Google 網路論壇不再支援新的 Usenet 貼文或訂閱項目,但過往內容仍可供查看。

True son of the Nazis - Herr Rolf Tueschen

瀏覽次數:23 次
跳到第一則未讀訊息

Chris Whittington

未讀,
1998年2月28日 凌晨3:00:001998/2/28
收件者:

The book "Hitler's Willing Executioners" by Daniel Goldhagen contains the
following section (pages 136-137 in the English language version):

"Constant, ubiquitous, antisemetic vituperation issued from German public
organs .......
It was above all an expressive act, the statement of Hitler's and his
followers expressive beliefs .....
This verbal violence was meant to be heard not only by Germans but also by
Jews. Its intent was to butress the Germans' beliefs and to terrorise the
Jews. These terrorising measures served the emotionally satisfying purpose
of plunging the Jews into fear and the programmatic goal of inducing them
to leave Germany, and, it was hoped, once gone, to leave it alone. The
verbal assault contributed, as much as any other policy, to transforming
the Jews into socially dead beings, beings who were seen to be owed few if
any moral obligations by Germans and who were conceived of as being
thoroughly dishonourable, indeed incapable of bearing honour. One Jewish
survivor records this aspect of Nazi policy .....

"The barrage of propaganda was directed against the Jews with undiminished
vehemance and intensity. In ceaseless repetitions, it was hammered into the
heads of the readers and listening audience that the Jews were sub-human
creatures and the source of all evil ...."

Perpetrating verbal violence upon the Jews was an integral part of both the
major Hitlerian objectives of rendering the Jews socially dead (thus
preparing Germans for the still more drastic eliminationist measures) and,
by inducing them to emigrate, of reducing their influence over Germnany."

End of quote.

Now some quotes taken from Herr Rolf Tauschen's rec.games.chess.computer
postings over the last two weeks. I could have used his posts to look
equally for a barrage of verbal violence and propaganda on Ed Schroder, or
Bob Hyatt, or Bruce Morland, or others; but I chose to gather up those made
against Thorsten Czub. Why ? One reason is an interesting common thread,
Herr Tauschen never mentions Thorsten's name. Another reason ? Thorsten is
the weakest one, he does some dumb stuff, says some dumb things. Bullies
like easy targets.


Herr Tauschen's quotes (just two weeks worth):

Yes, a German neo-nazi. Schroder tried to insult me as a pig

To end the war between the supporters of a German
neo-nazi, a close friend of Schroder and Whittington

He#s an amoking
madman, your friend.

BTW I already anoounce that I will also ask you detailed questions about
all your friends posted here in the past. Also about your private
vices... I think the public has a right to know about the details of
you're being forced to hold to your friend. Because he can blackmail
you???? Chris, come out of the closet, the truth is not so bad as
lifelong slavery under such a *friend* ----------------------

neo-nazi propaganda for concentration camps in Germany again

But not in the understanding of the former German Nazi SA
of the intimate 'friend' of ChrisW

Of course he's in love with me, one could say
after hundreds of posts in my favour, but he shouldn't have another love
affair with that neo-nazi, no??

*Now* that is good news in the end. You also play chess. Not bad as
such. And you play with our neo-nazi

A German
neo-nazi, a close friend of Whittington and Schroder BTW, propagated new
concentration camps for Germany.

Of course not really Hyatt is the problem, but the dumb silent majority
of the members of the group who let it *happen* that in 1997/98 a
neo-nazi could propagate his dangerous nonsense

As long as the fascist, the criminal, the hypocritical supporters of the
neo-nazi's propaganda for new concentration camps will not correct their
scandalous injustice, the posting about their crimes will go on.

Sorry, I
forgot for a moment that he as neo-nazi must have been very happy on the
contrary. ;)


In my data I opposed the neo-nazi's
popaganda for new concentration camps in Germany. I opposed exactly one
single neo-nazi.

So,
suddenly, it's true, I had to fight three buddies.
---The neo-nazi .....

Shit Chris, as I've told you it was again the other way round. It was
the neo-nazi with his "friends" ....

Weeks after I had attacked the neo-nazi, I was
attacked by the criminal programmer

This neo-nazi wrote the most disgustful allegation about you here in the
group probably to blackmail or "out" you and you still define him as
your friend?


Either you are not lieing that you wanted to correct what was done wrong
to me or you are befriended with the neo-nazi who was the reason BTW for
all the trouble between many of us here in the group

Whittington the greates censor
fascist, then the hypocritical mediator who tries to correct and then
again the overkiller with a neo-nazi at his warmer sides.... How
disgustful.

Didn't you read what the neo-nazi wrote about your secret vices when you
were on holidays?

