Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Karl S Kronenberger barred from practising law
8 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
BLafferty
Jan 27, 2012, 3:59:33 PM1/27/12
to
On Jan 27, 2:28 pm, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A reliable source which I cannot disclose has told me that Karl S.
> Kronenberger has been banned from practising law. Imagine that!!!
>
> While I cannot yet find confirmation about this, knowing what I do
> about the relationship between Bill Goichberg and Kronenberger and
> the motion to enjoin, it seems more than likely.
>
> It legally means that I am entitled to reopen all lawsuits which
> involved me and Kronenberger whatever the capacities.
>
> I have set up a webpage about this scandal.
>
> http://www.anusha.com/kronenbegrer-barred.html
>
> Kronenberger Burgoyne already phoned me in California to tell me
> I must take the page down or they will sue me. So it must be true.
>
> There is little chance that KB would contact the web hoster because
> unlike me, they are ignorant about the internets.
>
> I have published 143 books. The 144th one will be about attorneys
> like Kronenberger. Could anyone suggest a title for the book? Send
> any suggestions to me privately at samsl...@samsloan.com and not to
> samhsl...@gmail.com whose inbox is filled with pornographic spam
> sent to me by Bill Brock, his pedophile sidekick Jack M. Biello or
> even by Vaughn. But don't tell anyone about samsl...@samsloan.com
> because if they find out about that address they will spam it too.
>
> I don't have an enemy in the world because God has a way of dealing
> with them. This is why I know I am going to Heaven.
>
> If he asks very nicely, I'd offer Karl Kronenberger a clerical job
> connected with my vast and growing Publishing Empire.
>
> Sam Sloan
Very amusing, Paul.
> A reliable source which I cannot disclose has told me that Karl S.
> Kronenberger has been banned from practising law. Imagine that!!!
>
> While I cannot yet find confirmation about this, knowing what I do
> about the relationship between Bill Goichberg and Kronenberger and
> the motion to enjoin, it seems more than likely.
>
> It legally means that I am entitled to reopen all lawsuits which
> involved me and Kronenberger whatever the capacities.
>
> I have set up a webpage about this scandal.
>
> http://www.anusha.com/kronenbegrer-barred.html
>
> Kronenberger Burgoyne already phoned me in California to tell me
> I must take the page down or they will sue me. So it must be true.
>
> There is little chance that KB would contact the web hoster because
> unlike me, they are ignorant about the internets.
>
> I have published 143 books. The 144th one will be about attorneys
> like Kronenberger. Could anyone suggest a title for the book? Send
> any suggestions to me privately at samsl...@samsloan.com and not to
> samhsl...@gmail.com whose inbox is filled with pornographic spam
> sent to me by Bill Brock, his pedophile sidekick Jack M. Biello or
> even by Vaughn. But don't tell anyone about samsl...@samsloan.com
> because if they find out about that address they will spam it too.
>
> I don't have an enemy in the world because God has a way of dealing
> with them. This is why I know I am going to Heaven.
>
> If he asks very nicely, I'd offer Karl Kronenberger a clerical job
> connected with my vast and growing Publishing Empire.
>
> Sam Sloan
Very amusing, Paul.
BLafferty
Jan 27, 2012, 5:01:53 PM1/27/12
to
"internets" is used. Now who do we know who misuses language like
that?
Offramp
Jan 27, 2012, 5:29:58 PM1/27/12
to
Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days.
A vote for sam everett sloan
Is not a wasted vote!
There's a guy in Sierra Leone
In Sam Sloan's old mink coat.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days.
A vote for sam everett sloan
Is not a wasted vote!
There's a guy in Sierra Leone
In Sam Sloan's old mink coat.
Your smrat ®
Jan 28, 2012, 8:26:19 AM1/28/12
to
In this week's episode, entitled "Come Quickly Witless, the Game's
Afoot" Administrative Law Clerk Brian Laughingstock removes his
powered wig and panties and dons a deerstalker to solve a confounding
intertubes mystery ...
On Jan 27, 5:01 pm, BLafferty <lafferty1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a fake posted through a remailer.
In the detective business, this is what we call a clue.
> Interesting that the word "internets" is used.
> Now who do we know who misuses language like
> that?
Well that would be everyone over the age of 14 who's ever read
Something Awful, but if I'm following your reasoning to its logical
conclusion the murderer can only be one man: Norm Crosby, j'accuse!
