Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
OT: Racists welcomed at CPAC
27 views
Skip to first unread message
BillB
Feb 12, 2012, 2:01:04 AM2/12/12
to
Prominent white nationalist racists Peter Brimelow (whose VDARE website
has been categorized as a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law
Center) and Robert Vandervoort (executive director of ProEnglish, also
deemed part of a network of related hate groups by SPLC) were welcomed
with open arms as panelists at CPAC to spew their anti-immigrant, racist
propaganda to eager young teabaggers and career politicians alike.
What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to
anyone but susan and bub?
has been categorized as a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law
Center) and Robert Vandervoort (executive director of ProEnglish, also
deemed part of a network of related hate groups by SPLC) were welcomed
with open arms as panelists at CPAC to spew their anti-immigrant, racist
propaganda to eager young teabaggers and career politicians alike.
What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to
anyone but susan and bub?
BillB
Feb 12, 2012, 2:27:18 AM2/12/12
to
mo_ntresor
Feb 12, 2012, 3:40:38 AM2/12/12
to
canada may have to hide under a table!
mo_ntresor
--------
bratt
Feb 12, 2012, 8:00:03 AM2/12/12
to
On Feb 12 2012 1:01 AM, BillB wrote:
> What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
> tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
> at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to
> anyone but susan and bub?
Why does MSNBC promote Al Sharpton and give him so much air time?
> What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
> tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
> at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to
> anyone but susan and bub?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
---
BillB
Feb 12, 2012, 8:46:01 AM2/12/12
to
On 2/12/2012 5:00 AM, bratt wrote:
> On Feb 12 2012 1:01 AM, BillB wrote:
>
>> What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
>> tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
>> at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to
>> anyone but susan and bub?
>
> Why does MSNBC promote Al Sharpton and give him so much air time?
Isn't she amazing? She is comparing Reverend Al Sharpton to a white
> On Feb 12 2012 1:01 AM, BillB wrote:
>
>> What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
>> tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
>> at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to
>> anyone but susan and bub?
>
> Why does MSNBC promote Al Sharpton and give him so much air time?
nationalist racist scumbag pig. That is how they think.
To susan, anyone who points out the blatantly obvious, that blacks have
been fucked over royally by white-America time and time and time again,
or anyone who sticks up for black people in any way, shape or form, is a
"racist."
Welcome to Tennessee.
Dave the Clueless
Feb 12, 2012, 9:16:48 AM2/12/12
to
with that.
-------
Canada, keeping the brown people to a minimum for 80 years!
---
BillB
Feb 12, 2012, 9:25:04 AM2/12/12
to
On 2/12/2012 6:16 AM, Dave the Clueless wrote:
> You are asking a guy who believes that the SPLC defines racism?
I think *you* define racism, Dave. On every single issue imaginable,
> You are asking a guy who believes that the SPLC defines racism?
you, like susan, like most wingnuts, will come down against black
people. That's as good a definition of racism as any.
But yes, I think it's very fair to say the Southern Poverty Law Group is
considered *the* expert on hate groups in America. They've done a great
job exposing them to the public, and in some cases ruining them in
court, for many years.
BillB
Feb 12, 2012, 9:26:11 AM2/12/12
to
On 2/12/2012 6:25 AM, BillB wrote:
Southern Poverty Law Group
sorry, Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).
Southern Poverty Law Group
sorry, Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).
bratt
Feb 12, 2012, 10:14:48 AM2/12/12
to
On Feb 12 2012 8:25 AM, BillB wrote:
> On 2/12/2012 6:16 AM, Dave the Clueless wrote:
>
> > You are asking a guy who believes that the SPLC defines racism?
>
> I think *you* define racism, Dave. On every single issue imaginable,
> you, like susan, like most wingnuts, will come down against black
> people. That's as good a definition of racism as any.
Show me just ONCE where I have come down against black people.
> On 2/12/2012 6:16 AM, Dave the Clueless wrote:
>
> > You are asking a guy who believes that the SPLC defines racism?
>
> I think *you* define racism, Dave. On every single issue imaginable,
> you, like susan, like most wingnuts, will come down against black
> people. That's as good a definition of racism as any.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
bratt
Feb 12, 2012, 10:13:28 AM2/12/12
to
On Feb 12 2012 7:46 AM, BillB wrote:
> On 2/12/2012 5:00 AM, bratt wrote:
> > On Feb 12 2012 1:01 AM, BillB wrote:
> >
> >> What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
> >> tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
> >> at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to
> >> anyone but susan and bub?
> >
> > Why does MSNBC promote Al Sharpton and give him so much air time?
>
> Isn't she amazing? She is comparing Reverend Al Sharpton to a white
> nationalist racist scumbag pig. That is how they think.
So you are saying that Al Sharpton isn't racist? WOW back to the
> On 2/12/2012 5:00 AM, bratt wrote:
> > On Feb 12 2012 1:01 AM, BillB wrote:
> >
> >> What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
> >> tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
> >> at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to
> >> anyone but susan and bub?
> >
> > Why does MSNBC promote Al Sharpton and give him so much air time?
>
> Isn't she amazing? She is comparing Reverend Al Sharpton to a white
> nationalist racist scumbag pig. That is how they think.
racists only come in one color thingie. What about the Samuel L. Jackson
quote?
> To susan, anyone who points out the blatantly obvious, that blacks have
> been fucked over royally by white-America time and time and time again,
> or anyone who sticks up for black people in any way, shape or form, is a
> "racist."
> Welcome to Tennessee.
Tell me oh special one - what is wrong with Tennessee? Doesn't stack up
to your levels? People too happy to fit into your world?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
popinjay999
Feb 12, 2012, 10:51:05 AM2/12/12
to
On Feb 12, 6:16 am, "Dave the Clueless" <a987...@webnntp.invalid>
wrote:
>
> You are asking a guy who believes that the SPLC defines racism?
The Southern Poverty Law Center was founded as and continues to
operate as a communist front. Well known fact!
Go ahead and google "Southern Poverty Law Center" and "communist
front". BillB will pay you a nickel for every hit.
wrote:
>
> You are asking a guy who believes that the SPLC defines racism?
operate as a communist front. Well known fact!
Go ahead and google "Southern Poverty Law Center" and "communist
front". BillB will pay you a nickel for every hit.
VegasJerry
Feb 12, 2012, 10:53:21 AM2/12/12
to
--------
BillB
Feb 12, 2012, 11:07:31 AM2/12/12
to
Bea Foroni
Feb 12, 2012, 11:10:24 AM2/12/12
to
world might be in big trouble.
If Romney had been speaking Arabic and used the word "Allah" (praise
be His name) instead of "God", the same people cheering would instead
be demanding more troops in the Middle East.
This group seems to want to make the US a therocracy, with Biblical
law and confrence with religous leaders on how to proceed in every
endevour.
Here is a video of the entire speech. It is about 30 minutes long, but
look for medeviel ideas from begining to end.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/72749.html
FL Turbo
Feb 12, 2012, 12:13:16 PM2/12/12
to
March 25, 2010
Southern Poverty Law Center officially declared "left-wing hate group"
By J. Matt Barber
Though always left of center, the Alabama-based Southern Poverty Law
Center (SPLC) once had a reputation as a fairly objective civil rights
group. Founded by direct-marketing millionaire Morris Dees and partner
Joseph Levin Jr. in 1971, the SPLC made important and honorable
contributions to many of the historic civil rights gains of the 20th
Century. According to its own materials, the SPLC was "internationally
known for tracking and exposing the activities of hate groups."
Alas, "power corrupts," as it goes, and the SPLC, having amassed
tremendous power and wealth over the years, has regrettably become
corrupt to its core. By way of an ever-escalating wave of
"us-versus-them" money-grubbing schemes, Today's SPLC has morphed into
a far-left political activist outfit, famous for promoting a panoply
of extreme liberal causes.
Ken Silverstein, writing for Harper's Magazine, addressed this
untoward metamorphosis in 2000: "Today's SPLC spends most of its time
— and money — on a relentless fund-raising campaign, peddling
memberships in the church of tolerance with all the zeal of a circuit
rider passing the collection plate. 'He's the Jim and Tammy Faye
Bakker of the civil rights movement,' renowned anti-death-penalty
lawyer Millard Farmer says of Dees, his former associate, 'though I
don't mean to malign Jim and Tammy Faye.'
"The American Institute of Philanthropy gives the Center one of the
worst ratings of any group it monitors," continued Silverstein.
"Morris Dees doesn't need your financial support. The SPLC is already
the wealthiest civil rights group in America, though [its fundraising
literature] quite naturally omits that fact. ... 'Morris and
I...shared the overriding purpose of making a pile of money,' recalls
Dees's business partner, a lawyer named Millard Fuller (not to be
confused with Millard Farmer). 'We were not particular about how we
did it; we just wanted to be independently rich.'" (You say Fuller. I
say Farmer. The two Millards say "call the whole thing off.")
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------
I can see where you're getting your fixation on white raaaaaacism.
Bill maher and the SPLC.
<giggle, snort>
Dave the Clueless
Feb 12, 2012, 2:10:50 PM2/12/12
to
On Feb 12 2012 10:25 AM, BillB wrote:
> On 2/12/2012 6:16 AM, Dave the Clueless wrote:
>
> > You are asking a guy who believes that the SPLC defines racism?
