Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
On Harry Reid
40 views
Skip to first unread message
Dave the Clueless
Aug 6, 2012, 3:56:58 PM8/6/12
to
For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack. As
majority leader, he has managed to sink the public image of the Senate
even lower than it would otherwise be. He contributes to bad feelings,
gridlock and the sense īŋŊ nay, the reality īŋŊ that everything is done for
political advantage. Reid is a crass man, the very personification of the
gaudy and kitschy Las Vegas Strip.
Still, he is not some backbencher, but the Senate majority leader. He is
the face of the Democratic Party in the Senate and the ally of President
Obama. Yet, not a single Democrat has had the spine to rebuke Reid. The
White House has been given the chance and explicitly ducked its duty.
Other members of the Senate have run for cover. They fear Reid and, if
truth be told, sort of like what heīŋŊs doing īŋŊ constantly needling Romney,
keeping him on the defensive about taxes and his insistence on releasing
only two years of his returns.
The politics of this squabble are delightful. But Reid has managed to draw
both his party and his president into the gutter with him. When Reid
accuses the Republicans of being overly partisan, he now lacks all
credibility. For a long time itīŋŊs been difficult to believe anything he
says. Now, itīŋŊs impossible.
As for Obama, he is tarnished by this episode. The fresh new face that
promised us all a different kind of politics is suddenly looking cheesy.
The soaring rhetoric that Obama used in his first campaign has come to
ground in the mud of Harry ReidīŋŊs latter-day McCarthyism.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/post/harry-reids-gutter-politics/2012/08/06/b3546bfe-dfcf-11e1-8fc5-a7dcf1fc161d_blog.html
-------
"The people are sending a message, and elected officials would do well to
take heed: You aren't getting any more of our tax dollars until you can
show you're responsible and can be trusted with the money you have now."
- Debbie Dooley, state coordinator of the Georgia Tea Party Patriots
majority leader, he has managed to sink the public image of the Senate
even lower than it would otherwise be. He contributes to bad feelings,
gridlock and the sense īŋŊ nay, the reality īŋŊ that everything is done for
political advantage. Reid is a crass man, the very personification of the
gaudy and kitschy Las Vegas Strip.
Still, he is not some backbencher, but the Senate majority leader. He is
the face of the Democratic Party in the Senate and the ally of President
Obama. Yet, not a single Democrat has had the spine to rebuke Reid. The
White House has been given the chance and explicitly ducked its duty.
Other members of the Senate have run for cover. They fear Reid and, if
truth be told, sort of like what heīŋŊs doing īŋŊ constantly needling Romney,
keeping him on the defensive about taxes and his insistence on releasing
only two years of his returns.
The politics of this squabble are delightful. But Reid has managed to draw
both his party and his president into the gutter with him. When Reid
accuses the Republicans of being overly partisan, he now lacks all
credibility. For a long time itīŋŊs been difficult to believe anything he
says. Now, itīŋŊs impossible.
As for Obama, he is tarnished by this episode. The fresh new face that
promised us all a different kind of politics is suddenly looking cheesy.
The soaring rhetoric that Obama used in his first campaign has come to
ground in the mud of Harry ReidīŋŊs latter-day McCarthyism.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/post/harry-reids-gutter-politics/2012/08/06/b3546bfe-dfcf-11e1-8fc5-a7dcf1fc161d_blog.html
-------
"The people are sending a message, and elected officials would do well to
take heed: You aren't getting any more of our tax dollars until you can
show you're responsible and can be trusted with the money you have now."
- Debbie Dooley, state coordinator of the Georgia Tea Party Patriots
Clave
Aug 6, 2012, 4:02:38 PM8/6/12
to
"Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:a5k5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>
> For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack...
Politician Engages in Politics During Election Year
Qute the scoop you've got there, Clark.
Jim
news:a5k5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>
> For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack...
Politician Engages in Politics During Election Year
Qute the scoop you've got there, Clark.
