Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion OT: Why couldn't it be the altitude?

Received: by 10.66.84.168 with SMTP id a8mr5587771paz.25.1349903412150;
        Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
Path: jt13ni2777pbb.1!nntp.google.com!news.glorb.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:10:11 -0500
From: Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com>
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
Subject: Re: OT: Why couldn't it be the altitude?
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:10:08 -0500
Message-ID: <ptob78d7rtut163eteia66343938mco1as@4ax.com>
References: <136c9f4f-05bd-4398-bc73-585ed0906c18@pz10g2000pbb.googlegroups.com> <9a23k9x98s.ln2@news.ezprovider.com> <k4n319$nu6$1@dont-email.me> <mo5v689qekf5nk5mg1cnbhk346sm3csjge@4ax.com> <bce25f86-c1c9-433d-ac98-26bc16eb68b1@s9g2000pbh.googlegroups.com> <k4qe5p$h4k$1@dont-email.me> <Oc6dneSaHqeexuzNnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@giganews.com> <k4sq37$t4n$1@dont-email.me> <j66dnSJvfLF9nu_NnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@giganews.com> <k4t0ii$1v0$1@dont-email.me> <JuydnfGslfR_ou_NnZ2dnUVZ_hidnZ2d@giganews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 8
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 174.254.113.9
X-Trace: sv3-SF3GjWxTDh4yQNL0KCeZHgN6S7VrHABzpYSVfmsBQML3XQW2y7K3pDr91JazFiIR7TKIWYP9qfsEOAW!yEtNWwSEJUmNYIuU2Q3wWc/GGS++NrvB9VyT1yIYtwtj/Fk7E+ExXne/2jxTQnqmIlAOEd1pLyS/!QMPWmn9+MMeTBFrOq14XIKSTCkmlpgKu
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1746
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 20:52:13 -0600, TruthSeeker
<TruthSee...@nospam.us> wrote:

> As the principles that
>"Progressives" foster would actually make things worse, it is the
>opposite of progress. 

Here's your fallacy.  Your argument relies on conjecture, not fact.