Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Another minor magic item

17 views
Skip to first unread message

Jim Davies

unread,
Feb 3, 2013, 7:23:16 PM2/3/13
to
This was inspired (and named) by my 3-year-old daughter as we had a
pretend picnic.

Jug of Everything

This small copper jug can hold a total of 5 gallons of liquid of any
types (including water, wine, cream, acid, potions, oils, poisons,
etc), which will not mix. On command, the jug will pour the requested
liquid until none of that type remains. The jug cannot identify the
liquid, but uses the same name as spoken to it when the liquid is
added to it.

When found, the jug is ikely to contain a variety of fluids which will
occupy space and not come out until released by the correct command
word(s).

Which (as well as the usual mundane and adventuring conveniences)
lends itself to various amusing uses, such as pouring safe and
poisoned wine from the same jug.

--
Jim

http://www.aaargh.org

Nicole Massey

unread,
Feb 3, 2013, 9:02:07 PM2/3/13
to

"Jim Davies" <j...@aaargh.NoBleedinSpam.org> wrote in message
news:13vtg8dmh8tbhuvhg...@4ax.com...
Love it. I'll add it to the list.


Alcore

unread,
Feb 4, 2013, 11:34:39 AM2/4/13
to
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 6:23:16 PM UTC-6, Jim Davies wrote:
> This was inspired (and named) by my 3-year-old daughter as we had a
> pretend picnic.
>
> Jug of Everything
> This small copper jug can hold a total of 5 gallons of liquid of any
> types (including water, wine, cream, acid, potions, oils, poisons,
> etc), which will not mix. On command, the jug will pour the requested
> liquid until none of that type remains. The jug cannot identify the
> liquid, but uses the same name as spoken to it when the liquid is
> added to it.
[snip]
> Which (as well as the usual mundane and adventuring conveniences)
> lends itself to various amusing uses, such as pouring safe and
> poisoned wine from the same jug.

I love this item. Your daughter is a genius.

Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)

unread,
Feb 4, 2013, 12:07:56 PM2/4/13
to
This item sounds FAMILIAR to me, like I've read this description in one
of my many game books... about 20 years ago.

--
Sea Wasp
/^\
;;;
Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog:
http://seawasp.livejournal.com

WDS906 (less the 906)

unread,
Feb 4, 2013, 12:09:54 PM2/4/13
to
Given the size of potions ("A typical potion or oil consists of 1 ounce
of liquid ...") this is actually fairly powerful and not minor at all.
Just put all your potions in and get whichever one you want out.

A guy wanted something like this in my campaign once long ago and I just
charged him the same as for a Handy Haversack. We called it a Potion
Skin of Holding or something like that and decided it could hold 50
potions. I guess as described above yours would hold 640 potions.

Jim Davies

unread,
Feb 4, 2013, 4:06:28 PM2/4/13
to
On the grave of "WDS906 (less the 906)" <Bil...@seurer.net> is
inscribed:

>Given the size of potions ("A typical potion or oil consists of 1 ounce
>of liquid ...") this is actually fairly powerful and not minor at all.
>Just put all your potions in and get whichever one you want out.
>
>A guy wanted something like this in my campaign once long ago and I just
>charged him the same as for a Handy Haversack. We called it a Potion
>Skin of Holding or something like that and decided it could hold 50
>potions. I guess as described above yours would hold 640 potions.

It's certainly not bad. But how many potions do you carry, especially
in 3e? In 1e a high-level character might have 6, but in 3e it's more
like 1 or 2. So beyond those quantities it's pretty moot, and (purely
for its value in carrying potions) it's a lot less versatile than a
Haversack.

--
Jim

http://www.aaargh.org

WDS906 (less the 906)

unread,
Feb 4, 2013, 4:11:58 PM2/4/13
to
No one bothers because they are so cumbersome to use. But when you can
chug the one you want at will you use more. He was the only character
in multiple campaigns since 3e came out ever to actually pick up an
assortment of potions and actually use them. It worked quite well.

Nicole Massey

unread,
Feb 5, 2013, 8:34:40 AM2/5/13
to

"Jim Davies" <j...@aaargh.NoBleedinSpam.org> wrote in message
news:8i80h85to2d2iblc3...@4ax.com...
There's an easy fix -- to make it a non-violent magic item just put in a
rule that it can't store anything magical.
Also, Jim, do you want this credited to you or your daughter? If the latter
I'll need her name.


Jim Davies

unread,
Feb 5, 2013, 3:43:28 PM2/5/13
to
On the grave of "Nicole Massey" <ny...@gypsyheir.com> is inscribed:

>Also, Jim, do you want this credited to you or your daughter? If the latter
>I'll need her name.

Eleanor


--
Jim

http://www.aaargh.org

JimP.

unread,
Feb 7, 2013, 7:18:28 PM2/7/13
to
Yeah, I've read it somewhere. Could it be in one of those compendiums
of all D&D magic items ?
.
JimP.
--
Brushing aside the thorns so I can see the stars.
http://www.linuxgazette.net/ Linux Gazette
http://www.drivein-jim.net/ Drive-In movie theaters
http://story.drivein-jim.net/ A story Feb, 2011

Rast

unread,
Mar 15, 2013, 7:41:44 PM3/15/13
to
Jim Davies wrote...
> When found, the jug is ikely to contain a variety of fluids which will
> occupy space and not come out until released by the correct command
> word(s).

There should be a command word to dump everything out.

What happens if you add a fluid and name it the same as an existing
(different) fluid?

Jim Davies

unread,
Mar 15, 2013, 9:13:12 PM3/15/13
to
On the grave of Rast <ra...@yahoo.com> is inscribed:

>Jim Davies wrote...
>> When found, the jug is ikely to contain a variety of fluids which will
>> occupy space and not come out until released by the correct command
>> word(s).
>
>There should be a command word to dump everything out.

Could be.

>What happens if you add a fluid and name it the same as an existing
>(different) fluid?

You'd get a mixture, possibly horrible. Now what happens if you add
conc nitric acid and ether, with the same name, is uncertain. I
imagine it would blow up there and then. Your DM is waiting for you to
test this.

--
Jim

http://www.aaargh.org

Ubiquitous

unread,
Mar 17, 2013, 7:13:12 AM3/17/13
to
Assuming real-life chemistry rules apply.

--
"Right now, the president is not solving the budget chaos because he
doesn't want to cut federal spending. That's the truth. And the spinners
are misleading you. They are lying to you. That makes me angry. So you
saw that and will most likely see it again in the future."
-- Bill O'Reilly


0 new messages