Jim
Dave the Clueless
Aug 6, 2012, 4:00:34 PM8/6/12
to
�Isn�t this kind of like Joe McCarthy back in the era when he said, �I
have in my hand the names of 400 people in the State Department who are
communists�? It turns out he didn�t, and he was saying that the way to
prove that they�re not is for them to come forward there. I mean, asking
somebody to come forward just because there�s been an unsubstantiated
charge, that�s a little thin to me.�
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bob-schieffer-invokes-joe-mccarthy-during-discussion-on-harry-reid/
have in my hand the names of 400 people in the State Department who are
communists�? It turns out he didn�t, and he was saying that the way to
prove that they�re not is for them to come forward there. I mean, asking
somebody to come forward just because there�s been an unsubstantiated
charge, that�s a little thin to me.�
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bob-schieffer-invokes-joe-mccarthy-during-discussion-on-harry-reid/
Clave
Aug 6, 2012, 4:06:33 PM8/6/12
to
"Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:2ck5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
> "Isn't this kind of like Joe McCarthy back in the era when he said, 'I
> have in my hand the names of 400 people in the State Department who are
> communists'? It turns out he didn't, and he was saying that the way to
> prove that they're not is for them to come forward there. I mean, asking
> somebody to come forward just because there's been an unsubstantiated
> charge, that's a little thin to me."
If only there were something Mittens could do to defuse this whole issue...
> have in my hand the names of 400 people in the State Department who are
> communists'? It turns out he didn't, and he was saying that the way to
> prove that they're not is for them to come forward there. I mean, asking
> somebody to come forward just because there's been an unsubstantiated
> charge, that's a little thin to me."
Jim
Dave the Clueless
Aug 6, 2012, 4:13:09 PM8/6/12
to
sticker phrase. Typical.
Dave the Clueless
Aug 6, 2012, 4:13:52 PM8/6/12
to
Clave
Aug 6, 2012, 4:43:59 PM8/6/12
to
"Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> On Aug 6 2012 5:06 PM, Clave wrote:
>
>> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:2ck5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>> > "Isn't this kind of like Joe McCarthy back in the era when he said, 'I
>> > have in my hand the names of 400 people in the State Department who are
>> > communists'? It turns out he didn't, and he was saying that the way to
>> > prove that they're not is for them to come forward there. I mean,
>> > asking
>> > somebody to come forward just because there's been an unsubstantiated
>> > charge, that's a little thin to me."
>>
>> If only there were something Mittens could do to defuse this whole
>> issue...
>>
>> Jim
>
> Why would he when he can watch the libtards implode over it?
One of the most amusing things about this whole travesty is watching you
>
>> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:2ck5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>> > "Isn't this kind of like Joe McCarthy back in the era when he said, 'I
>> > have in my hand the names of 400 people in the State Department who are
>> > communists'? It turns out he didn't, and he was saying that the way to
>> > prove that they're not is for them to come forward there. I mean,
>> > asking
>> > somebody to come forward just because there's been an unsubstantiated
>> > charge, that's a little thin to me."
>>
>> If only there were something Mittens could do to defuse this whole
>> issue...
>>
>> Jim
>
> Why would he when he can watch the libtards implode over it?
wingnut hacks try to characterize the Dems as somehow desperate, when the
reality is that they're by far on the winning end of it, and laughing their
asses off.
Jim
Clave
Aug 6, 2012, 4:46:35 PM8/6/12
to
"Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:l3l5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
> On Aug 6 2012 5:02 PM, Clave wrote:
>
>> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:a5k5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>> >
>> > For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack...
>>
>>
>> Politician Engages in Politics During Election Year
>>
>>
>> Qute the scoop you've got there, Clark.
>>
>> Jim
>
> Liberals reduce the stupidity rampant in their party leaders to a
> bumper sticker phrase. Typical.
Your attempt to deflect attention away from Mittens' probable tax crimes is
>
>> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:a5k5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>> >
>> > For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack...
>>
>>
>> Politician Engages in Politics During Election Year
>>
>>
>> Qute the scoop you've got there, Clark.
>>
>> Jim
>
> Liberals reduce the stupidity rampant in their party leaders to a
> bumper sticker phrase. Typical.
barely worth that much space.
Jim
VegasJerry
Aug 6, 2012, 4:52:21 PM8/6/12
to
On Monday, August 6, 2012 12:56:58 PM UTC-7, Dave the Clueless wrote:
> For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack.
Bullshit, you stupid ignorant fuck. He reported information he was given. Do you believe he should have kept it secret? Answer that, you idiot.
> For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack.
> As majority leader,
Heh, "Excuse me, Mr. Major Leader." (HAR)
> he has managed to sink the public image of the Senate
> even lower than it would otherwise be.
> He contributes to bad feelings,
Clueless; you're the dumbest, most illiterate fuck here and an embarrassment to yourself.
Jerry (joining others in laughing at him) 'n Vegas
Clave
Aug 6, 2012, 4:57:14 PM8/6/12
to
"VegasJerry" <jer...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:953cba10-8b38-4ad5...@googlegroups.com...
