Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Mr Stan Booz - Seems like Mr Sloan wasn't such a fool
6 views
Skip to first unread message
AdJ
Jan 30, 2012, 3:37:08 AM1/30/12
to
I have only a casual interest in chess. I don't follow your NGs.
As a disinterested observer of The Fake Sam Sloan Saga, I had
suspected there was much more to the story than the "Mottershead
report" suggested. If the guilty parties named in it were also
competent to use remailers, why did they commit many elementary
blunders to permit themselves to be easily, conclusively traced?
That dog doan' hunt, as I once wrote.
Monitors I placed on all rec.games.chess.* postings came up with a
strike yesterday. There are three posts, all of them responding to
c956ef6c-346c-44df...@pj4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com
and quoting the same chain of posts as the reference.
The texts of all three posts are identical except the one sent via
Google has as usual the email addresses munged. I quote them with
non-relevant and non-evidential headers omitted :
-=X=- start post 1
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:50:03 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:50:03 +0100 (CET)
From: Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com>
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.analysis,rec.games.chess.misc,
rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.computer,alt.chess
Subject: Re: Ishi Press has now Reprinted More than 100 Chess Books
Message-ID: <f83c644550bd617d...@dizum.com>
Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@dizum.com
Organization: mail...@dizum.com
Path: news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news
In article
<c956ef6c-346c-44df...@pj4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
samsloan <samh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Did you notice this?
>
> http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?P20004537
Are you just completely unaware of what an asshole you are?
-=X=- end post 1
-=X=- start post 2
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:36:28 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:36:28 +0100 (CET)
From: Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org>
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.analysis,rec.games.chess.misc,
rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.computer,alt.chess
Subject: Re: Ishi Press has now Reprinted More than 100 Chess Books
Message-ID: <f83c644550bd617d...@ecn.org>
Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@dizum.com
Organization: mail...@dizum.com
Path: news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news
In article
<c956ef6c-346c-44df...@pj4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
samsloan <samh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Did you notice this?
>
> http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?P20004537
Are you just completely unaware of what an asshole you are?
-=X=- end post 2
-=X=- start post 3
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:52:51 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:52:51 -0800 (PST)
Path: postnews.google.com!s18g2000vby.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: None <joesc...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.analysis,rec.games.chess.misc,
rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.computer,alt.chess
Subject: Re: Ishi Press has now Reprinted More than 100 Chess Books
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID:
<8ef1e710-8232-486e...@s18g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 72.94.51.59
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1327686771 19251 127.0.0.1 (27 Jan 2012
17:52:51 GMT)
Injection-Info: s18g2000vby.googlegroups.com; posting-host=72.94.51.59;
posting-account=OKbuhQoAAABjSdgayfKrqhY-ZPljLPvg
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1;
Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe)
On Jan 24, 10:04 am, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Did you notice this?
>
> http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?P20004537
Are you just completely unaware of what an asshole you are?
-=X=- end post 3
Remailed posts take some time, even some days, to travel through
the net. But non-remailed posts take only a couple seconds, so :
Post 1 was sent via dizum remailer before Thursday 23:50 UTC
Post 2 was sent via dizum remailer before Friday 00:36 UTC
Post 3 was sent via google from 72.94.51.59 and Google posting-
account OKbuhQoAAABjSdgayfKrqhY-ZPljLPvg on Friday 17:52 UTC
Further, as the message prefix f83c644550bd617db3e522bd94f3b5ea
was the same for posts 1 and 2, they are one and the same post
sent with two final-hop remailers before Thursday 23:50 UTC.
The sender of post 3, "None" <joesc...@gmail.com> is identified
by the posting profile as being someone with the improbable but
apparently real name of Stan Booz (Mr).
There is no doubt about the authenticity of post 3. It cannot be
faked. Recall that the content of all three posts is identical.
