On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 2:53:57 PM UTC-7, brattt wrote:
> On Aug 1 2012 11:42 AM, Tim Norfolk wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 9:23:31 AM UTC-4, mo_ntresor wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 1 2012 7:10 AM,
double....@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > > sounds like we're in danger of electing a non-lawyer who can do basic
>
> > >
>
> > > > > math. �the public unions must be up in arms!
>
> > >
>
> > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > The millionaires will certainly like Romney's math:
>
> > >
>
> > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > "What would that mean for the average tax bill? Millionaires would get
>
> > >
>
> > > > an $87,000 tax cut, the study says. But for 95 percent of the
>
> > >
>
> > > > population, taxes would go up by about 1.2 percent, an average of $500
>
> > >
>
> > > > a year."
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > 50% of the population pays zero federal income tax. sounds like we're
>
> > >
>
> > > tired of paying for your idiot ass.
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > mo_ntresor
>
> >
>
> > I ask again. How many of the 50% are retirees?
>
>
>
> Do retirees file taxes? The almost 50% is people who filed a tax form.
Look at the OP. It was "50% of the population." It's how they fooled you. Now, again, what part of that 50% is children, students, prisoners...
It was a sound bite and you bit.