... dumb nuts neo-nazis dont really understand


here in the group and BTW on ccc too, you supported real neo-nazi
stuff and the neo-nazi in person


because I had attacked another German for his
neo-nazi off-topics

Last year we had a German poster who suddenly wrote off-topics about
concentration camps in Germany. He wanted to create new camps her in my
country.


Now, what I do here from time to time, is remembering the whole scandal.
That some German neo-nazi could poropagate concentration camps. But I
had not the right to criticise him. I was insulted as pig ...


but who's structure is the one of a neo-nazi. Period.


and on Monday after his return from Padeborn the
bloodhound again with phantasies abourt piss, shit and homosexual
misunderstandings against his former friend ...

End of quotes

For him Thorsten Czub is to be reduced to a 'thing', a label, a neo-nazi,
an anonymous non-human thing, a social dead, a sub-human to be thrown into
the pit of Herr Tauschen's choosing.

Here we have our writer to this newsgroup who perpetrates a "barrage of
propaganda, verbal violence with undiminished vehemance, hammered into the
heads of the listening audience". Thorsten is Herr Tauschen's very own Jew.
To be abused, humiliated, deprived of his identity - all for the pleasure
of Herr Tauschen. And he does it here, right in front of us.

Now one more quote from Herr Tauschen:

"When I read Churchills early books and then about the war it was funny
to see that he was at least as clever as H. and surely also with a
comparable genius of mind."

H. is Herr Tauschen's very own abreviation for Adolf Hitler. I expect Herr
Tauschen believes, he, himself, to be 'clever' and 'with genius of mind';
just like his H.

So, Herr Tauschen, you'ld like an answer to your question: "Why Hitler==RT
?"

Because you are the true son of the Nazis. Not Thorsten Czub, not Ed
Schroder, not Bob Hyatt, not any of those who set up CCC to be rid of your
foul diatribes, but you. You, the great projector of your own vicious
thoughts onto any poor victim you choose. You the bully. You the
humiliator. You the abuser. You the socially incompent fachidiot, highly
skilled in verbal violence, but utterly incompetent in all other forms of
human discourse and actions.

Rolf Tueschen, true son of the Nazis. You stink like rotting fish.

Chris Whittington


Rolf Tueschen

未讀,
1998年2月28日 凌晨3:00:001998/2/28
收件者:

Answer Part I
==================


"Chris Whittington" <chrisw[nospam]@cpsoft.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>Rolf Tueschen, true son of the Nazis. You stink like rotting fish.

Correction:

(1) Look into Dejas. There you'll find the name of your friend again
who propagated new concetration camps for Germany. You confuse him with
me. Chrissie.

(2) You tell the public that I stink. Ok, that's your choice. But then
tell the people the whole story, Chrissie.

Take your damned n o s e out of my ass, you gangster. +---(,-)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

PS. A brown-noser is a guy who tries to be near to his friends. But
Chris Whittington must have terribly misleaden. I declare hereby that I
did NEVER invite him to contact me...!!

>Chris Whittington


Rolf Tueschen

未讀,
1998年3月1日 凌晨3:00:001998/3/1
收件者:

Answer Part II
================


"Chris Whittington" <chrisw[nospam]@cpsoft.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>Now one more quote from Herr Tauschen:

>"When I read Churchills early books and then about the war it was funny
>to see that he was at least as clever as H. and surely also with a
>comparable genius of mind."

>H. is Herr Tauschen's very own abreviation for Adolf Hitler. I expect Herr
>Tauschen believes, he, himself, to be 'clever' and 'with genius of mind';
>just like his H.

Correction:

The little quote can be checked by every reader. I wrote it some hours
ago. But not in that way W. here quoted it in cheat.

There's Dann Corbitt who wanted to preach his wisdom about Hitler and he
said that H. was VERY intelligent. And that he (H.) had great respect
for Churchill and other leaders ...

My reply was clear. H. was NOT intelligent. But he was eidetic. Means
that he could fill or be filled up with knowledge information of all
sorts. Unfortunatelly in his case it was the wrong information. He could
reproduce his knowledge like the typical eidetic but he was not
intelligent in his own thinking that he could have seen the very wrong
of the cocluding on the base of his imported knowledge ...

Second. H. hat no respect for the western leaders.

Then I talked about Churchill, whose books I've read. Ansd I said that
C. surely also had the genius mind of H. but with an important
difference/addition. He was well educated. That's the very important
difference!

Now read what our cheat-master quoted. As if I preferred H. to
Churchill. And even more crazy, that I wanted to be seen like H. ...


Ok, I apologize for this too long post, but it's not easy to explain if
someone cheats on you. It takes time to correct. But basically it's not
a real problem. It's a pity that Chris Whittington now seems to be going
over the edge again after his week-long tries to corrump me, uhh, and to
correct the evil that was done to me. :)


Chris Whittington

未讀,
1998年3月1日 凌晨3:00:001998/3/1
收件者:


Rolf Tueschen <TUESCHEN.MEDIZ...@t-online.de> wrote in article
<6dadh4$1nt$1...@news01.btx.dtag.de>...