Also, a check with Google showed that "Are you just completely
unaware of what an asshole you are?" has never been used before
in the net - we can rule out coincidence as explaining things.
I see for certain that both the remailed posts were sent before
Mr Booz's post. So, it cannot be a case of the remailer user
mimicking Mr Booz's post. Unless a sci-fi time gate was used.
There are only two conclusions which are even remotely possible.
The first possibility is that Mr Booz wrote all of them, or knew,
and knew before Friday 17:52 UTC, who wrote all of them and knew
what the posts contained.
The second possibility is that Mr Booz was deliberately mimicking,
could be ironically, the two remailed posts but was otherwise
unconnected with them.
This second possibility, in light of the legal consequences, is
surely unlikely. Also, I have read in Google that Mr Booz is an
ex-marine and identifies remailed posts with "Charlie". I read
that Mr Booz has often suggested that the sender is a person of
Vietnamese extraction, is not liked by Mr Booz, is not someone
with whom Mr Booz seeks association and is considered by Mr Booz
to be almost as bad as Mr / Haji / Ismail / Samuel Sam Sloan.
So why would Mr Booz wish to emulate him?
Googling for Sam Sloan Stan Booz yields up some posts where Sam
Sloan, before Mottershead, speculated that the FSS was Stan Booz.
Even one post where Sloan was "certain". Sounds like Sloan was
right on the money.
There is no question but that Mr Booz is very, very smrat (R).
Therefore I think the 64000 dollar question is, did Mr Booz make
a careless mistake, did he want to be caught ((c) Sloan), or ..?
Should Mr Lafferty, Mr Kronenberger or anyone else desire more
details, reply to this post in the NGs and I will read it and
may respond.
AdJ
Instead of thanking me, could you chessplayers do me the good
turn of stopping your local village idiot, Mr Gordon Roy Parker,
from giving both privacy and anonymity services a bad name with
his ridiculous lawsuits, stupid posts and threatening emails?
Pardon me for not signing, but I doan' have a dog in this fight.
The sender address is non-replyable.
exit, stage right!
As a disinterested observer of The Fake Sam Sloan Saga, I had
suspected there was much more to the story than the "Mottershead
report" suggested. If the guilty parties named in it were also
competent to use remailers, why did they commit many elementary
blunders to permit themselves to be easily, conclusively traced?
That dog doan' hunt, as I once wrote.
Monitors I placed on all rec.games.chess.* postings came up with a
strike yesterday. There are three posts, all of them responding to
c956ef6c-346c-44df...@pj4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com
and quoting the same chain of posts as the reference.
The texts of all three posts are identical except the one sent via
Google has as usual the email addresses munged. I quote them with
non-relevant and non-evidential headers omitted :
-=X=- start post 1
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:50:03 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:50:03 +0100 (CET)
From: Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com>
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.analysis,rec.games.chess.misc,
rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.computer,alt.chess
Subject: Re: Ishi Press has now Reprinted More than 100 Chess Books
Message-ID: <f83c644550bd617d...@dizum.com>
Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@dizum.com
Organization: mail...@dizum.com
Path: news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news
In article
<c956ef6c-346c-44df...@pj4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
samsloan <samh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Did you notice this?
>
> http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?P20004537
Are you just completely unaware of what an asshole you are?
-=X=- end post 1
-=X=- start post 2
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:36:28 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:36:28 +0100 (CET)
From: Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org>
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.analysis,rec.games.chess.misc,
rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.computer,alt.chess
Subject: Re: Ishi Press has now Reprinted More than 100 Chess Books
Message-ID: <f83c644550bd617d...@ecn.org>
Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@dizum.com
Organization: mail...@dizum.com
Path: news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news
In article
<c956ef6c-346c-44df...@pj4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
samsloan <samh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Did you notice this?
>
> http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?P20004537
Are you just completely unaware of what an asshole you are?
