Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Oh, Risky Biz
30 views
Skip to first unread message
Travel A
Dec 2, 2011, 11:53:25 AM12/2/11
to
Below is a post from Risky Biz, (the dumbfuck who's posting under the
fake username, "da pickel," as usual) and my reply.
Note my prediction.
However, although my analysis and prediction is spot-on, it's really not
the main point. The important thing is the fun of kicking Risky Biz'
ass, again.
As a dumbfuck, Risky Biz has repeatedly posted-blithered about how he's
going to come out of his hole and gloat when, Romney, (who, according to
Risky biz, can't lose), is the nominee.
I've provided the latest polls, (below) beginning after the above
mentioned, pasted-up-post.
Just wondering how confident Risky Biz is exactly at this point
(chortle).
I mean, it's really going to suck for Risky Biz when I post, repeatedly,
all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts after Romney loses.
(begin post)............................................................
On Nov 8, 11:59 am, Travel <nine...@webtv.net> wrote:
> On Nov 7, 7:09 pm, da pickle <jcpick...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Risky Biz blithered:
> > I probably won’t bother watching the rest of the debates.
It’s over
> > now. Romney will be the nominee and the election will be a coin flip
> > depending on how voters perceive the economy. Not really very
> > interesting anymore.
I wrote:
> You don't think Newt has a chance? 75% of the Republican electorate is
> looking for a "not Romney" candidate.
>
> Newt's, previously, been one of the "ignored, far-end-of-the-stage
> candidates" at the debates.
>
> Newt's been polling in thid place, lately.
>
> The more air-time Newt gets in the debates, the higher he goes up in
> the polls. The higher he goes up in the polls, the closer he gets to
> the center stage position and gets more questions and competes head-on
> with Romney.
>
> If Cain takes a swan dive, figure it out. Newt's sure to be light-
> years beyond, Rick/Cain, in debating Romney.
>
> If a candidate who's strong enough to break the conservative-split,
> surges in the polls to, say, a sustainable 10 point lead, Mittens is
> toast: Rick would have done this if it weren't for his brain-lock
> perfomances in the debates.
>
> Cain wasn't nearly strong enough to do this even at his peak, so I'm
> not too concerned if he tanks.
>
> Also, the more candidates to drop out, the worse for Romney.
..................................................................
(end post)
And here's the ass-kicking fun part:
Republican Primary canadidates Election Poll:
Newt 38%- Romny 17%
http://www.google.com/gwt/x?source=m&u=http%3A%2F%2Frace42012.com/2011/12/01/poll-watch-rasmussen-2012-republican-nomination-survey-8/&wsi=54bec16f6e6b565c&ei=f9jYTvWUOYrbmgelssjJCQ&wsc=vb
.................................................................
Newt v. Obama, General Election Poll:
Newt 45%- Obama 43%
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/2012_presidential_matchups
............................
Iowa Caucus Poll:
Newt 32%- Romney 19%
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/iowa/2012_iowa_republican_caucus
..........................................
New Hampshire Primary Poll:
Romney 34%- Newt 24%
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/new_hampshire/election_2012_new_hampshire_republican_primary
...................................
South Carolina Republican Primary Election Poll:
Newt 33%- Romney 22%
http://www.google.com/gwt/x?wsc=vb&wsi=54bec16f6e6b565c&source=m&u=http%3A%2F%2Frace42012.com/2011/11/29/poll-watch-american-research-group-south-carolina-2012-republican-primary-survey/&ei=Gd3YTtDHIcSImweSmqjDCQ
...........................................................................
Florida Republican Primary Election Poll:
Newt 50%- Romney 19%
http://www.google.com/gwt/x?wsc=vb&wsi=54bec16f6e6b565c&source=m&u=http%3A%2F%2Famericanresearchgroup.com/pres2012/primary/rep/fl/&ei=4dnYTpzgMofcmgeH-czECQ
...........................................
Louisiana Republican Primary Polls:
Newt 31%- Romney 23%
http://www.google.com/gwt/x?wsc=vb&wsi=54bec16f6e6b565c&source=m&u=http%3A%2F%2Frace42012.com/2011/11/30/poll-watch-clarus-research-louisiana-2012-republican-primary-survey/&ei=DNvYTpDuLYWymQeRtvTHCQ
.........................................
Montana Republican Primary Election:
Newt 37%, Ron Paul 12%, Romney 11%
http://www.google.com/gwt/x?wsc=vb&wsi=54bec16f6e6b565c&source=m&u=http%3A%2F%2Frace42012.com/2011/11/30/poll-watch-ppp-d-montana-2012-republican-primary-survey-2/&ei=FdzYTq35Gsqpmge02PHFCQ
mo_ntresor
Dec 2, 2011, 12:17:16 PM12/2/11
to
On Dec 2 2011 9:53 AM, Travel A wrote:
<snip>
> Below is a post from Risky Biz, (the dumbfuck who's posting under the
> fake username, "da pickel," as usual) and my reply.
>
> Note my prediction.
>
> However, although my analysis and prediction is spot-on, it's really not
> the main point. The important thing is the fun of kicking Risky Biz'
> ass, again.
>
> As a dumbfuck, Risky Biz has repeatedly posted-blithered about how he's
> going to come out of his hole and gloat when, Romney, (who, according to
> Risky biz, can't lose), is the nominee.
>
> I've provided the latest polls, (below) beginning after the above
> mentioned, pasted-up-post.
>
> Just wondering how confident Risky Biz is exactly at this point
> (chortle).
>
> I mean, it's really going to suck for Risky Biz when I post, repeatedly,
> all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts after Romney loses.
i feel sorry for the community organizer in chief having to debate newt.
it's going to be like watching jerry try to tie his shoes.
mo_ntresor
---
<snip>
> Below is a post from Risky Biz, (the dumbfuck who's posting under the
> fake username, "da pickel," as usual) and my reply.
>
> Note my prediction.
>
> However, although my analysis and prediction is spot-on, it's really not
> the main point. The important thing is the fun of kicking Risky Biz'
> ass, again.
>
> As a dumbfuck, Risky Biz has repeatedly posted-blithered about how he's
> going to come out of his hole and gloat when, Romney, (who, according to
> Risky biz, can't lose), is the nominee.
>
> I've provided the latest polls, (below) beginning after the above
> mentioned, pasted-up-post.
>
> Just wondering how confident Risky Biz is exactly at this point
> (chortle).
>
> I mean, it's really going to suck for Risky Biz when I post, repeatedly,
> all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts after Romney loses.
it's going to be like watching jerry try to tie his shoes.
mo_ntresor
---
da pickle
Dec 3, 2011, 11:02:09 PM12/3/11
to
On Dec 2, 8:53 am, nine...@webtv.net (Travel A) wrote:
<stupid parts snipped> -------------------------
First you thought Sarah Palin was going to be the GOP nominee. I told
you she could never get the nomination and in fact she wasn’t even
going to run. But you were certain; you claimed she was definitely,
absolutely running for sure*. You were wrong and I was right.
Next. After Sarah admitted she wasn’t going to run and with Rick Perry
leading in the polls you thought he would be the nominee. I knew he
would not because he is nearly as stupid as Sarah. You were wrong and
I was right.
Next, you insisted that Herman Cain who was leading in all the polls
at that time would be the nominee. I told you he would not because he
is nearly as stupid as Sarah and a liar to boot. You were wrong and I
was right, again!
Now Gingrich is leading in the polls as the GOP ‘flavor of the week’.
I guess ALL repugs are just flip-floppers. At least, unlike Palin,
Perry, and Cain, Newt’s IQ is over 85. (But I bet his cellulite is
nearly as bad as Sarah’s.)
But just for the record I stand by my prediction that Romney will be
the GOP nominee. If I’m wrong, it will be interesting because it’s
never happened before. Keep your hopes up. Maybe someday you’ll get
one. (chuckle)
-----------------------------------------
P.S. I apologize for not kicking your ass sooner but your subject line
was mis-addressed ‘Oh Risky Biz’ so I didn’t notice it until just
now. It seems like after Ramashiva and others busted you awhile ago
when you posted fake headers trying to prove I was ‘Risky Biz’ you
should be embarrassed to continue with that nonsense. I really don’t
care if you think I’m someone I’m not but it does confirm to me (and
others) that you really are quite stupid. (chortle...)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
*Travel’s Greatest Web-TV Hits
=======================================
“Look for Sarah to announce her candidacy at the Tea Party rally. ”
“Also, Sarah isn't even an announced candidate: wait 'til she starts
campaigning.”
“Can't wait for her to kick-ass in the debates.”
“She'll have enormous respect from world leaders when she's the
President.”
“Imagine what Sarah's numbers are going to be upon announcing.”
“Once Sarah announces and gets a campaign going, she'll blow this
primary out of the water.”
“Sarah wins again.”
“Rick doesn't stand a chance against Sarah once she's in. Rick's just
a "place holder. There'll barely be a vote left for anyone else once
Sarah gets in.”