> Answer Part II
> ================
>
>
> "Chris Whittington" <chrisw[nospam]@cpsoft.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>

> >Now one more quote from Herr Tauschen:
>
> >"When I read Churchills early books and then about the war it was funny
> >to see that he was at least as clever as H. and surely also with a
> >comparable genius of mind."
>
> >H. is Herr Tauschen's very own abreviation for Adolf Hitler. I expect
Herr
> >Tauschen believes, he, himself, to be 'clever' and 'with genius of
mind';
> >just like his H.
>

> Correction:
>
> The little quote can be checked by every reader. I wrote it some hours
> ago. But not in that way W. here quoted it in cheat.
>

No cheat, Herr Tauschen, you nazi, user of nazi methods, idoliser of Adolf
Hilter, tormenter, humiliator, abuser, liar, false accuser, socially
incompetent fachidiot.

Have the quote again, have some more of the context around it if you like,
as if anybody can make any sense of your rambling nonsense .....


Herr Tauschen's quote embedded in yet more rantings:

You know what I wanted to know?? And really badly? How do you feel right
now. Are you really feeling still like a great expert or like a
schoolboy in moral and philosophy ...?

As far as H. looked on Churchill I remember that his mistake was exactly
that he had NO respect for him. He really believed that C. was an idiot.
But I'm not too deep in these details. The problem of H. was, and I read
volumes of his kitchen or night talks, mainly monologues for his clique,
that he felt that he was a far too clever guy for most of other humans.
Otherwise he wouldn't have talked hours and hours only to demonstrate
that he had -- sorry, it's my hobby to talk about -- 'eidetically'
enormous masses of data stored.

When I read Churchills early books and then about the war it was funny
to see that he was at least as clever as H. and surely also with a

comparable genius of mind. Only a little bit better educated at the
base! I digress.

If you really did that to enjoy the group and to lead the warriors in
direction of peace then you ,might have missed your result because if CW
is right you only tried to nail me... Let's see but I surely will have a
good laugh too. To end the war between the supporters of a German
neo-nazi, a close friend of Schroder and Whittington and a newbie who
did nothing but oppose propagation of new concentration camps -- think
of that -- in Germany you surely need more that C codes.

End of Herr Tauschen's quote.


> There's Dann Corbitt who wanted to preach his wisdom about Hitler and he
> said that H. was VERY intelligent. And that he (H.) had great respect
> for Churchill and other leaders ...
>
> My reply was clear. H. was NOT intelligent. But he was eidetic.

Sorry not in my dictionary.

> Means
> that he could fill or be filled up with knowledge information of all
> sorts. Unfortunatelly in his case it was the wrong information.

Like the Fuhrer, so Herr Tauschen. Unfortunately filled with the wrong
information. Which is then spewed out over this news group.
Rec.games.chess.computer, the Mein Kampf of Verfuhrer Tauschen.

> He could
> reproduce his knowledge like the typical eidetic but he was not
> intelligent in his own thinking that he could have seen the very wrong
> of the cocluding on the base of his imported knowledge ...

Remarkable similarities between the Fuhrer and the Verfuhrer. No, its true;
Verfuhrer Tauschen is so not very intelligent in his own thinking that he
could have seen the very wrong of the cocluding (what this, we ask
ourselves ?) on the base of his imported knowledge.

>
> Second. H. hat no respect for the western leaders.
>
> Then I talked about Churchill, whose books I've read. Ansd I said that
> C. surely also had the genius mind of H. but with an important
> difference/addition. He was well educated. That's the very important
> difference!

So we have Herr Tauschen's beloved Fuhrer, clever, with genius of mind, but
unfortunately he didn't get sent to English Public School. With an
education at Harrow, surely the Fuhrer would have been just a fine
gentleman.

Somehow, Herr Tauschen, this argument reminds me of the other German
apologist one: "Hitler was very good for Germany, really; except of course
for what happened to the Jews".

>
> Now read what our cheat-master quoted. As if I preferred H. to
> Churchill. And even more crazy, that I wanted to be seen like H. ...

Now that would be crazy. Herr Tauschen is like him, very like him; but he
doesn't indeed want to be *seen* to be like him.

But you see yourself like him, son of the Nazis, Herr Tauschen. Clever ?
Genius of Mind ? And you didn't go to English Public School either.

>
>
> Ok, I apologize for this too long post,

Liar.

1. its not long

2. you've never been known to apologise to anybosy.


> but it's not easy to explain if
> someone cheats on you.