I can't see how it could go away, at this point. The longer
it drags on, the more it looks like Romney really does have
something to hide. That's not to say it would be a deciding
factor, mind you, but it fits so well into the existing
narrative of Romney being a rich, privileged jerk who doesn't
think little-people rules apply to him that people are going
to remember it.
-- Hunter
Election year gold.
Jim
news:953cba10-8b38-4ad5...@googlegroups.com...
> On Monday, August 6, 2012 12:56:58 PM UTC-7, Dave the Clueless wrote:
>> For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack.
>
> Bullshit, you stupid ignorant fuck. He reported information
> he was given. Do you believe he should have kept it secret?
This guy says it pretty well:
>> For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack.
>
> Bullshit, you stupid ignorant fuck. He reported information
> he was given. Do you believe he should have kept it secret?
I can't see how it could go away, at this point. The longer
it drags on, the more it looks like Romney really does have
something to hide. That's not to say it would be a deciding
factor, mind you, but it fits so well into the existing
narrative of Romney being a rich, privileged jerk who doesn't
think little-people rules apply to him that people are going
to remember it.
-- Hunter
Election year gold.
Jim
brattt
Aug 6, 2012, 5:11:16 PM8/6/12
to
On Aug 6 2012 4:46 PM, Clave wrote:
> Your attempt to deflect attention away from Mittens' probable tax crimes
good boy - now teach Harry Reid the word *probable*
> Your attempt to deflect attention away from Mittens' probable tax crimes
---------------------------------------------------------------
Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator, rec.gambling.poker
Whose stated mission is to call out the Asses on RGP
gtech1
Aug 6, 2012, 8:15:22 PM8/6/12
to
How do you know he's reporting information he was given? What if Romney
says "I heard from a reliable source that Reid told me he was lying about
being given information?" Would you believe that?
says "I heard from a reliable source that Reid told me he was lying about
being given information?" Would you believe that?
double....@hotmail.com
Aug 6, 2012, 8:39:33 PM8/6/12
to
Give 'em hell Harry! I'm luvin' it! I wish all Democrats had the balls
to play the game like Reid! LOL
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2012/aug/06/harry-reid-keeps-pressure-mitt-romney-over-tax-ret/
to play the game like Reid! LOL
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2012/aug/06/harry-reid-keeps-pressure-mitt-romney-over-tax-ret/
FL Turbo
Aug 6, 2012, 9:10:37 PM8/6/12
to
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 17:15:22 -0700, "gtech1"
<duanepr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>How do you know he's reporting information he was given? What if Romney
>says "I heard from a reliable source that Reid told me he was lying about
>being given information?" Would you believe that?
Harry Reid should tend to his own problems.
<duanepr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>How do you know he's reporting information he was given? What if Romney
>says "I heard from a reliable source that Reid told me he was lying about
>being given information?" Would you believe that?
He has to answer to the charges that are going viral on the Internet.
http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/middle-class-guy/2012/aug/6/harry-reid-must-come-clean-if-s-possible/
CHICAGO, August 6, 2012 � If you Google �Harry Reid pederast,� you get
almost one million results. A pederast, by the way, is a man who
engages in sexual relations with an underage minor.
And while political blogs and social media lynch mobs are abuzz with
these low blow allegations against Reid, nothing is proven. But
according to the rules set by Harry Reid, he has an obligation to show
that they are false, or he must be held accountable as a pederast.
If you Google �Harry Reid organized crime," you get well over one
million results. He's from Nevada, and we've all seen The Godfather.
Frank Sinatra, Jimmy Hoffa, Caesar's Palace - need we say more?
Is Harry Reid a pederast? Does he support pederasty? Is he a corrupt
politician with ties to organized crime? Has he ever paid income
taxes? Is he a tax cheat?
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Hmmm.
A man who "...engages in sexual relations with an underaged minor?"
From some recent discussions on RGP, that may not be as unusual as
some might think.
For sure, these are allegations from unnamed sources, but it still is
up to Reid to stand up and deal with them.
Bradley K. Sherman
Aug 6, 2012, 9:24:02 PM8/6/12
to
There is no way that Romney should be arguing with Reid.