“That's why Jim Demint and Nikki Halely said they're holding off their
(all-important) endorsements.”
“It's a very smart move by Sarah to wait.”
“Rick's just a "place holder" for Sarah.”
“Wait until you see her numbers when she announces.”
“A week or so ago, SarahPac sent out tens of thousands of e-mails for
contributions. Sarah will run away with this once she's in.”
“Sarah will crush Mittens once she announces.”
She'll walk away with this, once in.”
“Sarah wins again.”
“There'll barely be a tea party vote left for anyone else once Sarah
gets in.”
“The tea party will be going nuts when Sarah announces, and she'll
have a lock on South Carolina and be free free to work Iowa and
Florida. Romney's now ahead in Iowa, and Sarah will crush Mittens once
she announces.”
“They should make a campaign video: the scene opens with an aerial
panorama across a vast, windswept Iowa field in the middle of a
snowstorm (the camera shot slowly zooms-in). A dog sled of loyal, hard-
driven huskies appears from out of the snowy, twilight gloom. It's
Sarah. She's waving, no! there's something written on the palms of her
mittens! They read ..."bye!"... "bye!" “
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
==============================================
This one’s my favorite:
“She'll have enormous respect from world leaders when she's the
President.”
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:)
<stupid parts snipped> -------------------------
First you thought Sarah Palin was going to be the GOP nominee. I told
you she could never get the nomination and in fact she wasn’t even
going to run. But you were certain; you claimed she was definitely,
absolutely running for sure*. You were wrong and I was right.
Next. After Sarah admitted she wasn’t going to run and with Rick Perry
leading in the polls you thought he would be the nominee. I knew he
would not because he is nearly as stupid as Sarah. You were wrong and
I was right.
Next, you insisted that Herman Cain who was leading in all the polls
at that time would be the nominee. I told you he would not because he
is nearly as stupid as Sarah and a liar to boot. You were wrong and I
was right, again!
Now Gingrich is leading in the polls as the GOP ‘flavor of the week’.
I guess ALL repugs are just flip-floppers. At least, unlike Palin,
Perry, and Cain, Newt’s IQ is over 85. (But I bet his cellulite is
nearly as bad as Sarah’s.)
But just for the record I stand by my prediction that Romney will be
the GOP nominee. If I’m wrong, it will be interesting because it’s
never happened before. Keep your hopes up. Maybe someday you’ll get
one. (chuckle)
-----------------------------------------
P.S. I apologize for not kicking your ass sooner but your subject line
was mis-addressed ‘Oh Risky Biz’ so I didn’t notice it until just
now. It seems like after Ramashiva and others busted you awhile ago
when you posted fake headers trying to prove I was ‘Risky Biz’ you
should be embarrassed to continue with that nonsense. I really don’t
care if you think I’m someone I’m not but it does confirm to me (and
others) that you really are quite stupid. (chortle...)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
*Travel’s Greatest Web-TV Hits
=======================================
“Look for Sarah to announce her candidacy at the Tea Party rally. ”
“Also, Sarah isn't even an announced candidate: wait 'til she starts
campaigning.”
“Can't wait for her to kick-ass in the debates.”
“She'll have enormous respect from world leaders when she's the
President.”
“Imagine what Sarah's numbers are going to be upon announcing.”
“Once Sarah announces and gets a campaign going, she'll blow this
primary out of the water.”
“Sarah wins again.”
“Rick doesn't stand a chance against Sarah once she's in. Rick's just
a "place holder. There'll barely be a vote left for anyone else once
Sarah gets in.”
“That's why Jim Demint and Nikki Halely said they're holding off their
(all-important) endorsements.”
“It's a very smart move by Sarah to wait.”
“Rick's just a "place holder" for Sarah.”
“Wait until you see her numbers when she announces.”
“A week or so ago, SarahPac sent out tens of thousands of e-mails for
contributions. Sarah will run away with this once she's in.”
“Sarah will crush Mittens once she announces.”
She'll walk away with this, once in.”
“Sarah wins again.”
“There'll barely be a tea party vote left for anyone else once Sarah
gets in.”
“The tea party will be going nuts when Sarah announces, and she'll
have a lock on South Carolina and be free free to work Iowa and
Florida. Romney's now ahead in Iowa, and Sarah will crush Mittens once
she announces.”
“They should make a campaign video: the scene opens with an aerial
panorama across a vast, windswept Iowa field in the middle of a
snowstorm (the camera shot slowly zooms-in). A dog sled of loyal, hard-
driven huskies appears from out of the snowy, twilight gloom. It's
Sarah. She's waving, no! there's something written on the palms of her
mittens! They read ..."bye!"... "bye!" “
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
==============================================
This one’s my favorite:
“She'll have enormous respect from world leaders when she's the
President.”
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:)
da pickle
Dec 3, 2011, 11:02:46 PM12/3/11
to
On Dec 2, 9:17 am, "mo_ntresor" <amontilladofortun...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Just in case anybody doesn’t know this already, ‘mo_ntresor’ is
actually‘mo_charles’. He got offended one day and threw a hissy-fit,
promised he was finished with RGP forever (chuckle). Later he realized
he’d made a laughable fool of himself. Unfortunately he was too
embarrassed to come back as “mo_charles”, so trying to save face he
changed his handle to ‘mo_ntresor’ and was back posting stupid crap in
a matter of hours. LOL.
Anyway, why do some idiots feel that they have to make a big
announcement if they quit RGP. Just go away. Then if you change your
mind it’s less embarrassing .
wrote:
actually‘mo_charles’. He got offended one day and threw a hissy-fit,
promised he was finished with RGP forever (chuckle). Later he realized
he’d made a laughable fool of himself. Unfortunately he was too
embarrassed to come back as “mo_charles”, so trying to save face he
changed his handle to ‘mo_ntresor’ and was back posting stupid crap in
a matter of hours. LOL.
Anyway, why do some idiots feel that they have to make a big
announcement if they quit RGP. Just go away. Then if you change your
mind it’s less embarrassing .
popinjay999
Dec 4, 2011, 12:30:07 AM12/4/11
to
On Dec 3, 8:02 pm, da pickle <jcpickels.nos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Newt’s IQ is over 85. (But I bet his cellulite is
> nearly as bad as Sarah’s.)
>
lol this was funny. You're an asshole, Fake Pickle, but you're
> Newt’s IQ is over 85. (But I bet his cellulite is
> nearly as bad as Sarah’s.)
>
pretty fucking funny. Ha! Cellulite, that cracked me up.
By the way, I must have missed when Ramashiva busted Travel doing fake
headers. How long ago was that? Does anyone have a link to the
thread? I could use a laugh. Right now I am watching The Hangover on
television, I thought it might be funny, but it's not very good, even
if it is about Vegas. I think it's almost over. I hope it is.
popinjay999
Dec 4, 2011, 1:15:31 AM12/4/11
to
On Dec 3, 9:30 pm, popinjay999 <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
< Right now I am watching The Hangover on
> television, I thought it might be funny, but it's not very good, even
> if it is about Vegas. I think it's almost over. I hope it is.
This was a lousy fucking movie. No way I will ever bother with
< Right now I am watching The Hangover on
> television, I thought it might be funny, but it's not very good, even
> if it is about Vegas. I think it's almost over. I hope it is.
Hangover-2. Unless, of course, I really have nothing else to do on a
Saturday night, like tonight.
Clave
Dec 4, 2011, 1:32:20 AM12/4/11
to
"popinjay999" <paulpo...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:10cc7c39-c7bf-4030...@h3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
You watched the TV version?
What a dope.
Jim
news:10cc7c39-c7bf-4030...@h3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
What a dope.
Jim
Beldin the Sorcerer
Dec 4, 2011, 1:38:35 AM12/4/11
to
news:e3fbea67-8d74-45f6...@v29g2000yqv.googlegroups.com...
***
Your tv doesn't have a power button and you can't change the station?
Your tv doesn't have a power button and you can't change the station?
popinjay999
Dec 4, 2011, 1:52:23 AM12/4/11
to
Both of them didn't.
Travel
Dec 4, 2011, 3:07:48 AM12/4/11
to
Newt- 45%- Obama 43%
Obama 42%- Romney 40%
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/2012_presidential_matchups
Obama 42%- Romney 40%
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/2012_presidential_matchups
Pepe Papon
Dec 4, 2011, 3:36:47 AM12/4/11
to
Travel
Dec 4, 2011, 3:32:47 AM12/4/11
to
On Dec 2, 11:53 am, nine...@webtv.net (Travel A) wrote:
> Below is a post from Risky Biz, (the dumbfuck who's posting under the
> fake username, "da pickel," as usual) and my reply.
>
> Note my prediction.
>
> However, although my analysis and prediction is spot-on, it's really not
> the main point. The important thing is the fun of kicking Risky Biz'
> ass, again.
