Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
OT: Not Worth the Paper it's Printed On
86 views
Skip to first unread message
popinjay999
Oct 23, 2012, 9:20:03 PM10/23/12
to
It can happen here. It will happen here. It doesn't matter at all
what Clave thinks, or what Pepe or Jerry or Dutch think, if our
government continues to run up debt and print more "money", this WILL
happen here.
See the Zimbabwean Trillion $Dollar Bill.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVuAktRkQTE&feature=related
what Clave thinks, or what Pepe or Jerry or Dutch think, if our
government continues to run up debt and print more "money", this WILL
happen here.
See the Zimbabwean Trillion $Dollar Bill.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVuAktRkQTE&feature=related
Pepe Papon
Oct 24, 2012, 3:43:14 AM10/24/12
to
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:20:03 -0700 (PDT), popinjay999
<paulpo...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>It can happen here. It will happen here. It doesn't matter at all
>what Clave thinks, or what Pepe or Jerry or Dutch think, if our
>government continues to run up debt and print more "money", this WILL
>happen here.
You say this as if you believe I'm not concerned with the government
<paulpo...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>It can happen here. It will happen here. It doesn't matter at all
>what Clave thinks, or what Pepe or Jerry or Dutch think, if our
>government continues to run up debt and print more "money", this WILL
>happen here.
debt. You sure do believe a lot of silly things.
--
Pepe "The Revelation" Papon
Dutch
Oct 24, 2012, 4:18:41 AM10/24/12
to
spending by 90% and raise taxes on the richest people who can afford it
until the debt is retired. Romney plans to do the exact opposite of that.
popinjay999
Oct 24, 2012, 7:23:03 AM10/24/12
to
On Oct 24, 12:43 am, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> You say this as if you believe I'm not concerned with the government
> debt. You sure do believe a lot of silly things.
>
I don't think that is one of the silly things I believe in. I do not
>
> You say this as if you believe I'm not concerned with the government
> debt. You sure do believe a lot of silly things.
>
believe one could google RGP archives and find a critical comment by
you concerning the enormous debt being piled up by this
administration. And you've crap-flooded about every other topic under
the sun, except that one. Therefore, it is quite reasonable for me to
assume that you do not, in fact, give a fuck about government debt.
If you can google the archives and produce even ONE link to where you
have commented critically of Obama's debt, then I will send $10 to
your PayPal account. Should be easy money, eh? And I will do so
immediately. No waiting period, just instant cash. Now who doesn't
want a free $10, except that stupid baby in the Capital One commercial?
popinjay999
Oct 24, 2012, 7:26:23 AM10/24/12
to
On Oct 24, 1:19 am, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>
> If you want your country out of debt slash military and other wasteful
> spending by 90%
Who's going to defend your little pussy Canadian ass if America cuts
>
> If you want your country out of debt slash military and other wasteful
> spending by 90%
military by 90%? The fucking Mounties? Dudley Fucking Do-Right?
mo_ntresor
Oct 24, 2012, 8:43:25 AM10/24/12
to
debt, deficits, and spending?
mo_ntresor
popinjay999
Oct 24, 2012, 10:28:29 AM10/24/12
to
On Oct 24, 5:48 am, "mo_ntresor" <amontilladofortun...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Are you serious? Has he actually defended Obama's red ink? The guy
was just busting my balls for busting his balls. In fact, I almost
felt bad for picking on him.
Pepe, you owe ME $10 now!
wrote:
was just busting my balls for busting his balls. In fact, I almost
felt bad for picking on him.
Pepe, you owe ME $10 now!
mo_ntresor
Oct 24, 2012, 10:41:51 AM10/24/12
to
On Oct 24 2012 8:28 AM, popinjay999 wrote:
> > > If you can google the archives and produce even ONE link to where you
> > > have commented critically of Obama's debt, then I will send $10 to
> > > your PayPal account. Should be easy money, eh? And I will do so
> > > immediately. No waiting period, just instant cash. Now who doesn't
> > > want a free $10, except that stupid baby in the Capital One commercial?
> >
> > can i negate any bet winners with posts in which he defended obama on
> > debt, deficits, and spending?
>
> > > If you can google the archives and produce even ONE link to where you
> > > have commented critically of Obama's debt, then I will send $10 to
> > > your PayPal account. Should be easy money, eh? And I will do so
> > > immediately. No waiting period, just instant cash. Now who doesn't
> > > want a free $10, except that stupid baby in the Capital One commercial?
> >
> > can i negate any bet winners with posts in which he defended obama on
> > debt, deficits, and spending?
