Does Polgar Really Have Minor Contacts with Pennsylvania as She Avers Under Oath?
MrVidmar
AFFIDAVIT OF SUSAN POLGAR
I, Susan Polgar, being duly sworn, according to law, hereby deposes and
states the following to be true and correct under penalty of perjury.
1. I am not and never have been a resident of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania.
2. I am a resident and domiciled in the State of Texas.
3. While I deny the allegations set forth by Mr. Parker in his lawsuit,
I have not communicated with Pennsylvania residents regarding Mr.
Parker, other than legal counsel.
4. I have not had continuous or systematic contacts with Pennsylvania;
instead, I have been physically present in Pennsylvania on a few
occasions for chess tournaments.
5. I have not personally or professionally benefited from any actions
taken in the State of Pennsylvania.
6. The United States Chess Federation magazine, Chess Life is not
distributed by myself.
7. My only personal contact in Pennsylvania was that I accompanied my
son last year to a youth chess event in Pittsburgh and attended a chess
event in Philadelphia approximately three years ago and in the 1980s.
Susan Polgar
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED
Before me this Sr day
http://susanpolgar.blogspot.com/2006/10/lecture-at-philadelphia-city-hall.html
http://susanpolgar.blogspot.com/2006/10/simul-at-philadelphia-city-hall.html
[Was this a free simul from Polgar's end or was she paid?]
None
> Or has she in fact done business in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania?
>
> AFFIDAVIT OF SUSAN POLGAR
> I, Susan Polgar, being duly sworn, according to law, hereby deposes and
> states the following to be true and correct under penalty of perjury.
>
> 1. I am not and never have been a resident of the Commonwealth of
> Pennsylvania.
>
> 2. I am a resident and domiciled in the State of Texas.
>
> 3. While I deny the allegations set forth by Mr. Parker in his lawsuit,
> I have not communicated with Pennsylvania residents regarding Mr.
> Parker, other than legal counsel.
>
> 4. I have not had continuous or systematic contacts with Pennsylvania;
> instead, I have been physically present in Pennsylvania on a few
> occasions for chess tournaments.
>
> 5. I have not personally or professionally benefited from any actions
> taken in the State of Pennsylvania.
>
> 6. The United States Chess Federation magazine, Chess Life is not
> distributed by myself.
>
> 7. My only personal contact in Pennsylvania was that I accompanied my
> son last year to a youth chess event in Pittsburgh and attended a chess
> event in Philadelphia approximately three years ago and in the 1980s.
>
> Susan Polgar
> SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED
> Before me this Sr day
>
>
> http://susanpolgar.blogspot.com/2006/10/simul-at-philadelphia-city-ha...
> [Was this a free simul from Polgar's end or was she paid?]
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quY8bVlSsCI
She does nothing for free. Contact the IRS and ask if she reported
this income. Also, the City of Philadelphia and the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania. That's how Pete Rose got snagged.
ChessFire
Say who? You don't even have a name! Therefore you don't say it.
> Contact the IRS and ask if she reported
> this income.
And also what expenses?
But what is the import of this information anyway?
> Also, the City of Philadelphia and the Commonwealth of
> Pennsylvania. That's how Pete Rose got snagged.
Why not up the ante and suggest she caused election rigging in PA? Why
not suggest she faked the Moon Landings? Was and Is a Global Warming
denier?
Why not say your name, and why the issue has the slightest interest to
anyone at all?
Why not keep on keeping on about possible, um, whatever Susan Polgar
has committed, just in case she is some female Lex Luther out to fox
us all? Whereas, Bill Batburg must be maintained at all costs!
[$500,000 this year alone]
But to you, nothing at all. You have never mentioned anything that
effects chess players, therefore you are not only a cowardly anon
commentator about others who you name, you are also persistently
obscure about any effects whatever this has to anything to do with
chess.
Like Brain Laffin'stockings, you continue to protest things which
don't seem to be worth any air space at all.
Is there anyone who understands why you protest?
Does anyone actually like anon smearers?