>
> As a dumbfuck, Risky Biz has repeatedly posted-blithered about how he's
> going to come out of his hole and gloat when, Romney, (who, according to
> Risky biz, can't lose), is the nominee.
>
> I've provided the latest polls, (below) beginning after the above
> mentioned, pasted-up-post.
>
> Just wondering how confident Risky Biz is exactly at this point
> (chortle).
>
> I mean, it's really going to suck for Risky Biz when I post, repeatedly,
> all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts after Romney loses.
>
> (begin post)............................................................
>
> On Nov 8, 11:59 am, Travel <nine...@webtv.net> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 7, 7:09 pm, da pickle <jcpick...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Risky Biz blithered:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > I probably won’t bother watching the rest of the debates.
> Below is a post from Risky Biz, (the dumbfuck who's posting under the
> fake username, "da pickel," as usual) and my reply.
>
> Note my prediction.
>
> However, although my analysis and prediction is spot-on, it's really not
> the main point. The important thing is the fun of kicking Risky Biz'
> ass, again.
>
> As a dumbfuck, Risky Biz has repeatedly posted-blithered about how he's
> going to come out of his hole and gloat when, Romney, (who, according to
> Risky biz, can't lose), is the nominee.
>
> I've provided the latest polls, (below) beginning after the above
> mentioned, pasted-up-post.
>
> Just wondering how confident Risky Biz is exactly at this point
> (chortle).
>
> I mean, it's really going to suck for Risky Biz when I post, repeatedly,
> all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts after Romney loses.
>
> (begin post)............................................................
>
> On Nov 8, 11:59 am, Travel <nine...@webtv.net> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 7, 7:09 pm, da pickle <jcpick...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Risky Biz blithered:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> It’s over
>
> .................................................................
>
> Newt v. Obama, General Election Poll:
> Newt 45%- Obama 43%
>
> http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/ele...
> .................................................................
>
> Newt v. Obama, General Election Poll:
> Newt 45%- Obama 43%
>
> ............................
>
> Iowa Caucus Poll:
> Newt 32%- Romney 19%
>
> http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/ele...
>
> Iowa Caucus Poll:
> Newt 32%- Romney 19%
>
>
> ..........................................
>
> New Hampshire Primary Poll:
> Romney 34%- Newt 24%
>
> http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/ele...
> ..........................................
>
> New Hampshire Primary Poll:
> Romney 34%- Newt 24%
>
>
> ...................................
>
> South Carolina Republican Primary Election Poll:
> Newt 33%- Romney 22%
>
> http://www.google.com/gwt/x?wsc=vb&wsi=54bec16f6e6b565c&source=m&u=ht...
> ...................................
>
> South Carolina Republican Primary Election Poll:
> Newt 33%- Romney 22%
>
>
> ...........................................................................
>
> Florida Republican Primary Election Poll:
> Newt 50%- Romney 19%
>
> http://www.google.com/gwt/x?wsc=vb&wsi=54bec16f6e6b565c&source=m&u=ht...
> ...........................................................................
>
> Florida Republican Primary Election Poll:
> Newt 50%- Romney 19%
>
>
> ...........................................
>
> Louisiana Republican Primary Polls:
> Newt 31%- Romney 23%
>
> http://www.google.com/gwt/x?wsc=vb&wsi=54bec16f6e6b565c&source=m&u=ht...
> ...........................................
>
> Louisiana Republican Primary Polls:
> Newt 31%- Romney 23%
>
> .........................................
>
> Montana Republican Primary Election:
> Newt 37%, Ron Paul 12%, Romney 11%
>
> http://www.google.com/gwt/x?wsc=vb&wsi=54bec16f6e6b565c&source=m&u=ht...- Hide quoted text -
>
> Montana Republican Primary Election:
> Newt 37%, Ron Paul 12%, Romney 11%
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Travel
Dec 4, 2011, 3:41:15 AM12/4/11
to
Fact: Sarah did not endorse anyone in the Nevada 2010 senate race.
Out of the countless ass-kickings and lies exposures of Riky Biz on a
daily basis, I've merely reposted a few of my favorites.
..........................................
Here's a few of the countless many:
From: Travel A
Subject: Risky Biz "Own Ears"
Date: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:38 AM
This was to "da pickel no spam" (who's Risky Biz) a creep who,
pathetically, is too dumb to even successfully hide behind a phony
username.
The fake, lying "da pickel no spam" (Risky Biz) claimed that Sarah
Palin endorsed Sharron Angle in the Nevada Repubican primary for the
U.S. senate election. He further, bogusly claimed that he "heard it
with his own ears" at Sarah Palin's Searchlight Nevada speech. He
lied, and I proved it.
So, you can see why the fake "pickel no spam" is so upset and can't
forget his public humiliation (chortle).
.......................
Re: ot: Sarah Palin's most embarrassing screw-up yet? Group:
rec.gambling.poker Date: Wed, Jul 7, 2010, 1:55am From: Travel A
<nin...@webtv.net>
Heard it with your "own ears," huh, lol. This is what we call a total
moron-ass-kicking.
http://www.examiner.com/x-44562-National-News-Headlines-Editor~y2010m6d9-Sarah-Palins-endorsement-is-the-winning-ticket-in-key-races-in-Calif-SC-and-Iowa
Toward the end of the article, note well that Sarah Palin endorsed no
one in the Nevada, Republican senate primary race. In fact, Sarah
Palin gave a"shout-out" to Sue Lowden (not Sharron Angle) at another
Nevada speech, elsewhere.
"Risky Biz" lied through his teeth and got caught.
.............................................
Group: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Fri, Nov 26, 2010, 8:29pm
From: da pickle nospam <jcpi...@hotmail.com>
On Nov 26, 8:58 pm, "Irish Mike" <ad7c...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
Sarah Palin made a slip of the tongue, on one word, in an interview
and immediately corrected it.
Risky Biz (who's the fake pickel) blithered:
"Sorry to correct you because I know how easily you are annoyed by
facts but actually it was Glenn Beck interviewing her who corrected
HER. Had he not she would still believe that North Korea was a U.S.
ally."
.............................................
I wrote:
Here are the facts. The fact is that Sarah was fully prepared to
discuss North/South Korea and saying "North" was clearly just a slip
of the tongue. She first, correctly, referred to whether the White
Houe has the balls to sanction North Korea. So, clearly, she used the
name "North Korea" in the correct context BEFORE she, later, misspoke
in using that same name.
Let's see if you idiots can read a transcript and realize what I'm
talking about. I'll grade you on your reading comprehension
"abilities."
This vindicates Sarah, entirely.
So, Risky Biz, it seems it's you who's afraid of the facts, doesn't
it.
Here's the entire interview Q & A with regard to Korea:
Cite:http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/196/48554/
Quote:
.............................................
PAT: And polls show that you would probably win the Republican
nomination. How would you handle a situation like just developed in
North Korea?
SARAH PALIN: Well, North Korea, this is stemming from I think a
greater problem when we're all sitting around asking, "Oh, no, what
are we going to do" and we're not having a lot of faith that the White
House is going to come out with a strong enough policy to sanction
what it is that North Korea's going to do. So this speaks to a bigger
picture here that certainly scares me in terms of our national
security policies. But obviously got to stand with our North Korean
allies. We're bound to by treaty. We're also bound to by ‑‑
STU: South Korea.
SARAH PALIN: Yeah. And we're also bound by prudence to stand with our
South Korean allies, yes. And, you know, to remind North Korea, well,
we're not going to reward bad behavior and we're not going to walk
away and we do need to press China to do more to increase pressure on
that arena.
GLENN: How do we press China? I mean, Sarah, I'm going to go way out
on
a lunatic fringe here but I've talked to enough people are in this
missile business who say that was not an airplane contrail that we saw
off the coast of California. It is my belief that that was a two‑stage
missile launched by China telling, sending a signal that the world has
changed. They're dropping the dollar in their trade with Russia today.
I mean, they control the world. The world has changed. We're no longer
the superpower that we were even two years ago.
SARAH PALIN: Well, that's right. And China's going to own our notes
because we are becoming so beholden on them. And a lot of this has to
do with energy. When we're not allowed to responsibly exploit our own
natural resources, and that's, of course, one of the ways that America
grew into such a prosperous nation.
GLENN: Yes.
SARAH PALIN: We developed domestically our own energy supplies.
Instead as we're reliant on foreign sources of energy, here's one
thing that we can do in pressing China. They need to restrict energy
exports to North Korea. But do you think that the Obama administration
gets that and understands why we would need to? No, they do not
because they're still locking up the lands that are warehousing our
own domestic supplies of energy. So they have it all wrong on energy
policy to start with.
.............................................
Re: "Machete"
Group: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Sun, Sep 5, 2010, 1:14am
From: Travel A <nin...@webtv.net>
Re: "Machete"
Group: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Sun, Sep 5, 2010, 1:50am (PDT+3)
From: jb <joe...@comcast.net>
(jb Written to Risky Biz)
"You have listed many great movies and quite a few bad ones. What this
has to do with Tarantino is dubious at best. This list clearly proves
that you are gay by the way."