That's a job for his minions. The more time Romney spends
dueling with Reid (as he did on Hannity's radio show) the
less presidential he appears:
|
| Romney tax returns: Harry Reid may be bluffing, but he's
| winning
|
| There's no proof that Sen. Harry Reid is correct in
| asserting that Mitt Romney paid no taxes for 10 years. But
| he has succeeded in keeping the political universe focused
| on Romney's wealth and finances, not the struggling economy.
| ...
| "I think at this point in time it's going to dog him all
| the way, and he needs to get it behind him," Republican
| strategist Ed Rollins said Sunday on Fox News. "I think he
| needs to release more taxes. Absolutely."
|
| Mr. Rollins joins conservative columnist George Will,
| Weekly Standard editor William Kristol, and former
| Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour (R) in saying that Romney
| should release more returns.
| ...
<http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2012/0806/Romney-tax-returns-Harry-Reid-may-be-bluffing-but-he-s-winning>
As to the efforts of the right-wing echo chamber to start rumors
about Reid. Go for it suckers, he's not up for re-electian this
year. You're spinning your wheels.
--bks
That's a job for his minions. The more time Romney spends
dueling with Reid (as he did on Hannity's radio show) the
less presidential he appears:
|
| Romney tax returns: Harry Reid may be bluffing, but he's
| winning
|
| There's no proof that Sen. Harry Reid is correct in
| asserting that Mitt Romney paid no taxes for 10 years. But
| he has succeeded in keeping the political universe focused
| on Romney's wealth and finances, not the struggling economy.
| ...
| "I think at this point in time it's going to dog him all
| the way, and he needs to get it behind him," Republican
| strategist Ed Rollins said Sunday on Fox News. "I think he
| needs to release more taxes. Absolutely."
|
| Mr. Rollins joins conservative columnist George Will,
| Weekly Standard editor William Kristol, and former
| Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour (R) in saying that Romney
| should release more returns.
| ...
<http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2012/0806/Romney-tax-returns-Harry-Reid-may-be-bluffing-but-he-s-winning>
As to the efforts of the right-wing echo chamber to start rumors
about Reid. Go for it suckers, he's not up for re-electian this
year. You're spinning your wheels.
--bks
Dave the Clueless
Aug 6, 2012, 10:34:19 PM8/6/12
to
On Aug 6 2012 5:46 PM, Clave wrote:
> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> news:l3l5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
> > On Aug 6 2012 5:02 PM, Clave wrote:
> >
> >> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> >> news:a5k5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
> >> >
> >> > For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack...
> >>
> >>
> >> Politician Engages in Politics During Election Year
> >>
> >>
> >> Qute the scoop you've got there, Clark.
> >>
> >> Jim
> >
> > Liberals reduce the stupidity rampant in their party leaders to a
> > bumper sticker phrase. Typical.
>
> Your attempt to deflect attention away from Mittens' probable tax crimes is
> barely worth that much space.
>
> Jim
Probable, my ass. Why don't your boys sic the IRS on him if they got such
> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> news:l3l5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
> > On Aug 6 2012 5:02 PM, Clave wrote:
> >
> >> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> >> news:a5k5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
> >> >
> >> > For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack...
> >>
> >>
> >> Politician Engages in Politics During Election Year
> >>
> >>
> >> Qute the scoop you've got there, Clark.
> >>
> >> Jim
> >
> > Liberals reduce the stupidity rampant in their party leaders to a
> > bumper sticker phrase. Typical.
>
> Your attempt to deflect attention away from Mittens' probable tax crimes is
> barely worth that much space.
>
> Jim
a hot fucking tip? Moron.
Dave the Clueless
Aug 6, 2012, 10:33:11 PM8/6/12
to
On Aug 6 2012 5:52 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
> On Monday, August 6, 2012 12:56:58 PM UTC-7, Dave the Clueless wrote:
> > For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack.
>
> Bullshit, you stupid ignorant fuck. He reported information he was given. Do
you believe he should
> have kept it secret? Answer that, you idiot.
You stupid partisan fuck, did you see who wrote the article?
> On Monday, August 6, 2012 12:56:58 PM UTC-7, Dave the Clueless wrote:
> > For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack.
>
> Bullshit, you stupid ignorant fuck. He reported information he was given. Do
you believe he should
> have kept it secret? Answer that, you idiot.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! You utter fool.
>
> > As majority leader,
>
> Heh, "Excuse me, Mr. Major Leader." (HAR)
>
>
> > he has managed to sink the public image of the Senate
> > even lower than it would otherwise be.
>
> No. The asshole Mitch McConnell is. He said his job was not to create jobs
for Americas, but to
> block everything the President and Democrats were trying to do to help
America.