>
> I think *you* define racism, Dave. On every single issue imaginable,
> you, like susan, like most wingnuts, will come down against black
> people. That's as good a definition of racism as any.
That is only because you are a moron. An educated moron, but a moron
> On 2/12/2012 6:16 AM, Dave the Clueless wrote:
>
> > You are asking a guy who believes that the SPLC defines racism?
>
> I think *you* define racism, Dave. On every single issue imaginable,
> you, like susan, like most wingnuts, will come down against black
> people. That's as good a definition of racism as any.
nonetheless.
> But yes, I think it's very fair to say the Southern Poverty Law Group is
> considered *the* expert on hate groups in America. They've done a great
> job exposing them to the public, and in some cases ruining them in
> court, for many years.
to your conclusions demeans the word.
-------
Canada, keeping the brown people to a minimum for 80 years!
TruthSeeker
Feb 12, 2012, 2:50:45 PM2/12/12
to
characterizations. Second, it appears that CPAC is more tolerant of
diverse views than you.
--
TruthSeeker
TruthSeeker
Feb 12, 2012, 2:53:14 PM2/12/12
to
bratt wrote:
> On Feb 12 2012 7:46 AM, BillB wrote:
>> Welcome to Tennessee.
> Tell me oh special one - what is wrong with Tennessee? Doesn't stack up
> to your levels? People too happy to fit into your world?
It is so funny how much BillB professes to not be a bigot, when he
> On Feb 12 2012 7:46 AM, BillB wrote:
>> Welcome to Tennessee.
> Tell me oh special one - what is wrong with Tennessee? Doesn't stack up
> to your levels? People too happy to fit into your world?
displays it so openly so often.
--
TruthSeeker
DDawgster
Feb 12, 2012, 5:27:22 PM2/12/12
to
to hear that there is racism in the GOP
yawwwwwwwwwwwwwn
----
yawwwwwwwwwwwwwn
----
BillB
Feb 12, 2012, 5:55:26 PM2/12/12
to
On 2/12/2012 9:13 AM, FL Turbo wrote:
> "The American Institute of Philanthropy gives the Center one of the
> worst ratings of any group it monitors," continued Silverstein.
A liar talking to an idiot. Nice combo.
> "The American Institute of Philanthropy gives the Center one of the
> worst ratings of any group it monitors," continued Silverstein.
http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=4482
> "Morris Dees doesn't need your financial support. The SPLC is already
> the wealthiest civil rights group in America, though [its fundraising
> literature] quite naturally omits that fact.
money...they have lots of money." It's the argument of an idiot (or in
this case, a liar pandering to idiots).
... 'Morris and
> I...shared the overriding purpose of making a pile of money,' recalls
> Dees's business partner, a lawyer named Millard Fuller (not to be
> confused with Millard Farmer). 'We were not particular about how we
> did it; we just wanted to be independently rich.'" (You say Fuller. I
> say Farmer. The two Millards say "call the whole thing off.")
weakest ad hominem attack I've ever seen.
> I can see where you're getting your fixation on white raaaaaacism.
> Bill maher and the SPLC.
my natural inclination to care about injustice and human suffering.
mo_ntresor
Feb 12, 2012, 6:02:34 PM2/12/12
to
On Feb 12 2012 12:53 PM, TruthSeeker wrote:
> > Tell me oh special one - what is wrong with Tennessee? Doesn't stack up
> > to your levels? People too happy to fit into your world?
>
> It is so funny how much BillB professes to not be a bigot, when he
> displays it so openly so often.
big tough cannuck has been quivering in fear for a decade over a trip to
> > Tell me oh special one - what is wrong with Tennessee? Doesn't stack up
> > to your levels? People too happy to fit into your world?
>
> It is so funny how much BillB professes to not be a bigot, when he
> displays it so openly so often.
puerto vallarta. LMAO! scary mexicans!!!
mo_ntresor
------
BillB
Feb 12, 2012, 6:10:35 PM2/12/12
to
going to Mexico. I said my wife was.
Aren't you the one who criss-crosses the street when you spot a scary
looking black teenager? Seriously, I wouldn't be talking about cowards
if I were you.
mo_ntresor
Feb 12, 2012, 6:22:46 PM2/12/12
to
On Feb 12 2012 4:10 PM, BillB wrote:
> > big tough cannuck has been quivering in fear for a decade over a trip to
> > puerto vallarta. LMAO! scary mexicans!!!
>
> Why do you keep saying this? I didn't say anything about being scared of
> going to Mexico. I said my wife was.
>
> Aren't you the one who criss-crosses the street when you spot a scary
> looking black teenager? Seriously, I wouldn't be talking about cowards
> if I were you.
you'd strut through chicago's west side with your shirt off, but keep the
> > big tough cannuck has been quivering in fear for a decade over a trip to
> > puerto vallarta. LMAO! scary mexicans!!!
>
> Why do you keep saying this? I didn't say anything about being scared of
> going to Mexico. I said my wife was.
>
> Aren't you the one who criss-crosses the street when you spot a scary
> looking black teenager? Seriously, I wouldn't be talking about cowards
> if I were you.
tough cannuck away from ... PUERTO VALLARTA!!!!
LMFAO!!! what a goddamn laughing stock you are.
this must be so embarrassing. tell us, bill, what about mexico scares you
silly? not knowing how to order an extra large pizza with extra extra
cheese and meat? the little brown people who talk funny? WHAT IS IT
that's kept you quivering for a decade now?
mo_ntresor
--------
Bea Foroni
Feb 12, 2012, 6:33:54 PM2/12/12
to
On Feb 12, 3:22 pm, "mo_ntresor" <amontilladofortun...@gmail.com>
wrote:
BillB, look at this quote and show your wife,
"As 13 year residents of Puerto Vallarta, we can attest to the safety
of this magnificent resort destination south of the border where the
possession of hand guns is prohibited and violent crime is virtually
nonexistent. For proof of this claim, we'll first determine the number
of US citizens that visit PV annually and then get the facts related
to violent crime in the area." http://banderasnews.com/1001/edop-therealfacts.htm
Seems as if the violence is only in places with lots of guns
(surprise!!!), and not in some of the gun controlled resort areas.
Bet you could get a pretty good deal on escaping the Canadian Artic
winter.
wrote:
"As 13 year residents of Puerto Vallarta, we can attest to the safety
of this magnificent resort destination south of the border where the
possession of hand guns is prohibited and violent crime is virtually
nonexistent. For proof of this claim, we'll first determine the number
of US citizens that visit PV annually and then get the facts related
to violent crime in the area." http://banderasnews.com/1001/edop-therealfacts.htm
Seems as if the violence is only in places with lots of guns
(surprise!!!), and not in some of the gun controlled resort areas.
Bet you could get a pretty good deal on escaping the Canadian Artic
winter.
Dave the Clueless
Feb 12, 2012, 6:52:16 PM2/12/12
to
On Feb 12 2012 6:55 PM, BillB wrote:
>
> My concern about racism comes primarily from cold, hard statistics and
> my natural inclination to care about injustice and human suffering.
Neither of which have presented themselves in anything you've posted to
>
> My concern about racism comes primarily from cold, hard statistics and
> my natural inclination to care about injustice and human suffering.
date.
-------
Canada, keeping the brown people to a minimum for 80 years!
Beldumb TurdSavant
Feb 12, 2012, 7:12:43 PM2/12/12
to
city in Canada & US. We were out all hours of the day & night, walking
through downtown, old town & the marina district. It was my first trip
back in 10 years and it felt even safer this trip than it did 10 years
ago. I would estimate that 60% of the tourists were Canadiens.
________________________________________________________________________
BillB
Feb 12, 2012, 7:18:41 PM2/12/12
to
you to this?
TruthSeeker
Feb 12, 2012, 7:47:05 PM2/12/12
to
BillB wrote:
> My concern about racism comes primarily from cold, hard statistics and
> my natural inclination to care about injustice and human suffering.
Troll or liar? This surely qualifies as one of the phoniest
> My concern about racism comes primarily from cold, hard statistics and
> my natural inclination to care about injustice and human suffering.
self-aggrandizing posts of the month.
--
TruthSeeker
bratt
Feb 12, 2012, 7:47:15 PM2/12/12
to
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
BillB
Feb 12, 2012, 8:00:42 PM2/12/12
to
On 2/12/2012 3:33 PM, Bea Foroni wrote:
> BillB, look at this quote and show your wife,
>
> "As 13 year residents of Puerto Vallarta, we can attest to the safety
> of this magnificent resort destination south of the border where the
> possession of hand guns is prohibited and violent crime is virtually
> nonexistent. For proof of this claim, we'll first determine the number
> of US citizens that visit PV annually and then get the facts related
> to violent crime in the area." http://banderasnews.com/1001/edop-therealfacts.htm
>
> Seems as if the violence is only in places with lots of guns
> (surprise!!!), and not in some of the gun controlled resort areas.
>
> Bet you could get a pretty good deal on escaping the Canadian Artic
> winter.
I'm more like the type of guy who will spend a vacation traveling *to*
> BillB, look at this quote and show your wife,
>
> "As 13 year residents of Puerto Vallarta, we can attest to the safety
> of this magnificent resort destination south of the border where the
> possession of hand guns is prohibited and violent crime is virtually
> nonexistent. For proof of this claim, we'll first determine the number
> of US citizens that visit PV annually and then get the facts related
> to violent crime in the area." http://banderasnews.com/1001/edop-therealfacts.htm
>
> Seems as if the violence is only in places with lots of guns
> (surprise!!!), and not in some of the gun controlled resort areas.
