of my personal original fantasy art web site!
>Everyone is welcome to come and have a look, especially cute chicks and Sean
>Reynolds.
>
>Look at my artwork and tell me what you think. Do you love it? How much do
>you love it? How much better is it than other art work, such as that for 3E?
>What's so fantastic about it? Why do you love it so much?
>
>I think it's the best fantasy artwork around. The good news is there's more
>to come depending on demand.
>
Quote from the website: "This stuff is so damn good I wet my pants
every day thinking about it."
No offence man... but your work sucks. It's not enough to justify
your post, let alone your ego. See my sig.
----------------------------------------------------
Consider yourself flamed.
I have erected a spamblocker. Simply remove the
#$% characters if you feel the need to email me.
Pinchy
Varsil Savai <varsil#$%@home.com> wrote in message
news:395308a5.5972987@news...
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:56:05 +0930, "Pinchy" <noe...@syet.com> wrote:
>
> >Anouncing the opening of my personal original fantasy art web site!
The URL
http://pinchyart.tripod.com/picnhart/id1.html
> Quote from the website: "This stuff is so damn good I wet my pants
> every day thinking about it."
>
> No offence man... but your work sucks. It's not enough to justify...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"YOUR WORK SUCKS" - What a completely constructive criticism. I'm really
glad you took the time and effort to put together a rational critique of my
work. I spend hours to produce artwork for the public's general enjoyment,
and you spend seconds to insult me. PLONK. Bye bye now.
--
Pinchy
Christopher Burke
fantasy art.
Second - the 'sucks' comment was fair in response to the 'so damn good'
comment.
If you place such grand statements in the public forum expect them to be
shot down in flames.
I think the critisism was about that comment more than the art.
noe...@syet.com (Pinchy) wrote in
<buE45.23$fJ4.3...@news.interact.net.au>:
Mark W Brehob
> Anouncing the opening of my personal original fantasy art web site!
> Reynolds.
> Look at my artwork and tell me what you think. Do you love it? How much do
> you love it? How much better is it than other art work, such as that for 3E?
> What's so fantastic about it? Why do you love it so much?
> I think it's the best fantasy artwork around. The good news is there's more
> to come depending on demand.
> The URL
> http://pinchyart.tripod.com/picnhart/
While I would argue the ego is a bit over the top (although amusing in
places) I do like it quite a bit. Would I hang it in my house? No,
probably not, it just isn't that kind of art IMO.
Comments:
* I do like the "flat" look of the work. A lot.
* Pinchy is a good name for the work. It feels pinched.
* The text comments need to lose a LOT of the ego. I think
it hurts the art.
* I'd suggest you try something like St. George vs. the Dragon. If
you can pull off the look of the dragon, it could be good.
* Related to the above, try a few pieces that aren't people.
Creatures, like the dragon, would seem a resonable direction.
* In a few cases the arms and hands felt too small to me. Even
given the nature of the work.
Mark "What do I know about art? I'm a computer person." Brehob
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://www.cps.msu.edu/~brehob ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~Mark Brehob: Ultimate Player, Gamer, Computer Geek~~~~~~~~~~
DungeonMasterDM
>the 'sucks' comment was fair in response to the 'so damn good'
>comment.
>
>If you place such grand statements in the public forum expect them to be
>shot down in flames.
>
>I think the critisism was about that comment more than the art.
>
Nah I think he meant the artwork hehe.
Personally I thought the ego combined with the not so good artwork will make
this guy really popular with WotC.
Varsil Savai
>
>Varsil Savai <varsil#$%@home.com> wrote in message
>news:395308a5.5972987@news...
>> On Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:56:05 +0930, "Pinchy" <noe...@syet.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Anouncing the opening of my personal original fantasy art web site!
>
>The URL
>http://pinchyart.tripod.com/picnhart/id1.html
>
>> Quote from the website: "This stuff is so damn good I wet my pants
>> every day thinking about it."