>
> > He contributes to bad feelings,
>
> Heh! "Excuse me Mr. Major Leader but you're contributing to bad feelings."
> Clueless; you're the dumbest, most illiterate fuck here and an embarrassment
to yourself.
>
blathering about.
> Jerry (joining others in laughing at him) 'n Vegas
Dave the Clueless
Aug 6, 2012, 10:35:07 PM8/6/12
to
On Aug 6 2012 5:43 PM, Clave wrote:
> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> news:05l5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
> > On Aug 6 2012 5:06 PM, Clave wrote:
> >
> >> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> >> news:2ck5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
> >> > "Isn't this kind of like Joe McCarthy back in the era when he said, 'I
> >> > have in my hand the names of 400 people in the State Department who are
> >> > communists'? It turns out he didn't, and he was saying that the way to
> >> > prove that they're not is for them to come forward there. I mean,
> >> > asking
> >> > somebody to come forward just because there's been an unsubstantiated
> >> > charge, that's a little thin to me."
> >>
> >> If only there were something Mittens could do to defuse this whole
> >> issue...
> >>
> >> Jim
> >
> > Why would he when he can watch the libtards implode over it?
>
> One of the most amusing things about this whole travesty is watching you
> wingnut hacks try to characterize the Dems as somehow desperate, when the
> reality is that they're by far on the winning end of it, and laughing their
> asses off.
>
> Jim
That is almost Jerry-worthy. And yes, we ARE laughing at you.
> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> news:05l5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
> > On Aug 6 2012 5:06 PM, Clave wrote:
> >
> >> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> >> news:2ck5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
> >> > "Isn't this kind of like Joe McCarthy back in the era when he said, 'I
> >> > have in my hand the names of 400 people in the State Department who are
> >> > communists'? It turns out he didn't, and he was saying that the way to
> >> > prove that they're not is for them to come forward there. I mean,
> >> > asking
> >> > somebody to come forward just because there's been an unsubstantiated
> >> > charge, that's a little thin to me."
> >>
> >> If only there were something Mittens could do to defuse this whole
> >> issue...
> >>
> >> Jim
> >
> > Why would he when he can watch the libtards implode over it?
>
> One of the most amusing things about this whole travesty is watching you
> wingnut hacks try to characterize the Dems as somehow desperate, when the
> reality is that they're by far on the winning end of it, and laughing their
> asses off.
>
> Jim
Dave the Clueless
Aug 6, 2012, 10:35:44 PM8/6/12
to
Clave
Aug 6, 2012, 11:59:57 PM8/6/12
to
"Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:rfb6f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
> On Aug 6 2012 5:43 PM, Clave wrote:
<...>
>> One of the most amusing things about this whole travesty is watching you
>> wingnut hacks try to characterize the Dems as somehow desperate, when the
>> reality is that they're by far on the winning end of it, and laughing
>> their
>> asses off.
>
LOL -- right on cue.
Jim
Clave
Aug 7, 2012, 12:37:02 AM8/7/12
to
"Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:beb6f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
> On Aug 6 2012 5:46 PM, Clave wrote:
<...>
>> Your attempt to deflect attention away from Mittens' probable
>> tax crimes is barely worth that much space.
>
Such hostility -- you're taking this rather personally.
Anyway, amnesty doesn't mean he didn't commit the crimes in the first place.
Jim
Pepe Papon
Aug 7, 2012, 4:22:39 AM8/7/12
to
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 13:43:59 -0700, "Clave" <cla...@the.monastery.com>
this. I wasn't very amused listening to them reciting all kinds of
logically fallacious right-wing talking point diversions. I found it
disturbing that they can pull the wool over the eyes of so many people
like they do.
--
Pepe "The Revelation" Papon
wrote:
>
>
>"Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>news:05l5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>> On Aug 6 2012 5:06 PM, Clave wrote:
>>
>>> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:2ck5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>>> > "Isn't this kind of like Joe McCarthy back in the era when he said, 'I
>>> > have in my hand the names of 400 people in the State Department who are
>>> > communists'? It turns out he didn't, and he was saying that the way to
>>> > prove that they're not is for them to come forward there. I mean,
>>> > asking
>>> > somebody to come forward just because there's been an unsubstantiated
>>> > charge, that's a little thin to me."
>>>
>>> If only there were something Mittens could do to defuse this whole
>>> issue...
>>>
>>> Jim
>>
>> Why would he when he can watch the libtards implode over it?
