Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Media speculation: Obama/Hagel ticket?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

risky biz

unread,
May 13, 2008, 10:55:34 AM5/13/08
to
I'd vote for that. I probably wouldn't vote for Obama/Clinton. In fact,
I'm sure I wouldn't. Clinton is worse than McCain.

Obama/Hagel is pretty unlikely, though. Hagel would be good as Secretary
of State.

____________________________________________________________________ 
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com


Scott/sjakma

unread,
May 13, 2008, 11:09:31 AM5/13/08
to
On May 13 2008 10:55 AM, risky biz wrote:

> I'd vote for that. I probably wouldn't vote for Obama/Clinton. In fact,
> I'm sure I wouldn't. Clinton is worse than McCain.
>
> Obama/Hagel is pretty unlikely, though. Hagel would be good as Secretary
> of State.


Hagel would not be a bad idea. One name that has been popping up all over
the place is Jim Webb. While he is very popular he does not have the
experience that Obama needs as a VP candidate. Personally, I would like
to see an Obama / Richardson ticket.

_______________________________________________________________________ 
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com

K9way

unread,
May 13, 2008, 2:19:24 PM5/13/08
to
On May 13 2008 9:55 AM, risky biz wrote:

> I'd vote for that. I probably wouldn't vote for Obama/Clinton. In fact,
> I'm sure I wouldn't. Clinton is worse than McCain.
>
> Obama/Hagel is pretty unlikely, though. Hagel would be good as Secretary
> of State.

TED STRICKLAND FROM OHIO.IT IS THE ONLY WAY HE CAN CARRY THAT STATE FULL
OR MORONS

_______________________________________________________________________ 
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com

Pepe Papon

unread,
May 15, 2008, 3:18:06 AM5/15/08
to
On Tue, 13 May 2008 08:09:31 -0700, "Scott/sjakma"
<sc...@scottadams.com> wrote:

>On May 13 2008 10:55 AM, risky biz wrote:
>
>> I'd vote for that. I probably wouldn't vote for Obama/Clinton. In fact,
>> I'm sure I wouldn't. Clinton is worse than McCain.
>>
>> Obama/Hagel is pretty unlikely, though. Hagel would be good as Secretary
>> of State.
>
>
>Hagel would not be a bad idea. One name that has been popping up all over
>the place is Jim Webb. While he is very popular he does not have the
>experience that Obama needs as a VP candidate. Personally, I would like
>to see an Obama / Richardson ticket.

Obama/Richrdson makes a lot of sense.

Irish Mike

unread,
May 15, 2008, 5:51:30 AM5/15/08
to

"Pepe Papon" <se...@sethjackson.net> wrote in message
news:qson24d7eg8os56im...@4ax.com...

I don't think Edwards endorsed him for free. I'd say Richardson and Edwards
both have first class seats on the Obama gravy train - assuming he wins. Of
course, if by some miracle Hillary wins....

Irish Mike


Pepe Papon

unread,
May 16, 2008, 4:19:47 AM5/16/08
to

Edwards doesn't provide much benefit to Obama. Richardson is a
Southwestern governor with executive experience and he's Hispanic.

0 new messages