-=X=- end post 2
-=X=- start post 3
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:52:51 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:52:51 -0800 (PST)
Path: postnews.google.com!s18g2000vby.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: None <joesc...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.analysis,rec.games.chess.misc,
rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.computer,alt.chess
Subject: Re: Ishi Press has now Reprinted More than 100 Chess Books
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID:
<8ef1e710-8232-486e...@s18g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 72.94.51.59
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1327686771 19251 127.0.0.1 (27 Jan 2012
17:52:51 GMT)
Injection-Info: s18g2000vby.googlegroups.com; posting-host=72.94.51.59;
posting-account=OKbuhQoAAABjSdgayfKrqhY-ZPljLPvg
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1;
Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe)
On Jan 24, 10:04 am, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Did you notice this?
>
> http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?P20004537
Are you just completely unaware of what an asshole you are?
-=X=- end post 3
Remailed posts take some time, even some days, to travel through
the net. But non-remailed posts take only a couple seconds, so :
Post 1 was sent via dizum remailer before Thursday 23:50 UTC
Post 2 was sent via dizum remailer before Friday 00:36 UTC
Post 3 was sent via google from 72.94.51.59 and Google posting-
account OKbuhQoAAABjSdgayfKrqhY-ZPljLPvg on Friday 17:52 UTC
Further, as the message prefix f83c644550bd617db3e522bd94f3b5ea
was the same for posts 1 and 2, they are one and the same post
sent with two final-hop remailers before Thursday 23:50 UTC.
The sender of post 3, "None" <joesc...@gmail.com> is identified
by the posting profile as being someone with the improbable but
apparently real name of Stan Booz (Mr).
There is no doubt about the authenticity of post 3. It cannot be
faked. Recall that the content of all three posts is identical.
Also, a check with Google showed that "Are you just completely
unaware of what an asshole you are?" has never been used before
in the net - we can rule out coincidence as explaining things.
I see for certain that both the remailed posts were sent before
Mr Booz's post. So, it cannot be a case of the remailer user
mimicking Mr Booz's post. Unless a sci-fi time gate was used.
There are only two conclusions which are even remotely possible.
The first possibility is that Mr Booz wrote all of them, or knew,
and knew before Friday 17:52 UTC, who wrote all of them and knew
what the posts contained.
The second possibility is that Mr Booz was deliberately mimicking,
could be ironically, the two remailed posts but was otherwise
unconnected with them.
This second possibility, in light of the legal consequences, is
surely unlikely. Also, I have read in Google that Mr Booz is an
ex-marine and identifies remailed posts with "Charlie". I read
that Mr Booz has often suggested that the sender is a person of
Vietnamese extraction, is not liked by Mr Booz, is not someone
with whom Mr Booz seeks association and is considered by Mr Booz
to be almost as bad as Mr / Haji / Ismail / Samuel Sam Sloan.
So why would Mr Booz wish to emulate him?
Googling for Sam Sloan Stan Booz yields up some posts where Sam
Sloan, before Mottershead, speculated that the FSS was Stan Booz.
Even one post where Sloan was "certain". Sounds like Sloan was
right on the money.
There is no question but that Mr Booz is very, very smrat (R).
Therefore I think the 64000 dollar question is, did Mr Booz make
a careless mistake, did he want to be caught ((c) Sloan), or ..?
Should Mr Lafferty, Mr Kronenberger or anyone else desire more
details, reply to this post in the NGs and I will read it and
may respond.
AdJ
Instead of thanking me, could you chessplayers do me the good
turn of stopping your local village idiot, Mr Gordon Roy Parker,
from giving both privacy and anonymity services a bad name with
his ridiculous lawsuits, stupid posts and threatening emails?
Pardon me for not signing, but I doan' have a dog in this fight.
The sender address is non-replyable.
exit, stage right!
None
Jan 30, 2012, 1:13:21 PM1/30/12
to
On Jan 30, 3:37 am, AdJ <root.admin@dizum_nospam.com> wrote:
> I have only a casual interest in chess. I don't follow your NGs.