>
> Bet you could get a pretty good deal on escaping the Canadian Artic
> winter.
the Canadian Arctic, not away from it. The idea of going to a Third
World country to have poor people wait on me hand and foot at an
Americanized resort carved out of the country's slums has never really
appealed to me. I know Puerto Vallarta's a little different, but the
country is so fucked up I just have no desire to go there right now.
Maybe someday. I wouldn't mind driving the country in a 4x4.
BillB
Feb 12, 2012, 8:05:35 PM2/12/12
to
On 2/12/2012 4:47 PM, bratt wrote:
>> I didn't say anything about being scared to go to Mexico. I've reduced
>> you to this?
>
> and neither did Mo say anything about being afraid of a black teenager.
Ya, he did. Ask him. He's a chronic criss-crosser.
>> I didn't say anything about being scared to go to Mexico. I've reduced
>> you to this?
>
> and neither did Mo say anything about being afraid of a black teenager.
popinjay999
Feb 12, 2012, 8:21:33 PM2/12/12
to
On Feb 12, 4:47 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> On Feb 12 2012 6:18 PM, BillB wrote:
>
>
> > I didn't say anything about being scared to go to Mexico. I've reduced
> > you to this?
>
> and neither did Mo say anything about being afraid of a black teenager.
>
I'm not sure of the context, and I know I am butting into the middle
> On Feb 12 2012 6:18 PM, BillB wrote:
>
>
> > I didn't say anything about being scared to go to Mexico. I've reduced
> > you to this?
>
> and neither did Mo say anything about being afraid of a black teenager.
>
of your conversation, but I am afraid of blacks and Mexicans and don't
see anything wrong with admitting it.
bratt
Feb 12, 2012, 8:25:02 PM2/12/12
to
New Haven he would smack the gun out of this hand and beat him to a pulp.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
bratt
Feb 12, 2012, 8:29:43 PM2/12/12
to
got me
there. i live in a city with some crazy criminal motherfuckers, and my
eyes and brain function. it's near endgame of democrat stupidity here in
chicago: public education, union control of gov, and handouts for idiots.
"
and you in your eternal cleverness changed his quote from punks to
niggers, and from PUNKS to one lowly nigger.
Why must you lie?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
bratt
Feb 12, 2012, 8:49:28 PM2/12/12
to
approached by a group of *niggers* (his word, not mine) he would feel no
fear and just continue on, cuz he is one tuff dude.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
popinjay999
Feb 12, 2012, 8:55:26 PM2/12/12
to
On Feb 12, 5:49 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>
> B-BillB claims that if he was walking down a dark alley at night and was
> approached by a group of *niggers* (his word, not mine) he would feel no
> fear and just continue on, cuz he is one tuff dude.
>
Without knowing BillB personally, I cannot possibly know whether he is
>
> B-BillB claims that if he was walking down a dark alley at night and was
> approached by a group of *niggers* (his word, not mine) he would feel no
> fear and just continue on, cuz he is one tuff dude.
>
telling the truth or not. But I am NOT one tuff dude, and those
people scare me.
dsm1
Feb 12, 2012, 9:53:54 PM2/12/12
to
> I am afraid of blacks...
So is Jesse.
"There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to
walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about
robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved" ~
Jesse Jackson
So is Jesse.
"There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to
walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about
robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved" ~
Jesse Jackson
mo_ntresor
Feb 12, 2012, 10:06:12 PM2/12/12
to
On Feb 12 2012 6:21 PM, popinjay999 wrote:
> > > I didn't say anything about being scared to go to Mexico. I've reduced
> > > you to this?
> >
> > and neither did Mo say anything about being afraid of a black teenager.
>
> I'm not sure of the context, and I know I am butting into the middle
> of your conversation, but I am afraid of blacks and Mexicans and don't
> see anything wrong with admitting it.
LOL. acute attention to personal safety comes with exposure and
> > > I didn't say anything about being scared to go to Mexico. I've reduced
> > > you to this?
> >
> > and neither did Mo say anything about being afraid of a black teenager.
>
> I'm not sure of the context, and I know I am butting into the middle
> of your conversation, but I am afraid of blacks and Mexicans and don't
> see anything wrong with admitting it.
experience. chicago offers TONS of experience. any idea why an ignorant
idiot would palpitate for a decade over a secluded vacation in peaceful
puerto vallarta yet proclaim to the same crowd that he'd walk confidently
at night through chicago's west side?
LMFAO!!!
yeah, this cannuck's for real. they're that phony and that ignorant up
there.
mo_ntresor
--------
mo_ntresor
Feb 12, 2012, 10:09:05 PM2/12/12
to
best to stay the fuck away! had nothing to do with the little spanish
fellers running around. he prefers black culture anyway, that's why he
lives in vancouver (.5% black).
mo_ntresor
_______________________________________________________________________
dsm1
Feb 12, 2012, 10:25:17 PM2/12/12
to
> if conservatives don't *really* have racist
> tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
> at one of their most important conferences?
Peter Brimelow was "given a platform" to speak by the University of
> tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
> at one of their most important conferences?
Cincinnati College of Law not too long ago. Does that make them a
racist organization? Apparantly so.
Iceman
Feb 12, 2012, 10:59:46 PM2/12/12
to
"mo_ntresor" <amontillad...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4abm09x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
news:4abm09x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
> On Feb 12 2012 6:21 PM, popinjay999 wrote:
>
>> > > I didn't say anything about being scared to go to Mexico. I've
>> > > reduced
>> > > you to this?
>> >
>> > and neither did Mo say anything about being afraid of a black teenager.
>>
>> I'm not sure of the context, and I know I am butting into the middle
>> of your conversation, but I am afraid of blacks and Mexicans and don't
>> see anything wrong with admitting it.
>
> LOL. acute attention to personal safety comes with exposure and
> experience. chicago offers TONS of experience. any idea why an ignorant
> idiot would palpitate for a decade over a secluded vacation in peaceful
> puerto vallarta yet proclaim to the same crowd that he'd walk confidently
> at night through chicago's west side?
http://www.chicagonow.com/chicago-muckrakers/2010/06/if-chicagos-west-and-south-sides-were-their-own-cities-theyd-be-the-deadliest-and-most-violent-in-america/
>
>> > > I didn't say anything about being scared to go to Mexico. I've
>> > > reduced
>> > > you to this?
>> >
>> > and neither did Mo say anything about being afraid of a black teenager.
>>
>> I'm not sure of the context, and I know I am butting into the middle
>> of your conversation, but I am afraid of blacks and Mexicans and don't
>> see anything wrong with admitting it.
>
> LOL. acute attention to personal safety comes with exposure and
> experience. chicago offers TONS of experience. any idea why an ignorant
> idiot would palpitate for a decade over a secluded vacation in peaceful
> puerto vallarta yet proclaim to the same crowd that he'd walk confidently
> at night through chicago's west side?
Bea Foroni
Feb 13, 2012, 12:09:02 AM2/13/12
to
Driving a cab you don't last long if you trust soley on race. My read
on it is, I don't like anyone behind me that has less than I do.
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 12:14:47 AM2/13/12
to
On 2/12/2012 7:06 PM, mo_ntresor wrote:
> LOL. acute attention to personal safety comes with exposure and
> experience. chicago offers TONS of experience.
That's your definition of a "great city?" A place where women and
> LOL. acute attention to personal safety comes with exposure and
> experience. chicago offers TONS of experience.
effeminate men such as yourself can only walk the streets in a state of
extreme fear?
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 12:41:34 AM2/13/12
to
On 2/12/2012 7:25 PM, dsm1 wrote:
> Peter Brimelow was "given a platform" to speak by the University of
> Cincinnati College of Law not too long ago. Does that make them a
> racist organization? Apparantly so.
I guess that would depend on the circumstances, wouldn't it. Sometimes
> Peter Brimelow was "given a platform" to speak by the University of
> Cincinnati College of Law not too long ago. Does that make them a
> racist organization? Apparantly so.
universities give a forum to racists, homophobes, despots, climate
change deniers, intelligent design proponents and and other assorted
weirdos for educational purposes. These are often debates that are
balanced with educated experts, who proceed to rip the racists (etc.) to
shreds with facts and logic, much to the delight of the student body.
But you know that's not why *CPAC* featured racists in its policy
forums, right?
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 12:52:23 AM2/13/12
to
On 2/11/2012 11:01 PM, BillB wrote:
> Prominent white nationalist racists Peter Brimelow (whose VDARE website
> has been categorized as a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law
> Center) and Robert Vandervoort (executive director of ProEnglish, also
> deemed part of a network of related hate groups by SPLC) were welcomed
> with open arms as panelists at CPAC to spew their anti-immigrant, racist
> propaganda to eager young teabaggers and career politicians alike.
>
> What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
> anyone but susan and bub?
Seems like right-wingers want to talk about *everything but* the reason
CPAC featured hardcore white-nationalist racists at their policy forums.
