Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
No racism here....
40 views
Skip to first unread message
O-PGManager
Jul 25, 2012, 1:37:00 PM7/25/12
to
Use of illegal drugs sometime in their lifetime for those 18 and over: *
Whites: 51.2%
Blacks: 45.1%
And yet black people go to jail 13.4 TIMES GREATER than whites for drug
crimes:
http://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports/2000/usa/Rcedrg00.htm#P54_1086
*
http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2k7NSDUH/tabs/Sect1peTabs1to46.htm#Tab1.23B
Opie G. Manager
Rec.Gambling.Poker
Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator Emeritus (2009-2011)
Whites: 51.2%
Blacks: 45.1%
And yet black people go to jail 13.4 TIMES GREATER than whites for drug
crimes:
http://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports/2000/usa/Rcedrg00.htm#P54_1086
*
http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2k7NSDUH/tabs/Sect1peTabs1to46.htm#Tab1.23B
Opie G. Manager
Rec.Gambling.Poker
Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator Emeritus (2009-2011)
mo_ntresor
Jul 25, 2012, 1:49:32 PM7/25/12
to
On Jul 25 2012 11:37 AM, O-PGManager wrote:
> Use of illegal drugs sometime in their lifetime for those 18 and over: *
>
> Whites: 51.2%
> Blacks: 45.1%
>
> And yet black people go to jail 13.4 TIMES GREATER than whites for drug
> crimes:
> http://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports/2000/usa/Rcedrg00.htm#P54_1086
>
> *
> http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2k7NSDUH/tabs/Sect1peTabs1to46.htm#Tab1.23B
LOL. if you think this says something meaningful, you're law training is
> Use of illegal drugs sometime in their lifetime for those 18 and over: *
>
> Whites: 51.2%
> Blacks: 45.1%
>
> And yet black people go to jail 13.4 TIMES GREATER than whites for drug
> crimes:
> http://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports/2000/usa/Rcedrg00.htm#P54_1086
>
> *
> http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2k7NSDUH/tabs/Sect1peTabs1to46.htm#Tab1.23B
progressing.
mo_ntresor
Dave the Clueless
Jul 25, 2012, 2:06:45 PM7/25/12
to
-------
When the truth hurts, lie. - Obama 2012
ramashiva
Jul 25, 2012, 2:29:54 PM7/25/12
to
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 10:37:00 AM UTC-7, O-PGManager wrote:
> Use of illegal drugs sometime in their lifetime for those 18 and over: *
> Whites: 51.2%
> Blacks: 45.1%
> And yet black people go to jail 13.4 TIMES GREATER than whites for drug
> crimes:
OK. Let's take off the kid gloves and tell it like it is. I am tired of pussyfooting around.
> Use of illegal drugs sometime in their lifetime for those 18 and over: *
> Whites: 51.2%
> Blacks: 45.1%
> And yet black people go to jail 13.4 TIMES GREATER than whites for drug
> crimes:
The reason niggers go to jail for drug crimes at a much higher rate than whites is because niggers are much stupider than white people, therefore, they get caught much more often.
The IQ of the average nigger is 85. The IQ of the average white person is 100.
Contrary to Bradley's assertions, this racial IQ gap is genetic. It has nothing to do with environmental factors. There is a mountain of evidence showing the cause of the racial IQ gap is genetic. There is no evidence worth talking about that the racial IQ gap is caused by the environment.
Got that Opie? Niggers are stupid, therefore they get caught using or selling drugs much more often. It has absolutely nothing to do with some imaginary bias in the court system against niggers.
William "The Life" Coleman (ramashiva)
O-PGManager
Jul 25, 2012, 2:39:09 PM7/25/12
to
I applaud your candor. I find your views wrong and abhorrent, but the
world would be a better place if everyone who harbored them such as
yourself was equally unafraid to voice them.
world would be a better place if everyone who harbored them such as
yourself was equally unafraid to voice them.
ramashiva
Jul 25, 2012, 2:46:58 PM7/25/12
to
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 11:39:09 AM UTC-7, O-PGManager wrote:
> I applaud your candor. I find your views wrong and abhorrent, but the
> world would be a better place if everyone who harbored them such as
> yourself was equally unafraid to voice them.
People wouldn't be afraid to voice such views if politically correct assholes like you didn't label them bigots and do everything possible to ostracize them from polite society.
> I applaud your candor. I find your views wrong and abhorrent, but the
> world would be a better place if everyone who harbored them such as
> yourself was equally unafraid to voice them.
O-PGManager
Jul 25, 2012, 3:24:46 PM7/25/12
to
psychiatrically damaged "faggots"...... that doesn't ostracize them from
polite society.
Dave the Clueless
Jul 25, 2012, 3:46:14 PM7/25/12
to
pigs don't bother me. They wear their bigotry on their sleeves.
It is the clever bigots who hide look down on you while they offer to give
you "help" that only makes you a slave to their system that piss me off.
popinjay999
Jul 25, 2012, 3:51:05 PM7/25/12
to
On Jul 25, 10:49 am, "mo_ntresor" <amontilladofortun...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> LOL. if you think this says something meaningful, you're law training is
> progressing.
>
"YOU'RE" grammar training is progressing.
wrote:
>
> LOL. if you think this says something meaningful, you're law training is
> progressing.
>
mo_ntresor
Jul 25, 2012, 4:15:46 PM7/25/12
to
On Jul 25 2012 1:51 PM, popinjay999 wrote:
> > LOL. �if you think this says something meaningful, you're law training is
> > progressing.
>
> "YOU'RE" grammar training is progressing.
i made another today. it's very embarrassing.
> > LOL. �if you think this says something meaningful, you're law training is
> > progressing.