> As a disinterested observer of The Fake Sam Sloan Saga, I had
> suspected there was much more to the story than the "Mottershead
> report" suggested. If the guilty parties named in it were also
> competent to use remailers, why did they commit many elementary
> blunders to permit themselves to be easily, conclusively traced?
> That dog doan' hunt, as I once wrote.
>
> Monitors I placed on all rec.games.chess.* postings came up with a
> strike yesterday. There are three posts, all of them responding to
> c956ef6c-346c-44df-9f15-66e35c4c4...@pj4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com
> I have only a casual interest in chess. I don't follow your NGs.
> As a disinterested observer of The Fake Sam Sloan Saga, I had
> suspected there was much more to the story than the "Mottershead
> report" suggested. If the guilty parties named in it were also
> competent to use remailers, why did they commit many elementary
> blunders to permit themselves to be easily, conclusively traced?
> That dog doan' hunt, as I once wrote.
>
> Monitors I placed on all rec.games.chess.* postings came up with a
> strike yesterday. There are three posts, all of them responding to
> and quoting the same chain of posts as the reference.
>
> The texts of all three posts are identical except the one sent via
> Google has as usual the email addresses munged. I quote them with
> non-relevant and non-evidential headers omitted :
>
> -=X=- start post 1
>
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:50:03 +0000 (UTC)
> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:50:03 +0100 (CET)
> From: Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com>
> Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.analysis,rec.games.chess.misc,
> rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.computer,alt.chess
> Subject: Re: Ishi Press has now Reprinted More than 100 Chess Books
> Message-ID: <f83c644550bd617d...@dizum.com>
> Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@dizum.com
> Organization: mail2n...@dizum.com
>
> The texts of all three posts are identical except the one sent via
> Google has as usual the email addresses munged. I quote them with
> non-relevant and non-evidential headers omitted :
>
> -=X=- start post 1
>
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:50:03 +0000 (UTC)
> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:50:03 +0100 (CET)
> From: Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com>
> Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.analysis,rec.games.chess.misc,
> rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.computer,alt.chess
> Subject: Re: Ishi Press has now Reprinted More than 100 Chess Books
> Message-ID: <f83c644550bd617d...@dizum.com>
> Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@dizum.com
> Path: news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news
>
> In article
> <c956ef6c-346c-44df-9f15-66e35c4c4...@pj4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
>
> samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Did you notice this?
>
> >http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?P20004537
>
> Are you just completely unaware of what an asshole you are?
>
> samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Did you notice this?
>
> >http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?P20004537
>
> Are you just completely unaware of what an asshole you are?
>
> -=X=- end post 1
> -=X=- start post 2
>
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:36:28 +0000 (UTC)
> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:36:28 +0100 (CET)
> From: Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org>
> Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.analysis,rec.games.chess.misc,
> rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.computer,alt.chess
> Subject: Re: Ishi Press has now Reprinted More than 100 Chess Books
> Message-ID: <f83c644550bd617db3e522bd94f3b...@ecn.org>
> -=X=- start post 2
>
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:36:28 +0000 (UTC)
> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:36:28 +0100 (CET)
> From: Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org>
> Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.analysis,rec.games.chess.misc,
> rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.computer,alt.chess
> Subject: Re: Ishi Press has now Reprinted More than 100 Chess Books
> Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@dizum.com
> Organization: mail2n...@dizum.com
> Path: news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news
>
> In article
> <c956ef6c-346c-44df-9f15-66e35c4c4...@pj4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
>
> samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Did you notice this?
>
> >http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?P20004537
>
> Are you just completely unaware of what an asshole you are?
>
> samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Did you notice this?
>
> >http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?P20004537
>
> Are you just completely unaware of what an asshole you are?