>
> Are you serious? Has he actually defended Obama's red ink? The guy
> was just busting my balls for busting his balls. In fact, I almost
> felt bad for picking on him.
>
> Pepe, you owe ME $10 now!
he's blamed bush. denominators believe obama and majorities had no
> was just busting my balls for busting his balls. In fact, I almost
> felt bad for picking on him.
>
> Pepe, you owe ME $10 now!
control over spending or revenue. the same people believe holding
spending constitutes a "cut". you should see the pathetic ads running
here in chicago:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQbV2fsqAO4
"[dold] voted to ESSENTIALLY end medicare"
this is a guy MICHAEL FUCKING BLOOMBERG'S PAC is backing for office. LOL.
we're not dealing with honest, thoughtful people here ... just mindless
fucking morons.
mo_ntresor
Dutch
Oct 24, 2012, 4:40:04 PM10/24/12
to
still wouldn't be enough? Space aliens?
Pepe Papon
Oct 26, 2012, 3:43:55 AM10/26/12
to
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 04:23:03 -0700 (PDT), popinjay999
<paulpo...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On Oct 24, 12:43 am, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> You say this as if you believe I'm not concerned with the government
>> debt. You sure do believe a lot of silly things.
>>
>
>
>
>I don't think that is one of the silly things I believe in. I do not
>believe one could google RGP archives and find a critical comment by
>you concerning the enormous debt being piled up by this
>administration.
When you base your conclusions on invalid assumptions, you get the
<paulpo...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On Oct 24, 12:43 am, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> You say this as if you believe I'm not concerned with the government
>> debt. You sure do believe a lot of silly things.
>>
>
>
>
>I don't think that is one of the silly things I believe in. I do not
>believe one could google RGP archives and find a critical comment by
>you concerning the enormous debt being piled up by this
>administration.
kind of errors you so often make. Garbage in, your posts out.
popinjay999
Oct 26, 2012, 4:16:33 AM10/26/12
to
On Oct 26, 12:43 am, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 04:23:03 -0700 (PDT), popinjay999
>
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 04:23:03 -0700 (PDT), popinjay999
>
> <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >On Oct 24, 12:43 am, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> >> You say this as if you believe I'm not concerned with the government
> >> debt. You sure do believe a lot of silly things.
>
> >I don't think that is one of the silly things I believe in. I do not
> >believe one could google RGP archives and find a critical comment by
> >you concerning the enormous debt being piled up by this
> >administration.
>
> When you base your conclusions on invalid assumptions, you get the
> kind of errors you so often make. Garbage in, your posts out.
>
Then do it, fuckface. Show me just ONE time when you have been
> >On Oct 24, 12:43 am, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> >> You say this as if you believe I'm not concerned with the government
> >> debt. You sure do believe a lot of silly things.
>
> >I don't think that is one of the silly things I believe in. I do not
> >believe one could google RGP archives and find a critical comment by
> >you concerning the enormous debt being piled up by this
> >administration.
>
> When you base your conclusions on invalid assumptions, you get the
> kind of errors you so often make. Garbage in, your posts out.
>
critical of the enormous debt this president has piled up. Fucking
liar. I knew you were stupid, but I didn't know you were a liar too.
Clave
Oct 26, 2012, 4:24:39 AM10/26/12
to
"popinjay999" <paulpo...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1c4755f8-8c69-41d6...@n2g2000pbp.googlegroups.com...
him? I guess someone with your skill with the horsies and video poker could
weather a depression.
BTW, where was *your* outrage when the previous administration was all busy
making that spending necessary?
Jim
popinjay999
Oct 26, 2012, 10:01:12 AM10/26/12
to
On Oct 26, 1:25 am, "Clave" <ChrisClav...@TheMonastery.com> wrote:
>
> BTW, where was *your* outrage when the previous administration was all busy
> making that spending necessary?
>
It was all over RGP. Where were you?
>
> BTW, where was *your* outrage when the previous administration was all busy
> making that spending necessary?
>
Pepe Papon
Oct 27, 2012, 3:30:19 AM10/27/12
to
lot. Including the concept of a leading question.
popinjay999
Oct 27, 2012, 10:26:41 AM10/27/12
to
On Oct 27, 12:30 am, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> What it boils down to is that you really don't know a whole hell of a
> lot. Including the concept of a leading question.
>
I may not know a helluva lot, fuckface, but I know that you have
>
> What it boils down to is that you really don't know a whole hell of a
> lot. Including the concept of a leading question.