............................................
I wrote:
(Chortle)
.............................................
Clave
Dec 4, 2011, 3:51:39 AM12/4/11
to
"Pepe Papon" <hitme...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:q7cmd79c1e7lbklip...@4ax.com...
He probably waited for the TV version of Blazing Saddles too.
Jim
news:q7cmd79c1e7lbklip...@4ax.com...
Jim
Travel
Dec 4, 2011, 3:31:11 AM12/4/11
to
On Dec 4, 12:30 am, popinjay999 <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 8:02 pm, da pickle <jcpickels.nos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Newt’s IQ is over 85. (But I bet his cellulite is
> > nearly as bad as Sarah’s.)
>
> lol this was funny. You're an asshole, Fake Pickle, but you're
> pretty fucking funny. Ha! Cellulite, that cracked me up.
>
Hey Goofy, Mary in Clark County owns you. Now that's funny.
> On Dec 3, 8:02 pm, da pickle <jcpickels.nos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Newt’s IQ is over 85. (But I bet his cellulite is
> > nearly as bad as Sarah’s.)
>
> lol this was funny. You're an asshole, Fake Pickle, but you're
> pretty fucking funny. Ha! Cellulite, that cracked me up.
>
> By the way, I must have missed when Ramashiva busted Travel doing fake
> headers. How long ago was that? Does anyone have a link to the
> thread?
(especially the real Pickel who points this out, regularly) but an
idiot (that would be you).
Mr Coleman didn't realize at the time that Risky Biz not only admitted
to being the fake Pickel, but that it has long been obvious that this
is the case. In fact, the real Pickel wanted to meet Risky Biz in
Vegas for a little "talk" and Risky Biz chickened out. Risky Biz has
been publicly humiliated, and one wonders how he can even post
anymore.
You remember all that, don't you, goofy?
Also, I never said Rick, Cain, ect., would definitely be the nominee.
Risky Biz is now so trapped he has nowhere to go but lying.
Which makes it all that much more fun.
The fact is, Riky Biz repeatedly states that Romney will definitely be
the nominee and now he's squirming, and I'm going to make sure that he
squirms, plenty.
I could use a laugh. Right now I am watching The Hangover on
> television, I thought it might be funny,
your ass. Reread those threads for a good laugh on, you.
Travel
Dec 4, 2011, 3:36:38 AM12/4/11
to
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: OT: Not that anyone except Travel is surprised, but... Group:
rec.gambling.poker Date: Wed, Oct 5, 2011, 5:08pm From: da pickle no
spam <jcpi...@hotmail.com>
On Oct 5, 4:28 pm, nine...@webtv.net (Travel A) wrote:
Well, splashie, Sarah may be out, but you're still an idiot. So, what
do you get out of it?
Risky Biz blithered:
I can tell you what I get out of it. I've kicked your dumb ass yet
again. LOL LOL
Seriously, right now you should not be calling anyone an idiot. You
should slink off in some corner, put on your dunce cap and not post
anything for a couple of months.
I wrote:
Lol, you merely had dumb luck on the up or down of Sarah running.
Also, with, within Sarah's numerous Fox commentaries stating that
she's thinking about running (stating she has "the fire in the belly"
to run for president in a Chris Wallace interview) and can beat Obama
if she does, the Rolling Thunder day, her historic America bus tour,
her documentary opening at a theater in Iowa, her big showing at the
Iowa State Fair/on Hannity's national television show, the
professional campaign video of it all, the big speech at Indianola
Iowa, (organized by a special tea party group for that purpose) huge
tea party support from all over the country and "owed" endorsements
from those she put into office in the 2010 mid-term elections, only a
complete idiot like Risky Biz would say she definitely wasn't running.
Which Risky Biz did say of course.
The left wing media and RINOs just said she wasn't running because it
reduced "buzz" and buzz increases poll numbers and can increase
contributions to her PAC.
So, one would either have to be a Sarah-hater or a dumb fuck or both
to declare she definitely wasn't running (rest assured that with Risky
Biz, all the above applies).
So, you still remain ass-kicked on every aspect that requires any
intelligent evaluation of the situation. What you "get out of it" is
the same as a broken clock being on the right time twice a day.
Risky Biz blithered:
My next prediction. She will very soon get canned from Fox Fake News.
She's useless to them now and she's starting to have fights with the
other more talented people there.
I wrote:
The "other people" at FOX are RINO frauds.
My prediction is:
Her contract will be at two years in January of a three year contract
of one million per year. She'll be going on FOX and breaking their
balls (and yours, chortle) for another year and three months and
there's nothing they (or you, snicker) can can do about it, whithout a
big, public, embarrassing lawsuit.
Note that Sarah didn't give FOX the big announcement that she wasn't
running. She gave it to Mark Levin on the radio, instead. That was
funny.
My prediction is: FOX will be paying Sarah big bucks for pissing them
(and you, chuckle) off.
My prediction is: Sarah will be doing for the 2012 elections what she
did for the 2010 elections, and congress will be all Republican if not
also the presidency.
My prediction is: Sarah will be THE most anticipated speaker at the
Republican convention in Florida, and will nail-down her leadership of
the conservative movement.
My prdiction is: Sarah will do for the 2012 elections what she did for
the 2010 elections: throw-out Democrats.
My prediction is: If Romney wins, Sarah will be in a position to stage
a primary challenge for herself or someone like Rand Paul in the next
presidential election if Romney goes RINO (which he will-is).
She's 47, and could run for president in the open elecion next cycle
if Obama wins in 2012, or sometime after (Ronald Reagan ran for
President several times).
She could become a senator from Alaska or Arizona and run for
president as a current senator and great-record-former-governor.
See how easy it is to kick your dumb ass. That's what you "get out of
it": another ass-kicking.
popinjay999
Dec 4, 2011, 4:32:29 AM12/4/11
to
On Dec 4, 12:31 am, Travel <nine...@webtv.net> wrote:
> In fact, the real Pickel wanted to meet Risky Biz in
> Vegas for a little "talk" and Risky Biz chickened out.
>
Perhaps Risky was afraid of The Real Pickle. Have you ever seen a
> In fact, the real Pickel wanted to meet Risky Biz in
> Vegas for a little "talk" and Risky Biz chickened out.
>
picture of Real Pickle? He's pretty intimidating.
Why don't you try YOUR luck with Risky, Travel? We all know you like
to frequent Vegas, and I think we also all suspect that you are a fat
little pudge named Barney who sits in front of your computer and talks
shit. Go on, tough guy, see if Risky wants to meet you. Unless you
are afraid he will stomp you into a grease spot.
fffurken
Dec 4, 2011, 10:43:00 AM12/4/11
to
On Dec 4, 5:30 am, popinjay999 <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> lol this was funny. You're an asshole, Fake Pickle, but you're
> pretty fucking funny. Ha! Cellulite, that cracked me up.
>
> By the way, I must have missed when Ramashiva busted Travel doing fake
> headers.
That's funny, because I've briefly looked into the IP thing etc for
> lol this was funny. You're an asshole, Fake Pickle, but you're
> pretty fucking funny. Ha! Cellulite, that cracked me up.
>
> By the way, I must have missed when Ramashiva busted Travel doing fake
> headers.
fake posters but they change and there never seems to be any clear
defining evidence, to me.
I know you love ramashiva, you've said as much, and clearly you'd suck
on it if you could. But the guy doesn't strike me as that smart. Sure,
throw him a bunch of numbers or literal facts and he can play with
that more than anyone.
But when it comes to anything else, he's a little unsure and confused.
You are smarter than he is in that regard. And you are a paranoid dumb
shit, ostensibly.
da pickle
Dec 4, 2011, 5:36:29 PM12/4/11
to
<Mr Coleman didn't realize at the time that Risky Biz not only
admitted
<to being the fake Pickel, but that it has long been obvious that this
<is the case.
Not only are you quite stupid but you are a liar. Risky Biz always
admitted
<to being the fake Pickel, but that it has long been obvious that this
<is the case.
denied this and I have told you many times that it’s ridiculous. Tell
you what liar, produce a link where he admits this and I will quit
posting here.
You have a habit of telling a lie as fact but never linking a source.
And don’t forget to turn your TV set to channel 3. (chortle)
da pickle
Dec 4, 2011, 6:13:46 PM12/4/11
to
< On Dec 3, 8:02 pm, da pickle <jcpickels.nos...@hotmail.com< wrote:
<You're an asshole, Fake Pickle,
Thanks.
<You're an asshole, Fake Pickle,
< By the way, I must have missed when Ramashiva busted Travel doing
fake
< headers.
Risky Biz. (I’m not) I’ve always said I wasn’t and despite Travel’s
lie in another post in this thread Risky Biz has always denied it as
well. I think he got this silly idea because I think his beloved Sarah
Palin is as stupid as a houseplant and Risky Biz also thought Sarah a
fool. Since we were the only two posters on this group who held a low
opinion of Sarah, Travel figured we must be the same person.
