Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Advanced Civilization (Board Game)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Stephane Di Cesare  
View profile  
 More options Jul 5 1997, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: rec.games.board
From: cie96...@student2.lth.se (Stephane Di Cesare)
Date: 1997/07/05
Subject: Re: Advanced Civilization (Board Game)

On Mon, 30 Jun 1997 13:39:37 -0700, Edward <edw...@largesoft.com> wrote:
>Hmm.  9 cities is 9 cities.  How can one "look much less dangerous" than
>another?  I'd argue that a 9 city Crete is more dangerous, in that Crete
>is far more mobile, due to all those fleets.  The lower AST advancement

I meant, subjectively. Crete's territories are smaller, so even a strong
Crete doesn't eat up half of the board space, like a strong Egypt or a
strong Babylon do, because their territories are bigger.

So as Crete looks smaller than it actually is, it ends up with less
calamity secondary effects.

Stephane Di Cesare

Lund University - Computational Linguistics
Sweden


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.