>
> "YOU'RE" grammar training is progressing.
mo_ntresor
BillB
Jul 25, 2012, 4:27:33 PM7/25/12
to
On 7/25/2012 11:29 AM, ramashiva wrote:
> Contrary to Bradley's assertions, this racial IQ gap is genetic. It has nothing to do with environmental factors. There is a mountain of evidence showing the cause of the racial IQ gap is genetic.
But miraculously, it has only been observed by neo-Nazi funded
> Contrary to Bradley's assertions, this racial IQ gap is genetic. It has nothing to do with environmental factors. There is a mountain of evidence showing the cause of the racial IQ gap is genetic.
researchers. What are the odds?? Nobody else can find the "mountain," no
matter how hard they look. Go figure. It must be one of those optical
illusion mountains that you only see if you want to.
O-PGManager
Jul 25, 2012, 4:41:19 PM7/25/12
to
http://msn.foxsports.com/olympics/track/story/greece-expels-triple-jumper-voula-papachristou-over-racist-tweets-072512
Girl espouses her nazi-inspired "jokes" and tweets and gets removed from
the Greek Olympic team. Newsflash Greece - 7% of your country voted with
this woman in your last elections...... are you going to pretend these
people don't exist?
Let her and her views compete openly in the games. Let her come to the
games and be ostracized.
mo_ntresor
Jul 25, 2012, 4:44:41 PM7/25/12
to
On Jul 25 2012 2:41 PM, O-PGManager wrote:
> > I agree entirely. Which is why toothless, sister-fucking hillbilly redneck
> > pigs don't bother me. They wear their bigotry on their sleeves.
> >
> > It is the clever bigots who hide look down on you while they offer to give
> > you "help" that only makes you a slave to their system that piss me off.
>
> Here is an example of what I'm talking about:
>
http://msn.foxsports.com/olympics/track/story/greece-expels-triple-jumper-voula-papachristou-over-racist-tweets-072512
>
> Girl espouses her nazi-inspired "jokes" and tweets and gets removed from
> the Greek Olympic team. Newsflash Greece - 7% of your country voted with
> this woman in your last elections...... are you going to pretend these
> people don't exist?
>
> Let her and her views compete openly in the games. Let her come to the
> games and be ostracized.
"Commenting on the widely reported appearance of Nile-virus-carrying
> > I agree entirely. Which is why toothless, sister-fucking hillbilly redneck
> > pigs don't bother me. They wear their bigotry on their sleeves.
> >
> > It is the clever bigots who hide look down on you while they offer to give
> > you "help" that only makes you a slave to their system that piss me off.
>
> Here is an example of what I'm talking about:
>
http://msn.foxsports.com/olympics/track/story/greece-expels-triple-jumper-voula-papachristou-over-racist-tweets-072512
>
> Girl espouses her nazi-inspired "jokes" and tweets and gets removed from
> the Greek Olympic team. Newsflash Greece - 7% of your country voted with
> this woman in your last elections...... are you going to pretend these
> people don't exist?
>
> Let her and her views compete openly in the games. Let her come to the
> games and be ostracized.
mosquitoes in Athens, Papachristou wrote: ''With so many Africans in
Greece, the West Nile mosquitoes will be getting home food!!!''."
i see nothing racist. you people are pathetic and weak.
mo_ntresor
bratt
Jul 25, 2012, 4:53:18 PM7/25/12
to
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03876wG1pmY
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator, rec.gambling.poker
Whose stated mission is to call out the Asses on RGP
ramashiva
Jul 25, 2012, 5:35:19 PM7/25/12
to
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 1:27:33 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On 7/25/2012 11:29 AM, ramashiva wrote:
> > Contrary to Bradley's assertions, this racial IQ gap is genetic. It has nothing to do with environmental factors. There is a mountain of evidence showing the cause of the racial IQ gap is genetic.
> But miraculously, it has only been observed by neo-Nazi funded
> researchers.
That's a flat out lie, and you know it. Every time you throw out that nonsense, you confirm you are a liar.
> On 7/25/2012 11:29 AM, ramashiva wrote:
> > Contrary to Bradley's assertions, this racial IQ gap is genetic. It has nothing to do with environmental factors. There is a mountain of evidence showing the cause of the racial IQ gap is genetic.
> But miraculously, it has only been observed by neo-Nazi funded
> researchers.
Rather than face the clear fact that the racial IQ gap is most certainly genetic, you comfort yourself with this politically correct lie.
You are pathetic. You have an idealized picture of the way the world should be, and you simply close your mind to all evidence that the world is not at all like you fantasize it to be.
Niggers are stupid, Bill. That's the bottom line. Stop blaming Whites for the failures and shortcomings of the niggers. That's the most pernicious of all your politically correct lies.
Pepe Papon
Jul 26, 2012, 5:10:53 AM7/26/12
to
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:29:54 -0700 (PDT), ramashiva
<ramas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Contrary to Bradley's assertions, this racial IQ gap is genetic. It has nothing to do with environmental factors. There is a mountain of evidence showing the cause of the racial IQ gap is genetic. There is no evidence worth talking about that the racial IQ gap is caused by the environment.
Nesbitt seems to make a pretty strong case to the contrary:
<ramas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Contrary to Bradley's assertions, this racial IQ gap is genetic. It has nothing to do with environmental factors. There is a mountain of evidence showing the cause of the racial IQ gap is genetic. There is no evidence worth talking about that the racial IQ gap is caused by the environment.
http://tinyurl.com/d3f2epp
--
Pepe "The Revelation" Papon
Pepe Papon
Jul 26, 2012, 5:17:22 AM7/26/12
to
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:53:18 -0700, "bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid>
wrote:
>On Jul 25 2012 3:27 PM, BillB wrote:
>
>> On 7/25/2012 11:29 AM, ramashiva wrote:
>>
>> > Contrary to Bradley's assertions, this racial IQ gap is genetic. It has
>nothing to do with
>> environmental factors. There is a mountain of evidence showing the cause of
>the racial IQ gap is
>> genetic.