So to prove it one day he posted a header from one of my posts and a
header from one of Risky’s posts. These two posts came from the same
ip address. This claimed Travel proved beyond a doubt that he was
right, I was Risky Biz. Well, at first it worked, people were buying
it. Then Ramashiva and others discovered the headers were faked.
(Risky and I have never posted from the same ip address.) Travel had
tried a fast one and been busted.
But Travel had a trick, an out if he got caught. He made this post
using a different email address from his normal one. Long after the
hoax was exposed, 11+ hours to be exact, Travel showed up claiming he
didn’t make the post (it must be Risky trying to convict himself) and
look he argued, it was a different email address from his, so it
couldn't have been posted by him. (Apparently webTV users are only
allowed one email address per household.) (LOUD CHORTLE)
popinjay999
Dec 4, 2011, 7:32:42 PM12/4/11
to
scumbag. I was going to vote for Sarah, but not now, not after this.
Fuck her and fuck Travel! I hope Risky Biz kicks his ass right in the
middle of Fremont Street.
Pepe Papon
Dec 5, 2011, 4:28:10 AM12/5/11
to
Pepe Papon
Dec 5, 2011, 4:32:00 AM12/5/11
to
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:36:29 -0800 (PST), da pickle
<jcpickel...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Dec 4, 12:31 am, Travel <nine...@webtv.net> wrote:
>
><Mr Coleman didn't realize at the time that Risky Biz not only
>admitted
><to being the fake Pickel, but that it has long been obvious that this
><is the case.
>
>Not only are you quite stupid but you are a liar. Risky Biz always
>denied this and I have told you many times that it’s ridiculous. Tell
>you what liar, produce a link where he admits this and I will quit
>posting here.
>
>You have a habit of telling a lie as fact but never linking a source.
Not so fast. Travel still thinks I'm DG777 because of a post with
<jcpickel...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Dec 4, 12:31 am, Travel <nine...@webtv.net> wrote:
>
><Mr Coleman didn't realize at the time that Risky Biz not only
>admitted
><to being the fake Pickel, but that it has long been obvious that this
><is the case.
>
>Not only are you quite stupid but you are a liar. Risky Biz always
>denied this and I have told you many times that it’s ridiculous. Tell
>you what liar, produce a link where he admits this and I will quit
>posting here.
>
>You have a habit of telling a lie as fact but never linking a source.
forged headers. When this was explained to him, he posted a link to
the post and still insisted it was proof.
So, he may, in fact, produce a link. It just won't prove what he
thinks it does.
Travel
Dec 5, 2011, 4:39:20 AM12/5/11
to
Hey Goofy, we all know that you like to go to Ireland, and you're now
afraid to go there because you're scared of fffurfken.
Btw, I'm tall, you're a short dumbass.
Travel
Dec 5, 2011, 4:43:35 AM12/5/11
to
On Dec 4, 5:36 pm, da pickle <jcpickels.nos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 12:31 am, Travel <nine...@webtv.net> wrote:
>
> <Mr Coleman didn't realize at the time that Risky Biz not only
> admitted
> <to being the fake Pickel, but that it has long been obvious that this
> <is the case.
>
>...Risky Biz always
> On Dec 4, 12:31 am, Travel <nine...@webtv.net> wrote:
>
> <Mr Coleman didn't realize at the time that Risky Biz not only
> admitted
> <to being the fake Pickel, but that it has long been obvious that this
> <is the case.
>
> denied this and I have told you many times that it’s ridiculous.
Lol, you were "outted" as the fake Pickel and humiliated long ago,
Risky Biz. That's why the real Pickel wants to have a liTtle talk with
you and you checkened out, repeatedly.
Travel
Dec 5, 2011, 5:08:51 AM12/5/11
to
"deny rant."
Risky Biz has admitted that he's the fake Pickel and then denied it
back and forth, on numerous occasions. He's even had back and forth
posts with himself under the two usernames: Risky Biz has been a joke
for a good long time. I merely enjoy showing-up his lies and kicking
his ass.
Risky Biz is obviously the fake Pickel. That's why he doesn't even
bother trying to deny that he's the fake Pickel when the real Pickel
wants to meet him in Vegas for a "little talk." No, Risky Biz just
hides from Pickel and says that he has to go to the pool room every
day on Eastern ave (chortle).
Travel
Dec 5, 2011, 5:11:33 AM12/5/11
to
On Dec 5, 4:32 am, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:36:29 -0800 (PST), da pickle
>
> On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:36:29 -0800 (PST), da pickle
>
that you, as a dumbfuck, forgot which username you were using and you
were caught.
Travel
Dec 5, 2011, 5:15:26 AM12/5/11
to
(end post)
And here's the ass-kicking fun part:
Republican Primary canadidates Election Poll:
Newt 38%- Romny 17%
http://www.google.com/gwt/x?source=m&u=http%3A%2F%2Frace42012.com/2011/12/01/poll-watch-rasmussen-2012-republican-nomination-survey-8/&wsi=54bec16f6e6b565c&ei=f9jYTvWUOYrbmgelssjJCQ&wsc=vb
And here's the ass-kicking fun part:
Republican Primary canadidates Election Poll:
Newt 38%- Romny 17%
..................................................................
Newt v. Obama, General Election Poll:
Newt 45%- Obama 43%
.............................
Iowa Caucus Poll:
Newt 32%- Romney 19%
...........................................
New Hampshire Primary Poll:
Romney 34%- Newt 24%
....................................
South Carolina Republican Primary Election Poll:
Newt 33%- Romney 22%
.............................................................................
Florida Republican Primary Election Poll:
Newt 50%- Romney 19%
............................................
Louisiana Republican Primary Polls:
Newt 31%- Romney 23%
..........................................
Montana Republican Primary Election:
Newt 37%, Ron Paul 12%, Romney 11%
popinjay999
Dec 5, 2011, 8:20:31 AM12/5/11
to
On Dec 5, 1:28 am, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
with Mel Brooks, but I just never saw it. When was I supposed to see
it?
> On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 00:51:39 -0800, "Clave" <clav...@the.monastery.com>
> wrote:
>
> >He probably waited for the TV version of Blazing Saddles too.
>
> <shudder>
I have never seen Blazing Saddles in my life. I know it was a movie
> wrote:
>
> >He probably waited for the TV version of Blazing Saddles too.
>
> <shudder>
with Mel Brooks, but I just never saw it. When was I supposed to see
it?
mo_ntresor
Dec 5, 2011, 12:11:50 PM12/5/11
to
On Dec 3 2011 9:02 PM, da pickle wrote:
> > i feel sorry for the community organizer in chief having to debate newt.
> > it's going to be like watching jerry try to tie his shoes.
>
> Just in case anybody doesn’t know this already, ‘mo_ntresor’ is
> actually‘mo_charles’. He got offended one day and threw a hissy-fit,
> promised he was finished with RGP forever (chuckle). Later he realized
> he’d made a laughable fool of himself. Unfortunately he was too
> embarrassed to come back as “mo_charles”, so trying to save face he
> changed his handle to ‘mo_ntresor’ and was back posting stupid crap in
> a matter of hours. LOL.
>
> Anyway, why do some idiots feel that they have to make a big
> announcement if they quit RGP. Just go away. Then if you change your
> mind it’s less embarrassing .
handle-frogger's an obama fellator ... big surprise! axelrod on meet the
press told the dem host in a gorilla mask that romney had no moral
standards. LOL!
risky, please speak for all lazy deadbeat leeches here (hopefully pepe and
clave won't mind): do you imbeciles draw any lines, or is there no limit
to your defecation on truth and reality?
mo_ntresor
------
> > i feel sorry for the community organizer in chief having to debate newt.
> > it's going to be like watching jerry try to tie his shoes.
>
> Just in case anybody doesn’t know this already, ‘mo_ntresor’ is
> actually‘mo_charles’. He got offended one day and threw a hissy-fit,
> promised he was finished with RGP forever (chuckle). Later he realized
> he’d made a laughable fool of himself. Unfortunately he was too
> embarrassed to come back as “mo_charles”, so trying to save face he
> changed his handle to ‘mo_ntresor’ and was back posting stupid crap in
> a matter of hours. LOL.
>
> Anyway, why do some idiots feel that they have to make a big
> announcement if they quit RGP. Just go away. Then if you change your
> mind it’s less embarrassing .
handle-frogger's an obama fellator ... big surprise! axelrod on meet the
press told the dem host in a gorilla mask that romney had no moral
standards. LOL!
risky, please speak for all lazy deadbeat leeches here (hopefully pepe and
clave won't mind): do you imbeciles draw any lines, or is there no limit
to your defecation on truth and reality?
mo_ntresor
------
da pickle
Dec 5, 2011, 12:11:15 PM12/5/11
to
On Dec 5, 2:08 am, Travel <nine...@webtv.net> lied:
< Risky Biz has admitted that he's the fake Pickel
<and then denied it back and forth, on numerous occasions.