>
>One of the most amusing things about this whole travesty is watching you
>wingnut hacks try to characterize the Dems as somehow desperate, when the
>reality is that they're by far on the winning end of it, and laughing their
>asses off.
I was near a TV today that was showing a Fox News panel discussion on
>
>
>"Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>news:05l5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>> On Aug 6 2012 5:06 PM, Clave wrote:
>>
>>> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:2ck5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>>> > "Isn't this kind of like Joe McCarthy back in the era when he said, 'I
>>> > have in my hand the names of 400 people in the State Department who are
>>> > communists'? It turns out he didn't, and he was saying that the way to
>>> > prove that they're not is for them to come forward there. I mean,
>>> > asking
>>> > somebody to come forward just because there's been an unsubstantiated
>>> > charge, that's a little thin to me."
>>>
>>> If only there were something Mittens could do to defuse this whole
>>> issue...
>>>
>>> Jim
>>
>> Why would he when he can watch the libtards implode over it?
>
>One of the most amusing things about this whole travesty is watching you
>wingnut hacks try to characterize the Dems as somehow desperate, when the
>reality is that they're by far on the winning end of it, and laughing their
>asses off.
this. I wasn't very amused listening to them reciting all kinds of
logically fallacious right-wing talking point diversions. I found it
disturbing that they can pull the wool over the eyes of so many people
like they do.
--
Pepe "The Revelation" Papon
Pepe Papon
Aug 7, 2012, 4:25:11 AM8/7/12
to
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 13:13:09 -0700, "Dave the Clueless"
<a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>On Aug 6 2012 5:02 PM, Clave wrote:
>
>> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:a5k5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>> >
>> > For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack...
>>
>>
>> Politician Engages in Politics During Election Year
>>
>>
>> Qute the scoop you've got there, Clark.
>>
>> Jim
>
>Liberals reduce the stupidity rampant in their party leaders to a bumper
>sticker phrase. Typical.
Kinda like:
<a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>On Aug 6 2012 5:02 PM, Clave wrote:
>
>> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:a5k5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>> >
>> > For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack...
>>
>>
>> Politician Engages in Politics During Election Year
>>
>>
>> Qute the scoop you've got there, Clark.
>>
>> Jim
>
>Liberals reduce the stupidity rampant in their party leaders to a bumper
>sticker phrase. Typical.
"For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack"
Clave
Aug 7, 2012, 4:27:42 AM8/7/12
to
"Pepe Papon" <hitme...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:csj1285h6qkkbgehj...@4ax.com...
<...>
>>One of the most amusing things about this whole travesty is watching you
>>wingnut hacks try to characterize the Dems as somehow desperate, when the
>>reality is that they're by far on the winning end of it, and laughing
>>their
>>asses off.
>
> I was near a TV today that was showing a Fox News panel discussion on
> this. I wasn't very amused listening to them reciting all kinds of
> logically fallacious right-wing talking point diversions. I found it
> disturbing that they can pull the wool over the eyes of so many people
> like they do.
Those people were already lost. Sad, but don't waste emotional energy
mourning them.
Jim
news:csj1285h6qkkbgehj...@4ax.com...
<...>
>>One of the most amusing things about this whole travesty is watching you
>>wingnut hacks try to characterize the Dems as somehow desperate, when the
>>reality is that they're by far on the winning end of it, and laughing
>>their
>>asses off.
>
> I was near a TV today that was showing a Fox News panel discussion on
> this. I wasn't very amused listening to them reciting all kinds of
> logically fallacious right-wing talking point diversions. I found it
> disturbing that they can pull the wool over the eyes of so many people
> like they do.
mourning them.
Jim
Dave the Clueless
Aug 7, 2012, 7:20:29 AM8/7/12
to
have this very credible evidence? Got an answer?
Dave the Clueless
Aug 7, 2012, 7:21:06 AM8/7/12
to
Clave
Aug 7, 2012, 11:51:08 AM8/7/12
to
"Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:t8a7f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
> On Aug 7 2012 1:37 AM, Clave wrote:
>
>> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:beb6f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>> > On Aug 6 2012 5:46 PM, Clave wrote:
>>
>> <...>
>>
>> >> Your attempt to deflect attention away from Mittens' probable
>> >> tax crimes is barely worth that much space.
>> >
>> > Probable, my ass...
>>
>> Such hostility -- you're taking this rather personally.
>>
>> Anyway, amnesty doesn't mean he didn't commit the crimes in the first
>> place.