>>
>> But miraculously, it has only been observed by neo-Nazi funded
>> researchers. What are the odds?? Nobody else can find the "mountain," no
>> matter how hard they look. Go figure. It must be one of those optical
>> illusion mountains that you only see if you want to.
>
>Tell me B-BillB - is this racist?
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03876wG1pmY
What about it is racist?
wrote:
>On Jul 25 2012 3:27 PM, BillB wrote:
>
>> On 7/25/2012 11:29 AM, ramashiva wrote:
>>
>> > Contrary to Bradley's assertions, this racial IQ gap is genetic. It has
>nothing to do with
>> environmental factors. There is a mountain of evidence showing the cause of
>the racial IQ gap is
>> genetic.
>>
>> But miraculously, it has only been observed by neo-Nazi funded
>> researchers. What are the odds?? Nobody else can find the "mountain," no
>> matter how hard they look. Go figure. It must be one of those optical
>> illusion mountains that you only see if you want to.
>
>Tell me B-BillB - is this racist?
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03876wG1pmY
Dave the Clueless
Jul 26, 2012, 11:21:09 AM7/26/12
to
bratt
Jul 26, 2012, 11:42:36 AM7/26/12
to
fffurken
Jul 26, 2012, 8:58:07 PM7/26/12
to
On Jul 26, 4:42 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> > >Tell me B-BillB - is this racist?
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03876wG1pmY
>
> > What about it is racist?
>
> > --
>
> > Pepe "The Revelation" Papon
>
> ahhhh the B-BillB theory - only white people can be racists.
The link you posted of the senator was of her accusing white people of
> > >Tell me B-BillB - is this racist?
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03876wG1pmY
>
> > What about it is racist?
>
> > --
>
> > Pepe "The Revelation" Papon
>
> ahhhh the B-BillB theory - only white people can be racists.
being racist, how is that racist?
And aren't you also accusing, or alluding to the fact, that black
people are racist? Does that make you a racist?
ramashiva
Jul 26, 2012, 9:25:04 PM7/26/12
to
On Thursday, July 26, 2012 5:58:07 PM UTC-7, fffurken wrote:
> The link you posted of the senator was of her accusing white people of
> being racist, how is that racist?
Numbnuts, when you make a general pejorative statement, like "white people are racists", about a race of people, that is by definition a racist statement.
> The link you posted of the senator was of her accusing white people of
> being racist, how is that racist?
Message has been deleted
fffurken
Jul 27, 2012, 3:57:32 AM7/27/12
to
On Jul 27, 2:25 am, ramashiva <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Numbnuts, when you make a general pejorative statement, like "white people are racists", about a race of people, that is by definition a racist statement.
No, it's not. It may be a politician playing the race card, it may be
> Numbnuts, when you make a general pejorative statement, like "white people are racists", about a race of people, that is by definition a racist statement.
rabble-rousing, it may be divisive, it may be WRONG, but it is not
racist.
Calling black people "dumb niggers" IS racist. An exclusionary policy
by the Boy Scouts, and last I checked the Boy Scouts has nothing to do
with sexuality or sex, based on sexuality IS bigotry. When you bragg
about your intelligence, whether it's true, IS bragging and also a
little ironic as you are a fool.
ramashiva
Jul 27, 2012, 6:13:04 AM7/27/12
to
On Friday, July 27, 2012 12:57:32 AM UTC-7, fffurken wrote:
> On Jul 27, 2:25 am, ramashiva <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Numbnuts, when you make a general pejorative statement, like "white people
> > are racists", about a race of people, that is by definition a racist
> > statement.
> No, it's not. It may be a politician playing the race card, it may be
> rabble-rousing, it may be divisive, it may be WRONG, but it is not
> racist.
It absolutely is racist in the vilest sense.
> On Jul 27, 2:25 am, ramashiva <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Numbnuts, when you make a general pejorative statement, like "white people
> > are racists", about a race of people, that is by definition a racist
> > statement.
> No, it's not. It may be a politician playing the race card, it may be
> rabble-rousing, it may be divisive, it may be WRONG, but it is not
> racist.
"White people are racists" is a pejorative, negative statement about a racial group. That is the very definition of a racist statement. What the fuck are you smoking, Fuckface?
> Calling black people "dumb niggers" IS racist.
> An exclusionary policy by the Boy Scouts, and last I checked the Boy Scouts
> has nothing to do with sexuality or sex, based on sexuality IS bigotry.
The Boy Scouts are a private organization. They are free to exclude any class of people they choose. If they want to belong to a faggot-free organization, they have that right, and their choice is none of your fucking business.
> When you bragg about your intelligence, whether it's true, IS bragging and
> also a little ironic as you are a fool.
"When you brag about your intelligence, it is bragging."
Fucking Fuckface! Master Logician!
Everything I have said about my IQ is a simple statement of fact. If you want to pejoratively characterize that as bragging, that is your problem, not mine.
I have taken many IQ tests, probably as many as any living human. I have never been given written results of an IQ test. The results are always communicated orally.
What I do have is the documentation that I scored 790/770 on the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) and a perfect 800 on the Graduate Management Admissions Test (GMAT).
Both these tests are taken exclusively by college graduates planning on going to graduate school. Obviously this group has an average IQ significantly higher than 100. Since the scores on the GRE and GMAT represent a normal distributon, my scores on these two tests are evidence of an extremely high IQ.
fffurken
Jul 27, 2012, 7:02:34 AM7/27/12
to
On Jul 27, 11:13 am, ramashiva <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > No, it's not. It may be a politician playing the race card, it may be
> > rabble-rousing, it may be divisive, it may be WRONG, but it is not
> > racist.
>
> It absolutely is racist in the vilest sense.
>
> "White people are racists" is a pejorative, negative statement about a racial group. That is the very definition of a racist statement. What the fuck are you smoking, Fuckface?
