Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
rec.games.backgammon
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Backgame Question
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
chessart  
View profile  
 More options Apr 28 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
From: chess...@feist.com
Date: 1998/04/28
Subject: Backgame Question
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

In the 1974 book How Good Are You At Backgammon, the authors Nicolaos and
Vassilios Tzannes rate the backgames as follows:  1 and 3 points, 1 and 2
points, 2 and 3 points, 2 and 4 points, 3 and 4 points, 1 and 4 points, 3 and
5 points.

I was under the impression that the 1 and 2 points was not a good backgame
position.  Could the experts please give their opinions on how the different
backgames rank?

Jerry Weaver

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/   Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google