But they'll talk about me, the SPLC, the University of Cincinnati, Al
Sharpton, MSNBC, Mexico, the communists....and on and on. It's seems
they'd rather talk about ANYTHING than why racist white-nationalists are
helping set the conservative policy agenda.
Why is that? Is it shame? Or is this just a case of reality finally
setting in?
> Prominent white nationalist racists Peter Brimelow (whose VDARE website
> has been categorized as a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law
> Center) and Robert Vandervoort (executive director of ProEnglish, also
> deemed part of a network of related hate groups by SPLC) were welcomed
> with open arms as panelists at CPAC to spew their anti-immigrant, racist
> propaganda to eager young teabaggers and career politicians alike.
>
> What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
> tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
> at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to
> anyone but susan and bub?
Seems like right-wingers want to talk about *everything but* the reason
CPAC featured hardcore white-nationalist racists at their policy forums.
But they'll talk about me, the SPLC, the University of Cincinnati, Al
Sharpton, MSNBC, Mexico, the communists....and on and on. It's seems
they'd rather talk about ANYTHING than why racist white-nationalists are
helping set the conservative policy agenda.
Why is that? Is it shame? Or is this just a case of reality finally
setting in?
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 1:22:55 AM2/13/12
to
On 2/12/2012 9:52 PM, BillB wrote:
> Why is that? Is it shame? Or is this just a case of reality finally
> setting in?
One thing about Brimelow, he's a lot more honest and open than your
> Why is that? Is it shame? Or is this just a case of reality finally
> setting in?
average racist right-winger. Below, in an excerpt from one of his
articles, he admits what objective people already knew, that the Tea
Party is, in fact, all about race. Is the fact that he was so warmly
embraced and applauded at CPAC mean that the right-wing is finally ready
to "come out of the closet?"
*****************************
But it's still "about race". It is no coincidence, comrades, that the
backlash is overwhelming white. Whites in America voted heavily against
Obama. White Protestants ("let's face it, they are America"—Phillip
Roth, American Pastoral, p. 311) still make up nearly half (42%) the
electorate and they voted 2-1 for McCain. But are even 4% of Obama's
appointments white Protestants?
The plain fact is that the Obama Administration has very shallow roots
in historic America. It is, to put it brutally, a minority occupation
government. Government and governed have little real contact or mutual
understanding. It's a recipe for continuous clashes.
Inevitably, a significant number of these clashes are racial.
...
The moral of this story: Diversity is not strength. It is weakness. By
importing diversity through the disastrous immigration reform of 1965
and the simultaneous abandonment of enforcement at the southern border,
Washington has forced whites—who for most of U.S. history would have
been simply called "Americans"—to recognize, if only for now at a
subliminal level, that they have common interests and must act to defend
them.
***************************
Hahaha...the Obama administration is a "minority occupation government!"
That's a Tea Party sign waiting to be made if I've ever seen one.
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 2:18:58 AM2/13/12
to
On 2/12/2012 5:25 PM, bratt wrote:
> I guess you missed the one where if confronted by a gun held by Will in
> New Haven he would smack the gun out of this hand and beat him to a pulp.
No, I wouldn't "smack the gun out of his hand." I said I would take it
> I guess you missed the one where if confronted by a gun held by Will in
> New Haven he would smack the gun out of this hand and beat him to a pulp.
away from him and proceed to beat him with it (using no more force than
necessary to brain him, of course). What would you have me do? Let him
shoot me?
mo_ntresor
Feb 13, 2012, 11:07:18 AM2/13/12
to
about the racist champion we already know: you. hold on .... !! i think
i hear a mexican, RUN BILL!!!!!
mo_ntresor
---
mo_ntresor
Feb 13, 2012, 11:03:37 AM2/13/12
to
nobody's buying it.
mo_ntresor
--------
BTSinAustin
Feb 13, 2012, 11:22:39 AM2/13/12
to
Dave the Clueless
Feb 13, 2012, 11:24:00 AM2/13/12
to
marshmallow man.
Remember, Dr. BillBigot the Street-Hardened Pugilistic Sociologist has
seen actual black people in custody. And HE WASN'T SCARED OF THEM! All
that stood between him and the gritty realities of street life were
handcuffs, leg irons and a few dozen armed cops. Plus, he's watched
"Homicide" a few times. That is one hard motherfucker.
-------
Canada, keeping the brown people to a minimum for 80 years!
-----
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 11:41:43 AM2/13/12
to
talk about the racists at CPAC. Go figure.
Dave the Clueless
Feb 13, 2012, 11:46:21 AM2/13/12
to
On Feb 13 2012 1:52 AM, BillB wrote:
> On 2/11/2012 11:01 PM, BillB wrote:
> > Prominent white nationalist racists Peter Brimelow (whose VDARE website
> > has been categorized as a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law
> > Center) and Robert Vandervoort (executive director of ProEnglish, also
> > deemed part of a network of related hate groups by SPLC) were welcomed
> > with open arms as panelists at CPAC to spew their anti-immigrant, racist
> > propaganda to eager young teabaggers and career politicians alike.
> >
> > What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
> > tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
> > at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to
> > anyone but susan and bub?
>
> Seems like right-wingers want to talk about *everything but* the reason
> CPAC featured hardcore white-nationalist racists at their policy forums.
They didn't. That is why there is no discussion of it.
> On 2/11/2012 11:01 PM, BillB wrote:
> > Prominent white nationalist racists Peter Brimelow (whose VDARE website
> > has been categorized as a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law
> > Center) and Robert Vandervoort (executive director of ProEnglish, also
> > deemed part of a network of related hate groups by SPLC) were welcomed
> > with open arms as panelists at CPAC to spew their anti-immigrant, racist
> > propaganda to eager young teabaggers and career politicians alike.
> >
> > What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
> > tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
> > at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to
> > anyone but susan and bub?
>
> Seems like right-wingers want to talk about *everything but* the reason
> CPAC featured hardcore white-nationalist racists at their policy forums.
> But they'll talk about me,
>the SPLC,
Because you used them as an authoritative source (LOL)
> the University of Cincinnati,
Because it was relevant
> Al Sharpton
Because you and he compare so well as champions of racial equity
> MSNBC,
Because they are funny
>Mexico
Because it scares you, and that shit is hilarious
> the communists
Like you
>....and on and on. It's seems
> they'd rather talk about ANYTHING than why racist white-nationalists are
> helping set the conservative policy agenda.
> Why is that? Is it shame? Or is this just a case of reality finally
> setting in?
-------
Canada, keeping the brown people to a minimum for 80 years!
Dave the Clueless
Feb 13, 2012, 11:47:24 AM2/13/12
to
On Feb 13 2012 2:22 AM, BillB wrote:
> On 2/12/2012 9:52 PM, BillB wrote:
>
> > Why is that? Is it shame? Or is this just a case of reality finally
> > setting in?
>
> One thing about Brimelow, he's a lot more honest and open than your
> average racist right-winger. Below, in an excerpt from one of his
> articles, he admits what objective people already knew, that the Tea
> Party is, in fact, all about race. Is the fact that he was so warmly
> embraced and applauded at CPAC mean that the right-wing is finally ready
> to "come out of the closet?"
>
>
> *****************************
> But it's still "about race". It is no coincidence, comrades, that the
> backlash is overwhelming white. Whites in America voted heavily against
> Obama. White Protestants ("let's face it, they are America"—Phillip
> Roth, American Pastoral, p. 311) still make up nearly half (42%) the
> electorate and they voted 2-1 for McCain. But are even 4% of Obama's
> appointments white Protestants?
>
> The plain fact is that the Obama Administration has very shallow roots
> in historic America. It is, to put it brutally, a minority occupation
> government. Government and governed have little real contact or mutual
> understanding. It's a recipe for continuous clashes.
>
> Inevitably, a significant number of these clashes are racial.
> ....
> On 2/12/2012 9:52 PM, BillB wrote:
>
> > Why is that? Is it shame? Or is this just a case of reality finally
> > setting in?
>
> One thing about Brimelow, he's a lot more honest and open than your
> average racist right-winger. Below, in an excerpt from one of his
> articles, he admits what objective people already knew, that the Tea
> Party is, in fact, all about race. Is the fact that he was so warmly
> embraced and applauded at CPAC mean that the right-wing is finally ready
> to "come out of the closet?"
>
>
> *****************************
> But it's still "about race". It is no coincidence, comrades, that the
> backlash is overwhelming white. Whites in America voted heavily against
> Obama. White Protestants ("let's face it, they are America"—Phillip
> Roth, American Pastoral, p. 311) still make up nearly half (42%) the
> electorate and they voted 2-1 for McCain. But are even 4% of Obama's
> appointments white Protestants?
>
> The plain fact is that the Obama Administration has very shallow roots
> in historic America. It is, to put it brutally, a minority occupation
> government. Government and governed have little real contact or mutual
> understanding. It's a recipe for continuous clashes.
>
> Inevitably, a significant number of these clashes are racial.
>
> The moral of this story: Diversity is not strength. It is weakness. By
> importing diversity through the disastrous immigration reform of 1965
> and the simultaneous abandonment of enforcement at the southern border,
> Washington has forced whites—who for most of U.S. history would have
> been simply called "Americans"—to recognize, if only for now at a
> subliminal level, that they have common interests and must act to defend
> them.
> ***************************
>
>
> Hahaha...the Obama administration is a "minority occupation government!"
