Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Dutch Open, final standings

8 views
Skip to first unread message

Walter Ravenek

unread,
Dec 5, 1996, 3:00:00 AM12/5/96
to

Initial ranking:

1 The King Pentium 166 Johan de Koning
2 Kallisto Pentium 166 Bart Westrate
3 Cilkchess 12 * UltraSPARC 167 Don Dailey, Chris Joerg, Larry Kaufman,
Charles Leiserson, Aske Plaat
4 Arthur Power Mac 8500/120 Walter Ravenek
5 Schach Pentium 120 Thomas Kreitmair, Matthias Engelbach
6 Diep Pentium 100 Vincent Diepeveen
7 Dappet Pentium 166 Dap Hartmann, Peter Kouwenhoven
8 Rajah Pentium 100 Valavan Manohararajah
9 Nightmare 5.4 Pentium Pro 233 Joost Buijs
10 Hector Cyrix P166 Maarten Bults
11 MacChess 3.0 PowerPC 604/200 Wim van Beusekom
12 Alexs 2.0alfa Dual Pentium 133 Alex van Tiggelen
13 Ant Pentium Pro 200 Tom Vijlbrief
14 Goldbar Pentium 200 Bart Goldhoorn
15 Zzzzzz 4.2 Pentium 133 Gijsbert Wiesenekker
16 Bionic Pentium 200 Hans Secelle
17 Delta Pentium Pro 200 Fre Felkers
18 Morphy 96 Pentium 60 Erik Walstra
19 Shannon Pentium Pro 233 Remy de Ruysscher
20 AChess Pentium 100 Amindo Naarden

Final results after 11 rounds of play:
1. Cilkchess 10.0 (9 wins and 2 draws, no losses)
2. The King 9.5 (the initial favorite: the 1995 Dutch Champion)
3. Kallisto 8.5 (the 1995 runner up)
4. Schach 7.5
Arthur 7.5
6. Zzzzzz 6.0
MacChess 6.0
Ant 6.0
Hector 6.0
Dappet 6.0
11. Shannon 5.5
Goldbar 5.5
13. Nightmare 5.0
Diep 5.0
Rajah 5.0
16. Alexs 3.5
Morphy 3.5
18. Bionic 2.5
19. AChess 1.0
20. Delta 0.5

--
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_/ Dr. Walter Ravenek _/
_/ Dept. of Chemistry _/
_/ Vrije Universiteit _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_/ De Boelelaan 1083 _/ phone: +31 20 444 7617 _/
_/ 1081 HV Amsterdam _/ fax : +31 20 444 7643 _/
_/ The Netherlands _/ email: rav...@chem.vu.nl _/
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

Chris Whittington

unread,
Dec 5, 1996, 3:00:00 AM12/5/96
to

Congratulations to Droop. A great result. Shame it wasn't a
correspondence match :)

Chris Whittington

Kjell Tore Sandum

unread,
Dec 5, 1996, 3:00:00 AM12/5/96
to

[snip]
: Final results after 11 rounds of play:

: 1. Cilkchess 10.0 (9 wins and 2 draws, no losses)
[snip]
:
: --
: _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
: _/ Dr. Walter Ravenek _/
: _/ Dept. of Chemistry _/
: _/ Vrije Universiteit _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
: _/ De Boelelaan 1083 _/ phone: +31 20 444 7617 _/
: _/ 1081 HV Amsterdam _/ fax : +31 20 444 7643 _/
: _/ The Netherlands _/ email: rav...@chem.vu.nl _/
: _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
:

Where can I find more info about "Cilkchess"?

Thanks! :-)

KT
--
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_/ Kjell.T...@hiMolde.no / Molde College_/
_/ Tel: +47 71 21 40 00 / \ / P. Box: 308 _/
_/ Fax: +47 71 21 41 00 / \ / N-6401 Molde _/
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

Marcel van Kervinck

unread,
Dec 6, 1996, 3:00:00 AM12/6/96
to

Kjell Tore Sandum (Kjell.T...@hiMolde.no) wrote:
> [snip]
> : Final results after 11 rounds of play:
> : 1. Cilkchess 10.0 (9 wins and 2 draws, no losses)
> [snip]
> Where can I find more info about "Cilkchess"?

It's a parallel program, written in 'Cilk', and it ran
on a 12 processor Sun. More info on

http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/~cilk/

Marcel
-- _ _
_| |_|_|
|_ |_ Marcel van Kervinck
|_| bue...@urc.tue.nl

brucemo

unread,
Dec 8, 1996, 3:00:00 AM12/8/96
to

Kjell Tore Sandum wrote:
>
> [snip]
> : Final results after 11 rounds of play:
> : 1. Cilkchess 10.0 (9 wins and 2 draws, no losses)
> [snip]

> Where can I find more info about "Cilkchess"?
>

> Thanks! :-)

I noticed that these were the *Socrates guys, and it used a whole pile of
processors, so I doubt you'll be buying it at Electronics Boutique soon.