>>
>> No offence man... but your work sucks. It's not enough to justify...
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>"YOUR WORK SUCKS" - What a completely constructive criticism. I'm really
>glad you took the time and effort to put together a rational critique of my
>work. I spend hours to produce artwork for the public's general enjoyment,
>and you spend seconds to insult me. PLONK. Bye bye now.
>
Ahh... so you want constructive criticism...
Keep drawing. Eventually you'll get better. After all, my cousin who
drew about as well as you do when she was four is now quite a bit
better...
Pinchy
news:8j01ss$17rb$3...@msunews.cl.msu.edu...
> Pinchy <noe...@syet.com> wrote:
> > Anouncing the opening of my personal original fantasy art web site!
> > The URL
> While I would argue the ego is a bit over the top (although amusing in
> places) I do like it quite a bit. Would I hang it in my house? No,
> probably not, it just isn't that kind of art IMO.
My brother hangs it on his wall. It looks better than you'd think once
framed.
> Comments:
> * I do like the "flat" look of the work. A lot.
> * Pinchy is a good name for the work. It feels pinched.
> * The text comments need to lose a LOT of the ego. I think
> it hurts the art.
Message received. Will change it. Thanks for your honest feedback.
> * I'd suggest you try something like St. George vs. the Dragon. If
> you can pull off the look of the dragon, it could be good.
> * Related to the above, try a few pieces that aren't people.
> Creatures, like the dragon, would seem a resonable direction.
> * In a few cases the arms and hands felt too small to me. Even
> given the nature of the work.
Can't change that sorry. Often the size of things represents something about
the character or balances the piece. The drawing is not even planned in
anyway. No pencil sketch. Often the pen wandered across the page to make an
arm or leg appear.
> Mark "What do I know about art? I'm a computer person." Brehob
Wow! Thanks Mark for all your positive comments. It means a lot. You're my
new target audience. I like people who know nothing about art because I
don't either. Now the ego thing was always supposed to be humourous, I'm
glad it gave you a few chuckles, but I will spend most of today re-writing
the overly-inflated ego sections of the site. Honestly I just put that in
there because it made me laugh. Though some small part of me does think it's
pretty neat work for a self taught 14-15 year old.
Those images I put up are only the smallest collection of my stuff. There
are many pictures of creatures I could stick up there. I have a neat old
english book that my grandma won when she was a little girl with very choice
pictures of St George Vs. the Dragon, and I'd love to give that a go.
--
Pinchy
Pinchy
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2000 17:10:44 +0930, "Pinchy" <noe...@syet.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Varsil Savai <varsil#$%@home.com> wrote in message
> >news:395308a5.5972987@news...
> >>
> >> >Anouncing the opening of my personal original fantasy art web site!
> >
> >The URL
> >
> >> Quote from the website: "This stuff is so damn good I wet my pants
> >> every day thinking about it."
> >>
> >> No offence man... but your work sucks. It's not enough to justify...
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> >"YOUR WORK SUCKS" - What a completely constructive criticism. I'm really
> >glad you took the time and effort to put together a rational critique of
my
> >work. I spend hours to produce artwork for the public's general
enjoyment,
> >and you spend seconds to insult me. PLONK. Bye bye now.
> >
> Ahh... so you want constructive criticism...
>
> Keep drawing. Eventually you'll get better. After all, my cousin who
> drew about as well as you do when she was four is now quite a bit
> better...
I think often kids draw better than adults. Anyway I considered putting up a
brail site for the visually impaired such as yourself but a site for you has
already been done much better than I could put together...I hope you enjoy
it.
URL for the best site for the visually impaired
http://www.thunderhouse.com.br/cannes/laramara/
--
Pinchy
Pinchy
DungeonMasterDM <dungeon...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20000623124846...@ng-cv1.aol.com...