> That's a Tea Party sign waiting to be made if I've ever seen one.
Let me know when you see it, there'll be a Democrat waving it.
> The moral of this story: Diversity is not strength. It is weakness. By
> importing diversity through the disastrous immigration reform of 1965
> and the simultaneous abandonment of enforcement at the southern border,
> Washington has forced whites—who for most of U.S. history would have
> been simply called "Americans"—to recognize, if only for now at a
> subliminal level, that they have common interests and must act to defend
> them.
> ***************************
>
>
> Hahaha...the Obama administration is a "minority occupation government!"
> That's a Tea Party sign waiting to be made if I've ever seen one.
-------
Canada, keeping the brown people to a minimum for 80 years!
Dave the Clueless
Feb 13, 2012, 11:51:12 AM2/13/12
to
your vaunted education and you can't get past your reflexive bigotry. It
is a pity, really, because someone spent time, money and effort trying to
educate you.
-------
Canada, keeping the brown people to a minimum for 80 years!
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 11:54:17 AM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 8:41 AM, BillB wrote:
>> Remember, Dr. BillBigot the Street-Hardened Pugilistic Sociologist has
>> seen actual black people in custody. And HE WASN'T SCARED OF THEM! All
>> that stood between him and the gritty realities of street life were
>> handcuffs, leg irons and a few dozen armed cops. Plus, he's watched
>> "Homicide" a few times. That is one hard motherfucker.
It always makes me chuckle me how right-wingers can never seem to wrap
>> Remember, Dr. BillBigot the Street-Hardened Pugilistic Sociologist has
>> seen actual black people in custody. And HE WASN'T SCARED OF THEM! All
>> that stood between him and the gritty realities of street life were
>> handcuffs, leg irons and a few dozen armed cops. Plus, he's watched
>> "Homicide" a few times. That is one hard motherfucker.
their heads around the fact that not *everyone* is afraid of black
people like they are. It just baffles them. Then it causes them outrage.
"Not afraid of black people?? IMPOSSIBLE!!"
I really pity you guys.
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 12:08:05 PM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 8:51 AM, Dave the Clueless wrote:
> There weren't any, moron.
So your position is that someone who admits the Tea Party is all about
> There weren't any, moron.
race, and who says all white people must join together to preserve white
America, and who claims that immigrants of any kind "pollute" American
society, is NOT a racist??
Someone who calls the Obama administration a "minority occupation
government" is NOT a racist??
LOL! What a fucking idiot.
Does this finally explain why none of them can see racism anywhere? They
are completely deaf, dumb and blind.
mo_ntresor
Feb 13, 2012, 12:09:48 PM2/13/12
to
mo_ntresor
-----
BTSinAustin
Feb 13, 2012, 12:08:46 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 12 2012 8:29 PM, bratt wrote:
> On Feb 12 2012 7:05 PM, BillB wrote:
>
> > On 2/12/2012 4:47 PM, bratt wrote:
> >
> > >> I didn't say anything about being scared to go to Mexico. I've reduced
> > >> you to this?
> > >
> > > and neither did Mo say anything about being afraid of a black teenager.
> >
> > Ya, he did. Ask him. He's a chronic criss-crosser.
>
> He said "I cross the street when i see young punks approaching. you've
> got me
> there. i live in a city with some crazy criminal motherfuckers, and my
> eyes and brain function. it's near endgame of democrat stupidity here in
> chicago: public education, union control of gov, and handouts for idiots.
> "
>
> and you in your eternal cleverness changed his quote from punks to
> niggers, and from PUNKS to one lowly nigger.
>
> Why must you lie?
Total waste of time Susan, chasing a trolling liar. As many times as you
> On Feb 12 2012 7:05 PM, BillB wrote:
>
> > On 2/12/2012 4:47 PM, bratt wrote:
> >
> > >> I didn't say anything about being scared to go to Mexico. I've reduced
> > >> you to this?
> > >
> > > and neither did Mo say anything about being afraid of a black teenager.
> >
> > Ya, he did. Ask him. He's a chronic criss-crosser.
>
> He said "I cross the street when i see young punks approaching. you've
> got me
> there. i live in a city with some crazy criminal motherfuckers, and my
> eyes and brain function. it's near endgame of democrat stupidity here in
> chicago: public education, union control of gov, and handouts for idiots.
> "
>
> and you in your eternal cleverness changed his quote from punks to
> niggers, and from PUNKS to one lowly nigger.
>
> Why must you lie?
prove it he will continue to lie, spin, change the subject or just ignore.
You should spend your time on something more fun. Like Google "fat angry
men" and imagine bill as the pics that pop up.
Try this one...
How Billy sees himself
http://tinyurl.com/6mpwfss
The sad truth
http://tinyurl.com/83pddeg
-----
bratt
Feb 13, 2012, 12:17:46 PM2/13/12
to
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 12:21:15 PM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 9:09 AM, mo_ntresor wrote:
> afraid of puerto vallarta for a decade, you raging TWAT.
I didn't say anything about being afraid of Puerto Vallarta. I said I
> afraid of puerto vallarta for a decade, you raging TWAT.
have no desire to go there.
Why don't you go harass the people who actually DID say they are afraid
of going to Mexico? There were several, but I wasn't one of them.
Do you really think making up lies about me somehow makes you look
better for admitting you are afraid of black teenagers?
bratt
Feb 13, 2012, 12:19:25 PM2/13/12
to
head around that one B-BillB
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 12:28:24 PM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 9:19 AM, bratt wrote:
> NO ONE has said they are afraid of black people (except PP) Wrap your
> head around that one B-BillB
You haven't made several posts expressing indignation that I claim not
> NO ONE has said they are afraid of black people (except PP) Wrap your
> head around that one B-BillB
to be afraid of black teenagers?? I'm pretty sure you have.
If you simply CAN NOT believe a 6'4" 240lb man like me is not afraid of
black teenagers, doesn't that sort of imply that a petite woman like you
or wispy effeminates like mo or clueless dave most certainly would be?
bratt
Feb 13, 2012, 1:00:32 PM2/13/12
to
one teenager of any color?
Why haven't you comment on what Samuel L. Jackson said?
bratt
Feb 13, 2012, 12:58:09 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 13 2012 11:08 AM, BillB wrote:
> So your position is that someone who admits the Tea Party is all about
> race, and who says all white people must join together to preserve white
> America, and who claims that immigrants of any kind "pollute" American
> society, is NOT a racist??
>
> Someone who calls the Obama administration a "minority occupation
> government" is NOT a racist??
cite?
> So your position is that someone who admits the Tea Party is all about
> race, and who says all white people must join together to preserve white
> America, and who claims that immigrants of any kind "pollute" American
> society, is NOT a racist??
>
> Someone who calls the Obama administration a "minority occupation
> government" is NOT a racist??
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
bratt
Feb 13, 2012, 12:58:54 PM2/13/12
to
Dave the Clueless
Feb 13, 2012, 1:11:46 PM2/13/12
to
people didn't scare you. Now you run from it. Sad little marshmallow man.
-------
Canada, keeping the brown people to a minimum for 80 years!
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 1:13:29 PM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 10:00 AM, bratt wrote:
>>
>>> NO ONE has said they are afraid of black people (except PP) Wrap your
>>> head around that one B-BillB
>>
>> You haven't made several posts expressing indignation that I claim not
>> to be afraid of black teenagers?? I'm pretty sure you have.
>>
>> If you simply CAN NOT believe a 6'4" 240lb man like me is not afraid of
>> black teenagers, doesn't that sort of imply that a petite woman like you
>> or wispy effeminates like mo or clueless dave most certainly would be?
>
> and you see no difference between a group of teenagers of any color and
> one teenager of any color?
Are you saying you guys only fear black people when you spot more than
>>
>>> NO ONE has said they are afraid of black people (except PP) Wrap your
>>> head around that one B-BillB
>>
>> You haven't made several posts expressing indignation that I claim not
>> to be afraid of black teenagers?? I'm pretty sure you have.
>>
>> If you simply CAN NOT believe a 6'4" 240lb man like me is not afraid of
>> black teenagers, doesn't that sort of imply that a petite woman like you
>> or wispy effeminates like mo or clueless dave most certainly would be?
>
> and you see no difference between a group of teenagers of any color and
> one teenager of any color?
one of them together? In a country awash with guns, isn't a lone black
person just as potentially dangerous in your racist minds? You really
aren't making any sense. If you are afraid of two black teenagers,
there's really no logical reason to not be afraid of one black teenager.
> Why haven't you comment on what Samuel L. Jackson said?
Dave the Clueless
Feb 13, 2012, 1:15:34 PM2/13/12
to
scare me, bigot-boy. But then you wouldn't know anything about black
teenagers, would you?
-------
Canada, keeping the brown people to a minimum for 80 years!
Dave the Clueless
Feb 13, 2012, 1:18:01 PM2/13/12
to
think anyone here would have bought it, marshmallow man.
Dave the Clueless
Feb 13, 2012, 1:20:00 PM2/13/12
to
-------
Canada, keeping the brown people to a minimum for 80 years!
Dave the Clueless
Feb 13, 2012, 1:18:55 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 13 2012 1:41 AM, BillB wrote:
> On 2/12/2012 7:25 PM, dsm1 wrote:
>
> > Peter Brimelow was "given a platform" to speak by the University of
> > Cincinnati College of Law not too long ago. Does that make them a
> > racist organization? Apparantly so.