>
> -=X=- end post 2
> -=X=- start post 3
>
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:52:51 +0000 (UTC)
> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:52:51 -0800 (PST)
> Path: postnews.google.com!s18g2000vby.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: None <joeschm...@gmail.com>
> -=X=- start post 3
>
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:52:51 +0000 (UTC)
> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:52:51 -0800 (PST)
> Path: postnews.google.com!s18g2000vby.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.analysis,rec.games.chess.misc,
> rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.computer,alt.chess
> Subject: Re: Ishi Press has now Reprinted More than 100 Chess Books
> Organization:http://groups.google.com
> Message-ID:
> <8ef1e710-8232-486e-9951-e7962b073...@s18g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
> rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.computer,alt.chess
> Subject: Re: Ishi Press has now Reprinted More than 100 Chess Books
> Organization:http://groups.google.com
> Message-ID:
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 72.94.51.59
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1327686771 19251 127.0.0.1 (27 Jan 2012
> 17:52:51 GMT)
> Injection-Info: s18g2000vby.googlegroups.com; posting-host=72.94.51.59;
> posting-account=OKbuhQoAAABjSdgayfKrqhY-ZPljLPvg
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1;
> Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe)
>
> On Jan 24, 10:04 am, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Did you notice this?
>
> >http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?P20004537
>
> Are you just completely unaware of what an asshole you are?
>
> -=X=- end post 3
>
> Remailed posts take some time, even some days, to travel through
> the net. But non-remailed posts take only a couple seconds, so :
> Post 1 was sent via dizum remailer before Thursday 23:50 UTC
> Post 2 was sent via dizum remailer before Friday 00:36 UTC
> Post 3 was sent via google from 72.94.51.59 and Google posting-
> account OKbuhQoAAABjSdgayfKrqhY-ZPljLPvg on Friday 17:52 UTC
>
> Further, as the message prefix f83c644550bd617db3e522bd94f3b5ea
> was the same for posts 1 and 2, they are one and the same post
> sent with two final-hop remailers before Thursday 23:50 UTC.
>
> The sender of post 3, "None" <joeschm...@gmail.com> is identified
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1327686771 19251 127.0.0.1 (27 Jan 2012
> 17:52:51 GMT)
> Injection-Info: s18g2000vby.googlegroups.com; posting-host=72.94.51.59;
> posting-account=OKbuhQoAAABjSdgayfKrqhY-ZPljLPvg
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1;
> Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe)
>
> On Jan 24, 10:04 am, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Did you notice this?
>
> >http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?P20004537
>
> Are you just completely unaware of what an asshole you are?
>
> -=X=- end post 3
>
> Remailed posts take some time, even some days, to travel through
> the net. But non-remailed posts take only a couple seconds, so :
> Post 1 was sent via dizum remailer before Thursday 23:50 UTC
> Post 2 was sent via dizum remailer before Friday 00:36 UTC
> Post 3 was sent via google from 72.94.51.59 and Google posting-
> account OKbuhQoAAABjSdgayfKrqhY-ZPljLPvg on Friday 17:52 UTC
>
> Further, as the message prefix f83c644550bd617db3e522bd94f3b5ea
> was the same for posts 1 and 2, they are one and the same post
> sent with two final-hop remailers before Thursday 23:50 UTC.
>
try, but I doubt Mr. Sloan, the object of your apparent affection,
would not see through it. But, the other cast of characters here might
not.
Anonymous
Feb 11, 2012, 11:00:55 AM2/11/12
to
Oh, he is/you are a fool, all right. As I said, you apparently have
no idea of what an asshole you are.
Do you dispute that? Are you saying that you really are aware of
can stumble into.
no idea of what an asshole you are.
Do you dispute that? Are you saying that you really are aware of
what an asshole you are?
Keep on analyzing my messages, see what more stupid conclusions you
can stumble into.