Tune in next week when Administrative Law Clerk Laughingstock places
himself under citizens arrest after he catches himself in the act of
befouling a photo Susan Polgar. Redhanded, nearly.
Afoot" Administrative Law Clerk Brian Laughingstock removes his
powered wig and panties and dons a deerstalker to solve a confounding
intertubes mystery ...
On Jan 27, 5:01 pm, BLafferty <lafferty1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a fake posted through a remailer.
> Interesting that the word "internets" is used.
> Now who do we know who misuses language like
> that?
Something Awful, but if I'm following your reasoning to its logical
conclusion the murderer can only be one man: Norm Crosby, j'accuse!
Tune in next week when Administrative Law Clerk Laughingstock places
himself under citizens arrest after he catches himself in the act of
befouling a photo Susan Polgar. Redhanded, nearly.
samsloan
Jan 28, 2012, 1:22:30 PM1/28/12
to
The Fake Sam Sloan Strikes again
This is absolutely a fake posting. The website it cites is fake. The
email address is fake. Everything about this is fake.
I agree that this is probably Paul Truong or one of his cronies like
Gregory Alexander.
I just got an idea. Now that I am officially registered with the
Federal Election Commission as a US Presidential Candidate, should not
the Secret Service take an interest in this? Is not impersonating a
presidential candidate a federal crime?
The Real Sam Sloan
http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?P20004537
This is absolutely a fake posting. The website it cites is fake. The
email address is fake. Everything about this is fake.
I agree that this is probably Paul Truong or one of his cronies like
Gregory Alexander.
I just got an idea. Now that I am officially registered with the
Federal Election Commission as a US Presidential Candidate, should not
the Secret Service take an interest in this? Is not impersonating a
presidential candidate a federal crime?
The Real Sam Sloan
http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?P20004537
Taylor Kingston
Jan 28, 2012, 2:10:29 PM1/28/12
to
On Jan 28, 10:22 am, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is not impersonating a
> presidential candidate a federal crime?
If it is, Sam, then you may expect to be arrested very soon.
>
> Is not impersonating a
> presidential candidate a federal crime?
samsloan
Jan 28, 2012, 5:26:25 PM1/28/12
to
On Jan 28, 10:22 am, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Fake Sam Sloan Strikes again
>
> This is absolutely a fake posting. The website it cites is fake. The
> email address is fake. Everything about this is fake.
>
> I agree that this is probably Brian Lafferty or one of his cronies.
>
> This is absolutely a fake posting. The website it cites is fake. The
> email address is fake. Everything about this is fake.
>
>
> I just got an idea. Now that I am officially registered with the
> Federal Election Commission as a US Presidential Candidate, should not
> the Secret Service take an interest in this? Is not impersonating a
> presidential candidate a federal crime?
>
> The Real Sam Sloan
The above was written by (yet another?) imposter. This situation
> I just got an idea. Now that I am officially registered with the
> Federal Election Commission as a US Presidential Candidate, should not
> the Secret Service take an interest in this? Is not impersonating a
> presidential candidate a federal crime?
>
> The Real Sam Sloan
has become worse than intolerable!
As it is definitely a federal crime to impersonate the very next
President of the United States, I am probably going to contact the
F.B.I., the Secret Service and the (far superior) Mossad about it.
Does anyone have any opinion if there is any danger to me if I go
and do this? What if they start investigating the claims made by
crazy liars like Brock that I have raped many underage girls? I
can prove it is not rape as I always got their written permission
first, except where it was my daughters, in which case I got prior
permission from their mothers, or where their mothers could not
read English, I signed on their behalf as the head of the family?
It is not rape if there is consent, which in Hungary can be given
at the age of 14 or 13 for gypsies. It is the law there.
I don't think there is much risk to me because it is well known
that both the F.B.I and Secret Service are mainly staffed by
people who are stupid, gullable or pedophiles, who naturally may
be sympathetic to all the unjust persecution I have faced after
the "suicide" of my third daughter.
http://www.direkickfeud.com is a fake website and most of the
so-called crimes it describes took place outside the country, so
from the point of view of our courts, they never ever took place.
Please answer seriously because I believe I have a very serious
chance of becoming the next President, instead of Ron Paul who
should have been a Libertarian like I have always been, even when
I was co-founder of the Sexual Defense League which campaigned
for the age of consent to intercourse to be lowered to 13. My pal
and cofounder of the SDL, clitlick, still remembers the young
girl David Irving's woman provided for him to look after.
Why does it concern anyone if I found Mr Hussein Obama's older
daughter very sexually attractive and put her in my websites?
