USCF is paper-blitzing me
Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"
every possible technicality, almost all grounds that would lead to dismissal
without prejudice and resolve nothing.
My hand has been forced in that I have to address EVERY argument they raise
to the best of my ability. That's two full workdays I won't get back, thank
you very much.
I would rather they had just answered the complaint andwe could move through
discovery and to trial or summary judgment. They seem to want to win before
that, which is far more protracted than a straightforward defense to a
mutually agreed upon set of facts.
Because they have chosen this path, I now have to construct replies to three
motions to dismiss, and four other motions related to my response. Those
four motions will have to be answered, and even resolution in favor of the
defendants on these procedural issues will likely have USCF back at square
one.
--
--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
Finding Your A-Game:
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy (FREE!)
The book Neil Strauss and VH-1 STOLE The Pivot From
Click HERE: for the ORIGINAL pivot chapter:
http://www.cybersheet.com/pivot.pdf
Here's my Myspace Page: And Pickup Blog (FREE advice)
http://www.myspace.com/snodgrasspublishing
Don't rely on overexposed, mass-marketed commercial seduction methods which
no longer work. Learn the methods the gurus USE with the money they make
from what they teach.
Thinking of taking a seduction "workshiop?" Read THIS:
http://www.dirtyscottsdale.com/?p=1187
My lawsuit against Viacom, Mystery, and Venusian Arts Corp. over "The Pickup
Arist" VH-1 show: http://www.cybersheet.com/lawsuit-viacom.pdf
samsloan
<r...@cybersheet.com> wrote:
> Three motions to dismiss....arguments out the wazoo....30+ pages, raising
> every possible technicality, almost all grounds that would lead to dismissal
> without prejudice and resolve nothing.
>
> My hand has been forced in that I have to address EVERY argument they raise
> to the best of my ability. That's two full workdays I won't get back, thank
> you very much.
>
> I would rather they had just answered the complaint andwe could move through
> discovery and to trial or summary judgment. They seem to want to win before
> that, which is far more protracted than a straightforward defense to a
> mutually agreed upon set of facts.
>
> Because they have chosen this path, I now have to construct replies to three
> motions to dismiss, and four other motions related to my response. Those
> four motions will have to be answered, and even resolution in favor of the
> defendants on these procedural issues will likely have USCF back at square
> one.
>
> --
> --
> Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
And you have not even heard from the BIG GOZILLA , yet.
Me !
Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"
>
> Me !
Er, about that, um, the time limit to respond is like 20 days.
Looks like the issues relating to service will finally get some judicial
ink.
--
--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
Finding Your A-Game:
Matt Nemmers
<r...@cybersheet.com> wrote:
> Three motions to dismiss....arguments out the wazoo....30+ pages, raising
> every possible technicality, almost all grounds that would lead to dismissal
> without prejudice and resolve nothing.
>
> My hand has been forced in that I have to address EVERY argument they raise
> to the best of my ability.
LMAO. Gordo bitching because the USCF didn't just roll over and pay
him off. With all his supposed "legal expertise," one has to wonder
exactly what he expected.
I am, however, confident that "the best of [his] ability" won't be
good enough to survive the MTDs, despite his best efforts to explain
it all away. You see, courts require a little sumpin'-sumpin' called
"evidence," a fact that ol' Gordo hasn't been able to wrap his little
noodle around quite yet.
> That's two full workdays I won't get back, thank
> you very much.
He buttered his own bread and now, again, bitches about "workdays [he]
won't get back." As a professional frivolous lawsuit filer, seems
he's actually got a full-time job now.
Not that he's very good at it.
> I would rather they had just answered the complaint andwe could move through
> discovery and to trial or summary judgment.
Of course he would! What do they expect him to do?? PROVE his case
merits the courts time??? My God...the HUMANITY!
</sarcasm>
> They seem to want to win before
> that, which is far more protracted than a straightforward defense to a
> mutually agreed upon set of facts.
"Mutually agreed set of facts." That's more than a little stretch
since (quite obviously) the USCF wouldn't have filed three MTDs if the
facts had been agreed upon.
Stupid Gordy. Even by the standards he's set here.
> Because they have chosen this path, I now have to construct replies to three
> motions to dismiss, and four other motions related to my response.
In other words, he has to convince a court that his "case" (such as it
is) merits more than the USCF getting the ol' stink-eye from the
Better Business Bureau because of actions allegedly committed by a
member of their EB.
> Those
> four motions will have to be answered, and even resolution in favor of the
> defendants on these procedural issues will likely have USCF back at square
> one.
LMAO....good fucking luck with that, netkook. But do let us know how
it all turns out. I mean, when you're thrown out on your can
for....what is it? The 25th time now?
<snicker>