Message has been deleted
ChessFire
Feb 12, 2012, 4:23:54 PM2/12/12
to
On Feb 11, 7:18 pm, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
> On February 11 2012 at 5:01pm CET "Anonymous" (lol) wrote:>Oh, he is/you are a fool, all right. As I said, you apparently have
> Analyze message texts? That's only for stupids. There's a better way. I
> work in law enforcement- reassure me that you didn't miss ******'s new
> (non-)privacy policy, D****.
> From the automated log response to the request, I learn that but one
> person, apart from Sloan, accessed this 'Groups Conversation' in the
> requisite way to post pseudonymously.
> That one person signed on with posting account
You are somewhat arrogant in such singularity, friend. Some 5 years
ago I suggested a linguistic analysis could be made to the fake-Sloan,
it was successful in that it was cried down by the outer mob, who said
they couldn't tell American cant speech from ESL, though those
resenting this idea had failed to look or even acknowledge that a non-
native American/English speaker could be differentiated by what they
said by anyone else either, they possessed no curiosity about it. This
is itself peculiar, even to amateurs, except some ex cathedra motive.
Currently, are we all saying that the usual suspects are not involved
here, but the original perp or perps, more likely, are, and can
continue. The lack of speculation is itself a telling one.
I say to your descriptions of 6 falsifiers, malesuada fames? And to
better look to the originals not the copyists. All is there. I worked
with someone in chess once who was an assistant attorney general in Wa
DC. He was reporting on another game, but also on similarities to
chess subversions.The level of deviancy is not the usual kind, for
personal profit, but as in a dark mirror, on what has not been
achieved though resented. This is a fair clue.
Phil Innes
> On February 11 2012 at 5:01pm CET "Anonymous" (lol) wrote:>Oh, he is/you are a fool, all right. As I said, you apparently have
> work in law enforcement- reassure me that you didn't miss ******'s new
> (non-)privacy policy, D****.
> From the automated log response to the request, I learn that but one
> person, apart from Sloan, accessed this 'Groups Conversation' in the
> requisite way to post pseudonymously.
> That one person signed on with posting account
You are somewhat arrogant in such singularity, friend. Some 5 years
ago I suggested a linguistic analysis could be made to the fake-Sloan,
it was successful in that it was cried down by the outer mob, who said
they couldn't tell American cant speech from ESL, though those
resenting this idea had failed to look or even acknowledge that a non-
native American/English speaker could be differentiated by what they
said by anyone else either, they possessed no curiosity about it. This
is itself peculiar, even to amateurs, except some ex cathedra motive.
Currently, are we all saying that the usual suspects are not involved
here, but the original perp or perps, more likely, are, and can
continue. The lack of speculation is itself a telling one.
I say to your descriptions of 6 falsifiers, malesuada fames? And to
better look to the originals not the copyists. All is there. I worked
with someone in chess once who was an assistant attorney general in Wa
DC. He was reporting on another game, but also on similarities to
chess subversions.The level of deviancy is not the usual kind, for
personal profit, but as in a dark mirror, on what has not been
achieved though resented. This is a fair clue.
Phil Innes
Anonymous
Feb 13, 2012, 4:49:35 AM2/13/12
to
In article <47ccfb497d69547a...@dizum.com>
> '25'. The access IP was in one of the two subdomains often used by this
> person. So, no hacking or spoofing was involved. I've asterisked out
> enough to make the originator know he has been ID'd, and how, but useless
> to anyone else. ....
You think this is a Gmail account? WTF?
In short, you haven't ID'd me at all. But Sloan is such a piece of
work that I will probably feel motivated again at some point to say
something about that asshole.
I can't believe that nobody has hauled Sloan's sorry ass into court
and crushed him with criminal charges or civil litigation yet.
Well, Eventually it will have to happen.
Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
>
> On February 11 2012 at 5:01pm CET "Anonymous" (lol) wrote:
>
> On February 11 2012 at 5:01pm CET "Anonymous" (lol) wrote:
> Analyze message texts? That's only for stupids. There's a better way. I
> work in law enforcement- reassure me that you didn't miss ******'s new
> (non-)privacy policy, D****.
