Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion What the hell?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Jon Eaton  
View profile  
 More options Mar 2 2004, 2:58 am
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
From: "Jon Eaton" <acesfullrem...@mchsi.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 07:58:50 GMT
Local: Tues, Mar 2 2004 2:58 am
Subject: Re: What the hell?
    Bla bla bla, he called all-in with the sucker end of the straight
because "it would have been bad poker to fold."  That's all I need.

    Jon

"Benji026" <benji...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:fb9c7001.0403012349.424f728a@posting.google.com...
> This article has got to be the most ignorant piece of trash ever
> written.

> http://www.improving.org/paulp/poker/biz2.0-poker.html

> Just because you graduated with an engineering degree doesn't mean you
> are any better than any other poker player. I hate how they make Mel
> Judah and TJ Cloutier out to be really stupid just because of their
> academic background. I'm sure they know just as much poker math, if
> not more, than Paul Phillips.

> "But as Phillips continues his routine, cupping his hands over his
> cards for another peek, the complex workings of his mind reflect
> subtler ways that technology is transforming the world of poker."

> Does anyone else say WTF when they read this?

> "Phillips quickly calls and, the betting done, flips over his two
> queens. Seed shows king-jack and has to hope for a miracle."

> I don't think 33% chance of winning qualifies as a miracle...however
> the 77's against Cloutier's jacks does

> They also say Chip Jett looks like a "back-alley punk".

> "A lot of the younger guys, like Ferguson and myself, approach the
> game from a mathematical angle," Phillips says. "It's game theory.
> Basically, it comes down to modeling your opponent, assessing
> percentages of the time they do particular actions, and then applying
> the exploitive counterstrategy."

> Paul Phillips isnt doing anything new...A lot of the older guys have
> been doing this for years, its called looking for betting patterns.

> just wanted to get this out of my system, I had to vent after reading
> this very arrogant and snobby article, let me know what you guys
> think...


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google