I've explained what it is above, I won't repeat myseld. Do you think
> > No, it's not. It may be a politician playing the race card, it may be
> > rabble-rousing, it may be divisive, it may be WRONG, but it is not
> > racist.
>
> It absolutely is racist in the vilest sense.
>
> "White people are racists" is a pejorative, negative statement about a racial group. That is the very definition of a racist statement. What the fuck are you smoking, Fuckface?
she was saying ALL white people are racist btw? I doubt she is as
irrational as you are.
> > Calling black people "dumb niggers" IS racist.
>
> It absolutely is not. That is politically correct demonization of the word "nigger", which is a perfectly good English word which has been in common use for hundreds of years. You are full of shit and do not know what you are talking about.
niggers are innately stupid and are inferior to white people. You are
racist of the vilest kind and anyone with a room temperature IQ would
realise that.
> > An exclusionary policy by the Boy Scouts, and last I checked the Boy Scouts
> > has nothing to do with sexuality or sex, based on sexuality IS bigotry.
>
> It absolutely is not bigotry. That is a pernicious, politically correct lie In the USA, we have freedom of association. That means we have a constitutional right to associate or not associate with whomever we please, and we don't have to explain why we make these decisions.
>
> The Boy Scouts are a private organization. They are free to exclude any class of people they choose. If they want to belong to a faggot-free organization, they have that right, and their choice is none of your fucking business.
it isn't bigotry. Fuck me, you are dense.
> > When you bragg about your intelligence, whether it's true, IS bragging and
> > also a little ironic as you are a fool.
>
> You are a master logician. Here is what you are saying --
>
> "When you brag about your intelligence, it is bragging."
>
> Fucking Fuckface! Master Logician!
obvious, because it IS fucking obvious! Your delusions or otherwise
faulty reasoning really do not matter.
O-PGManager
Jul 27, 2012, 1:03:24 PM7/27/12
to
Pepe Papon
Jul 27, 2012, 7:43:37 PM7/27/12
to
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:42:36 -0700, "bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid>
for you.
She believes that racism is an issue in the election. You think that
believing racism is an issue and pointing it out is itself racist.
That absurd position is perfectly consitent with the racist
accusations you so often direct at BlllB.
wrote:
>On Jul 26 2012 4:17 AM, Pepe Papon wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:53:18 -0700, "bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Jul 25 2012 3:27 PM, BillB wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 7/25/2012 11:29 AM, ramashiva wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Contrary to Bradley's assertions, this racial IQ gap is genetic. It has
>> >nothing to do with
>> >> environmental factors. There is a mountain of evidence showing the cause
>of
>> >the racial IQ gap is
>> >> genetic.
>> >>
>> >> But miraculously, it has only been observed by neo-Nazi funded
>> >> researchers. What are the odds?? Nobody else can find the "mountain," no
>> >> matter how hard they look. Go figure. It must be one of those optical
>> >> illusion mountains that you only see if you want to.
>> >
>> >Tell me B-BillB - is this racist?
>> >
>> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03876wG1pmY
>>
>> What about it is racist?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Pepe "The Revelation" Papon
>
>ahhhh the B-BillB theory - only white people can be racists.
Failure to answer the question noted. Not to worry. I'll answer it
>On Jul 26 2012 4:17 AM, Pepe Papon wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:53:18 -0700, "bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Jul 25 2012 3:27 PM, BillB wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 7/25/2012 11:29 AM, ramashiva wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Contrary to Bradley's assertions, this racial IQ gap is genetic. It has
>> >nothing to do with
>> >> environmental factors. There is a mountain of evidence showing the cause
>of
>> >the racial IQ gap is
>> >> genetic.
>> >>
>> >> But miraculously, it has only been observed by neo-Nazi funded
>> >> researchers. What are the odds?? Nobody else can find the "mountain," no
>> >> matter how hard they look. Go figure. It must be one of those optical
>> >> illusion mountains that you only see if you want to.
>> >
>> >Tell me B-BillB - is this racist?
>> >
>> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03876wG1pmY
>>
>> What about it is racist?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Pepe "The Revelation" Papon
>
>ahhhh the B-BillB theory - only white people can be racists.
for you.
She believes that racism is an issue in the election. You think that
believing racism is an issue and pointing it out is itself racist.
That absurd position is perfectly consitent with the racist
accusations you so often direct at BlllB.
ramashiva
Jul 27, 2012, 9:10:07 PM7/27/12
to
On Friday, July 27, 2012 10:03:24 AM UTC-7, O-PGManager wrote:
> But saying "niggers are stupid" is not a racist statement. Got it.
No, it is not a racist statement, and here's why --
> But saying "niggers are stupid" is not a racist statement. Got it.
The average IQ of whites in America is 100. The average IQ for blacks is 85. This has been well known and well documented for 100 years.
The big argument is whether this racial IQ gap is primarily caused by genetic factors or environmental factors. There is a mountain of evidence suggesting that the cause is primarily genetic, although there is no question that environmental factors also play a part.
Neither Bradley nor the politically correct academic psychologists Bradley loves to quote have laid a glove on the peer reviewed scientific evidence published by Rushton and Jensen in 2005 --
"Thirty Years of Research on Race Differences in Cognitive Ability"
http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf
I want you to note that this ground breaking article is published in --
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
2005, Vol. 11, No. 2, 235–294
That is a refereed, peer reviewed scientific journal, and it is considered the top tier of publications of the American Psychological Association.
So Opie, bottom line. "Niggers are stupid" is not a racist statement. It is a statement of scientific fact expressed crudely in the vernacular.
fffurken
Jul 27, 2012, 9:57:28 PM7/27/12
to
On Jul 28, 2:10 am, ramashiva <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The big argument is whether this racial IQ gap is primarily caused by genetic factors or environmental factors. There is a mountain of evidence suggesting that the cause is primarily genetic, although there is no question that environmental factors also play a part.