> >From: cra...@hotmail.com (Christopher Burke)
>
> >the 'sucks' comment was fair in response to the 'so damn good'
> >comment.
> >
> >If you place such grand statements in the public forum expect them to be
> >shot down in flames.
> >
> >I think the critisism was about that comment more than the art.
> >
>
> Nah I think he meant the artwork hehe.
artwork will make
> this guy really popular with WotC.
You find it hard to grasp new concepts don't you?
--
Pinchy
Tim Martin
make it over, it brings to mind surrealism or maybe something Tim Burton
might like. However that is not my thing, and not the kind of artwork I
prefer. I tend to like realism more.
Your egotistical comments are hilarious, I do hope they are tongue in cheek.
I do though see how they can be a massive turn off to people. You aren't
going to get much honest commentary with that sort of attitude. People who
might saying something nice, or constructive, or just be silent are going to
blast you, and they are correct in doing so. Such a stance you have taken is
not good netiquette, and begs for flaming.
You did get me to look at your site though, so perhaps your stance worked.
You have definitely though made me think twice about posting something when
I update my site soon. I am not sure that I should, given some of these
responses.
Tim
Pinchy
Tim Martin <tf_m...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:HWX45.13139$dD3....@news1.atl...
[snip]
> Your egotistical comments are hilarious, I do hope they are tongue in
cheek.
> I do though see how they can be a massive turn off to people. You aren't
> going to get much honest commentary with that sort of attitude. People who
> might saying something nice, or constructive, or just be silent are going
to
> blast you, and they are correct in doing so. Such a stance you have taken
is
> not good netiquette, and begs for flaming.
I'm glad those comments made you laugh. Ofcourse those comments are tongue
in cheek! I'm scared that we live in a world where some [weird] people
mistake these comments as serious. Anyway thanks to your and other people's
honest good hearted feedback I am soon launching a new "ego-free" site. Look
for it in coming posts!
--
Pinchy
Varsil Savai
Ahh, so that's what you're going for... gratz, you've achieved the
'incompetent' look in your work. Seems your plonking is below par
too.
Varsil Savai
Let us know when the suck-free site is up.
Pinchy
> Ahh, so that's what you're going for... gratz, you've achieved the
> 'incompetent' look in your work. Seems your plonking is below par
> too.
It's just insults dribbling from that Varsil Savai again. I try to raise the
tone but you're ot helping with these playground debate tactics. Double
PLONK! You're outta here!
Pinchy
> Let us know when the suck-free site is up.
I'll let others know, but not you. I banish thee back to the playground
where you and your insults belong. *A heavy weight with the words "triple
PLONK" lands on Varsil Savai, squishing him out of this existence*
--
Pinchy
Varsil Savai
You might want to ask someone about what plonking is supposed to
signify. You still seem to be having trouble.
Let me give you a hint: It has something to do with mail filters.
Pinchy
> On Sat, 24 Jun 2000 16:59:38 +0930, "Pinchy" <noe...@syet.com> wrote:
>
> >Varsil Savai <varsil#$%@home.com> wrote in message
> >news:39546016.12780270@news...
> >> Let us know when the suck-free site is up.
> >
> >I'll let others know, but not you. I banish thee back to the playground
> >where you and your insults belong. *A heavy weight with the words "triple
> >PLONK" lands on Varsil Savai, squishing him out of this existence*
> >
> You might want to ask someone about what plonking is supposed to
> signify. You still seem to be having trouble.
>
> Let me give you a hint: It has something to do with mail filters.
You might want to ask someone what usenet is for. I'll give you a hint. It
has something to do with the exchange of *meaningful* posts. I don't need a
mail filter to totally disregard your rubish posts, I just find it ammusing
to reply to them aswell. QUAD-PLONK! Your in my mental-quad-killfile.
--
Pinchy
Varsil Savai
>
>Varsil Savai <varsil#$%@home.com> wrote in message
>news:39546786.14684270@news...