Hey, Herr Tauschen, cheater, liar, nazi, user of nazi methods, idoliser of
Adolf Hilter, tormenter, humiliator, abuser, false accuser, socially
incompetent fachidiot; let's get it the right way round. You're the
cheater, I mean, just look in Dejas.


> It takes time to correct.

Yes, Herr Tauschen does take time to correct. That's true. The sheer volume
of Vehfuhrer Tauschen's lies and repetition slanders takes time to correct.

> But basically it's not
> a real problem. It's a pity that Chris Whittington now seems to be going
> over the edge again after his week-long tries to corrump me, uhh, and to
> correct the evil that was done to me. :)

Shucks. A real pity, eh ? Herr Tauschen, you nazi, user of nazi methods,
idoliser of Adolf Hilter, tormenter, humiliator, abuser, liar, false
accuser, socially incompetent fachidiot.


Chris Whittington


>
>
>
>

Chris Whittington

未讀,
1998年3月1日 凌晨3:00:001998/3/1
收件者:


Rolf Tueschen <TUESCHEN.MEDIZ...@t-online.de> wrote in article

<6da4pg$q12$1...@news00.btx.dtag.de>...
> Answer Part I


>
> Take your damned n o s e out of my ass, you gangster. +---(,-)
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>

For any young people who may be reading this nonsense, please be warned:

Herr Tauschen's advertising campaign for the delights of his back bottom
should be treated with severe caution.

It is possible to catch AIDS. It is possible that Herr Tauschen carries the
virus.

Stay well clear.

After all would you wish to become an infected, embittered, and twisted old
man ? Just look at Herr Tauschen, and be warned.

And for Herr Tauschen: normal chaps use their front bottom in association
with a normal girl's front bottom. I say this because you do seem to have
it all the wrong way round.

Chris Whittington


Chris Whittington

未讀,
1998年3月1日 凌晨3:00:001998/3/1
收件者:


Rolf Tueschen <TUESCHEN.MEDIZ...@t-online.de> wrote in article
<6da4pg$q12$1...@news00.btx.dtag.de>...
> Answer Part I

> ==================
>


Your answer is not satisfactory. Nothing is adressed satisfactorily. Here's
the material again, Herr Tauschen, nazi, liar, etc. etc. etc.

End of quote.

.... dumb nuts neo-nazis dont really understand

End of quotes

Chris Whittington

>

> "Chris Whittington" <chrisw[nospam]@cpsoft.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>

> >Rolf Tueschen, true son of the Nazis. You stink like rotting fish.
>

> Correction:
>
> (1) Look into Dejas. There you'll find the name of your friend again
> who propagated new concetration camps for Germany. You confuse him with
> me. Chrissie.
>
> (2) You tell the public that I stink. Ok, that's your choice. But then
> tell the people the whole story, Chrissie.
>

> Take your damned n o s e out of my ass, you gangster. +---(,-)
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>

Chris Whittington

未讀,
1998年3月1日 凌晨3:00:001998/3/1
收件者:


Rolf Tueschen <TUESCHEN.MEDIZ...@t-online.de> wrote in article

<6dadh4$1nt$1...@news01.btx.dtag.de>...
> Answer Part II
> ================
>

Your answer is not satisfactory. Nothing is adressed satisfactorily. Here's


the material again, Herr Tauschen, nazi, liar, etc. etc. etc.

The book "Hitler's Willing Executioners" by Daniel Goldhagen contains the

End of quote.

.... dumb nuts neo-nazis dont really understand

End of quotes

Chris Whittington

>

> "Chris Whittington" <chrisw[nospam]@cpsoft.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>

> >Now one more quote from Herr Tauschen:
>
> >"When I read Churchills early books and then about the war it was funny
> >to see that he was at least as clever as H. and surely also with a
> >comparable genius of mind."
>
> >H. is Herr Tauschen's very own abreviation for Adolf Hitler. I expect
Herr
> >Tauschen believes, he, himself, to be 'clever' and 'with genius of
mind';
> >just like his H.
>

> Correction:
>
> The little quote can be checked by every reader. I wrote it some hours
> ago. But not in that way W. here quoted it in cheat.
>

> There's Dann Corbitt who wanted to preach his wisdom about Hitler and he
> said that H. was VERY intelligent. And that he (H.) had great respect
> for Churchill and other leaders ...
>

> My reply was clear. H. was NOT intelligent. But he was eidetic. Means


> that he could fill or be filled up with knowledge information of all

> sorts. Unfortunatelly in his case it was the wrong information. He could


> reproduce his knowledge like the typical eidetic but he was not
> intelligent in his own thinking that he could have seen the very wrong
> of the cocluding on the base of his imported knowledge ...
>