> From the automated log response to the request, I learn that but one
> person, apart from Sloan, accessed this 'Groups Conversation' in the
> requisite way to post pseudonymously.
> That one person signed on with posting account
> XpKouQk****H2cQr6oD*bJ*CirO*Y*r3, whose associated gmai1 address ends with
> work in law enforcement- reassure me that you didn't miss ******'s new
> (non-)privacy policy, D****.
> From the automated log response to the request, I learn that but one
> person, apart from Sloan, accessed this 'Groups Conversation' in the
> requisite way to post pseudonymously.
> That one person signed on with posting account
> '25'. The access IP was in one of the two subdomains often used by this
> person. So, no hacking or spoofing was involved. I've asterisked out
> enough to make the originator know he has been ID'd, and how, but useless
> to anyone else. ....
You think this is a Gmail account? WTF?
In short, you haven't ID'd me at all. But Sloan is such a piece of
work that I will probably feel motivated again at some point to say
something about that asshole.
I can't believe that nobody has hauled Sloan's sorry ass into court
and crushed him with criminal charges or civil litigation yet.
Well, Eventually it will have to happen.
Anonymous
Feb 13, 2012, 2:33:30 PM2/13/12
to
In article <2808db80c45958af...@ecn.org>
I'm back again. I've more to say but first I'm not David Ames, who I
found by elimination among r.g.c.p posters met your ID criteria.
OK I've slept on it. I have more to say on the subject of Sloan. I have
read from google that he is a bankrupt so there's no chance of civilly
litigating him in a way that gives him pain. The police and prosecution
services are worse than useless as they can't nail a self confessed, it
is still in his website this morning, and long-term serial child molester
like Sloan. By elimination again, that leaves only Vigilante Action. I'd
be willing to put my C notes into the collection box to fund it. But I do
want to see the before and after photos. I will try to find a phone
number for Jay Roberts to see if he is willing to do what hillbillies do.
Sloan's been found brain dead as a matter of law by Federal Judge Denny
Chin and others. Their decisions against Sloan were all confirmed on
appeal so this can be cited as precedent if needed in future cases. Well,
this explains why on this Sunday Sloan wrote
> as a matter of policy, I never ever write bad things about judges
but then went on to write on the same day
> the people who helped her kidnap my daughter, including not only
> Lawrence Janow, Michael Gamble, and William G. Petty
when all three of these are Judges, and also write in the same posting
> a criminal like Charles and Shelby Roberts, Dorchen Leidholdt and
> Lawrence Janow
where Janow is a Judge, and then the earlier shit Sloan wrote about
arranging compulsory enemas for Judge Wiss, but it also explains how he
cannot be held responsible for writing these, because Sloan is legally
confirmed to be brain damaged as a matter of citeable case law.
In his miscellaneous lawsuits Sloan names lots of people in official
places as being responsible for kidnapping about five of his bastards
at one time or another. Because Sloan is so brain fucked he does not
understand that the first question that pops into the mind of whatever
unfortunate judge who reads this bullshit is "What would motivate them
to do this?". A minute later with google and the Judge knows that Sloan
is addicted to sexually and mentally molesting kids, including his own.
Somehow Sloan thinks this helps his chances of winning.
I was going to quote yet more Sloanian but I hosed it. Since he cannot
figure out that it was his own Mother who alerted the embassy in the
U.A.E. that her grand daughter was being molested and this is why they
arranged for the child's rescue and her return to the safety of the
Roberts fold, discussing anything with Sloan is a waste of fingertips.
How can one reason with someone who thinks Sheikh Rashid Emir of Dubai
was secretly murdered so as to enable Sloan's kid to be smuggled out?
Long live Sam Sloan. But not Too Long.
found by elimination among r.g.c.p posters met your ID criteria.