> The big argument is whether this racial IQ gap is primarily caused by genetic factors or environmental factors. There is a mountain of evidence suggesting that the cause is primarily genetic, although there is no question that environmental factors also play a part.
"Contrary to Bradley's assertions, this racial IQ gap is genetic. It
has nothing to do with environmental factors."
ramadikhead, in this fucking thread, July 25th.
has nothing to do with environmental factors."
Why does anyone take you seriously anymore?
O-PGManager
Jul 28, 2012, 12:23:44 AM7/28/12
to
On Jul 27 2012 9:10 PM, ramashiva wrote:
> On Friday, July 27, 2012 10:03:24 AM UTC-7, O-PGManager wrote:
>
> > But saying "niggers are stupid" is not a racist statement. Got it.
>
> No, it is not a racist statement, and here's why --
"when you make a general pejorative statement.... about a race of people,
> On Friday, July 27, 2012 10:03:24 AM UTC-7, O-PGManager wrote:
>
> > But saying "niggers are stupid" is not a racist statement. Got it.
>
> No, it is not a racist statement, and here's why --
that is by definition a racist statement." -Ramashiva
"niggers" - that's general, lumping billions of people together under one
racial umbrella, using the most pejorative term in history....
"are stupid" - that's pejorative...
Explain how this doesn't perfectly line up with your asserted definition
of a racist statement.
ramashiva
Jul 28, 2012, 2:29:30 AM7/28/12
to
On Friday, July 27, 2012 9:23:44 PM UTC-7, O-PGManager wrote:
> On Jul 27 2012 9:10 PM, ramashiva wrote:
> > On Friday, July 27, 2012 10:03:24 AM UTC-7, O-PGManager wrote:
> > > But saying "niggers are stupid" is not a racist statement. Got it.
> > No, it is not a racist statement, and here's why --
> "when you make a general pejorative statement.... about a race of people,
> that is by definition a racist statement." -Ramashiva
> "niggers" - that's general, lumping billions of people together under one
>
> racial umbrella, using the most pejorative term in history....
Sorry, there are not billions of niggers in the world. And everyone with any degree of intellectual sophistication understands that there are always exceptions to general rules and statements, including this one.
> On Jul 27 2012 9:10 PM, ramashiva wrote:
> > On Friday, July 27, 2012 10:03:24 AM UTC-7, O-PGManager wrote:
> > > But saying "niggers are stupid" is not a racist statement. Got it.
> > No, it is not a racist statement, and here's why --
> "when you make a general pejorative statement.... about a race of people,
> that is by definition a racist statement." -Ramashiva
> "niggers" - that's general, lumping billions of people together under one
>
> racial umbrella, using the most pejorative term in history....
And why is "niggers" the most pejorative racial epithet in history? There are thousands of racial epithets in the English language? Why is "niggers" especially egregious??? You are spouting politically correct nonsense.
> "are stupid" - that's pejorative...
> Explain how this doesn't perfectly line up with your asserted definition
> of a racist statement.
In other words, it is a scientific fact that niggers are stupid. Please explain how a statement of fact can be racist. Or do you think, a la Stephen Colbert, that reality has a well known racist bias?
Dutch
Jul 28, 2012, 2:41:23 AM7/28/12
to
missed his point, the term "nigger" is not the reason it is a racist
statement, the reason is that the statement uses racial origin to
disparage, that's what racism is.
BillB
Jul 28, 2012, 3:19:08 AM7/28/12
to
On 7/26/2012 8:42 AM, bratt wrote:
> ahhhh the B-BillB theory - only white people can be racists.
I've never, ever said that, or anything like it.
> ahhhh the B-BillB theory - only white people can be racists.
I'll ask one more time: If I am such a bad person, why do you need to
make up lies about me?
ramashiva
Jul 28, 2012, 5:15:04 AM7/28/12
to
On Friday, July 27, 2012 11:41:23 PM UTC-7, Dutch wrote:
> ramashiva wrote:
> > In other words, it is a scientific fact that niggers are stupid. Please explain how a statement of fact can be racist. Or do you think, a la Stephen Colbert, that reality has a well known racist bias?
"Thirty Years of Research on Race Differences in Cognitive Ability"
http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf
I want you to note that this ground breaking article is published in --
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
2005, Vol. 11, No. 2, 235–294
That is a refereed, peer-reviewed, scientific journal, and it is considered among the top tier of publications of the American Psychological Association.
It is fact-free politically correct doctrine that the racial IQ gap is caused by environmental factors, not genetic factors.
> ramashiva wrote:
> > In other words, it is a scientific fact that niggers are stupid. Please explain how a statement of fact can be racist. Or do you think, a la Stephen Colbert, that reality has a well known racist bias?
> It's not a scientific fact, it's racist doctrine, and horseshit. And you
> missed his point, the term "nigger" is not the reason it is a racist
> statement, the reason is that the statement uses racial origin to
> disparage, that's what racism is.
It's not racist doctrine, idiot. It's scientific fact. Did you read the ground breaking article I linked by Rushton and Jensen, two of the most highly credentialed psychologists who are experts on IQ? this article --
> missed his point, the term "nigger" is not the reason it is a racist
> statement, the reason is that the statement uses racial origin to
> disparage, that's what racism is.
"Thirty Years of Research on Race Differences in Cognitive Ability"
http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf
I want you to note that this ground breaking article is published in --
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
2005, Vol. 11, No. 2, 235–294
It is fact-free politically correct doctrine that the racial IQ gap is caused by environmental factors, not genetic factors.
fffurken
Jul 28, 2012, 6:30:53 AM7/28/12
to
On Jul 28, 10:15 am, ramashiva <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, July 27, 2012 11:41:23 PM UTC-7, Dutch wrote:
> > ramashiva wrote:
> > > In other words, it is a scientific fact that niggers are stupid. Please explain how a statement of fact can be racist. Or do you think, a la Stephen Colbert, that reality has a well known racist bias?