On “NUMEROUS OCCASIONS” and yet you can’t post a link to even a SINGLE
instance? Like I said, you’re a liar.
< Risky Biz has admitted that he's the fake Pickel
<and then denied it back and forth, on numerous occasions.
instance? Like I said, you’re a liar.
Iceman
Dec 5, 2011, 12:50:01 PM12/5/11
to
"mo_ntresor" <amontillad...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:mjavq8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
had WMD and was behind 9/11, global warming is a myth, and gay marriage
threatens straight marriage?
mo_ntresor
Dec 5, 2011, 1:06:08 PM12/5/11
to
On Dec 5 2011 10:50 AM, Iceman wrote:
> > handle-frogger's an obama fellator ... big surprise! axelrod on meet the
> > press told the dem host in a gorilla mask that romney had no moral
> > standards. LOL!
> >
> > risky, please speak for all lazy deadbeat leeches here (hopefully pepe and
> > clave won't mind): do you imbeciles draw any lines, or is there no limit
> > to your defecation on truth and reality?
>
> Hmmm, which party's supporters believe that tax cuts raise revenue, Saddam
> had WMD and was behind 9/11, global warming is a myth, and gay marriage
> threatens straight marriage?
was that list of nonsense directed at me, or some standard-free leftwinger?
> > handle-frogger's an obama fellator ... big surprise! axelrod on meet the
> > press told the dem host in a gorilla mask that romney had no moral
> > standards. LOL!
> >
> > risky, please speak for all lazy deadbeat leeches here (hopefully pepe and
> > clave won't mind): do you imbeciles draw any lines, or is there no limit
> > to your defecation on truth and reality?
>
> Hmmm, which party's supporters believe that tax cuts raise revenue, Saddam
> had WMD and was behind 9/11, global warming is a myth, and gay marriage
> threatens straight marriage?
mo_ntresor
------
Pepe Papon
Dec 6, 2011, 3:30:59 AM12/6/11
to
was the dumbest piece of crap you've ever seen.
Pepe Papon
Dec 6, 2011, 3:33:47 AM12/6/11
to
Travel
Dec 6, 2011, 5:04:36 AM12/6/11
to
Travel
Dec 6, 2011, 5:07:11 AM12/6/11
to
Prev Next Normal view To: nin...@webtv.net
From: Travel A
Subject: Risky Biz "Romney Can't Lose"
Date: Friday, December 2, 2011 11:21 AM
From: Travel A
Subject: Risky Biz "Romney Can't Lose"
Date: Friday, December 2, 2011 11:21 AM
phlash74
Dec 6, 2011, 1:18:36 PM12/6/11
to
On Dec 6 2011 2:07 AM, Travel wrote:
> Prev Next Normal view To: nin...@webtv.net
> From: Travel A
> Subject: Risky Biz "Romney Can't Lose"
> Date: Friday, December 2, 2011 11:21 AM
>
>
> Below is a post from Risky Biz, (the dumbfuck who's posting under the
> fake username, "da pickel," as usual) and my reply.
>
> Note my prediction.
>
> However, although my analysis and prediction is spot-on, it's really
> not the main point. The important thing is the fun of kicking Risky
> Biz' ass, again.
>
> As a dumbfuck, Risky Biz has repeatedly posted-blithered about how
> he's going to come out of his hole and gloat when, Romney, (who,
> according to Risky biz, can't lose), is the nominee.
>
> I've provided the latest polls, (below) beginning after the above
> mentioned, pasted-up-post.
>
> Just wondering how confident Risky Biz is exactly at this point
> (chortle).
>
> I mean, it's really going to suck for Risky Biz when I post,
> repeatedly, all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts after
> Romney loses.
>
Probably about as bad as it sucks for you when he posts repeatedly all
> Prev Next Normal view To: nin...@webtv.net
> From: Travel A
> Subject: Risky Biz "Romney Can't Lose"
> Date: Friday, December 2, 2011 11:21 AM
>
>
> Below is a post from Risky Biz, (the dumbfuck who's posting under the
> fake username, "da pickel," as usual) and my reply.
>
> Note my prediction.
>
> However, although my analysis and prediction is spot-on, it's really
> not the main point. The important thing is the fun of kicking Risky
> Biz' ass, again.
>
> As a dumbfuck, Risky Biz has repeatedly posted-blithered about how
> he's going to come out of his hole and gloat when, Romney, (who,
> according to Risky biz, can't lose), is the nominee.
>
> I've provided the latest polls, (below) beginning after the above
> mentioned, pasted-up-post.
>
> Just wondering how confident Risky Biz is exactly at this point
> (chortle).
>
> I mean, it's really going to suck for Risky Biz when I post,
> repeatedly, all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts after
> Romney loses.
>
your "Sarah is going to run away with the nomination and become President"
posts, especially since she didn't even run.
Actually, I take that back - it still sucks worse for you, because you
were literally the only moron stupid enough to actually believe that she
had a snowball's chance in hell of winning. Everyone else on the ng told
you she wasn't even going to run. Fake Pickle doesn't have 1% of the
emotional investment in Romney's campaign as you had in Sarah's
nonexistent campaign.
Michael
-----------------
"> phlash
On your circle jerk k00l kidz email list. Should be disqualified for
that, but I'll give him a pass because he is smart." - ramashiva,
8/22/2010
"Hitler has already been forgiven, but you have not." - Reptillian AKA
Igotskillz, 4/6/2011
____________________________________________________________________
Travel
Dec 6, 2011, 5:07:18 PM12/6/11
to
On Dec 6, 1:18 pm, "phlash74" <a102...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> On Dec 6 2011 2:07 AM, Travel wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Prev Next Normal view To: nine...@webtv.net
> On Dec 6 2011 2:07 AM, Travel wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > From: Travel A
> > Subject: Risky Biz "Romney Can't Lose"
> > Date: Friday, December 2, 2011 11:21 AM
>
> >
> > Below is a post from Risky Biz, (the dumbfuck who's posting under the
> > fake username, "da pickel," as usual) and my reply.
>
> > Note my prediction.
>
> > However, although my analysis and prediction is spot-on, it's really
> > not the main point. The important thing is the fun of kicking Risky
> > Biz' ass, again.
>
> > As a dumbfuck, Risky Biz has repeatedly posted-blithered about how
> > he's going to come out of his hole and gloat when, Romney, (who,
> > according to Risky biz, can't lose), is the nominee.
>
> > I've provided the latest polls, (below) beginning after the above
> > mentioned, pasted-up-post.
>
> > Just wondering how confident Risky Biz is exactly at this point
> > (chortle).
>
> > I mean, it's really going to suck for Risky Biz when I post,
> > repeatedly, all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts after
> > Romney loses.
>
> Probably about as bad as it sucks for you when he posts repeatedly all
> your "Sarah is going to run away with the nomination and become President"
> posts, especially since she didn't even run.
You shoud have stopped right there, dumbass.
> > Subject: Risky Biz "Romney Can't Lose"
> > Date: Friday, December 2, 2011 11:21 AM
>
> >
> > Below is a post from Risky Biz, (the dumbfuck who's posting under the
> > fake username, "da pickel," as usual) and my reply.
>
> > Note my prediction.
>
> > However, although my analysis and prediction is spot-on, it's really
> > not the main point. The important thing is the fun of kicking Risky
> > Biz' ass, again.
>
> > As a dumbfuck, Risky Biz has repeatedly posted-blithered about how
> > he's going to come out of his hole and gloat when, Romney, (who,
> > according to Risky biz, can't lose), is the nominee.
>
> > I've provided the latest polls, (below) beginning after the above
> > mentioned, pasted-up-post.
>
> > Just wondering how confident Risky Biz is exactly at this point
> > (chortle).
>
> > I mean, it's really going to suck for Risky Biz when I post,
> > repeatedly, all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts after
> > Romney loses.
>
> Probably about as bad as it sucks for you when he posts repeatedly all
> your "Sarah is going to run away with the nomination and become President"
> posts, especially since she didn't even run.
She didn't run. Prove she wouldn't have won if she ran.
It's the tea party vote sending Newt to the lead. Sarah is the tea
party hero, Newt's "settling" for what's available.
And as far as emotional investment, it seems you have a great deal
tied up in me (chortle). That must make your constant ass-kickings
sting like hell :-).
Travel
Dec 6, 2011, 5:25:06 PM12/6/11
to
Subject: Splash Slam- Predictions
Date: Thursday, October 13, 2011 12:32 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Travel A
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 8:53 PM
To: nin...@webtv.net
Subject: Splashie's Ass-Kicking
Splashie, remember this ass-kicking you took (reposted below)?
Looks like you had a lot of emotional investment in your blithering,
hummm?
Well guess what, Splashie, I told you then that you're a dancing,
drooling imbecile, and the reasons why. And now it's proven. Only now,
after Cain, the conservatives are coalescing much more so, and with a
much stronger candidate in Newt.