> Second. H. hat no respect for the western leaders.
>
> Then I talked about Churchill, whose books I've read. Ansd I said that
> C. surely also had the genius mind of H. but with an important
> difference/addition. He was well educated. That's the very important
> difference!
>

> Now read what our cheat-master quoted. As if I preferred H. to
> Churchill. And even more crazy, that I wanted to be seen like H. ...
>
>

> Ok, I apologize for this too long post, but it's not easy to explain if
> someone cheats on you. It takes time to correct. But basically it's not

Robert Hyatt

未讀,
1998年3月1日 凌晨3:00:001998/3/1
收件者:

Chris Whittington <chrisw[nospam]@cpsoft.demon.co.uk> wrote:


: Rolf Tueschen <TUESCHEN.MEDIZ...@t-online.de> wrote in article


: <6dadh4$1nt$1...@news01.btx.dtag.de>...
:> Answer Part II
:> ================
:>

: Your answer is not satisfactory. Nothing is adressed satisfactorily. Here's
: the material again, Herr Tauschen, nazi, liar, etc. etc. etc.

You are wasting your time. *nothing* wil be addressed satisfactorily by
him. It's his very nature...

Rolf Tueschen

未讀,
1998年3月1日 凌晨3:00:001998/3/1
收件者:

Attention:

This post should NOT be read by under 25 y. old muckers.


"Chris Whittington" <chrisw[nospam]@cpsoft.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>Rolf Tueschen <TUESCHEN.MEDIZ...@t-online.de> wrote in article

><6da4pg$q12$1...@news00.btx.dtag.de>...
>> Answer Part I
>>

>> Take your damned n o s e out of my ass, you gangster. +---(,-)
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>

>For any young people who may be reading this nonsense, please be warned:

>Herr Tauschen's advertising campaign for the delights of his back bottom
>should be treated with severe caution.

>It is possible to catch AIDS.

What a nonsense.

Correction:

Chris Whittington wooed me since several weeks, but I had politely to
reject his obsene idea.

Now he's somewhat down mentally/emotionally.

While his neo-nazi friend was for weeks no topic between the two of us,
he was fed up with him, he now suddenly turned round again and returned
to his neo-nazi. Now suddenly I should *stink* like a beast again.

Well, friends, I was at first a little bit disturbed. Because I use the
most lovable eau-de-cologne. How could Chis still smell some
stink/stunk??

But then -- please excuse all the details, but such is life -- after a
successful event on the toilette I had the saving idea. There's only one
single lieu of 'me' body where Chrissie might have smelled/sniffed the
terrible stunk. And I know for sure that Chrissie has a certain organ to
be able to detect such chemical odors.

So, to prevent a lesson about Chrissie's horrible defect/addiction (also
called brown-nosing...) I told him to eff off out off my effice...


Now Chrissie in his desperate attempt to get rid of the horrible stunk
on/in his nose tried to spread rumour about possible virus illnesses he
might have caught during his stay in my po-sterior ...
Maybe he has some ulcers on the nose already...?

Therefore I declare hereby:

Chrissie is master of *his* nose, not me.
My shit is completely virus-free.
Extremely extended brown-nosing causes by force a somewhat hurt nose.
But that illness should be non-fatal.


As sort of little love-song for my former lover and now re-lover of the
neo-nazi ... comes here to the consolation of all left-behinds in the
world. [NOT.]


It goes like this:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Inflammation of the foreskin
reminds me of your smile
I've had ballanital chancroids
for quite a little while
I gave my heart to CW/NSU
that lovely night in January/June
I ache for you my darling
And I hope you get well soon.

My penile warts, your herpes
my syphillitic sores
Your moenelial infection
how I miss you more and more
Your dobie's itch my scrumpox
our lovely gonorrhea
At least we both were lying
when we said we were clear.

Our syphilitic kisses
sealed the secret of our tryst
You gave me scrotal pustules
with a quick flick of your wrist
Your trichovaginitis
sent shivers down my spine
I got snail tracks in my anus
when your spirochetes met mine.

[..]

My heart is very tender
though my parts are awful raw
You might have been infected
but you never were a bore
I'm dying of your love my love
I'm your spirochaetal clown
I've left my body to the science
but I'm afraid they've
turned it down.

Gonoccocal urethritis, streptococcal
ballinitis, Meningo myelitis,
diplococcal cephalitis, Epididimitis,
uterstitial keratitis, Syphilitic
choroiditis, and anterior u-ve-i-tis.

[1998 Mar 1 ------> G.C./E.I./J.D.P.]


Chris Whittington

未讀,
1998年3月1日 凌晨3:00:001998/3/1
收件者:


Robert Hyatt <hy...@cis.uab.edu> wrote in article
<6dc187$cfu$2...@juniper.cis.uab.edu>...


