Received: by 10.68.129.169 with SMTP id nx9mr6568012pbb.2.1330371293491;
        Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:34:53 -0800 (PST)
Path: h9ni16218pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!k29g2000yqc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Nick Bentley <nickobe...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.games.abstract
Subject: Re: New Game: Magnapoco
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:34:44 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <33ff7e28-119b-4ce0-aed0-37fe8b1dc7f0@k29g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
References: <51c92465-8b42-4d30-8689-7c68751adcbb@f5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
 <b4f5accf-bafd-4191-a299-252e56078f73@eb6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <31fe4d57-d92e-4d19-8016-46502ed248ee@j5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
 <74090c0b-5693-44f8-bef5-da9a5d6e44a7@b18g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>
 <ade9f217-570c-43ac-adb8-45229f301f3c@p13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
 <d299e4dd-8f3d-49b1-8cb2-c3e38631bc5f@p6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <a0298517-9c4e-46e7-a203-6dd625263932@l7g2000vbw.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.175.148.65
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1330371289 17349 127.0.0.1 (27 Feb 2012 19:34:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:34:49 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: k29g2000yqc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.175.148.65; posting-account=SwPjaAoAAADVqNYW_3ZxV3-hmrTaaBj-
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like
 Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.56 Safari/535.11,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

> Actually, it means the player with the bigger group wins.

Ok, it looks like I got my thoughts mixed up instead of my words. In
any case, my concern is the same either way. When both players end up
with only one group, one will win, and that fact might incentivize one
player to try to win that way.

Although it doesn't feel right to me now, it might not be a bad thing,
however. I've no idea. I need to play much more.