On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:07:05 -0800 (PST), Taylor Kingston
<
ttk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 11, 10:25 am, Ken Blake <kbl...@kb.invalid> wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:31:07 -0800 (PST), Taylor Kingston
> >
> > <
ttk5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 10, 9:42 pm, Offramp <
alaneobr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Here is an unusual one:
http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/pics/cn7507_caesar.jpg
> > > > Usual rules!!
> >
> > > > Guest judge is Herschel Krustovsky.
> >
> > > I don't have a funny caption to give here, but I do have the 1948
> > > issue of Chess Review with this photo on its cover. Their caption was
> > > "If looks could kill ..." It appears that Sid Caesar is about to give
> > > a Philidor's Legacy mate: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6 3.Bc4 Nc6 4.Nc3 Bg4?
> > > 5.Nxe5! Bxd1
> >
> > And what would White do after 5. ... Nxe5?
>
> Good point, Ken. That's what I get for composing the game in my head
> rather than on a board (Koltanowski I am not).
My ability to play moves in my head (blindfolded, as it were) is
greatly inferior to what it used to be, back in the days when I was an
active tournament player (55 years or so ago), but I can still handle
it from move 1 to 5. <g>
I once played three blindfolded games simultaneously, and won all
three, but if my opponents had been better and I hadn't won them all
quickly, I would have had a very hard time.
> However, based on the
> position in the photo, the moves I gave do indeed appear to be the
> ones that created it. But I was wrong in the "?" and "!" I gave.
Not a big problem. I didn't mind the error, and I wasn't trying to
give you a hard time. Just pointing it out.
--
Ken Blake