> > It's not a scientific fact, it's racist doctrine, and horseshit. And you
> > missed his point, the term "nigger" is not the reason it is a racist
> > statement, the reason is that the statement uses racial origin to
> > disparage, that's what racism is.
>
> It's not racist doctrine, idiot. It's scientific fact.
Your "scientific fact" is that black people have consistently
> On Friday, July 27, 2012 11:41:23 PM UTC-7, Dutch wrote:
> > ramashiva wrote:
> > > In other words, it is a scientific fact that niggers are stupid. Please explain how a statement of fact can be racist. Or do you think, a la Stephen Colbert, that reality has a well known racist bias?
> > It's not a scientific fact, it's racist doctrine, and horseshit. And you
> > missed his point, the term "nigger" is not the reason it is a racist
> > statement, the reason is that the statement uses racial origin to
> > disparage, that's what racism is.
>
> It's not racist doctrine, idiot. It's scientific fact.
underperformed white people in empirical IQ studies by approximately 1
standard deviation.
What else ya got?
Is this a scientific fact?
"Contrary to Bradley's assertions, this racial IQ gap is genetic. It
has nothing to do with environmental factors."
fffurken
Jul 28, 2012, 8:58:24 AM7/28/12
to
On Jul 26, 10:10 am, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Contrary to Bradley's assertions, this racial IQ gap is genetic. It has nothing to do with environmental factors. There is a mountain of evidence showing the cause of the racial IQ gap is genetic. There is no evidence worth talking about that the racial IQ gap is caused by the environment.
>
> Nesbitt seems to make a pretty strong case to the contrary:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/d3f2epp
<..crickets..>
> <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Contrary to Bradley's assertions, this racial IQ gap is genetic. It has nothing to do with environmental factors. There is a mountain of evidence showing the cause of the racial IQ gap is genetic. There is no evidence worth talking about that the racial IQ gap is caused by the environment.
>
> Nesbitt seems to make a pretty strong case to the contrary:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/d3f2epp
O-PGManager
Jul 28, 2012, 10:41:54 AM7/28/12
to
On Jul 28 2012 2:29 AM, ramashiva wrote:
> On Friday, July 27, 2012 9:23:44 PM UTC-7, O-PGManager wrote:
>
> > On Jul 27 2012 9:10 PM, ramashiva wrote:
>
> > > On Friday, July 27, 2012 10:03:24 AM UTC-7, O-PGManager wrote:
>
> > > > But saying "niggers are stupid" is not a racist statement. Got it.
>
> > > No, it is not a racist statement, and here's why --
>
> > "when you make a general pejorative statement.... about a race of people,
> > that is by definition a racist statement." -Ramashiva
>
> > "niggers" - that's general, lumping billions of people together under one
> >
> > racial umbrella, using the most pejorative term in history....
>
> Sorry, there are not billions of niggers in the world. And everyone with
any degree of intellectual
> sophistication understands that there are always exceptions to general rules
and statements,
> including this one.
Got it. "Niggers are stupid" is an "exception to the rule" that all
> On Friday, July 27, 2012 9:23:44 PM UTC-7, O-PGManager wrote:
>
> > On Jul 27 2012 9:10 PM, ramashiva wrote:
>
> > > On Friday, July 27, 2012 10:03:24 AM UTC-7, O-PGManager wrote:
>
> > > > But saying "niggers are stupid" is not a racist statement. Got it.
>
> > > No, it is not a racist statement, and here's why --
>
> > "when you make a general pejorative statement.... about a race of people,
> > that is by definition a racist statement." -Ramashiva
>
> > "niggers" - that's general, lumping billions of people together under one
> >
> > racial umbrella, using the most pejorative term in history....
>
> Sorry, there are not billions of niggers in the world. And everyone with
any degree of intellectual
> sophistication understands that there are always exceptions to general rules
and statements,
> including this one.
general, pejorative statements about a race are by definition racist
statements - and everyone with "any degree of intellectual sophistication
understands that". Got it.
Dutch
Jul 28, 2012, 7:05:30 PM7/28/12
to
ramashiva wrote:
> On Friday, July 27, 2012 11:41:23 PM UTC-7, Dutch wrote:
>
>> ramashiva wrote:
>
>>> In other words, it is a scientific fact that niggers are stupid. Please explain how a statement of fact can be racist. Or do you think, a la Stephen Colbert, that reality has a well known racist bias?
>
>> It's not a scientific fact, it's racist doctrine, and horseshit. And you
>> missed his point, the term "nigger" is not the reason it is a racist
>> statement, the reason is that the statement uses racial origin to
>> disparage, that's what racism is.
>
> It's not racist doctrine, idiot. It's scientific fact.
No it isn't. It is a scientific study the meaning of which is hotly
> On Friday, July 27, 2012 11:41:23 PM UTC-7, Dutch wrote:
>
>> ramashiva wrote:
>
>>> In other words, it is a scientific fact that niggers are stupid. Please explain how a statement of fact can be racist. Or do you think, a la Stephen Colbert, that reality has a well known racist bias?
>
>> It's not a scientific fact, it's racist doctrine, and horseshit. And you
>> missed his point, the term "nigger" is not the reason it is a racist
>> statement, the reason is that the statement uses racial origin to
>> disparage, that's what racism is.
>
> It's not racist doctrine, idiot. It's scientific fact.
debated by scientists.
> Did you read the ground breaking article I linked by Rushton and Jensen, two of the most highly credentialed psychologists who are experts on IQ? this article --
scientists on the meaning of these findings.
> "Thirty Years of Research on Race Differences in Cognitive Ability"
>
> http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf
>
> I want you to note that this ground breaking article is published in --
>
> Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
> 2005, Vol. 11, No. 2, 235–294
>
> That is a refereed, peer-reviewed, scientific journal, and it is considered among the top tier of publications of the American Psychological Association.