Let them speak, including the fat bloke on a bike [and there is
nothing funny about that, as ani ful no, tragic really, tha bike ain't
going to last]
Phil Innes
MrVidmar
None
>
> - Show quoted text -
Methinks he doth protest too much.
ChessFire
Two twits write in to say nothing. None, and the Brain.
I see that no one else has chipped up to say if they actually like
anon smearers, or if they understand whatever this thread is about to
be other than another 'hot sauce' report
:((
Is it true that the Brain is just a 1000-rated legal clerk with a big
keyboard? Does None really shave his forehead, if any, to make him
look smarter?
Who knows, cares? Nothing to do with chess, is it? Not at any level
that this pair can say to us.
Phil Innes
help bot
> That's how Pete Rose got snagged.
That depends on the crime. Mr. Rose got caught
/by slow-motion camera footage/ for the crime of
swinging his butt into a pitch, deceptively implying
that the ball hit him (not the other way around).
Upon seeing their hero cheat in these slow-motion
butt-attack-move replays, baseball fans everywhere
wanted to cry... but were summarily informed that
"there is no crying in baseball".
-- help bot
help bot
> > She does nothing for free.
> Say who? You don't even have a name! Therefore you don't say it.
It is amusing to watch an ad hominst squeal
like stuck pig when he cannot fathom a personal
identity (for his own ad hominidiocy purposes)
rather than, say, adressing an issue which has
been raised.
> Why not up the ante and suggest she caused election rigging in PA? Why
> not suggest she faked the Moon Landings?
It is well-known that it was *not* SP who faked
the moon landings. Ms. Polgar was much too
busy with chess at the time these shams were
perpetrated on a very naive public.
> Why not say your name
Rather, why obsess over the personal identity
of one who discusses any given issue? What
does this say about the obsessive-compulsive
ad hoministette?
> But to you, nothing at all. You have never mentioned anything that
> effects chess players, therefore you are not only a cowardly anon
> commentator about others who you name, you are also persistently
> obscure about any effects whatever this has to anything to do with
> chess.
For the benefit of dim-bulbs everywhere, the
connection (invisible to the dimwits) is the fact
that many lawsuits involving chess players and
the USCF are affecting chessplayers in the
USA.
One example is the magical disappearance
of vast USCF funds into the giant maw of the
lawyer's childrens' college funds and 401-Ks.
All these monies /could have/ gone toward,
say, improving Chess Lies magazine.
> Is there anyone who understands why you protest?
Perhaps the meanness of these attacks is
a /reaction/ to the idiocy of certain apologists
here?
> Does anyone actually like anon smearers?
Put it this way: when one compares the mean-
ness of certain "anon smearers" and their revelry
in torturing the insane apologist with the insanity
of the apologistette himself, the term "like" loses
all meaning.
And one wonders if the above question was
meant to imply some sort of /superiority/ of the
named smearsters (i.e. Larry Parr) to their anon
counterparts; if so, then the apologistette is even
more insane than one may have at first imagined.
Now then, having dealt with the luna-pologist
anon-dreader Himself, I must turn to the fact that
some of these apologistette-torturers are remark-
ably similar to Mr. Sloan in the way they come
across-- in their obsessive nastiness toward the
dynamic duo (SP & PT). Suffice it to say that
any comparison to Mr. Sloan is, well, unbecom-
ming. In addition, it is not considered proper
ettiquette to torture the insane-- so lay off of Dr.
IMnes the 2450nearly-an-IM... .
-- help bot
MrVidmar
Kalyan
>
> - Show quoted text -
Brian,
These non-response responses are getting very painful. If you find
Phil pointless and verbose (I assume most do), simply ignore him. Or
come up with witty/sarcastic responses as Mike Murray does. Do you
really want to be considered as painful and irritating as Phil?
MrVidmar
him as sharing with us. It's always polite to thank one for sharing. So
when you see a response from me to one of his posts, just assume I'm
thanking him and pass that post by.
None
ChessFarte has become quite the GM panty sniffer.
RayGordon
Ray