This couldn't be better, lol. Thanks for setting yourself up again
perfectly, dumbass.
.............................................
BS in Austin blithered:
If he was smart enough to be himself and own his record he'd be great.
But I assume he will pull a McCain and try and look more conservative
and religious and scare off the independents... the only voters that
matter. The cool aide drinkers on either side will keep drinking the
Kool-Aide and slurping up the cool-aid.
----�
Splashie (sets himself up for an ass-kicking) double-blithered:
"Well put,"
I wrote:
Lol, the independent vote went over 2 to 1 for the conservative
Republican, just last year in the 2010 mid term elections. In Sarah
Palin's last poll, she beat Obama among independents, nationally.
Sarah's a conservative, btw.
Splashie blithered:
but I don't think he has to worry about that now. Sure, the Tea Party
voters will make lots of noise about Romney not being good enough for
them, but what are they going to do next year, vote for Obama?
I wrote:
No, they'll vote to nominate another candidate, duh! If the
conservative vote settles on one candidate, Romney gets creamed in the
primaries. Is that enough "noise," idiot?
Splahie blithered:
Stay home? Really? And as usual, Trivial has it backwards,
I wrote:
No, I have it right. You, don't even have "it," never mind backwards.
Splashie blithered:
he keeps saying Romney's ceiling is 25%.
I wrote:
Romney does have a ceiling of 25%, obviously. Do you know how to read
a poll?
Splashie blithered:
No, that's the ceiling of the Tea Party vote,
I wrote:
Okay, Splashie, here's the height of you're ass-kicking: the tea party/
conservative vote is split among six other cadidates DUH! The
Republican electorate is 73% conservative (Gallup poll).
Does 73% look like 25% to you, numbnuts?
The tea party vote is the same as the conservative vote: the tea party
is just the activists of the conservatives. If the conservatives
decide predominately on a "not Romney" single candidate, Romney loses.
Romney can only win the nomination with a vastly split vote among the
six conservative candidates; and they all would have to stay in the
race through the early primaries. And he still might not win at that.
The conservatives haven't, and they won't "coalesce" around Romney in
the primaries, you dumbfuck.
Splashie blithered:
which is why none of their flavors of the week (first Trump, then
Bachmann, then Perry, now Cain) have shown true staying power.
I wrote:
No, imbecile, they went down because the conservatives left them for
various reasons, not because THEY'RE (Bachmann, Trump and Perry)
conservatives. Could you be any fucking dumber?
Also, dumfuck, you included Cain. Cain is now in first place and
beating Romney.
Splashie blithered:
I think Romney's got inside track now,
I wrote:
Really (titter)? Four polls just came out today that has CAIN in first
place over Romney. Just as predicted yesterday, btw.
Splashie blithered:
and it appears like the GOP is going to coalesce behind him early
enough that he'll be the presumptive nominee by March.
I wrote:
Lol, no idiot, it's the conservatie vote that has the coalescing power
with 73% of the Republican electorate vote.
See what happens when you don't know what you're talking about and
blither-post what you fabricate and pull from the imagination of your
ass? You get your ass-kicked.
...............................................
Four new polls out today, and all have Cain in first, beating Romney:
NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll:
http://www.google.com/gwt/x?site=search&safe=off&q=10/12/2011+nbc+news/wall+street+journal+poll&hl=en&ei=bCWWTrjwDJCasgeVtAE&ved=0CBkQFjAI&source=m&rd=1&u=http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1671322/pg1
........................................................................
Evolving Strategies Poll:
http://www.google.com/gwt/x?source=m&u=http%3A%2F%2Frace42012.com/2011/10/12/poll-watch-evolving-strategiesyougov-2012-gop-national-primary-poll/&wsi=54bec16f6e6b565c&ei=BR-WTr2YBsmQmQe0uuyHCw&wsc=vb
....................................................................
Public Policy Poll:
http://www.google.com/gwt/x?source=m&u=http%3A%2F%2Frace42012.com/2011/10/12/poll-watch-ppp-d-2012-republican-nomination-survey-3/&wsi=54bec16f6e6b565c&ei=lyGWTsXFBYaFmwfft9y5CA&wsc=vb
.......................................................
Gallup Favorability Poll:
http://www.google.com/gwt/x?source=m&u=http%3A%2F%2Fargojournal.blogspot.com/2011/10/poll-watch-gallup-2012-gop-favorability_11.html&wsi=54bec16f6e6b565c&ei=lyGWTsXFBYaFmwfft9y5CA&wsc=vb
Date: Thursday, October 13, 2011 12:32 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Travel A
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 8:53 PM
To: nin...@webtv.net
Subject: Splashie's Ass-Kicking
Splashie, remember this ass-kicking you took (reposted below)?
Looks like you had a lot of emotional investment in your blithering,
hummm?
Well guess what, Splashie, I told you then that you're a dancing,
drooling imbecile, and the reasons why. And now it's proven. Only now,
after Cain, the conservatives are coalescing much more so, and with a
much stronger candidate in Newt.
This couldn't be better, lol. Thanks for setting yourself up again
perfectly, dumbass.
.............................................
BS in Austin blithered:
If he was smart enough to be himself and own his record he'd be great.
But I assume he will pull a McCain and try and look more conservative
and religious and scare off the independents... the only voters that
matter. The cool aide drinkers on either side will keep drinking the
Kool-Aide and slurping up the cool-aid.
----�
Splashie (sets himself up for an ass-kicking) double-blithered:
"Well put,"
I wrote:
Lol, the independent vote went over 2 to 1 for the conservative
Republican, just last year in the 2010 mid term elections. In Sarah
Palin's last poll, she beat Obama among independents, nationally.
Sarah's a conservative, btw.
Splashie blithered:
but I don't think he has to worry about that now. Sure, the Tea Party
voters will make lots of noise about Romney not being good enough for
them, but what are they going to do next year, vote for Obama?
I wrote:
No, they'll vote to nominate another candidate, duh! If the
conservative vote settles on one candidate, Romney gets creamed in the
primaries. Is that enough "noise," idiot?
Splahie blithered:
Stay home? Really? And as usual, Trivial has it backwards,
I wrote:
No, I have it right. You, don't even have "it," never mind backwards.
Splashie blithered:
he keeps saying Romney's ceiling is 25%.
I wrote:
Romney does have a ceiling of 25%, obviously. Do you know how to read
a poll?
Splashie blithered:
No, that's the ceiling of the Tea Party vote,
I wrote:
Okay, Splashie, here's the height of you're ass-kicking: the tea party/
conservative vote is split among six other cadidates DUH! The
Republican electorate is 73% conservative (Gallup poll).
Does 73% look like 25% to you, numbnuts?
The tea party vote is the same as the conservative vote: the tea party
is just the activists of the conservatives. If the conservatives
decide predominately on a "not Romney" single candidate, Romney loses.
Romney can only win the nomination with a vastly split vote among the
six conservative candidates; and they all would have to stay in the
race through the early primaries. And he still might not win at that.
The conservatives haven't, and they won't "coalesce" around Romney in
the primaries, you dumbfuck.
Splashie blithered:
which is why none of their flavors of the week (first Trump, then
Bachmann, then Perry, now Cain) have shown true staying power.
I wrote:
No, imbecile, they went down because the conservatives left them for
various reasons, not because THEY'RE (Bachmann, Trump and Perry)
conservatives. Could you be any fucking dumber?
Also, dumfuck, you included Cain. Cain is now in first place and
beating Romney.
Splashie blithered:
I think Romney's got inside track now,
I wrote:
Really (titter)? Four polls just came out today that has CAIN in first
place over Romney. Just as predicted yesterday, btw.
Splashie blithered:
and it appears like the GOP is going to coalesce behind him early
enough that he'll be the presumptive nominee by March.
I wrote:
Lol, no idiot, it's the conservatie vote that has the coalescing power
with 73% of the Republican electorate vote.
See what happens when you don't know what you're talking about and
blither-post what you fabricate and pull from the imagination of your
ass? You get your ass-kicked.
...............................................
Four new polls out today, and all have Cain in first, beating Romney:
NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll:
http://www.google.com/gwt/x?site=search&safe=off&q=10/12/2011+nbc+news/wall+street+journal+poll&hl=en&ei=bCWWTrjwDJCasgeVtAE&ved=0CBkQFjAI&source=m&rd=1&u=http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1671322/pg1
........................................................................
Evolving Strategies Poll:
http://www.google.com/gwt/x?source=m&u=http%3A%2F%2Frace42012.com/2011/10/12/poll-watch-evolving-strategiesyougov-2012-gop-national-primary-poll/&wsi=54bec16f6e6b565c&ei=BR-WTr2YBsmQmQe0uuyHCw&wsc=vb
....................................................................