>
> It is fact-free politically correct doctrine that the racial IQ gap is caused by environmental factors, not genetic factors.
genetic factors, not environmental factors.
If you took a typical group of American white children, and exchanged
the educational opportunity and environment with a typical group of
black children over a decade, the test results would reverse.
You are a racist scumsucker.
fffurken
Jul 28, 2012, 9:25:01 PM7/28/12
to
little doubt that if the lower socioeconomic group was tested for IQ
in my country they would underperform the higher socioeconomic group.
But we're ALL white (practically)!
Coleman is just a racist propagandist. Don't mind that evil cunt.
Travel A
Jul 28, 2012, 9:58:25 PM7/28/12
to
Ummm, what's "tried drugs" have to do with drug related street crime and
areas of the most street, drug deals? Which has the most, black
neighborhoods or white neighborhoods.
Which demographic chooses drugs related income for an occupation most,
white or black?
Where are, and who does the most shootings in the street over drugs,
muggings, robberies of drug stores,etc., (see Oklahoma) on an' on.
areas of the most street, drug deals? Which has the most, black
neighborhoods or white neighborhoods.
Which demographic chooses drugs related income for an occupation most,
white or black?
Where are, and who does the most shootings in the street over drugs,
muggings, robberies of drug stores,etc., (see Oklahoma) on an' on.
fffurken
Jul 28, 2012, 10:34:48 PM7/28/12
to
thread, probably because you're a fellow racist, allow me to say this
-
To whom you were replying to is not understandable to some RGPers, so
clean up your act.
Secondly, no one gives a flying fuck what you have to say. You are an
object of ridicule on RGP, whether it's politics or your belief that
science is a left wing conspiracy, or whatever.
So I think it's best you stay in your fucking box, and be a good boy.
Travel A
Jul 28, 2012, 11:07:53 PM7/28/12
to
Please explain how the Phoenicians, Egypt, Carthage, all developed great
civilizations thousands of years ago, and the Sub-Saharan black people
(non European influenced- like South Africa) still live in mud huts to
this day.
The "blacks" in the United States are descendent from West Africa, were
slaves and ony educated in relatively, recent times.
It only makes obvious, objective sense that they didn't deveop
brain-power at anywhere near the rate of educated European-societies,
for example.
How about the Persian Empire?
Now, if you moonbats believe in evolution so much, as a method of
filling-in-the blanks of science so much, explain why Sub-Saharan blacks
didn't evolve in civilization development if they have an equal I.Q. as
those in North Africa?
It was too hot down there to bother? They're all of a Rhodes Scholar
I.Q. who just said; "fuck it, the huts are good enough, and it's fun to
camp out, anyway."
It's pretty hot in the North African desert, too.
Okay, "the Eskimos," or the various native indians of South America,
etc., who live in the same locales as the ancient Aztecs, but didn't
duplicate that same advanced civiliation. That's the same "environment,"
isn't it?
Let's give credit where credit is due: if certain people have enormous
success and develop great civilizations, they're proably smarter than
the ones who didn't. Where's the "racism?"
There's nothing racist about the facts of the matter. There's only left
wing propaganda and political agenda on this topic.
civilizations thousands of years ago, and the Sub-Saharan black people
(non European influenced- like South Africa) still live in mud huts to
this day.
The "blacks" in the United States are descendent from West Africa, were
slaves and ony educated in relatively, recent times.
It only makes obvious, objective sense that they didn't deveop
brain-power at anywhere near the rate of educated European-societies,
for example.
How about the Persian Empire?
Now, if you moonbats believe in evolution so much, as a method of
filling-in-the blanks of science so much, explain why Sub-Saharan blacks
didn't evolve in civilization development if they have an equal I.Q. as
those in North Africa?
It was too hot down there to bother? They're all of a Rhodes Scholar
I.Q. who just said; "fuck it, the huts are good enough, and it's fun to
camp out, anyway."
It's pretty hot in the North African desert, too.
Okay, "the Eskimos," or the various native indians of South America,
etc., who live in the same locales as the ancient Aztecs, but didn't
duplicate that same advanced civiliation. That's the same "environment,"
isn't it?
Let's give credit where credit is due: if certain people have enormous
success and develop great civilizations, they're proably smarter than
the ones who didn't. Where's the "racism?"
There's nothing racist about the facts of the matter. There's only left
wing propaganda and political agenda on this topic.
~M~
Jul 28, 2012, 11:29:23 PM7/28/12
to
"Dutch" wrote in message news:Th_Qr.28461$jA7....@newsfe15.iad...
>If you took a typical group of American white children, and exchanged the
>educational opportunity and environment with a typical group of black
>children over a decade, the test results would reverse.
Cite?
--
"Let's take a wander into the Republican Southern States, including Texas.
We'll find a typical singlewide (with a doublewide porch for 8-dogs to hid
[sic]
under); with a shiny new pickup with tires the size of Bel-dim's ego; gun
rack, stars and bars, Christian cross and a radio blaring Rush Limbaugh.
The single-toothed right-wing idiot comes out and spits as he laughs at
the suggestion that Democrats are against 'colored people' and are Ku Klux
Klan lovers."
- Jerry (Big 'ol Bigot) 'n Vegas Sturdivant 4/6/2011
>If you took a typical group of American white children, and exchanged the
>educational opportunity and environment with a typical group of black
>children over a decade, the test results would reverse.
--
"Let's take a wander into the Republican Southern States, including Texas.
We'll find a typical singlewide (with a doublewide porch for 8-dogs to hid
[sic]
under); with a shiny new pickup with tires the size of Bel-dim's ego; gun
rack, stars and bars, Christian cross and a radio blaring Rush Limbaugh.
The single-toothed right-wing idiot comes out and spits as he laughs at
the suggestion that Democrats are against 'colored people' and are Ku Klux
Klan lovers."