>> On Sat, 24 Jun 2000 16:59:38 +0930, "Pinchy" <noe...@syet.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Varsil Savai <varsil#$%@home.com> wrote in message
>> >news:39546016.12780270@news...
>> >> Let us know when the suck-free site is up.
>> >
>> >I'll let others know, but not you. I banish thee back to the playground
>> >where you and your insults belong. *A heavy weight with the words "triple
>> >PLONK" lands on Varsil Savai, squishing him out of this existence*
>> >
>> You might want to ask someone about what plonking is supposed to
>> signify. You still seem to be having trouble.
>>
>> Let me give you a hint: It has something to do with mail filters.
>
>You might want to ask someone what usenet is for. I'll give you a hint. It
>has something to do with the exchange of *meaningful* posts. I don't need a
>mail filter to totally disregard your rubish posts, I just find it ammusing
>to reply to them aswell. QUAD-PLONK! Your in my mental-quad-killfile.
>
That has to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard anyone say here...
Why do I have the feeling I'm flaming a 12 year old? :)
Mark W Brehob
> My brother hangs it on his wall. It looks better than you'd think once
> framed.
:-)
> Message received. Will change it. Thanks for your honest feedback.
>> * I'd suggest you try something like St. George vs. the Dragon. If
>> you can pull off the look of the dragon, it could be good.
>> * Related to the above, try a few pieces that aren't people.
>> Creatures, like the dragon, would seem a resonable direction.
>> * In a few cases the arms and hands felt too small to me. Even
>> given the nature of the work.
> Can't change that sorry. Often the size of things represents something about
> the character or balances the piece. The drawing is not even planned in
> anyway. No pencil sketch. Often the pen wandered across the page to make an
> arm or leg appear.
No worries, just my reaction.
>> Mark "What do I know about art? I'm a computer person." Brehob
> Wow! Thanks Mark for all your positive comments. It means a lot. You're my
> new target audience. I like people who know nothing about art because I
> don't either. Now the ego thing was always supposed to be humourous, I'm
> glad it gave you a few chuckles, but I will spend most of today re-writing
> the overly-inflated ego sections of the site. Honestly I just put that in
> there because it made me laugh. Though some small part of me does think it's
> pretty neat work for a self taught 14-15 year old.
> Those images I put up are only the smallest collection of my stuff. There
> are many pictures of creatures I could stick up there. I have a neat old
> english book that my grandma won when she was a little girl with very choice
> pictures of St George Vs. the Dragon, and I'd love to give that a go.
Best of luck,
Mark
> --
> Pinchy
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://www.cps.msu.edu/~brehob ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| | The reports of SIMD's death have been greatly exaggerated | |
| -=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- |
Pinchy
Varsil Savai <var...@home.com> wrote in message news:39550cd3.962678@news...
> On Sat, 24 Jun 2000 17:58:19 +0930, "Pinchy" <noe...@syet.com> wrote:
>
> That has to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard anyone say here...
> Why do I have the feeling I'm flaming a 12 year old? :)
What's that? 6th ignorant insult from Varsil? (but who's counting, or
keeping exact records?) I wonder If he remembers agreeing to an "Acceptable
Use Policy"[1] for the @home service? I wonder If I could get him kicked for
being a complete tool on usenet? ...[reads policy]...Hmm yes It says here
that "...no account holder may be a complete tool on usenet..." Better give
ab...@home.net an email.
--
Pinchy
[1] A few excerpts from the Acceptable Use Policy for your account, I
thought this might be an interesting read for you Varsil. Enjoy.