>
repeatedly dodged my point throughout this thread. You will not show
us where you have previously voiced an objection to Obama's wild debt
run-up because you CAN'T show us. You can't show us because you never
have voiced such an objection. You can't even bring yourself to do so
in this thread, to prove me wrong. Like I said, you're an open book,
fuckface. What a phony.
Please don't reply unless you are going to once and for all state that
you are concerned with the enormous debt that Obama has run up.
popinjay999
Oct 27, 2012, 10:28:03 AM10/27/12
to
me get the last word in before? This is an RGP first.
VegasJerry
Oct 27, 2012, 10:39:20 AM10/27/12
to
On Saturday, October 27, 2012 7:26:41 AM UTC-7, popinjay999 wrote:
> On Oct 27, 12:30 am, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > What it boils down to is that you really don't know a whole hell of a
> > lot. Including the concept of a leading question.
> >
>
>
>
> I may not know a helluva lot, fuckface, but I know that you have
> repeatedly dodged my point throughout this thread. You will not show
> us where you have previously voiced an objection to Obama's wild debt
> run-up because you CAN'T show us.
Because it's not there. This president has spent LESS that any president since Ike. The Teabagger Congress won't LET him spend anything. It would create a STIMULUS. Heaven forged the economy might benefit from it.
> On Oct 27, 12:30 am, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > What it boils down to is that you really don't know a whole hell of a
> > lot. Including the concept of a leading question.
> >
>
>
>
> I may not know a helluva lot, fuckface, but I know that you have
> repeatedly dodged my point throughout this thread. You will not show
> us where you have previously voiced an objection to Obama's wild debt
> run-up because you CAN'T show us.
> You can't show us because you never
> have voiced such an objection. You can't even bring yourself to do so
> in this thread, to prove me wrong. Like I said, you're an open book,
> fuckface. What a phony.
.
> Please don't reply unless you are going to once and for all state that
> you are concerned with the enormous debt that Obama has run up.
Jerry 'n Vegas
Abbey Johnsson
Oct 27, 2012, 10:41:32 AM10/27/12
to
other random countries around the world. it could be cut by 50% easy. most
of it is just a giant work-fare program.
popinjay999
Oct 27, 2012, 10:55:26 AM10/27/12
to
On Oct 27, 7:39 am, VegasJerry <jerr...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> Because it's not there. This president has spent LESS that any president since Ike. The Teabagger Congress won't LET him spend anything. It would create a STIMULUS. Heaven forged the economy might benefit from it.
>
I'm not even going to address the ridiculousness of what you said
>
> Because it's not there. This president has spent LESS that any president since Ike. The Teabagger Congress won't LET him spend anything. It would create a STIMULUS. Heaven forged the economy might benefit from it.
>
about his spending, but the discussion was about the debt. Why are
you such an orangutan? You contribute zero to this newsgroup. What
do you get out of it? You're obviously a grown man. What do you get
out of disrupting this newsgroup like this?
popinjay999
Oct 27, 2012, 11:01:50 AM10/27/12
to
On Oct 27, 7:43 am, "Abbey Johnsson" <ac68...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>
> we dont use our military to protect ourselves. we use it to attack various
> other random countries around the world. it could be cut by 50% easy. most
> of it is just a giant work-fare program.
I'm not going to argue those facts, and I'm not totally in
>
> we dont use our military to protect ourselves. we use it to attack various
> other random countries around the world. it could be cut by 50% easy. most
> of it is just a giant work-fare program.
disagreement with some of what you said. But do you realize that
China is building an enormous war machine? And that they will
continue to do so until they can easily walk right over us? Do you,
Abbey? Should we accept 2nd Place and prepare to be occupied?
VegasJerry
Oct 27, 2012, 11:11:42 AM10/27/12
to
On Saturday, October 27, 2012 7:55:26 AM UTC-7, popinjay999 wrote:
> On Oct 27, 7:39 am, VegasJerry <jerr...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > Because it's not there. This president has spent LESS that any
> > president since Ike. The Teabagger Congress won't LET him
> >spend anything. It would create a STIMULUS. Heaven forbid the
> On Oct 27, 7:39 am, VegasJerry <jerr...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > Because it's not there. This president has spent LESS that any
> > president since Ike. The Teabagger Congress won't LET him
> > economy might benefit from it.
.
> I'm not even going to address the ridiculousness of what you said
> about his spending, but the discussion was about the debt.
You CAN'T address it because I nailed you to the cross.
.
> I'm not even going to address the ridiculousness of what you said
> about his spending, but the discussion was about the debt.
.
