Irish Mike replied. "without Ice".
Once again, Russ gets it wrong.
the word is: N-E-A-T
--
Kenneth Sloan Kennet...@gmail.com
Computer and Information Sciences +1-205-932-2213
University of Alabama at Birmingham FAX +1-205-934-5473
Birmingham, AL 35294-1170 http://KennethRSloan.com/
As stupid as they both are, "straight" does mean "undiluted".
Jim
Nope. You are the one who is wrong.
http://www.answers.com/topic/straight
"Without ice, water, or a mixer: drink whiskey straight."
William Coleman (ramashiva)
You must be *really* bored.
Jim
And you're not?
William Coleman (ramashiva)
> >You must be *really* bored.
> And you're not?
I don't know, Ramashiva, but Clave has over 6000 posts to alt.dr.laura.
I kid you not! rotflmao!
<...>
>> You must be *really* bored.
>
> And you're not?
I'm only bored enough to be reading this shit.
I'm not trying to incite a "Let's you and him fight" among morons over
whether "neat" or "straight" means "undiluted" more than the other.
Jim
Heh.
Popinfresh counts my posts.
I'm famous.
Jim
I don't give a shit what a bitter, broken down old has-been poker cheat like
Russ G. says. This nasty old bastard has been spewing the same hate and
bull shit on this news group for years. And it's nothing but attacks on
dead guys who can't defend themselves and endlessly repeated thirty year old
poker cheating stories that no one gives a shit about. The guy is pathetic.
Irish Mike
No, you are also bored enough to make three posts to this thread, over
6000 posts to alt.dr.laura, and over 98000 posts to usenet. That's
pretty fucking bored.
> I'm not trying to incite a "Let's you and him fight" among morons over
> whether "neat" or "straight" means "undiluted" more than the other.
Nor am I.
William Coleman (ramashiva)
No, you are also bored enough to make three posts to this thread, over
6000 posts to alt.dr.laura, and over 98000 posts to usenet. That's
pretty fucking bored.
===================================================
Heh.
The sockpuppet counts my posts too.
Jim
Google counts your pathetic posts. 98000? Can you point me to one you
are overly proud of? Because the first 20 I read are complete crap.
On Oct 6, 12:08�am, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net> wrote:
> "Kenneth Sloan" <KennethRSl...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:gccaoa$opu$1...@SonOfMaze.dpo.uab.edu...
<...>
> Google counts your pathetic posts. 98000?
Another moron who can't make sense out of crossposts.
> Can you point me to one you
> are overly proud of? Because the first 20 I read are complete crap.
Gosh -- and here I've been posting just for *your* amusement.
I shall indeed lose sleep over this to-nite.
Jim
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
<...>
Jim
..........................................................
Fucking priceless.
Well Jim you got me there, I'm no match for your brilliance. Did you
crosspost that gem as well?
You post for self gratification. Autoeroticism via keyboard. I'm sure
you sleep well afterward.
<...>
> Well Jim you got me there, I'm no match for your brilliance. Did you
> crosspost that gem as well?
Gosh, Dan -- can't you read a header?
A more intelligent person might infer that even *with* a proper
interpretation of Google's post count, I'm not likely to be all askeered
of garden-variety Usenet fuckheads like you or any of the rest of the RGP
drama queens.
But just FYI, I should say that while you have the self-imparted "virtue" of
being a relatively infrequent Usenet poster, your writing is shallow,
rather witless, and well...not all that interesting, truth be told. You do
little to distinguish yourself.
If you don't want to lose my interest, Dan, you're going to have to start
being a whole lot less boring, and I say that in the *nicest* possible way.
*SMOOCH*
Jim
Gosh -- and here I've been posting just for *your* amusement.
I shall indeed lose sleep over this to-nite.
Dan