Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
From: Walt <walt_ask...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 21:58:53 -0400
Local: Sun, Apr 1 2012 9:58 pm
Subject: Re: why didn't it double?
On 3/31/2012 5:09 PM, badgolferman wrote:
> I was ahead 6 games to 1 and lost the Jacoby game to make it 6 games to
No, gnubg didn't know what was coming - gnu doesn't know what rolls are
> 2. I started off with a 5-2 roll. GNUBG did not double but started > off with a double 5 to kill my two blots in it's home board. Why > didn't GNUBG double before it rolled? Did it know what was coming? > GNU Backgammon Position ID: M07wATDg8+ABYA
coming any more than you do. After the 5-2 opening, it saw that you were ~51% to win and evaluated
It also understood that even if it rolled it's best number (and 55 is
The main issue is that your takepoint at odd-away post-Crawford is
See http://www.bkgm.com/faq/Matches.html#what_is_the_trick_
Bottom line at post crawford
1) if your opponent is an even number away, drop anything less than 50%
Look at what happens if you dance:
GNU Backgammon Position ID: 4PPgAWAzTvABMA
Cube analysis
In this position, gnu has rolled its best number and you rolled your
Post-Crawford odd-away, it's going to wait until it has market losers to
//Walt
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||