The Really Real Sam Sloan
http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?P20004537
Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> allegedly wrote in alt.law...
Some pages have to be found using the wayback engine:
http://web.archive.org/web/20050828213407/www.ishipress.com/burmese.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20050829115609/www.ishipress.com/burmese2.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20060503021436/http://www.ishipress.com/girlsgot.htm
In others, since some of Sloan's websites have been shut down by law
enforcement, you need to change the address (like, samsloan.com is changed
to anusha.com):
http://www.samsloan.com/aminmina.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/chantabu.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/girlsgot.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/donmoon.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/sfl-no26.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/forbiddendreams.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/noweight.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/pic-quiz.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/league.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/pornplot.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/my7-kids.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/patpong1.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/virgins.htm
http://www.shamema.com/pokepoll.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/missvirg.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/trobrian.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/arraign.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/why-nude.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/daa.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/spread.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/pokeplot.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/movies.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/ininlaw.htm
http://www.anusha.com/how2rape.htm
http://www.samsloan.com//moremami.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/burmese2.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/catholic.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/holmes.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/a-virgin.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/girlspic.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/tobutler.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/evilwoma.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/maesai-v.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/lim.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/got-her.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/sailors.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/pokepoll.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/laxson.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/threesom.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/va-sover.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/weight.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/laura.htm
http://www.ishipress.com/badporn.htm
http://www.samsloan.com/sailormoon.htm
snip
Offramp
Jan 29, 2012, 4:12:06 AM1/29/12
to
You YUTZ!
He was impersonating the fake Sam Sloan... that's no crime!
He was impersonating the fake Sam Sloan... that's no crime!
None
Jan 30, 2012, 2:25:22 PM1/30/12
to
On Jan 28, 4:26 pm, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.direkickfeud.com is a fake website and most of the
Sure that is a fake website.
> http://www.direkickfeud.com is a fake website and most of the
But the non-fake website is http://direkickfeud.blogspot.com and very
convincing it is too. The site's all about you. Rearrange the letters
of direkickfeud to get kiddiefucker. Why did BB choose that, imbecile?
Both the anons weren't dizumed. One was from cripto. Can't you read?
None
Jan 30, 2012, 3:40:34 PM1/30/12
to
On Jan 30, 2:25 pm, None <joeschm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 28, 4:26 pm, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >http://www.direkickfeud.comis a fake website and most of the
> On Jan 28, 4:26 pm, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Sure that is a fake website.
> But the non-fake website ishttp://direkickfeud.blogspot.comand very
> Sure that is a fake website.
> convincing it is too. The site's all about you. Rearrange the letters
> of direkickfeud to get kiddiefucker. Why did BB choose that, imbecile?
>
> Both the anons weren't dizumed. One was from cripto. Can't you read?
This is a fake. I did not send it but I will report it to the FBI
> of direkickfeud to get kiddiefucker. Why did BB choose that, imbecile?
>
> Both the anons weren't dizumed. One was from cripto. Can't you read?
Cyber fraud
None
Jan 30, 2012, 6:22:48 PM1/30/12
to
On Jan 28, 4:26 pm, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
Sure that is a fake website.
But the non-fake website is http://direkickfeud.blogspot.com and very
samsloan
Jan 31, 2012, 11:11:28 AM1/31/12
to
Whomever is responsible for these Fake Sam Sloan postings is a lot
braver than I would be.
Sam Sloan
braver than I would be.
Sam Sloan
Taylor Kingston
Jan 31, 2012, 12:59:28 PM1/31/12
to
On Jan 31, 8:11 am, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Whomever is responsible for these Fake Sam Sloan postings is a lot
> braver than I would be.
A better grammarian, too.
>
> Whomever is responsible for these Fake Sam Sloan postings is a lot
> braver than I would be.
None
Jan 31, 2012, 2:47:43 PM1/31/12
to
On Jan 30, 6:22 pm, None <joeschm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 28, 4:26 pm, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >http://www.direkickfeud.comis a fake website and most of the
> On Jan 28, 4:26 pm, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Sure that is a fake website.
>
> But the non-fake website ishttp://direkickfeud.blogspot.comand very
> Sure that is a fake website.
>
> convincing it is too. The site's all about you. Rearrange the letters
> of direkickfeud to get kiddiefucker. Why did BB choose that, imbecile?
Not my post
> of direkickfeud to get kiddiefucker. Why did BB choose that, imbecile?
0 new messages