> Chris Whittington <chrisw[nospam]@cpsoft.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>

> : Rolf Tueschen <TUESCHEN.MEDIZ...@t-online.de> wrote in


article
> : <6dadh4$1nt$1...@news01.btx.dtag.de>...
> :> Answer Part II
> :> ================
> :>
>
>
>
> : Your answer is not satisfactory. Nothing is adressed satisfactorily.
Here's
> : the material again, Herr Tauschen, nazi, liar, etc. etc. etc.
>
>
>

> You are wasting your time. *nothing* wil be addressed satisfactorily by
> him. It's his very nature...
>

I disagree.

Maybe he won't address the issues satisfactorily. Probably he won't.
However, he has the opportunity to do so.

Rolf swims in the sea of rgcc. If you've read your Chairman Mao, unlikely,
in your case :) you'ld know that he needs some friendly other fish. If he
can't address the issues, publicly, clearly, in full view, he'll be unable
to keep swimming. To determine that is why I am challenging him.

It may be that, in the end, he can show that he is a reasonable person, and
that all the chaos and unpleasantness was caused by others. Maybe. We'll
see.

Chris Whittington


Chris Whittington

未讀,
1998年3月1日 凌晨3:00:001998/3/1
收件者:


Rolf Tueschen <TUESCHEN.MEDIZ...@t-online.de> wrote in article

<6dbus6$7i0$1...@news02.btx.dtag.de>...

[ much nonsense, attempts to divert attention, and general smut snipped ]

Herr Tauschen, I'ld like to draw your attention again to the material below
......

End of quote.

.... dumb nuts neo-nazis dont really understand

mclane

未讀,
1998年3月1日 凌晨3:00:001998/3/1
收件者:

"Chris Whittington" <chrisw[nospam]@cpsoft.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>End of quotes

>For him Thorsten Czub is to be reduced to a 'thing', a label, a neo-nazi,
>an anonymous non-human thing, a social dead, a sub-human to be thrown into
>the pit of Herr Tauschen's choosing.

And all because I did not helped him to fight HIS war against my
friend Ed as he requested me to do so.

>Because you are the true son of the Nazis. Not Thorsten Czub, not Ed
>Schroder, not Bob Hyatt, not any of those who set up CCC to be rid of your
>foul diatribes, but you.

I guess it is obvious that tueschen is ill.
The desease is to attack people all over this newsgroup for 2 years by
now.

>You, the great projector of your own vicious
>thoughts onto any poor victim you choose. You the bully. You the
>humiliator. You the abuser. You the socially incompent fachidiot, highly
>skilled in verbal violence, but utterly incompetent in all other forms of
>human discourse and actions.

Right. He is unable to live in a social group. He is therefore
asocial !
Instead of sharing what we all share, nice and friendly and with joy,
he has to attack people.
he is asocial.
He will never understand the concept of friendship. And he has no
friends.
He knows this. This is the source of his HATE against all groups. He
attacks us as a group because we ARE a social group.
WE are his enemies because we have something he will never get:
social acceptance and group spirit, joy and good feelings for friends.
Human interactions. He cannot joy them because he is full of hatred.

>Rolf Tueschen, true son of the Nazis. You stink like rotting fish.

>Chris Whittington

Chris, you proved it. Can we now come to another topic and concentrate
on computerchess again ?
How is your program doing ?

J...@suffolk.lib

未讀,
1998年3月2日 凌晨3:00:001998/3/2
收件者:

On Sun, 01 Mar 1998 12:12:32 GMT, "Chris Whittington"
<chrisw[nospam]@cpsoft.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>
>
>Rolf Tueschen <TUESCHEN.MEDIZ...@t-online.de> wrote in article

><6da4pg$q12$1...@news00.btx.dtag.de>...
>> Answer Part I
>>
>> Take your damned n o s e out of my ass, you gangster. +---(,-)
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>
>For any young people who may be reading this nonsense, please be warned:
>
>Herr Tauschen's advertising campaign for the delights of his back bottom
>should be treated with severe caution.
>

>It is possible to catch AIDS. It is possible that Herr Tauschen carries the
>virus.
>
>Stay well clear.
>
>After all would you wish to become an infected, embittered, and twisted old
>man ? Just look at Herr Tauschen, and be warned.
>
>And for Herr Tauschen: normal chaps use their front bottom in association
>with a normal girl's front bottom. I say this because you do seem to have
>it all the wrong way round.
>
>Chris Whittington

I am bothering to reply to this offensive tripe only because I feel
that there is some hope that I'm not just wasting my digital energy.
I am not alone in being disappointed that RT's attacks have alienated
most of the computer chess experts whose posts I come here to read.
But I have long recognized that a polite request for him to refrain
from such vitriol _would_ be a waste of energy.