>>
>> Jim
>
> Amnesty? What amnesty?
The 2009 IRS amnesty program for tax criminals, dumbass -- pay attention.
>
>> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:beb6f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>> > On Aug 6 2012 5:46 PM, Clave wrote:
>>
>> <...>
>>
>> >> Your attempt to deflect attention away from Mittens' probable
>> >> tax crimes is barely worth that much space.
>> >
>> > Probable, my ass...
>>
>> Such hostility -- you're taking this rather personally.
>>
>> Anyway, amnesty doesn't mean he didn't commit the crimes in the first
>> place.
>>
>> Jim
>
> Amnesty? What amnesty?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120718123718AA5aYD4
Jim
VegasJerry
Aug 7, 2012, 3:13:37 PM8/7/12
to
On Monday, August 6, 2012 7:33:11 PM UTC-7, Dave the Clueless wrote:
> On Aug 6 2012 5:52 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > On Monday, August 6, 2012 12:56:58 PM UTC-7, Dave the Clueless wrote:
> > > For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack.
> >
> > Bullshit, you stupid ignorant fuck. He reported information he was given. Do
> you believe he should
> > have kept it secret? Answer that, you idiot.
> You stupid partisan fuck, did you see who wrote the article?
> HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! You utter fool.
Still dodging that question? I've asked it of you 12-times in three different threads. You keep covering your ears and running.
> On Aug 6 2012 5:52 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > On Monday, August 6, 2012 12:56:58 PM UTC-7, Dave the Clueless wrote:
> > > For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack.
> >
> > Bullshit, you stupid ignorant fuck. He reported information he was given. Do
> you believe he should
> > have kept it secret? Answer that, you idiot.
> You stupid partisan fuck, did you see who wrote the article?
> HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! You utter fool.
Jerry 'n Vegas
VegasJerry
Aug 7, 2012, 3:17:03 PM8/7/12
to
On Tuesday, August 7, 2012 4:20:29 AM UTC-7, Dave the Clueless wrote:
> On Aug 7 2012 1:37 AM, Clave wrote:
>
> > "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> > news:beb6f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
> > > On Aug 6 2012 5:46 PM, Clave wrote:
> >
> > <...>
> >
> > >> Your attempt to deflect attention away from Mittens' probable
> > >> tax crimes is barely worth that much space.
> > >
> > > Probable, my ass...
> >
> > Such hostility -- you're taking this rather personally.
> >
> > Anyway, amnesty doesn't mean he didn't commit the crimes in the first place.
> >
> > Jim
> Amnesty? What amnesty?
JFC! You don't even know about the Amnesty part?
> On Aug 7 2012 1:37 AM, Clave wrote:
>
> > "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> > news:beb6f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
> > > On Aug 6 2012 5:46 PM, Clave wrote:
> >
> > <...>
> >
> > >> Your attempt to deflect attention away from Mittens' probable
> > >> tax crimes is barely worth that much space.
> > >
> > > Probable, my ass...
> >
> > Such hostility -- you're taking this rather personally.
> >
> > Anyway, amnesty doesn't mean he didn't commit the crimes in the first place.
> >
> > Jim
> Amnesty? What amnesty?
You're embarrassing yourself beyond belief. Notice how you're all alone……
Jerry (lol) 'n Vegas
Clave
Aug 7, 2012, 3:20:40 PM8/7/12
to
"VegasJerry" <jer...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:10234939-aa61-4202...@googlegroups.com...
> On Tuesday, August 7, 2012 4:20:29 AM UTC-7, Dave the Clueless wrote:
>> On Aug 7 2012 1:37 AM, Clave wrote:
>>
>> > "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>> > news:beb6f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>> > > On Aug 6 2012 5:46 PM, Clave wrote:
>> >
>> > <...>
>> >
>> > >> Your attempt to deflect attention away from Mittens' probable
>> > >> tax crimes is barely worth that much space.
>> > >
>> > > Probable, my ass...
>> >
>> > Such hostility -- you're taking this rather personally.
>> >
>> > Anyway, amnesty doesn't mean he didn't commit the crimes in the first
>> > place.
>> >
>> > Jim
>
>> Amnesty? What amnesty?
>
> JFC! You don't even know about the Amnesty part?
>
> You're embarrassing yourself beyond belief. Notice how you're all alone……
He's thrashing around like a gut-hooked trout.
