Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Candyland Strategy & Tactics
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  7 messages - Expand all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Richard Irving  
View profile  
 More options Oct 4 1996, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: rec.games.board
From: Richard Irving <m...@pge.com>
Date: 1996/10/04
Subject: Candyland Strategy & Tactics

After taking some very fine LSD, a few buddies from work & I
set to the task of developing a very workable simulation with
the old Milton Bradley Candyland game components, and a
few contemporary additions...

The basic game board is set up as a concentration camp with
various ethnic groups in chains, starving, etc. We brought
them in by rails using the 18xx system. Then, using weapons
from ASL, we exterminated the prisoners and ate all the candy.

It was a shame my freinds had to go back to work at the nuclear
power plant.
--

Richard Irving     r...@pge.com

I don't like disclaimers, but I have to put them in.  The opinions here
are my own and not necessarily PG&E's.
(As if it had any opinions about this stuff!)

Made with recycled electrons.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "More for the Peterson files Was: Candyland Strategy & Tactics" by RICHARD IRVING
RICHARD IRVING  
View profile  
 More options Oct 4 1996, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: rec.games.board
From: r...@pge.com (RICHARD IRVING)
Date: 1996/10/04
Subject: More for the Peterson files Was: Candyland Strategy & Tactics

Hey, Scott.  I didn't know you liked me so much.  (At least you could
have gotten my address right!)  Here is the reference line of your
original post:

--->  References: <5328l0$...@s10.mcn.org>

Since you are the only person at mcn.org that might want to libel me as
you have Brian Bankler and Bob Ruth, it wasn't too hard to find out who
did this.

Richard Irving (m...@pge.com) wrote:

: After taking some very fine LSD, a few buddies from work & I

Note:  I do not and have never taken LSD.  And I think Candyland is a
fine game as is for the people it is intended for.

Rest of post deleted--no use to repeat it.

--

Richard Irving     r...@pge.com

I don't like disclaimers, but I have to put them in.  The opinions here
are my own and not necessarily PG&E's.
(As if it had any opinions about this stuff!)

Made with recycled electrons.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Candyland Strategy & Tactics" by RICHARD IRVING
RICHARD IRVING  
View profile  
 More options Oct 4 1996, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: rec.games.board
From: r...@pge.com (RICHARD IRVING)
Date: 1996/10/04
Subject: Re: Candyland Strategy & Tactics

The REAL Richard Irving here.  

Scot, if you were going to forge me,  you
should have at least got my e-mail address right.

That being said, I did not write that offensive garbage and I have sent
it to postmas...@mcn.org for their attention.

Richard Irving (m...@pge.com) wrote:

: After taking some very fine LSD, a few buddies from work & I

Rest of post deleted.  No need to repeat it.

--

Richard Irving     r...@pge.com

I don't like disclaimers, but I have to put them in.  The opinions here
are my own and not necessarily PG&E's.
(As if it had any opinions about this stuff!)

Made with recycled electrons.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Gregory Nelson  
View profile  
 More options Oct 5 1996, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: rec.games.board
From: nels...@winternet.com (Gregory Nelson)
Date: 1996/10/05
Subject: Re: Candyland Strategy & Tactics

Here's some *real* content regarding Candyland strategy and
tactics, from a few years back.

In one of those syndicated "parenting" newspaper columns, a
distraught mother wrote in. It seems that she had caught
her 5-year-old daughter stacking the Candyland deck
so that she would always beat her friends. The mother
was worried about having such a dishonest kid.

The advice? Commend her daughter for having the intelligence to
be able to stack the deck, then point out how she is taking
away from the fun of her friends by not playing fairly. At that
age, the daughter wasn't taking into account the feelings
and wishes of the other players, so she wouldn't think
she was doing anything wrong.

Now that I think of it, game players of *all* ages could learn
something from that story.

Greg Nelson
nels...@winternet.com


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "More for the Peterson files Was: Candyland Strategy & Tactics" by Danny Holte
Danny Holte  
View profile  
 More options Oct 5 1996, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: rec.games.board
From: dann...@earthlink.net (Danny Holte)
Date: 1996/10/05
Subject: Re: More for the Peterson files Was: Candyland Strategy & Tactics

r...@pge.com (RICHARD IRVING) wrote:
>Hey, Scott.  I didn't know you liked me so much.  (At least you could
>have gotten my address right!)  Here is the reference line of your
>original post:
>--->  References: <5328l0$...@s10.mcn.org>

Richard,

Am I right in thinking that this guy used _your_ name, and publically stated
that he used LSD, etc., also in your name?   And he owns a company? (..or very
soon, maybe not)  I didn't see the original post.

Do you know a good lawyer?

-Danny


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Candyland Strategy & Tactics" by RICHARD IRVING
RICHARD IRVING  
View profile  
 More options Oct 7 1996, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: rec.games.board
From: r...@pge.com (RICHARD IRVING)
Date: 1996/10/07
Subject: Re: Candyland Strategy & Tactics

Gregory Nelson (nels...@winternet.com) wrote:

: Here's some *real* content regarding Candyland strategy and
: tactics, from a few years back.

: In one of those syndicated "parenting" newspaper columns, a
: distraught mother wrote in. It seems that she had caught
: her 5-year-old daughter stacking the Candyland deck
: so that she would always beat her friends. The mother
: was worried about having such a dishonest kid.

: The advice? Commend her daughter for having the intelligence to
: be able to stack the deck, then point out how she is taking
: away from the fun of her friends by not playing fairly. At that
: age, the daughter wasn't taking into account the feelings
: and wishes of the other players, so she wouldn't think
: she was doing anything wrong.

That mirrors my opinion.  The most important thing that games teach is
playing by the rules and sportsmanship.

: Now that I think of it, game players of *all* ages could learn
: something from that story.

I think most of the gamers here play games to enjoy themselves.  The
enjoyment comes from the challenge more than just winning.  A close
well-played game that I have lost has often given me more enjoyment than
winning a game in a blow out.

Occasionally some people engage in "rules lawyering":  (i.e. looking for
loopholes in the rules for every advantage), but most people want to
simply get the rules correct as the designer of the game intended.
--

Richard Irving     r...@pge.com

I don't like disclaimers, but I have to put them in.  The opinions here
are my own and not necessarily PG&E's.
(As if it had any opinions about this stuff!)

Made with recycled electrons.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
ABTreon  
View profile  
 More options Oct 16 1996, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: rec.games.board
From: abtr...@aol.com (ABTreon)
Date: 1996/10/16
Subject: Re: Candyland Strategy & Tactics

I have lost my copy of the rules for "Campaign Game" Candyland .Also,
could someone e-mail me a copy of the Morale Ratings for "Shutes and
Ladders-Solitaire"


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google