> Why are you such an orangutan? You contribute zero to this
> newsgroup. What do you get out of it? You're obviously a
> grown man. What do you get out of disrupting this newsgroup
> like this?
Jerry 'n Vegas
BillB
Oct 27, 2012, 11:15:04 AM10/27/12
to
China spends $75. That's year after year after year. Who has a more
legitimate reason to be concerned?
Have you considered the possibility that China might spend less if they
weren't being outspent better than 25:1 per capita (every year) by the US?
popinjay999
Oct 27, 2012, 11:21:07 AM10/27/12
to
On Oct 27, 8:14 am, BillB <bo...@shaw1.ca> wrote:
>
> haha...the US is spending way over $2000 per capita on military, while
> China spends $75. That's year after year after year. Who has a more
> legitimate reason to be concerned?
>
> Have you considered the possibility that China might spend less if they
> weren't being outspent better than 25:1 per capita (every year) by the US?
You are really fucked up in the head. Either you are totally ignorant
>
> haha...the US is spending way over $2000 per capita on military, while
> China spends $75. That's year after year after year. Who has a more
> legitimate reason to be concerned?
>
> Have you considered the possibility that China might spend less if they
> weren't being outspent better than 25:1 per capita (every year) by the US?
of the Chinese game plan, or you are intentionally jerking my chain.
Either way, I don't give a fuck, I'm going to the casino after I
shower and you will be the furthest thing from my mind in about an
hour.
fffurken
Oct 27, 2012, 11:21:41 AM10/27/12
to
On Oct 27, 3:43 pm, "Abbey Johnsson" <ac68...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> we dont use our military to protect ourselves. we use it to attack various
> other random countries around the world.
lol @ random
> we dont use our military to protect ourselves. we use it to attack various
> other random countries around the world.
It's anything but random. Militarily, the US has taken the idea of
self-interest to a new level. The whole idea of colonialism and empire
isn't that far fetched, or it wasn't under Bush.
Although the countries I've been twitching about for years as a
potentially serious problem, Iran and Pakistan, seem to be firmly on
the map now. There's nowhere else left beatable and Pakistan is
arguably not even beatable now. I'm not naturally inclined to support
any war but I think a war in Iran *may* have to be fought more than
any other in recent history.
popinjay999
Oct 27, 2012, 11:24:10 AM10/27/12
to
I've had about enough of your shit. LEAVE RGP, AT ONCE! Do you hear
me? You are out of here. I have never demanded that anyone leave RGP
for good, so I hope you're proud that you are the first one. Don't
bother sending us a card. Just go.
me? You are out of here. I have never demanded that anyone leave RGP
for good, so I hope you're proud that you are the first one. Don't
bother sending us a card. Just go.
VegasJerry
Oct 27, 2012, 11:28:02 AM10/27/12
to
On Saturday, October 27, 2012 8:24:10 AM UTC-7, popinjay999 wrote:
> On Oct 27, 8:11 am, VegasJerry <jerr...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > Bla, bla, bla. Learn to lose.
.
> I've had about enough of your shit.
Then yield.
> On Oct 27, 8:11 am, VegasJerry <jerr...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > Bla, bla, bla. Learn to lose.
.
> I've had about enough of your shit.
Jerry 'n Vegas
Clave
Oct 27, 2012, 3:57:37 PM10/27/12
to
news:b2556c48-dac6-4d25...@ph9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
You made an unsubstantiated claim -- I have no intention of spelunking
through Google to find an example.
Jim
> On Oct 26, 7:01 am, popinjay999 <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> On Oct 26, 1:25 am, "Clave" <ChrisClav...@TheMonastery.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > BTW, where was *your* outrage when the previous administration was all
>> > busy
>> > making that spending necessary?
>>
>> It was all over RGP. Where were you?
>
>
>
> Look everyone...
>> On Oct 26, 1:25 am, "Clave" <ChrisClav...@TheMonastery.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > BTW, where was *your* outrage when the previous administration was all
>> > busy
>> > making that spending necessary?
>>
>> It was all over RGP. Where were you?
>
>
>
You made an unsubstantiated claim -- I have no intention of spelunking
through Google to find an example.
Jim
Pepe Papon
Oct 30, 2012, 1:46:51 AM10/30/12
to
serious, honest discussion, I'd be all for it. But you're not, so
I'm not going to walk into your "Have you stopped beating your wife
yet" trap.
Not only are you an ignorant, dishonest twit, you don't read for
comprehension very well. If you did, you'd have noticed many, many
posts from me relating to the debt issue.
popinjay999
Oct 30, 2012, 2:43:34 AM10/30/12
to
On Oct 29, 10:46 pm, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> If there were any chance that you were actually interested in a
> serious, honest discussion, I'd be all for it. But you're not, so
> I'm not going to walk into your "Have you stopped beating your wife
> yet" trap.