>
> I guess that would depend on the circumstances, wouldn't it. Sometimes
> universities give a forum to racists, homophobes, despots, climate
> change deniers, intelligent design proponents and and other assorted
> weirdos for educational purposes. These are often debates that are
> balanced with educated experts, who proceed to rip the racists (etc.) to
> shreds with facts and logic, much to the delight of the student body.
>
> But you know that's not why *CPAC* featured racists in its policy
> forums, right?
Except CPAC featured no racists, rendering your pathetic "point" moot.
-------
Canada, keeping the brown people to a minimum for 80 years!
_______________________________________________________________________
> On 2/12/2012 7:25 PM, dsm1 wrote:
>
> > Peter Brimelow was "given a platform" to speak by the University of
> > Cincinnati College of Law not too long ago. Does that make them a
> > racist organization? Apparantly so.
>
> I guess that would depend on the circumstances, wouldn't it. Sometimes
> universities give a forum to racists, homophobes, despots, climate
> change deniers, intelligent design proponents and and other assorted
> weirdos for educational purposes. These are often debates that are
> balanced with educated experts, who proceed to rip the racists (etc.) to
> shreds with facts and logic, much to the delight of the student body.
>
> But you know that's not why *CPAC* featured racists in its policy
> forums, right?
Except CPAC featured no racists, rendering your pathetic "point" moot.
-------
Canada, keeping the brown people to a minimum for 80 years!
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 1:26:33 PM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 10:18 AM, Dave the Clueless wrote:
> Except CPAC featured no racists, rendering your pathetic "point" moot.
We got it the first time, Dave. You don't think Brimelow or his
> Except CPAC featured no racists, rendering your pathetic "point" moot.
anti-immigrant, white-nationalist hate group are racist. Tells us all we
need to know.
bratt
Feb 13, 2012, 1:56:58 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 13 2012 12:13 PM, BillB wrote:
> On 2/13/2012 10:00 AM, bratt wrote:
> >>
> >>> NO ONE has said they are afraid of black people (except PP) Wrap your
> >>> head around that one B-BillB
> >>
> >> You haven't made several posts expressing indignation that I claim not
> >> to be afraid of black teenagers?? I'm pretty sure you have.
> >>
> >> If you simply CAN NOT believe a 6'4" 240lb man like me is not afraid of
> >> black teenagers, doesn't that sort of imply that a petite woman like you
> >> or wispy effeminates like mo or clueless dave most certainly would be?
> >
> > and you see no difference between a group of teenagers of any color and
> > one teenager of any color?
>
> Are you saying you guys only fear black people when you spot more than
> one of them together? In a country awash with guns, isn't a lone black
> person just as potentially dangerous in your racist minds? You really
> aren't making any sense. If you are afraid of two black teenagers,
> there's really no logical reason to not be afraid of one black teenager.
You are really this stupid?
> On 2/13/2012 10:00 AM, bratt wrote:
> >>
> >>> NO ONE has said they are afraid of black people (except PP) Wrap your
> >>> head around that one B-BillB
> >>
> >> You haven't made several posts expressing indignation that I claim not
> >> to be afraid of black teenagers?? I'm pretty sure you have.
> >>
> >> If you simply CAN NOT believe a 6'4" 240lb man like me is not afraid of
> >> black teenagers, doesn't that sort of imply that a petite woman like you
> >> or wispy effeminates like mo or clueless dave most certainly would be?
> >
> > and you see no difference between a group of teenagers of any color and
> > one teenager of any color?
>
> Are you saying you guys only fear black people when you spot more than
> one of them together? In a country awash with guns, isn't a lone black
> person just as potentially dangerous in your racist minds? You really
> aren't making any sense. If you are afraid of two black teenagers,
> there's really no logical reason to not be afraid of one black teenager.
> > Why haven't you comment on what Samuel L. Jackson said?
>
> I didn't see anything comment-worthy about it. Do you?
wrap your mind around.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
VegasJerry
Feb 13, 2012, 3:36:09 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 12 2012 11:53 AM, TruthSeeker wrote:
> bratt wrote:
> > On Feb 12 2012 7:46 AM, BillB wrote:
>
> >> Welcome to Tennessee.
>
> > Tell me oh special one - what is wrong with Tennessee? Doesn't stack up
> > to your levels? People too happy to fit into your world?
>
>
> It is so funny how much BillB professes to not be a bigot, when he
> displays it so openly so often.
I must have missed it. Why don't you show us?
J..
---
> bratt wrote:
> > On Feb 12 2012 7:46 AM, BillB wrote:
>
> >> Welcome to Tennessee.
>
> > Tell me oh special one - what is wrong with Tennessee? Doesn't stack up
> > to your levels? People too happy to fit into your world?
>
>
> It is so funny how much BillB professes to not be a bigot, when he
> displays it so openly so often.
I must have missed it. Why don't you show us?
J..
---
BTSinAustin
Feb 13, 2012, 4:01:45 PM2/13/12
to
big·ot 
noun
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or
opinion.
Would you say that fits bill
_____________________________________________________________________
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 4:10:09 PM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 1:01 PM, BTSinAustin wrote:
> big·ot 
> noun
> a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or
> opinion.
>
>
> Would you say that fits bill
If I was utterly intolerant of racist right-wingers, why would I be
> big·ot 
> noun
> a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or
> opinion.
>
>
> Would you say that fits bill
here? I've tolerated you guys for years.
In fact, you seem to have a lot more difficulty tolerating me than I
have tolerating you. I'm not the one that launches into personal attacks
every time I see a post from someone I don't agree with. I think you
guys are just projecting again.
In any event, I don't think someone who is intolerant of racists is
usually considered a "bigot." As usual, you have it completely backwards.
VegasJerry
Feb 13, 2012, 4:36:19 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 13 2012 1:01 PM, BTSinAustin wrote:
> On Feb 13 2012 3:36 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > On Feb 12 2012 11:53 AM, TruthSeeker wrote:
> >
> > > bratt wrote:
> > > > On Feb 12 2012 7:46 AM, BillB wrote:
> > >
> > > >> Welcome to Tennessee.
> > >
> > > > Tell me oh special one - what is wrong with Tennessee? Doesn't stack
up
> > > > to your levels? People too happy to fit into your world?
> > >
> > >
> > > It is so funny how much BillB professes to not be a bigot, when he
> > > displays it so openly so often.
> >
> > I must have missed it. Why don't you show us?
>
> Jerry. based on definition of bigot.
Ummm. Didn't think so.
> On Feb 13 2012 3:36 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > On Feb 12 2012 11:53 AM, TruthSeeker wrote:
> >
> > > bratt wrote:
> > > > On Feb 12 2012 7:46 AM, BillB wrote:
> > >
> > > >> Welcome to Tennessee.
> > >
> > > > Tell me oh special one - what is wrong with Tennessee? Doesn't stack
up
> > > > to your levels? People too happy to fit into your world?
> > >
> > >
> > > It is so funny how much BillB professes to not be a bigot, when he
> > > displays it so openly so often.
> >
> > I must have missed it. Why don't you show us?
>
> Jerry. based on definition of bigot.
J..
>
>
> big·ot 
> noun
> a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or
> opinion.
>
>
> Would you say that fits bill
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
bratt
Feb 13, 2012, 4:39:12 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 13 2012 3:10 PM, BillB wrote:
> On 2/13/2012 1:01 PM, BTSinAustin wrote:
>
> > big·ot 
> > noun
> > a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or
> > opinion.
> >
> >
> > Would you say that fits bill
>
> If I was utterly intolerant of racist right-wingers, why would I be
> here? I've tolerated you guys for years.
But racist left-wingers are cool, right?
> On 2/13/2012 1:01 PM, BTSinAustin wrote:
>
> > big·ot 
> > noun
> > a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or
> > opinion.
> >
> >
> > Would you say that fits bill
>
> If I was utterly intolerant of racist right-wingers, why would I be
> here? I've tolerated you guys for years.
> In fact, you seem to have a lot more difficulty tolerating me than I
> have tolerating you. I'm not the one that launches into personal attacks
> every time I see a post from someone I don't agree with. I think you
> guys are just projecting again.
> In any event, I don't think someone who is intolerant of racists is
> usually considered a "bigot." As usual, you have it completely backwards.
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 4:49:23 PM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 1:39 PM, bratt wrote:
> I posted a list of people you are intolerant of - bigot.
The only problem is, you made it all up. There is very little I am
> I posted a list of people you are intolerant of - bigot.
actually intolerant of. Racism is one of the only that I WILL NOT
TOLERATE under any circumstances, and I don't know what that would
bother anyone but racists themselves. I don't know it bothers some here
(in Canada, being against racism is almost uniformly considered a
positive thing), but I assume it's the same reason why right-wingers
here seem to uniformly dislike organizations like the SPLC that risk
their lives going after skinheads, Nazis, teabaggers, and other assorted
racists.
BTSinAustin
Feb 13, 2012, 5:01:10 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 13 2012 4:10 PM, BillB wrote:
> On 2/13/2012 1:01 PM, BTSinAustin wrote:
>
> > big·ot 
> > noun
> > a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or
> > opinion.