bruce

Eric Hallsworth

unread,
Dec 9, 1996, 3:00:00 AM12/9/96
to

In article <ravenek-ya0231800...@news.vu.nl>, Walter
Ravenek <rav...@chem.vu.nl> writes

>Initial ranking:
>
> 1 The King Pentium 166 Johan de Koning
> 2 Kallisto Pentium 166 Bart Westrate
> 3 Cilkchess 12 * UltraSPARC 167 Don Dailey, Chris Joerg, Larry Kaufman,
> Charles Leiserson, Aske Plaat
> 4 Arthur Power Mac 8500/120 Walter Ravenek
> 5 Schach Pentium 120 Thomas Kreitmair, Matthias Engelbach
> 6 Diep Pentium 100 Vincent Diepeveen
> 7 Dappet Pentium 166 Dap Hartmann, Peter Kouwenhoven
> 8 Rajah Pentium 100 Valavan Manohararajah
> 9 Nightmare 5.4 Pentium Pro 233 Joost Buijs
>10 Hector Cyrix P166 Maarten Bults
>11 MacChess 3.0 PowerPC 604/200 Wim van Beusekom
>12 Alexs 2.0alfa Dual Pentium 133 Alex van Tiggelen
>13 Ant Pentium Pro 200 Tom Vijlbrief
>14 Goldbar Pentium 200 Bart Goldhoorn
>15 Zzzzzz 4.2 Pentium 133 Gijsbert Wiesenekker
>16 Bionic Pentium 200 Hans Secelle
>17 Delta Pentium Pro 200 Fre Felkers
>18 Morphy 96 Pentium 60 Erik Walstra
>19 Shannon Pentium Pro 233 Remy de Ruysscher
>20 AChess Pentium 100 Amindo Naarden
>
>Final results after 11 rounds of play:
> 1. Cilkchess 10.0 (9 wins and 2 draws, no losses)
> 2. The King 9.5 (the initial favorite: the 1995 Dutch Champion)
> 3. Kallisto 8.5 (the 1995 runner up)
> 4. Schach 7.5
> Arthur 7.5
> 6. Zzzzzz 6.0
> MacChess 6.0
> Ant 6.0
> Hector 6.0
> Dappet 6.0
>11. Shannon 5.5
> Goldbar 5.5
>13. Nightmare 5.0
> Diep 5.0
> Rajah 5.0
>16. Alexs 3.5
> Morphy 3.5
>18. Bionic 2.5
>19. AChess 1.0
>20. Delta 0.5
>
Thanks for sharing the results and games with us all!

Could you tell us what time control was used in the games, please?!
--
Best wishes,
Eric Hallsworth, Computer Chess Magazine, The Red House,
46 High Street, Wilburton, Cambs CB6 3RA

Valavan Manohararajah

unread,
Dec 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM12/10/96
to

In article <FA6UnBAFj$qyE...@elhchess.demon.co.uk>,

Time control used was 60moves in 90mins and then 40moves in 60mins thereafter
forever.


--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
man...@ecf.utoronto.ca | 3rd year Comp Eng., University of Toronto
Valavan Manohararajah |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

mclane

unread,
Dec 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM12/10/96
to

Chris Whittington <chr...@cpsoft.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>Congratulations to Droop. A great result. Shame it wasn't a
>correspondence match :)

He must have done something wrong?!
What a pity that CSTal did not participate!
Is Diep a strong program Vincent ? Or was it a bad day?
>Chris Whittington


>> Rajah 5.0
>> 16. Alexs 3.5
>> Morphy 3.5
>> 18. Bionic 2.5
>> 19. AChess 1.0
>> 20. Delta 0.5
>>

mclane

unread,
Dec 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM12/10/96
to

Eric Hallsworth <er...@elhchess.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>In article <ravenek-ya0231800...@news.vu.nl>, Walter
>Ravenek <rav...@chem.vu.nl> writes
>>Initial ranking:

>> 6 Diep Pentium 100 Vincent Diepeveen

>>Final results after 11 rounds of play:
...


>>13. Nightmare 5.0
>> Diep 5.0

>Could you tell us what time control was used in the games, please?!


>--
>Best wishes,
>Eric Hallsworth, Computer Chess Magazine, The Red House,
>46 High Street, Wilburton, Cambs CB6 3RA

It was mail-chess-level, I am sure.
But his initial-ranking was fairly high!!
6th rank!! Brilliant!


Lonnie Cook

unread,
Dec 12, 1996, 3:00:00 AM12/12/96
to

On Mon, 9 Dec 1996 11:32:21 +0000, Eric Hallsworth <er...@elhchess.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>--
>Best wishes,
>Eric Hallsworth, Computer Chess Magazine, The Red House,
>46 High Street, Wilburton, Cambs CB6 3RA


Eric,
Here's the page from MIT with tourney and such


http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/~cilk/Dutch1996/crosstable/table.html
같같같
Lonnie

C:\WINDOWS C:\WINDOWS\GO
C:\PC\CRAWL

C:\DOS C:\DOS\RUN
RUN\DOS\RUN

0 new messages