>
> Not only are you an ignorant, dishonest twit, you don't read for
> comprehension very well. If you did, you'd have noticed many, many
> posts from me relating to the debt issue.
>
Liar. You cannot produce even ONE time where you voiced concern over
>
> If there were any chance that you were actually interested in a
> serious, honest discussion, I'd be all for it. But you're not, so
> I'm not going to walk into your "Have you stopped beating your wife
> yet" trap.
>
> Not only are you an ignorant, dishonest twit, you don't read for
> comprehension very well. If you did, you'd have noticed many, many
> posts from me relating to the debt issue.
>
Obama's outrageous increasing of the debt. And that's my point, plain
and simple. I would gladly offer a little monetary incentive if that
would prove how interested I actually am. But I know you would not
take the bet unless you knew for sure you could collect. (in the
style of Beldin and his bullshit 'prop bets') So, if there actually
was a quote of yours hidden in the archives that I have not seen but
you know you can produce, then I could only lose the bet because you
would take me up on it if you knew you could win yet you would
continue to talk snark if you knew you would lose the bet. You are
more than disingenuous, you are an out and out flagrant liar. You
have NEVER criticized this administration's debt. Liar liar pants on
fire.
Clave
Oct 30, 2012, 2:46:53 AM10/30/12
to
news:bb93d6df-7ee4-4d09...@b9g2000pba.googlegroups.com...
Didn't I ask you to do the exact same thing about Bush's debt explosion?
Jim
> On Oct 29, 10:46 pm, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> If there were any chance that you were actually interested in a
>> serious, honest discussion, I'd be all for it. But you're not, so
>> I'm not going to walk into your "Have you stopped beating your wife
>> yet" trap.
>>
>> Not only are you an ignorant, dishonest twit, you don't read for
>> comprehension very well. If you did, you'd have noticed many, many
>> posts from me relating to the debt issue.
>>
>
>
>
> Liar. You cannot produce even ONE time where you voiced concern over
> Obama's outrageous increasing of the debt...
>
>>
>> If there were any chance that you were actually interested in a
>> serious, honest discussion, I'd be all for it. But you're not, so
>> I'm not going to walk into your "Have you stopped beating your wife
>> yet" trap.
>>
>> Not only are you an ignorant, dishonest twit, you don't read for
>> comprehension very well. If you did, you'd have noticed many, many
>> posts from me relating to the debt issue.
>>
>
>
>
> Liar. You cannot produce even ONE time where you voiced concern over
Didn't I ask you to do the exact same thing about Bush's debt explosion?
Jim
popinjay999
Oct 30, 2012, 2:48:56 AM10/30/12
to
On Oct 27, 12:58 pm, "Clave" <ChrisClav...@TheMonastery.com> wrote:
> "popinjay999" <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
I can count numerous RGPers who would gladly verify that I am a George-
Bush-hater to the highest magnitude.
Here's a few:
Chris Robin
Opie Manager
Fl Turbo
Da Pickle
Susan
Ramashiva
James H.
Tad Perry
Risky Biz
John Savage
Gary Carson
and many more
So I know you missed it because you are newer to RGP, but now this
should settle the matter and I don't ever want to hear you ask me
again why I didn't criticize Bush, because I was all over Bush. I'm
not a phony partisan hack like you. I calls them like I sees them.
> "popinjay999" <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
Bush-hater to the highest magnitude.
Here's a few:
Chris Robin
Opie Manager
Fl Turbo
Da Pickle
Susan
Ramashiva
James H.
Tad Perry
Risky Biz
John Savage
Gary Carson
and many more
So I know you missed it because you are newer to RGP, but now this
should settle the matter and I don't ever want to hear you ask me
again why I didn't criticize Bush, because I was all over Bush. I'm
not a phony partisan hack like you. I calls them like I sees them.
popinjay999
Oct 30, 2012, 2:51:10 AM10/30/12
to
On Oct 29, 11:47 pm, "Clave" <ChrisClav...@TheMonastery.com> wrote:
> "popinjay999" <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
You do it, fuckface. Like I said, it's all over the archives.
Hundreds of examples, literally. If you want to put some money on it
and make it worth my while, then I will find some instances.
> "popinjay999" <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
Hundreds of examples, literally. If you want to put some money on it
and make it worth my while, then I will find some instances.
Clave
Oct 30, 2012, 2:52:26 AM10/30/12
to
news:ab7bc85c-a9dc-4354...@sh1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
Cite yourself or it didn't happen.
Jim
> On Oct 29, 11:47 pm, "Clave" <ChrisClav...@TheMonastery.com> wrote:
>> "popinjay999" <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:bb93d6df-7ee4-4d09...@b9g2000pba.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Oct 29, 10:46 pm, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> If there were any chance that you were actually interested in a
>> >> serious, honest discussion, I'd be all for it. But you're not, so
>> >> I'm not going to walk into your "Have you stopped beating your wife
>> >> yet" trap.
>>
>> >> Not only are you an ignorant, dishonest twit, you don't read for
>> >> comprehension very well. If you did, you'd have noticed many, many
>> >> posts from me relating to the debt issue.
>>
>> > Liar. You cannot produce even ONE time where you voiced concern over
>> > Obama's outrageous increasing of the debt...
>>
>> Didn't I ask you to do the exact same thing about Bush's debt explosion?
>
>
>> "popinjay999" <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:bb93d6df-7ee4-4d09...@b9g2000pba.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Oct 29, 10:46 pm, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> If there were any chance that you were actually interested in a
>> >> serious, honest discussion, I'd be all for it. But you're not, so
>> >> I'm not going to walk into your "Have you stopped beating your wife
>> >> yet" trap.
>>
>> >> Not only are you an ignorant, dishonest twit, you don't read for
>> >> comprehension very well. If you did, you'd have noticed many, many
>> >> posts from me relating to the debt issue.
>>
>> > Liar. You cannot produce even ONE time where you voiced concern over
>> > Obama's outrageous increasing of the debt...
>>
>> Didn't I ask you to do the exact same thing about Bush's debt explosion?
>
>
> You do it, fuckface. Like I said, it's all over the archives.
I don't have any reason to remember what you said ten minutes ago.
Cite yourself or it didn't happen.
Jim
Clave
Oct 30, 2012, 2:54:02 AM10/30/12
to
news:8870751a-6d37-4262...@6g2000pbh.googlegroups.com...
Cite or it didn't happen.
Jim
> On Oct 27, 12:58 pm, "Clave" <ChrisClav...@TheMonastery.com> wrote:
>> "popinjay999" <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:b2556c48-dac6-4d25...@ph9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > On Oct 26, 7:01 am, popinjay999 <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> >> On Oct 26, 1:25 am, "Clave" <ChrisClav...@TheMonastery.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > BTW, where was *your* outrage when the previous administration was
>> >> > all
>> >> > busy
>> >> > making that spending necessary?
>>
>> >> It was all over RGP. Where were you?
>>
>> > Look everyone...
>>
>> You made an unsubstantiated claim -- I have no intention of spelunking
>> through Google to find an example.
>>
>> Jim
>
>
> I can count numerous RGPers who would gladly verify that I am a George-
> Bush-hater to the highest magnitude.
I don't care. Show me where you objected to his expansion of the debt.
>> "popinjay999" <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:b2556c48-dac6-4d25...@ph9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > On Oct 26, 7:01 am, popinjay999 <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> >> On Oct 26, 1:25 am, "Clave" <ChrisClav...@TheMonastery.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > BTW, where was *your* outrage when the previous administration was
>> >> > all
>> >> > busy
>> >> > making that spending necessary?
>>
>> >> It was all over RGP. Where were you?
>>
>> > Look everyone...
>>
>> You made an unsubstantiated claim -- I have no intention of spelunking
>> through Google to find an example.
>>
>> Jim
>
>
> I can count numerous RGPers who would gladly verify that I am a George-
> Bush-hater to the highest magnitude.
Cite or it didn't happen.
Jim
popinjay999
Oct 30, 2012, 5:45:29 AM10/30/12
to
On Oct 29, 11:54 pm, "Clave" <ChrisClav...@TheMonastery.com> wrote:
>
> Cite or it didn't happen.
>
> Jim
Now you've done it. 24-hour ignore!
>
> Cite or it didn't happen.
>
> Jim
Clave
Oct 30, 2012, 5:46:14 AM10/30/12
to
news:c07641cb-5ab3-4b91...@qi8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
24-hour LOL here.
popinjay999
Oct 30, 2012, 6:00:22 AM10/30/12
to
On Oct 30, 2:46 am, "Clave" <ChrisClav...@TheMonastery.com> wrote:
> "popinjay999" <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
Wow! That took you exactly ONE minute to respond. I didn't even have
time to activate the 24-hour ignore mechanism. Please give me at
least 2 minutes before you beldinly get the last word in. Thanks.
> "popinjay999" <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
time to activate the 24-hour ignore mechanism. Please give me at
least 2 minutes before you beldinly get the last word in. Thanks.
Beldin the Sorcerer
Oct 30, 2012, 8:10:09 AM10/30/12
to
you looking pathetic, right
da pickle
Oct 30, 2012, 8:34:44 AM10/30/12
to
mo_ntresor
Oct 30, 2012, 8:40:59 AM10/30/12
to
On Oct 30 2012 3:45 AM, popinjay999 wrote:
> > Cite or it didn't happen.
>
> > Cite or it didn't happen.
>
> Now you've done it. 24-hour ignore!
clave just can't understand. aren't the guys in "your party" supposed to
be infallible angels from heaven who blow fairy dust up your ass and make
everything perfect?
mo_ntresor
Clave
Oct 30, 2012, 9:00:35 AM10/30/12
to
"da pickle" <jcpi...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wa-dnduCXv_...@giganews.com...
Not having much luck.
Jim
FL Turbo
Oct 30, 2012, 8:16:14 PM10/30/12
to
to your veracity.
I even caught a lot of abuse when I refused to sing along with the
Libtards Bashing Bush.
But that was a long time ago.
I almost never hold grudges for more than about 10-15 years when
somebody says something mean about me.
BTW
Why are you still Claving?
You should know that nothing good can come out of Facebook or Claving.
popinjay999
Oct 30, 2012, 11:25:53 PM10/30/12
to
On Oct 30, 5:16 pm, FL Turbo <noem...@notime.com> wrote:
>
> I can offer a voluntary, unsolicited and unmedicated verification as
> to your veracity.
>
> I even caught a lot of abuse when I refused to sing along with the
> Libtards Bashing Bush.
>
Abuse? What abuse? From me? I never abused you. You dope.
>
> I can offer a voluntary, unsolicited and unmedicated verification as
> to your veracity.
>
> I even caught a lot of abuse when I refused to sing along with the
> Libtards Bashing Bush.
>
I wish I had a copy now of what Chuck Baldwin had to say about Obama's
win in 2008, and his critique of what happened and why. That's Chuck
Baldwin of the Constitution Party, just to be clear. I don't want
Travel to start chortling again, thinking I'm talking about one of the
Baldwin Brothers. (yeah, Travel's a sophisticated conservative,
political suave enough not to know who Chuck Baldwin is, but I
digress) I would post it if I had it saved on my hard drive, it was
quite enlightening. I may google it later. But he blamed Bush and
the republican leadership entirely for Obama's win, and Baldwin was
right. Bush and the Bush Family are big time liberals from way back.
It was a huge betrayal of conservative support when candidate Reagan
picked Bush as his running mate in 1979. Bush was a disaster. Bush
is still a disaster.
Pepe Papon
Oct 31, 2012, 3:54:55 AM10/31/12
to
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 23:43:34 -0700 (PDT), popinjay999
<paulpo...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On Oct 29, 10:46 pm, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> If there were any chance that you were actually interested in a
>> serious, honest discussion, I'd be all for it. But you're not, so
>> I'm not going to walk into your "Have you stopped beating your wife
>> yet" trap.
>>
>> Not only are you an ignorant, dishonest twit, you don't read for
>> comprehension very well. If you did, you'd have noticed many, many
>> posts from me relating to the debt issue.
>>
>
>
>
>Liar. You cannot produce even ONE time where you voiced concern over
>Obama's outrageous increasing of the debt.
By the same token, you have never voiced your objection to the United
<paulpo...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On Oct 29, 10:46 pm, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> If there were any chance that you were actually interested in a
>> serious, honest discussion, I'd be all for it. But you're not, so
>> I'm not going to walk into your "Have you stopped beating your wife
>> yet" trap.
>>
>> Not only are you an ignorant, dishonest twit, you don't read for
>> comprehension very well. If you did, you'd have noticed many, many
>> posts from me relating to the debt issue.
>>
>
>
>
>Liar. You cannot produce even ONE time where you voiced concern over
>Obama's outrageous increasing of the debt.
States invasion of China.
FL Turbo
Nov 2, 2012, 12:09:29 PM11/2/12
to
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:25:53 -0700 (PDT), popinjay999
<paulpo...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On Oct 30, 5:16 pm, FL Turbo <noem...@notime.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I can offer a voluntary, unsolicited and unmedicated verification as
>> to your veracity.
>>
>> I even caught a lot of abuse when I refused to sing along with the
>> Libtards Bashing Bush.
>>
>
>
>Abuse? What abuse? From me? I never abused you. You dope.
>
Oh, OK.
<paulpo...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On Oct 30, 5:16 pm, FL Turbo <noem...@notime.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I can offer a voluntary, unsolicited and unmedicated verification as
>> to your veracity.
>>
>> I even caught a lot of abuse when I refused to sing along with the
>> Libtards Bashing Bush.
>>
>
>
>Abuse? What abuse? From me? I never abused you. You dope.
>
I spose your references to "Bush Fellators", etc were all addressed to
somebody else?
>I wish I had a copy now of what Chuck Baldwin had to say about Obama's
>win in 2008, and his critique of what happened and why. That's Chuck
>Baldwin of the Constitution Party, just to be clear.
Constitution Party).
All I find today is his own personal blog info.
No mention of the Constitution Party that I can find.
The candidate for today's Constitution Party is Virgil Goode (whoever
the hell he is/was.)
>I don't want Travel to start chortling again, thinking I'm talking about one of the Baldwin Brothers.
>(yeah, Travel's a sophisticated conservative,
>political suave enough not to know who Chuck Baldwin is, but I
>digress)
You ought to know by now that if you ever disagree with any one of
Travel's opinions, he will attack you like a rabid dog.
(IMNSOHO, a trait he shares with the New Liberal Fascists.)
But I digress.
> I would post it if I had it saved on my hard drive, it was
>quite enlightening. I may google it later. But he blamed Bush and
>the republican leadership entirely for Obama's win, and Baldwin was
>right. Bush and the Bush Family are big time liberals from way back.
>It was a huge betrayal of conservative support when candidate Reagan
>picked Bush as his running mate in 1979. Bush was a disaster. Bush
>is still a disaster.
"ButBush!! ButBush!!"?
As I recall, in 2008 the Constitution Party had the usual statement
about restoring Constitutional Government, and respecting the Big Ten.
So far so good.
Then, there was the part about recognizing that Christianity should be
an integral part of the Constitution.
Well, that kind of queered the deal right then and there for me.
I think that the 1st requires the Government to stay neutral on
matters of religion, with respect for the beliefs of all religions.
Today, I don't see anything on the current Constitution Party saying
different.
(No Chuck Baldwin anywhere in sight)
I think there is a Wayback Machine on the Inet, but I don't know how
to access it.
It would be interesting to see what their platform was in 2008.
I'm only going by my memory so I'm open to correction.
I have an excellent memory but it's very short.
Of course back in 2008, I expressed my doubts about the Constitution
Party.
My archives don't go back to 2008, so I just have to go by memory.
I did save one of my most cherished Popinjay quotes, though.
But hey, I don't hold grudges.
Anyway, in the last 4 years we have had a whole parade of morons.
----------------------------------
"Holy fuck city, Turbo, you really ARE the biggest moron on this whole
entire newsgroup. I will pray for you." - Paul Popinjay, 11/7/2008
popinjay999
Nov 2, 2012, 1:11:39 PM11/2/12
to
On Nov 2, 9:09 am, FL Turbo <noem...@notime.com> wrote:
>
> So you join in with the Lefty weenies who are still chanting
> "ButBush!! ButBush!!"?
>
A slightly different twist, Turbo. It was because the conservative
>
> So you join in with the Lefty weenies who are still chanting
> "ButBush!! ButBush!!"?
>
base was so disgusted with Bush's LIBERAL performance, that is how
Obama slipped in. I truly believe that if we had REAL conservatives
in office, the economy and health of the nation would be humming. And
that would be good for everyone, and people would want to keep the
status quo if the status quo was good.
Make sense?
popinjay999
Nov 2, 2012, 1:12:56 PM11/2/12
to
> My archives don't go back to 2008, so I just have to go by memory.
> I did save one of my most cherished Popinjay quotes, though.
>
> But hey, I don't hold grudges.
> Anyway, in the last 4 years we have had a whole parade of morons.
>
> ----------------------------------
> "Holy fuck city, Turbo, you really ARE the biggest moron on this whole
> entire newsgroup. I will pray for you." - Paul Popinjay, 11/7/2008
Well? Did my prayers work?
> I did save one of my most cherished Popinjay quotes, though.
>
> But hey, I don't hold grudges.
> Anyway, in the last 4 years we have had a whole parade of morons.
>
> ----------------------------------
> "Holy fuck city, Turbo, you really ARE the biggest moron on this whole
> entire newsgroup. I will pray for you." - Paul Popinjay, 11/7/2008
0 new messages