> >
> >
> > Would you say that fits bill
>
> If I was utterly intolerant of racist right-wingers, why would I be
> here? I've tolerated you guys for years.
There you go again. You offer no proof yet lump me in as a racist.
> On 2/13/2012 1:01 PM, BTSinAustin wrote:
>
> > big·ot 
> > noun
> > a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or
> > opinion.
> >
> >
> > Would you say that fits bill
>
> If I was utterly intolerant of racist right-wingers, why would I be
> here? I've tolerated you guys for years.
There's proof you're foolish, a pinhead, and a liar.
Thanks for playing troll boy. Did you go practice yet?
-----
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 5:06:54 PM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 2:01 PM, BTSinAustin wrote:
> There you go again. You offer no proof yet lump me in as a racist.
You are calling me a bigot for being against racists. You are piling on
> There you go again. You offer no proof yet lump me in as a racist.
with clueless dave, who asserts that the founder of VDARE is not a
racist. You have bent over backwards to ignore the substance of my
original post in favor of attacking me personally for bringing it up.
What other reasonable conclusion is there?
BTSinAustin
Feb 13, 2012, 5:24:03 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 13 2012 5:06 PM, BillB wrote:
> On 2/13/2012 2:01 PM, BTSinAustin wrote:
>
> > There you go again. You offer no proof yet lump me in as a racist.
>
> You are calling me a bigot for being against racists. You are piling on
> with clueless dave, who asserts that the founder of VDARE is not a
As a so called lawyer I'd assume you would't get all your exercise jumping
> On 2/13/2012 2:01 PM, BTSinAustin wrote:
>
> > There you go again. You offer no proof yet lump me in as a racist.
>
> You are calling me a bigot for being against racists. You are piling on
> with clueless dave, who asserts that the founder of VDARE is not a
to conclusions.
Show me where i called you a bigot for being against racists. Didn't
happen. Queue the crickets chirping. I called you a bigot for
intolerance of other ideas and opinions.
> racist. You have bent over backwards to ignore the substance of my
> original post in favor of attacking me personally for bringing it up.
> What other reasonable conclusion is there?
and paste BS is tiresome. All i see is you being your usual dick wad
self and I point it out.
_____________________________________________________________________
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 5:41:20 PM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 2:24 PM, BTSinAustin wrote
> Show me where i called you a bigot for being against racists. Didn't
> happen. Queue the crickets chirping. I called you a bigot for
> intolerance of other ideas and opinions.
Are you intolerant of MY ideas and opinions? Can you give me a concrete
example of how my supposed intolerance of "other ideas and opinions" is
somehow materially different than your intolerance of mine? What about
your intolerance of the Catholic church? Does that make YOU a bigot?
Probably not, right? What about child molesters. Are you intolerant of
them? Does that make you a bigot?
The only people I recall showing expressing real intolerance toward on
RGP on a consistent basis are racists. In my practical life experience,
the only people who stick up for racists are other racists.
>> racist. You have bent over backwards to ignore the substance of my
>> original post in favor of attacking me personally for bringing it up.
>> What other reasonable conclusion is there?
>
> I didn't have to try to ignore it, I did'nt even read your OP, your copy
> and paste BS is tiresome. All i see is you being your usual dick wad
> self and I point it out.
First of all, you are lying. You read my OP, just as you do all my
posts. Please don't insult your readers' intelligence. Secondly, as you
well know, I hardly ever cut and paste anything, except small snippets
for context. All my ideas are my own. All my writing is original. Do you
have any more obvious lies you want to tell? Let it all out.
You have brought a squirt gun to an intellectual gunfight.
Unfortunately, that is the entire extent of your arsenal. It's a battle
you CAN NOT win.
> Show me where i called you a bigot for being against racists. Didn't
> happen. Queue the crickets chirping. I called you a bigot for
> intolerance of other ideas and opinions.
example of how my supposed intolerance of "other ideas and opinions" is
somehow materially different than your intolerance of mine? What about
your intolerance of the Catholic church? Does that make YOU a bigot?
Probably not, right? What about child molesters. Are you intolerant of
them? Does that make you a bigot?
The only people I recall showing expressing real intolerance toward on
RGP on a consistent basis are racists. In my practical life experience,
the only people who stick up for racists are other racists.
>> racist. You have bent over backwards to ignore the substance of my
>> original post in favor of attacking me personally for bringing it up.
>> What other reasonable conclusion is there?
>
> I didn't have to try to ignore it, I did'nt even read your OP, your copy
> and paste BS is tiresome. All i see is you being your usual dick wad
> self and I point it out.
posts. Please don't insult your readers' intelligence. Secondly, as you
well know, I hardly ever cut and paste anything, except small snippets
for context. All my ideas are my own. All my writing is original. Do you
have any more obvious lies you want to tell? Let it all out.
You have brought a squirt gun to an intellectual gunfight.
Unfortunately, that is the entire extent of your arsenal. It's a battle
you CAN NOT win.
BTSinAustin
Feb 13, 2012, 5:58:16 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 13 2012 5:41 PM, BillB wrote:
> On 2/13/2012 2:24 PM, BTSinAustin wrote
>
> > Show me where i called you a bigot for being against racists. Didn't
> > happen. Queue the crickets chirping. I called you a bigot for
> > intolerance of other ideas and opinions.
>
> Are you intolerant of MY ideas and opinions? Can you give me a concrete
> example of how my supposed intolerance of "other ideas and opinions" is
> somehow materially different than your intolerance of mine? What about
> your intolerance of the Catholic church? Does that make YOU a bigot?
> Probably not, right? What about child molesters. Are you intolerant of
> them? Does that make you a bigot?
Dodge noted, answer a question with a question
> On 2/13/2012 2:24 PM, BTSinAustin wrote
>
> > Show me where i called you a bigot for being against racists. Didn't
> > happen. Queue the crickets chirping. I called you a bigot for
> > intolerance of other ideas and opinions.
>
> Are you intolerant of MY ideas and opinions? Can you give me a concrete
> example of how my supposed intolerance of "other ideas and opinions" is
> somehow materially different than your intolerance of mine? What about
> your intolerance of the Catholic church? Does that make YOU a bigot?
> Probably not, right? What about child molesters. Are you intolerant of
> them? Does that make you a bigot?
>
> The only people I recall showing expressing real intolerance toward on
> RGP on a consistent basis are racists. In my practical life experience,
> the only people who stick up for racists are other racists.
>
>
> >> racist. You have bent over backwards to ignore the substance of my
> >> original post in favor of attacking me personally for bringing it up.
> >> What other reasonable conclusion is there?
> >
> > I didn't have to try to ignore it, I did'nt even read your OP, your copy
> > and paste BS is tiresome. All i see is you being your usual dick wad
> > self and I point it out.
>
> First of all, you are lying. You read my OP, just as you do all my
> posts. Please don't insult your readers' intelligence. Secondly, as you
otherwise. I sure as hell didn't click your OP link.
And before you get all Lies this and liar that. I see threads where you
go back and forth ad nauseam, we know your ego makes you think we all hang
on every word. Well guess again pinhead. Only if i see something that's
stupid even for you do i jump in. If i responded to every goofy thing you
spew i'd be like you with no life.
> well know, I hardly ever cut and paste anything, except small snippets
> for context. All my ideas are my own. All my writing is original. Do you
> have any more obvious lies you want to tell? Let it all out.
however...
>
> You have brought a squirt gun to an intellectual gunfight.
> Unfortunately, that is the entire extent of your arsenal. It's a battle
> you CAN NOT win.
playing
-----
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 6:09:55 PM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 2:58 PM, BTSinAustin wrote:
> On Feb 13 2012 5:41 PM, BillB wrote:
>
>> On 2/13/2012 2:24 PM, BTSinAustin wrote
>>
>>> Show me where i called you a bigot for being against racists. Didn't
>>> happen. Queue the crickets chirping. I called you a bigot for
>>> intolerance of other ideas and opinions.
>>
>> Are you intolerant of MY ideas and opinions? Can you give me a concrete
>> example of how my supposed intolerance of "other ideas and opinions" is
>> somehow materially different than your intolerance of mine? What about
>> your intolerance of the Catholic church? Does that make YOU a bigot?
>> Probably not, right? What about child molesters. Are you intolerant of
>> them? Does that make you a bigot?
>
> Dodge noted, answer a question with a question
lol...you didn't ask a question, you fucking idiot. There's that Texas
> On Feb 13 2012 5:41 PM, BillB wrote:
>
>> On 2/13/2012 2:24 PM, BTSinAustin wrote
>>
>>> Show me where i called you a bigot for being against racists. Didn't
>>> happen. Queue the crickets chirping. I called you a bigot for
>>> intolerance of other ideas and opinions.
>>
>> Are you intolerant of MY ideas and opinions? Can you give me a concrete
>> example of how my supposed intolerance of "other ideas and opinions" is
>> somehow materially different than your intolerance of mine? What about
>> your intolerance of the Catholic church? Does that make YOU a bigot?
>> Probably not, right? What about child molesters. Are you intolerant of
>> them? Does that make you a bigot?
>
> Dodge noted, answer a question with a question
Public School education rearing its ugly head again. For future
reference, questions generally end with this symbol: "?" .
Is this guy really this stupid, or is it all an act?