By sinking to the level that you did in the above post, you are only
making things worse for the rest of us (and hardly bothering Rolf, I
might add). I welcome your posts on computer chess, as I would those
of Ed, Enrique, and many other luminaries who used to enlighten me
regularly.

Instead of giving "an eye for an eye", I plead for you to "rise
above".


Regards,

Jon


Chris Whittington

未讀,
1998年3月2日 凌晨3:00:001998/3/2
收件者:


J...@suffolk.lib wrote in article <34fb4935...@newshost.li.net>...

Yup, you're quite right.

Problem is this: one can present Rolf with perfectly lucid arguments or
questions, but, to avoid answering he uses the Idi Amin / Colonel Gaddafi /
Saddam Hussein approach (also the approach of the chess player in a
materially lost position), which is to complicate, change the subject,
bring up irrelevancies, attack the messenger, goard, insult - or generally
to move the discussion, gently or abruptly, into the gutter.

One has various choices at this point:

1. You can follow him in there

2. You can insist on restoring the original agenda

3. You can decide its not worth carrying on and stop


In the case of (1), you just end up demeaned, sure.
In the case of (2), you have a fight on your hands, because he's going to
resist
In the case of (3), no individual ever makes a stand against him, and he
ends up polluting the news group forever.

Whatever you do , if you've ever stood against him, you can look forward,
like Bob Hyatt, Ed Schroder, Thorsten Czub and others, to a never ending
stream of insults, diatribes, verbal violence, propaganda, lies, in much
the same mode as that perpetrated by the nazis onto the Jews, with the same
intention, as has already been described.

And, you're not the only one to make the above suggestion. I think the
private email count, of 'stop arguing with him, there's no purpose, rise
above him' is running at about 10-0 in favour of stopping.

So, ok, I'll limit myself to one-off analysis of his behaviour. He has no
answer to the initial analysis over Thorsten Czub, so I'll take that as
case proved.

In due course I'll be analysing his behaviour and attitudes concerning Bob
Hyatt; with some reflections on what that has to tell us of RT's
'personality'.

With apologies to you all as I pick myself out of the gutter :)

Chris Whittington

> Regards,
>
> Jon
>
>

Rolf Tueschen

未讀,
1998年3月2日 凌晨3:00:001998/3/2
收件者:

Answer Part III
===============

"Chris Whittington" <chrisw[nospam]@cpsoft.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>[..] is to be reduced to a 'thing', a label, a neo-nazi,


>an anonymous non-human thing, a social dead, a sub-human to be thrown into
>the pit of Herr Tauschen's choosing.

Correction:

° The notion neo-nazi is not a label. It's a quote of a confession of
the neo-nazi himself. A quote BTW provided by Chris Whittington.

° The notion 'thing' is an exact quote out of the vocabulary of the
neo-nazi, your warm friend, but I for one never used it for a human
being. Period.

° The idea of concentration camps is inhuman. So there're reasonable
doubts if the human that propagated such inhuman tools is a really
*human* human being. The German Law has clear paragraphes for the like
ideas and the neo-nazis.

° Of course the neo-nazi is not alone. He has a social environment, a
clique. Here on the net e.g. the founder group of censors in CCC in the
US commercial server ICD of Tim Mirabile and Steven Schwartz.

° Neo-nazis in Germany are NOT thrown into the pit. But they get their
fair trial.


It's funny how the expressions reveal the supporter of the neo-nazi.
It's the language of the nazis. *They* threw humans into the pit. Not
the critiques. It's a special perversion of Chris Whittington to turn
round the facts. Fortunately they are all saved in Dejas.

Chris Whittington wanted to make all that out of *me*. A pityful,
outsider species, without human values, sort of social vermin. As the
neo-nazi and clique considered --- ready to be killed (!) by a vet.
Even dear gasolining Alabama Bob had some mercy. He wanted to sent me
only to Dr.Death KERVOKIAN ...


PS.

Thanks Chris for the helpful support unintentionally. So I could clarify
many important points. Please post more...

As promissed I will send you the wording of the neo-nazi's homosexual
blackmailing idea about our marriage ...


Rolf Tueschen

未讀,
1998年3月2日 凌晨3:00:001998/3/2
收件者:

"Chris Whittington" <chrisw[nospam]@cpsoft.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>so I'll take that as case proved.

So we have again the situation of last November. When nobody resisted
you in the group against your fascist censorship. You yourself called
this later her in rgcc and in private email a "scandal", a very "wrong"
injustice. And you shocked the group with your idea to correct the wrong
you've done to me.

Now again you want to lead the masses (!) into another / the same
injustice. You have proven *nothing*, but your verdict is the same.

You replied on not a single objection I made against your weak
presentation of white-washing a proven neo-nazi into a "Jew"-victim.

The ham-act itself speaks against you. And Dejas will keep the record of
the accomplice of the criminal Schroder, the father of REBEL.


