Message from discussion Rules question
From: mikh...@panix.com (Mikhail Kuperblum)
Subject: Re: Rules question
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:11:20 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Public Access Networks
X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1059642680 8210 126.96.36.199 (31 Jul 2003 09:11:20 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:11:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
Originator: mikh...@panix.com (Mikhail Kuperblum)
In article <3F28C42C.1040...@adelaide.edu.au>,
Denis <denis.cabas...@adelaide.edu.au> wrote:
> Russia: SWE and STP
> Germany: DEN and BAL
> England: SKA and NGE and GRO
These abbreviations are non-standard in the US, but from context I
understand NGE to be the abbreviation for Norway, and GRO the abbreviation
for the Norwegian Sea.
> STP S SWE - NGE
> BAL - SWE
> DEN S BAL - SWE
> NGE - SWE
> SKA S NGE - SWE
> GRO - NGE
> First answer: Russian and English attacks are cancelled, because of rule
> on exchanging places. Thus, German attack succeed.
Attacks don't cancel. They may fail, but they don't cancel.
> Second answer: There is a general stand-off. Two attacks of the same
> strength against SWE, hence stand-off
Three attacks of strength 2, two into Sweden and one out. All bounce. Even
if any one support is cut, they all will bounce as the other two stand off
and the attack whose support is cut also bounces.
Just to be sure I'm clear, the only correct adjudication of the above
orders, assuming no effect by other forces, is that all units bounce.
Randy Hudson <i...@panix.com>