Public Policy Poll:
http://www.google.com/gwt/x?source=m&u=http%3A%2F%2Frace42012.com/2011/10/12/poll-watch-ppp-d-2012-republican-nomination-survey-3/&wsi=54bec16f6e6b565c&ei=lyGWTsXFBYaFmwfft9y5CA&wsc=vb
.......................................................
Gallup Favorability Poll:
http://www.google.com/gwt/x?source=m&u=http%3A%2F%2Fargojournal.blogspot.com/2011/10/poll-watch-gallup-2012-gop-favorability_11.html&wsi=54bec16f6e6b565c&ei=lyGWTsXFBYaFmwfft9y5CA&wsc=vb
Travel
Dec 6, 2011, 5:36:43 PM12/6/11
to
This must have really, really sucked for you (chortle).
Remember this, Splashie?
............................................................
Date: Friday, June 24, 2011 7:28 AM
Savor the irony. Splashie starts another retarded poll (or as Susan
says (paraphrase): a stupid, stupid poll that most ignore) and
Splashie gets multiple votes for idiocy and I'm not even mentioned
(chortle). This must have been quite frustrating for Splashie, as he,
while tearing his hair out, had to throw my name in himself (lol).
No, Splashie, you're not fooling anyone: here's what's bothering you
(below).
From: Travel A
Date: Saturday, June 4, 2011 8:38 PM
Well, for one thing, Splashie, you really are one dumb fuck. I can't
count the number of your retarded posts on politics and other subjects
requiring a certain level of knowledge and analytical ability, where I
completely humiliated you and you had to run away.
It's comical to witness the presumptuous faux-swaggering of an idiot
like Splahie. You're all girly-snark (and girly-polls) and no
substance. You're a dummy who has never posted anything to be even
remotely considered intelligent.
And Splashie, you've been told about your irritating little "Michael"
in the sig box. Get rid of it. No one givesafuck about your name,
"dumb-fuck" is all anyone needs to know.
Remember this, Splashie?
............................................................
Date: Friday, June 24, 2011 7:28 AM
Savor the irony. Splashie starts another retarded poll (or as Susan
says (paraphrase): a stupid, stupid poll that most ignore) and
Splashie gets multiple votes for idiocy and I'm not even mentioned
(chortle). This must have been quite frustrating for Splashie, as he,
while tearing his hair out, had to throw my name in himself (lol).
No, Splashie, you're not fooling anyone: here's what's bothering you
(below).
From: Travel A
Date: Saturday, June 4, 2011 8:38 PM
Well, for one thing, Splashie, you really are one dumb fuck. I can't
count the number of your retarded posts on politics and other subjects
requiring a certain level of knowledge and analytical ability, where I
completely humiliated you and you had to run away.
It's comical to witness the presumptuous faux-swaggering of an idiot
like Splahie. You're all girly-snark (and girly-polls) and no
substance. You're a dummy who has never posted anything to be even
remotely considered intelligent.
And Splashie, you've been told about your irritating little "Michael"
in the sig box. Get rid of it. No one givesafuck about your name,
"dumb-fuck" is all anyone needs to know.
da pickle
Dec 6, 2011, 7:15:54 PM12/6/11
to
On Dec 6, 10:18 am, "phlash74" <a102...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
<On Dec 6 2011 2:07 AM, Travel wrote:
<<I mean, it's really going to suck for Risky Biz when I post,
<<repeatedly, all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts after
<<Romney loses.
<
<Probably about as bad as it sucks for you when he posts repeatedly
all
<your "Sarah is going to run away with the nomination and become
President"
<posts, especially since she didn't even run.
<
<Actually, I take that back - it still sucks worse for you, because
you
<were literally the only moron stupid enough to actually believe that
she
<had a snowball's chance in hell of winning. Everyone else on the ng
told
<you she wasn't even going to run. Fake Pickle doesn't have 1% of the
<emotional investment in Romney's campaign as you had in Sarah's
<nonexistent campaign.
<
<Michael
It’s not even 1% of the emotional involvement. I’d just as soon Newt
<On Dec 6 2011 2:07 AM, Travel wrote:
<<I mean, it's really going to suck for Risky Biz when I post,
<<repeatedly, all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts after
<<Romney loses.
<
<Probably about as bad as it sucks for you when he posts repeatedly
all
<your "Sarah is going to run away with the nomination and become
President"
<posts, especially since she didn't even run.
<
<Actually, I take that back - it still sucks worse for you, because
you
<were literally the only moron stupid enough to actually believe that
she
<had a snowball's chance in hell of winning. Everyone else on the ng
told
<you she wasn't even going to run. Fake Pickle doesn't have 1% of the
<emotional investment in Romney's campaign as you had in Sarah's
<nonexistent campaign.
<
<Michael
got the nomination because he would be easy for Obama to beat despite
what Rasmussen fake polls claim. I’m predicting that Romney will get
the nomination because I don’t think the Repugs are THAT stupid. Most
illiterate teabaggers don’t know yet about his adultery and self
enriching near criminal activities. Wait until somebody starts “swift-
boating” him with the truth. Isn’t it ironic that the stupid righties
threw Herman Cain under the bus for his sexual peccadillos only to
gravitate to an even sleazier adulterer? What morons.
This is win/win for me. If Romney gets the nod I can enjoy poking fun
at Travel’s stupidity for the umpteenth time and if Gingrich gets it,
I can ridicule all the right-wingnut fools including Travel.
Palin was never planning to run and would have had no chance anyway.
Perry was in the lead and then crashed and burned. Then Cain was on
top and Travel was sticking up for him. Then he flunked out just as I
predicted. It’s true that Newt is smarter than Sarah, Rick, or Herman
but he has other problems that will bring him down.
I’m sticking with my prediction that Romney will ultimate prevail but
that doesn’t mean I like him any better than the rest of the turds. (I
heard Travel’s mommy had him on suicide watch for two weeks after
Sarah admitted the truth.) In any case the GOP nominee will not be
stupid Rick, stupid Herman, or stupidest Sarah. And that's good news.
da pickle
Dec 6, 2011, 7:35:57 PM12/6/11
to
On Dec 5, 9:11 am, "mo_ntresor" <amontilladofortun...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Easy man. Don’t have another hissy fit. You don’t want to have to go
to all that trouble of signing up for a new free email account and for
a new Recgroups account this soon. (chortle)
wrote:
to all that trouble of signing up for a new free email account and for
a new Recgroups account this soon. (chortle)
Travel
Dec 7, 2011, 7:16:12 AM12/7/11
to
Below is a post from Risky Biz, (the dumbfuck who's posting under the
fake username, "da pickel," as usual) and my reply.
Note my prediction.
However, although my analysis and prediction is spot-on, it's really
not the main point. The important thing is the fun of kicking Risky
Biz' ass, again.
As a dumbfuck, Risky Biz has repeatedly posted-blithered about how
he's going to come out of his hole and gloat when, Romney, (who,
according to Risky biz, can't lose), is the nominee.
I've provided the latest polls, (below) beginning after the above
mentioned, pasted-up-post.
Just wondering how confident Risky Biz is exactly at this point
(chortle).
I mean, it's really going to suck for Risky Biz when I post,
repeatedly, all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts after
Romney loses.
repeatedly, all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts after
Romney loses.
Travel
Dec 7, 2011, 7:14:12 AM12/7/11
to
Wow, this is more fun that I could ever have hoped.
Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).
80% of my posts having to do with Sarah Palin have been in repsonse to
Risky Biz sputtering vitriol and tearing his hair out over her. That's
80% of the posts where I wouldn't be posting about Sarah Palin,
otherewise. But, note well, Risky Biz, DID: now there's your
obsession, folks.
Emotional investment? Holy shit! has there ever been anyone more hate-
obsessed than Risky Biz (who's the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin?
And now he's equally freak-hating over Newt! Gotta luv that.
Check the polls, Risky Biz (chortle)
Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).
80% of my posts having to do with Sarah Palin have been in repsonse to
Risky Biz sputtering vitriol and tearing his hair out over her. That's
80% of the posts where I wouldn't be posting about Sarah Palin,
otherewise. But, note well, Risky Biz, DID: now there's your
obsession, folks.
Emotional investment? Holy shit! has there ever been anyone more hate-
obsessed than Risky Biz (who's the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin?
And now he's equally freak-hating over Newt! Gotta luv that.
Check the polls, Risky Biz (chortle)
FL Turbo
Dec 7, 2011, 8:49:17 PM12/7/11
to
I think that Popinjay has a rather twisted sense of humor, like Mel
Brooks.
Blazing Saddles is one of my faves from back in the Day.
I laughed my ass off when I saw it in the theater.
The censored TV version absolutely wrecked the movie.
I didn't think it was funny any more.
For sure, somebody seeing it for the first time on TV wouldn't get the
full effect.
The ending was most definitely lame, original or TV version.
------------------------------------------------------
"Lord, can we do this all in one night --- or are we just jerking
off?"
"Lord, can we do this all in one night --- or are we just whistling
Dixie?"
0 new messages