Now, back to all the questions you dodged, because you know you'll sound
like a complete fool if you attempt to answer them:
bratt
Feb 13, 2012, 6:47:39 PM2/13/12
to
You really didn't think this was a question?
"Show me where i called you a bigot for being against racists. Didn't
happen. Queue the crickets chirping. I called you a bigot for
intolerance of other ideas and opinions."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
____________________________________________________________________
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 6:58:07 PM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 3:47 PM, bratt wrote:
> so he left the *?* off an obvious question means that you didn't dodget it?
There was no question, obvious or otherwise.
> so he left the *?* off an obvious question means that you didn't dodget it?
> You really didn't think this was a question?
>
> "Show me where i called you a bigot for being against racists. Didn't
> happen. Queue the crickets chirping. I called you a bigot for
> intolerance of other ideas and opinions."
Holy fuck, these morons don't even know what a question is!
Let me guess: I am bigoted against fully grown English-speaking adults
who haven't mastered basic concepts from first grade English?
bratt
Feb 13, 2012, 7:18:36 PM2/13/12
to
question?
Here, let me help you
Show any of us where we have called you a bigot for being against
racists???????????
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 7:27:27 PM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 4:18 PM, bratt wrote:
> Show me where I called you a bigot for being against racists - isn't a
> question?
No, it is not. It's a directive.
> Show me where I called you a bigot for being against racists - isn't a
> question?
> Here, let me help you
>
> Show any of us where we have called you a bigot for being against
> racists???????????
Putting a question mark after a non-question does not make it a question.
Are you SURE you made it through high school? Even in Tennessee that
won't get you a pass.
bratt
Feb 13, 2012, 7:46:20 PM2/13/12
to
called you a bigot for being against racists, it's OK. Really - it's OK.
Just go on in you own sad little world.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 7:59:01 PM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 4:46 PM, bratt wrote:
> B-BillB - it's OK. If you don't want to back up your claims that we
> called you a bigot for being against racists, it's OK. Really - it's OK.
> Just go on in you own sad little world.
I am only speculating. Of course nobody but you knows *for sure* why you
> B-BillB - it's OK. If you don't want to back up your claims that we
> called you a bigot for being against racists, it's OK. Really - it's OK.
> Just go on in you own sad little world.
do the things you do. Many people have asked you and your fellow
right-wing morons why you call me a bigot. All I know is it started with
me denouncing racists, so I can only assume that is the underlying
motivation.
I'm not exactly sure why, but right-wingers get very sensitive (and
usually abusive) when people talk about racism.
bratt
Feb 13, 2012, 8:13:05 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 13 2012 6:59 PM, BillB wrote:
> On 2/13/2012 4:46 PM, bratt wrote:
>
> > B-BillB - it's OK. If you don't want to back up your claims that we
> > called you a bigot for being against racists, it's OK. Really - it's OK.
> > Just go on in you own sad little world.
>
> I am only speculating.
Priceless - you have accused us of this numerous times, and now you are
> On 2/13/2012 4:46 PM, bratt wrote:
>
> > B-BillB - it's OK. If you don't want to back up your claims that we
> > called you a bigot for being against racists, it's OK. Really - it's OK.
> > Just go on in you own sad little world.
>
> I am only speculating.
only speculating?
> Of course nobody but you knows *for sure* why you
> do the things you do. Many people have asked you and your fellow
> right-wing morons why you call me a bigot. All I know is it started with
> me denouncing racists, so I can only assume that is the underlying
> motivation.
>
> I'm not exactly sure why, but right-wingers get very sensitive (and
> usually abusive) when people talk about racism.
about racism. We get sensitive when we are accused of racism.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 8:21:39 PM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 5:13 PM, bratt wrote:
> Wrong again - why must you lie? We don't get sensitive when people talk
> about racism. We get sensitive when we are accused of racism.
Can you show me a single instance of me accusing you of racism before
> Wrong again - why must you lie? We don't get sensitive when people talk
> about racism. We get sensitive when we are accused of racism.
you did the same to me?
No, you can't, because it never happened.
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 8:29:14 PM2/13/12
to
racist. I remember it well, because I shocked. Silly me, I really
considered you something of a friend (albeit a slightly slow one) up
until that very point. I thought we had had a lot of good polite
discussions on a variety of topics.
But go ahead, show me the first instance of me calling you a racist.
Maybe I'm wrong. Wouldn't be the first time (third? fourth?).
The fact is, you can look at my long posting history on RGP, and I think
you will find I have always been very polite to everyone who was polite
to me.
FL Turbo
Feb 13, 2012, 8:44:08 PM2/13/12
to
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:46:21 -0800, "Dave the Clueless"
<a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>On Feb 13 2012 1:52 AM, BillB wrote:
>
>> On 2/11/2012 11:01 PM, BillB wrote:
>> > Prominent white nationalist racists Peter Brimelow (whose VDARE website
>> > has been categorized as a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law
>> > Center) and Robert Vandervoort (executive director of ProEnglish, also
>> > deemed part of a network of related hate groups by SPLC) were welcomed
>> > with open arms as panelists at CPAC to spew their anti-immigrant, racist
>> > propaganda to eager young teabaggers and career politicians alike.
>> >
>> > What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
>> > tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
>> > at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to
>> > anyone but susan and bub?
>>
>> Seems like right-wingers want to talk about *everything but* the reason
>> CPAC featured hardcore white-nationalist racists at their policy forums.
>
>They didn't. That is why there is no discussion of it.
Well, speaking of the <ahem> CPAC as we were, here is a video of one
of the speakers.
A modern in-your-face type Conservative, who tells them it is time for
them to fight back against the slander of the Liberals and their
sycophants in the MSM.
Hopefully, he can generate some spine in wimpy Conservatives who have
been willing to meekly go along without questioning the spin that the
Media promotes day after day.
He's Mad as Hell, and he ain't gonna take it no more.
Right on, Andrew.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/watch-andrew-breitbarts-fiery-cpac-speech-i-have-college-days-obama-videos/
WARNING:
Pregnant or nursing Liberals, or those with high blood pressure need
to take precautions before viewing.
Keep a damp cloth nearby to drape over your forehead, lest your head
explodes.
<a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>On Feb 13 2012 1:52 AM, BillB wrote:
>
>> On 2/11/2012 11:01 PM, BillB wrote:
>> > Prominent white nationalist racists Peter Brimelow (whose VDARE website
>> > has been categorized as a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law
>> > Center) and Robert Vandervoort (executive director of ProEnglish, also
>> > deemed part of a network of related hate groups by SPLC) were welcomed
>> > with open arms as panelists at CPAC to spew their anti-immigrant, racist
>> > propaganda to eager young teabaggers and career politicians alike.
>> >
>> > What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
>> > tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
>> > at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to
>> > anyone but susan and bub?
>>
>> Seems like right-wingers want to talk about *everything but* the reason
>> CPAC featured hardcore white-nationalist racists at their policy forums.
>
>They didn't. That is why there is no discussion of it.
Well, speaking of the <ahem> CPAC as we were, here is a video of one
of the speakers.
A modern in-your-face type Conservative, who tells them it is time for
them to fight back against the slander of the Liberals and their
sycophants in the MSM.
Hopefully, he can generate some spine in wimpy Conservatives who have
been willing to meekly go along without questioning the spin that the
Media promotes day after day.
He's Mad as Hell, and he ain't gonna take it no more.
Right on, Andrew.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/watch-andrew-breitbarts-fiery-cpac-speech-i-have-college-days-obama-videos/
WARNING:
Pregnant or nursing Liberals, or those with high blood pressure need
to take precautions before viewing.
Keep a damp cloth nearby to drape over your forehead, lest your head
explodes.
Dave the Clueless
Feb 13, 2012, 8:53:26 PM2/13/12
to
-------
Canada, keeping the brown people to a minimum for 80 years!
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 9:06:45 PM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 5:53 PM, Dave the Clueless wrote:
> The very essence of the bigot, a closed mind. How very expected from you.
It's nice to hear you have an "open mind" toward Nazis. Normally I would
> The very essence of the bigot, a closed mind. How very expected from you.
say "just make sure it's not so open that your brains fall out," but
somehow that doesn't seem to apply to you.
bratt
Feb 13, 2012, 9:25:20 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 13 2012 7:29 PM, BillB wrote:
> But go ahead, show me the first instance of me calling you a racist.
> Maybe I'm wrong. Wouldn't be the first time (third? fourth?).
No - someone of my stature sees no reason to coddle you.
> But go ahead, show me the first instance of me calling you a racist.
> Maybe I'm wrong. Wouldn't be the first time (third? fourth?).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
BillB
Feb 13, 2012, 9:32:16 PM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 6:25 PM, bratt wrote:
> On Feb 13 2012 7:29 PM, BillB wrote:
>
>> But go ahead, show me the first instance of me calling you a racist.
>> Maybe I'm wrong. Wouldn't be the first time (third? fourth?).
>
>
> No - someone of my stature sees no reason to coddle you.
Translation: "Oh no. He's caught me in REALLY big lie for everyone to
> On Feb 13 2012 7:29 PM, BillB wrote:
>
>> But go ahead, show me the first instance of me calling you a racist.
>> Maybe I'm wrong. Wouldn't be the first time (third? fourth?).
>
>
> No - someone of my stature sees no reason to coddle you.
see. Now what??? Eeeek!"
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages