Received: by 10.68.227.230 with SMTP id sd6mr3107585pbc.8.1334352931381;
        Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
Path: r9ni52913pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:35:29 -0500
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:35:24 -0600
From: TruthSeeker <TruthSee...@nospam.us>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
Subject: Re: Obamacare to Fall
References: <cav4o7tfmmj3a1i9at0eca805r0iao5c17@4ax.com> <xICdnRgmGYO3lB7SnZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <7ml7o7pnk5rr852gtvmg0do32ckvshi2ju@4ax.com> <icqdnbVs87EvxhnSnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <9k3ao793pfjdlo57kcrlvs4t314ik6soak@4ax.com> <HLGdnes_-6YiJxjSnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@giganews.com> <qmvco71n2qi1mlh9rvia03phlv7bagpvtn@4ax.com> <qs6dnRFDa89rzhrSnZ2dnUVZ_uednZ2d@giganews.com> <ocifo7leh26picljjhhuiv6e3vntqhf0eo@4ax.com> <KqednT7QNon05RXSnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <js5ho7l3s710tqi2351nq8oqtsp4kif8lh@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <js5ho7l3s710tqi2351nq8oqtsp4kif8lh@4ax.com>
Message-ID: <TuedndurUdu_ARXSnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 25
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-vfwo32oZmT8pzF3VVbkbhCFExGnTJwBdTi/fOS4di0ooAWcZmA+koEsEMmwxHPf8rwUUliWfY7OT6oU!yDfVsFAxTGMu8P3RBdHugLJNu65n5TXGuC+L6I5BxUzsxdbeOulrOiAvrvV/H0rdK10FwE5w8vc=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2421
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 4/13/12 3:19 PM, Pepe Papon wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:03:04 -0600, Truthseeker
> <truthsee...@nospam.us> wrote:

...

>> You can play your semantic games to try to convince yourself that the 
>> mandate is a tax, and Constitutional.  I'll accept the fact of what the 
>> law says and see what the Supreme Court decides about its Constitutionality.

> Again, you're the one hung up on semantics, not me.   Your entire
> argument is based on the wording of the law.   I'm saying that the
> wording doesn't matter.  


No, I'm done with you.  I'm saying that the law means what it says, and
that the meaning of words matter (especially in such things as laws),
and all you can do is play Humpty Dumpty.



-- 
TruthSeeker

"On the Internet, no one knows you're a dog."