>In due course I'll be analysing his behaviour and attitudes concerning Bob
>Hyatt; with some reflections on what that has to tell us of RT's
>'personality'.

Would you mind to add please the ideas you wrote about Alabama Bob? I
mean the ideas hidden in private emails? BTW you didn't answer my
question related to the neo-nazi, your friend.

>With apologies to you all as I pick myself out of the gutter :)

Why using smileys. Do you still think that the members of the group
think you ever were *out* of it? I tried for some weeks now to socialize
you for a productive cooperation in an expert's group. I still wished
you could succeed, but the doubts, alas, grow constantly...


>Chris Whittington


Chris Whittington

未讀,
1998年3月2日 凌晨3:00:001998/3/2
收件者:


Rolf Tueschen <TUESCHEN.MEDIZ...@t-online.de> wrote in article

[ snipped ]

The last word is yours .........

Chris Whittington


Don Getkey

未讀,
1998年3月3日 凌晨3:00:001998/3/3
收件者:

In article <01bd4506$afa09920$c308...@cpsoft.demon.co.uk>, "Chris Whittington"
<chrisw[nospam]@cpsoft.demon.co.uk> writes:

>Herr Tauschen, you nazi, user of nazi methods,
idoliser of Adolf Hilter,
>tormenter, humiliator, abuser, liar, false
accuser, socially incompetent
>fachidiot.


Chris Whittington

========================================================

Well, well, well, look what we have here. Finally, confirmation of what I have
always thought about Rolf since his first slur here on rgcc. Way to hit the
nail on the head Chris!

Turns out Rolf is betrayed for what he is by the very method he uses. I.e.
Nazi propaganda/brainwashing. Not a very creditable tool for someone to use
while they accuse various other reputable people as being "Nazi-like", is it
Rolf.

At long last the jig is up! You will from now on, and forever more be
recognized for what you truly are (unless you repent and confess Christ as
your Lord and Savior that is), "Herr Tauschen, you nazi, user of nazi
methods,idoliser of Adolf Hilter, tormenter, humiliator, abuser, liar, false
accuser, socially incompetent fachidiot."

Repent sinner! He (God) is your only hope.

yours in chess,
Don

Coon Rapids MN USA

Rolf Tueschen

未讀,
1998年3月3日 凌晨3:00:001998/3/3
收件者:

dong...@aol.com (Don Getkey) wrote:

>>Herr Tauschen, you nazi, user of nazi methods,
>idoliser of Adolf Hilter,
>>tormenter, humiliator, abuser, liar, false
>accuser, socially incompetent
>>fachidiot.

>Chris Whittington

>Well, well, well, look what we have here. Finally, confirmation of what I have


>always thought about Rolf since his first slur here on rgcc. Way to hit the
>nail on the head Chris!

I know it's a waste of time, but I would never give up hope that also
you in particular could understand the difference between a
confirmation, a proof with evidence, and pure insinuations, allegations.
Chris is a very powerful speaker but he as accomplice of the criminal
Schroder and warm friend of the neo-nazi, --Schroder and the neo-nazi
both responsible for the whole scandal in rgcc about concentration camps
and neo-nazi support --, is not able to provide the needed evidential
proof.


>Turns out Rolf is betrayed for what he is by the very method he uses. I.e.
>Nazi propaganda/brainwashing. Not a very creditable tool for someone to use
>while they accuse various other reputable people as being "Nazi-like", is it
>Rolf.


Nonsense, if the police is accusing a criminal on the base of facts and
evidence the police itself is NOT using false/disrespectful methods. If
I declare a hundred times that a neo-nazi who wants to install new
concentration camps for Germany, then I'm not using nazi methods. How
could I?


>At long last the jig is up! You will from now on, and forever more be
>recognized for what you truly are (unless you repent and confess Christ as

>your Lord and Savior that is), "Herr Tauschen, you nazi, user of nazi
>methods,idoliser of Adolf Hilter, tormenter, humiliator, abuser, liar, false
>accuser, socially incompetent fachidiot."

How do you know what I am? What Chris never has proven I should be in
his eyes? Or do you have your own evidence?

>Repent sinner! He (God) is your only hope.

Not that I wanted to test another time your own integrity ----, but all
I know, I assume that I'm not a real expert, but Christian religion is
not defined by an accomplice of the criminal Schroder, named _Chris_,
but by someone called Christ. Jesus Christ. And one thing further I
also know that is the philistines and hypocrites were not pro but contra
Jesus. And assuming that Mr. Getkey is at least a hypocrite leads me to
the idea that will contact him (God), but I will not hurry because did
not commit the sins I'm accused of.


And finally I still have my personal confessor, Mr.Frick., don't forget
him. ;-)


0 則新訊息