OK I've slept on it. I have more to say on the subject of Sloan. I have
read from google that he is a bankrupt so there's no chance of civilly
litigating him in a way that gives him pain. The police and prosecution
services are worse than useless as they can't nail a self confessed, it
is still in his website this morning, and long-term serial child molester
like Sloan. By elimination again, that leaves only Vigilante Action. I'd
be willing to put my C notes into the collection box to fund it. But I do
want to see the before and after photos. I will try to find a phone
number for Jay Roberts to see if he is willing to do what hillbillies do.
Sloan's been found brain dead as a matter of law by Federal Judge Denny
Chin and others. Their decisions against Sloan were all confirmed on
appeal so this can be cited as precedent if needed in future cases. Well,
this explains why on this Sunday Sloan wrote
> as a matter of policy, I never ever write bad things about judges
but then went on to write on the same day
> the people who helped her kidnap my daughter, including not only
> Lawrence Janow, Michael Gamble, and William G. Petty
when all three of these are Judges, and also write in the same posting
> a criminal like Charles and Shelby Roberts, Dorchen Leidholdt and
> Lawrence Janow
where Janow is a Judge, and then the earlier shit Sloan wrote about
arranging compulsory enemas for Judge Wiss, but it also explains how he
cannot be held responsible for writing these, because Sloan is legally
confirmed to be brain damaged as a matter of citeable case law.
In his miscellaneous lawsuits Sloan names lots of people in official
places as being responsible for kidnapping about five of his bastards
at one time or another. Because Sloan is so brain fucked he does not
understand that the first question that pops into the mind of whatever
unfortunate judge who reads this bullshit is "What would motivate them
to do this?". A minute later with google and the Judge knows that Sloan
is addicted to sexually and mentally molesting kids, including his own.
Somehow Sloan thinks this helps his chances of winning.
I was going to quote yet more Sloanian but I hosed it. Since he cannot
figure out that it was his own Mother who alerted the embassy in the
U.A.E. that her grand daughter was being molested and this is why they
arranged for the child's rescue and her return to the safety of the
Roberts fold, discussing anything with Sloan is a waste of fingertips.
How can one reason with someone who thinks Sheikh Rashid Emir of Dubai
was secretly murdered so as to enable Sloan's kid to be smuggled out?
Long live Sam Sloan. But not Too Long.
None
Feb 13, 2012, 4:00:47 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 13, 2:33 pm, Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org> wrote:
> In article <2808db80c45958af41014da858d5c...@ecn.org>
>
>
>
>
>
> Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org> wrote:
> > In article <47ccfb497d69547af2c62b74b50ec...@dizum.com>
> Long live Sam Sloan. But not Too Long.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
> In article <2808db80c45958af41014da858d5c...@ecn.org>
>
>
>
>
>
> Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org> wrote:
> > In article <47ccfb497d69547af2c62b74b50ec...@dizum.com>
>
> - Show quoted text -
samsloan
Feb 13, 2012, 9:40:25 PM2/13/12
to
> number for Jay Roberts to see if he is willing to do what hillbillies do.No problem.
>
No problem. I will help you out.
Darrel Jay Roberts
141 Odins Bow Dr
Madison Heights, VA 24572
(434) 528-4145
His original name was just Jay Roberts. He added the Darrel when he
turned queer.
His hillbillie father is:
Charles E Roberts
427 Amelon Rd
Madison Heights, VA 24572
(434) 929-8888
>
No problem. I will help you out.
Darrel Jay Roberts
141 Odins Bow Dr
Madison Heights, VA 24572
(434) 528-4145
His original name was just Jay Roberts. He added the Darrel when he
turned queer.
His hillbillie father is:
Charles E Roberts
427 Amelon Rd
Madison Heights, VA 24572
(434) 929-8888
None
Feb 14, 2012, 10:49:16 AM2/14/12
to
0 new messages