- Jerry (Big 'ol Bigot) 'n Vegas Sturdivant 4/6/2011
Travel A
Jul 28, 2012, 11:27:22 PM7/28/12
to
Wow, look at the poison spew outa, fffurfgoof, chortle.
Travel A
Jul 28, 2012, 11:49:38 PM7/28/12
to
ffurfie, you need to read this, again:
fffurken
Jul 29, 2012, 6:09:14 AM7/29/12
to
On Jul 29, 4:49 am, nine...@webtv.net (Travel A) wrote:
> ffurfie, you need to read this, again:
>
> Ummm, what's "tried drugs" have to do with drug related street crime and
> areas of the most street, drug deals? Which has the most, black
> neighborhoods or white neighborhoods.
> Which demographic chooses drugs related income for an occupation most,
> white or black?
The poor.
> ffurfie, you need to read this, again:
>
> Ummm, what's "tried drugs" have to do with drug related street crime and
> areas of the most street, drug deals? Which has the most, black
> neighborhoods or white neighborhoods.
> Which demographic chooses drugs related income for an occupation most,
> white or black?
Barney, when I watched susan's "Awesome video" about America's fall
from the greatest country (where I think it belongs) this part
reminded me of you -
"We aspired to intelligence, we didn't belittle it, it didn't make us
feel inferior".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=zEyUWKJFER8&NR=1
You are one of the dumbest creatures to walk this Earth. And you and
the rest of the religious right in America have a helluva lot to
answer for, IMO. You are all going straight to hell.
ramashiva
Jul 29, 2012, 6:22:09 AM7/29/12
to
The niggers do all those things. Duh, fucking duh.
As a racial group, the niggers are by far the most toxic element in our society. Anyone who denies this would be a much better country without them is in denial.
Of course, the politically correct liberals insist that all the niggers' problems are because of the racism of white people.
That is delusional nonsense. Ultimately, everyone is responsible for their own behavior and their own lives, and that includes the niggers, individually and collectively.
It is time for the niggers and their nigger-fellating politically correct white liberal allies to face reality and stop blaming white racism for the niggers' problems. In the most profound sense, the niggers are responsible for their own problems.
William Coleman (ramashiva)
fffurken
Jul 29, 2012, 6:29:04 AM7/29/12
to
On Jul 29, 11:22 am, ramashiva <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will answer for Fuckface, since he is incapable of giving an honest answer to this question, or most any other question.
Question? Don't make me fucking laugh. Barney wasn't looking for an
> I will answer for Fuckface, since he is incapable of giving an honest answer to this question, or most any other question.
answer, you imbecile, it was more a statement. I could have given "The
niggers, duh fucking duh" as an answer but I'm just slightly more
thoughtful than a moron like you.
Travel A
Jul 29, 2012, 6:45:32 AM7/29/12
to
Furfgoof, this reminds me of you:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/35/Olive_baboon_Ngorongoro.jpg/250px-Olive_baboon_Ngorongoro.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/35/Olive_baboon_Ngorongoro.jpg/250px-Olive_baboon_Ngorongoro.jpg
Travel A
Jul 29, 2012, 6:47:04 AM7/29/12
to
fffurken
Jul 29, 2012, 6:52:56 AM7/29/12
to
On Jul 29, 11:45 am, nine...@webtv.net (Travel A) wrote:
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/35/Olive_baboon...
You should make a tinyurl out of that or something Barney.
Otherwise It's kindof a giveaway that you're just linking me to a
picture of a baboon, you baboon!
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/35/Olive_baboon...
You should make a tinyurl out of that or something Barney.
Otherwise It's kindof a giveaway that you're just linking me to a
picture of a baboon, you baboon!
Travel A
Jul 30, 2012, 12:34:39 AM7/30/12
to
Travel A
Jul 30, 2012, 12:35:50 AM7/30/12
to
Pepe Papon
Jul 30, 2012, 2:05:27 AM7/30/12
to
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 23:29:23 -0400, "~M~" <~M~@gmail.com> wrote:
>"Dutch" wrote in message news:Th_Qr.28461$jA7....@newsfe15.iad...
>
>
>>If you took a typical group of American white children, and exchanged the
>>educational opportunity and environment with a typical group of black
>>children over a decade, the test results would reverse.
>
>Cite?
This article doesn't specifcally state the above, but it strongly
>"Dutch" wrote in message news:Th_Qr.28461$jA7....@newsfe15.iad...
>
>
>>If you took a typical group of American white children, and exchanged the
>>educational opportunity and environment with a typical group of black
>>children over a decade, the test results would reverse.
>
>Cite?
suggests it:
http://goo.gl/qfwz4
--
Pepe "The Revelation" Papon
Pepe Papon
Jul 30, 2012, 2:07:01 AM7/30/12
to
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 23:41:23 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>> In other words, it is a scientific fact that niggers are stupid. Please explain how a statement of fact can be racist. Or do you think, a la Stephen Colbert, that reality has a well known racist bias?
>>
>>
>> William "The Life" Coleman (ramashiva)
>>
>
>It's not a scientific fact, it's racist doctrine, and horseshit. And you
>missed his point, the term "nigger" is not the reason it is a racist
>statement, the reason is that the statement uses racial origin to
>disparage, that's what racism is.
What if the statement were, in fact, true. Would it still be racist?
>> In other words, it is a scientific fact that niggers are stupid. Please explain how a statement of fact can be racist. Or do you think, a la Stephen Colbert, that reality has a well known racist bias?
>>
>>
>> William "The Life" Coleman (ramashiva)
>>
>
>It's not a scientific fact, it's racist doctrine, and horseshit. And you
>missed his point, the term "nigger" is not the reason it is a racist
>statement, the reason is that the statement uses racial origin to
>disparage, that's what racism is.
0 new messages