"ANY USER WHO DOES NOT AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THESE TERMS SHOULD IMMEDIATELY
STOP USE OF THE SERVICES AND NOTIFY THE @HOME CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT SO
THAT THE USER'S ACCOUNT MAY BE CLOSED. "
"You are solely responsible for any information which you publish on the web
or other Internet services. You must ensure that the recipient of the
content is appropriate. Excite@Home and its distribution affiliates reserve
the right to refuse to post or to remove any information or materials, in
whole or in part, that it, in its sole discretion, deems to be offensive,
indecent, or otherwise inappropriate regardless of whether such material or
its dissemination is unlawful. "
Varsil Savai
>
>Varsil Savai <var...@home.com> wrote in message news:39550cd3.962678@news...
>> On Sat, 24 Jun 2000 17:58:19 +0930, "Pinchy" <noe...@syet.com> wrote:
>>
>> That has to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard anyone say here...
>> Why do I have the feeling I'm flaming a 12 year old? :)
>
>What's that? 6th ignorant insult from Varsil? (but who's counting, or
>keeping exact records?) I wonder If he remembers agreeing to an "Acceptable
>Use Policy"[1] for the @home service? I wonder If I could get him kicked for
>being a complete tool on usenet? ...[reads policy]...Hmm yes It says here
>that "...no account holder may be a complete tool on usenet..." Better give
>ab...@home.net an email.
>
Apparently _you're_ keeping track. Running to 'net-mommy?
>--
>Pinchy
>
>[1] A few excerpts from the Acceptable Use Policy for your account, I
>thought this might be an interesting read for you Varsil. Enjoy.
<snip>
Nice. You might try A) finding relevant things (IE, not
anti-pornography sections or sections pertaining to websites), and you
might try covering the @Home variant I'm using, which, it turns out,
has a different use policy. If I actually _were_ a tool, I'd see
about breaking some glass houses. Sorry man... you're going to have
to learn to deal with the playground on your own.
Pinchy
--
Varsil Savai <varsil#$%@home.com> wrote in message
news:3956ee21.36881772@news...
Hmmm. How about FUCK OFF! YOU'RE A ANNOYING DEADBEAT! GO FUCKING KILL
YOURSELF! YOU ARE A FUCKING PARASITE! If you have any shred of decency you
will leave me the fuck alone as I don't want to have anything to do with
you. IF YOU REPLY TO MY THREADS AT ALL IT PROVES HOW FUCKING SHIT YOU ARE.
DungeonMasterDM
>Hmmm. How about FUCK OFF! YOU'RE A ANNOYING DEADBEAT! GO FUCKING KILL
>YOURSELF! YOU ARE A FUCKING PARASITE! If you have any shred of decency you
>will leave me the fuck alone as I don't want to have anything to do with
>you. IF YOU REPLY TO MY THREADS AT ALL IT PROVES HOW FUCKING SHIT YOU ARE.
>
>
Hehe and I thought I had a mouth. Course i only get mad when people talk shit
<Like anything tsrkeith has to say>. This guy brags about himself though and
get's mad when other question not only his ego but his lack of artistic
ability. This guy's as warped as his artwork (note that term is used loosely in
this situation) and twice as vulgar to bear in person.
Azrael
Heheh, geez..strike one for the outpatient program eh? :)
Varsil Savai
>Hmmm. How about FUCK OFF! YOU'RE A ANNOYING DEADBEAT! GO FUCKING KILL
>YOURSELF! YOU ARE A FUCKING PARASITE! If you have any shred of decency you
>will leave me the fuck alone as I don't want to have anything to do with
>you. IF YOU REPLY TO MY THREADS AT ALL IT PROVES HOW FUCKING SHIT YOU ARE.
>
*snap* Another one bites the dust.
Brian L. Bowers
> > >Varsil Savai <var...@home.com> wrote in message
Would the two of your please take your flame fest to private e-mail.
The thread, while amusing early on, has long since grown boring,
repetitive, and devoid of imagination.
--
Brian Lee Bowers | Albuquerque High Performance Computing Center
blbo...@ahpcc.unm.edu | http://www.ahpcc.unm.edu/
http://www.ahpcc.unm.edu/~blbowers