>> On Aug 7 2012 1:37 AM, Clave wrote:
>>
>> > "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>> > news:beb6f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>> > > On Aug 6 2012 5:46 PM, Clave wrote:
>> >
>> > <...>
>> >
>> > >> Your attempt to deflect attention away from Mittens' probable
>> > >> tax crimes is barely worth that much space.
>> > >
>> > > Probable, my ass...
>> >
>> > Such hostility -- you're taking this rather personally.
>> >
>> > Anyway, amnesty doesn't mean he didn't commit the crimes in the first
>> > place.
>> >
>> > Jim
>
>> Amnesty? What amnesty?
>
> JFC! You don't even know about the Amnesty part?
>
> You're embarrassing yourself beyond belief. Notice how you're all alone……
Jim
Travel A
Aug 7, 2012, 3:26:52 PM8/7/12
to
Lol, Clavey, even Harry Reid isn't dumb enough to lie about Romney being
involved in tax amnesty.
If amnesty were the case for Romney, Holder's the DoJ would know about
it, and rest assured it would "out."
involved in tax amnesty.
If amnesty were the case for Romney, Holder's the DoJ would know about
it, and rest assured it would "out."
Adam Russell
Aug 7, 2012, 5:24:14 PM8/7/12
to
On 8/6/2012 12:56 PM, Dave the Clueless wrote:
> For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack.
Reid just gave Romney ammunition. All he has to do is prove Reid a liar
> For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack.
and it will be a HUGE blow to the Obama campaign.
Bradley K. Sherman
Aug 7, 2012, 5:29:26 PM8/7/12
to
release his tax returns. A child would understand the logic.
--bks
Travel A
Aug 8, 2012, 6:21:32 AM8/8/12
to
Romney, correctly, knows that the Democrats and left wing media will
just try to distort his tax records and fabricate controversy.
Sarah Palin didn't release her over 20,000 e-mails on her own, just
because her enemies wanted them, either. WTF should she?
They found, zero, wrong.
just try to distort his tax records and fabricate controversy.
Sarah Palin didn't release her over 20,000 e-mails on her own, just
because her enemies wanted them, either. WTF should she?
They found, zero, wrong.
Travel A
Aug 8, 2012, 6:23:32 AM8/8/12
to
Reid's just baiting, and Romney's not taking the bait. WTF should he.
Adam Russell
Aug 8, 2012, 1:02:01 PM8/8/12
to
On 8/8/2012 3:21 AM, Travel A wrote:
> Romney, correctly, knows that the Democrats and left wing media will
> just try to distort his tax records and fabricate controversy.
>
That doesnt fly since every other candidate has always released the
> Romney, correctly, knows that the Democrats and left wing media will
> just try to distort his tax records and fabricate controversy.
>
records and it hasnt ever been a problem.
phlash74
Aug 8, 2012, 3:17:03 PM8/8/12
to
every President of the last 40-some odd years (based on released tax
returns, which for Romney includes 2010 and his 2011 estimated return)? He
makes by far the most money and pays the lowest effective rate. The
donkeys want the numbers so they can put them in commercials. That's all
this is and all it ever has been. I bet his tax returns for the last 10
years look a hell of a lot like the one from 2010.
As far as Reid's stunt goes, I give him credit - he gave himself plausible
deniability with his "anonymous source". If and when Mittens caves and
shows he paid taxes for the last 10 years, Reid can just say that his
source was obviously misinformed and not apologize. But only mouth
breathers believe Romney hasn't paid any taxes for ten years, and only
complete retards believe there's some smoking gun evidence of actual
illegal activity in the unreleased returns. Thus, Reid's anonymous source
is not a whistleblower, since he (if he even exists, which is doubtful for
many reasons) is not accusing Romney of illegal activity. So there's
absolutely no good reason for Reid not to reveal his source. He's not a
journalist or an investigator.
If I were Romney, I'd tell Reid to produce either concrete evidence, his
"anonymous source", or STFD and STFU. Or at the very least produce his own
tax returns and offer to match the number of years that Reid does.
Michael
-----------------
"> phlash
On your circle jerk k00l kidz email list. Should be disqualified for
that, but I'll give him a pass because he is smart." - ramashiva,
8/22/2010
"Hitler has already been forgiven, but you have not." - Reptillian AKA
Igotskillz, 4/6/2011
phlash74
Aug 8, 2012, 3:23:01 PM8/8/12
to
On Aug 8 2012 12:17 PM, phlash74 wrote:
> If I were Romney, I'd tell Reid to produce either concrete evidence, his
> "anonymous source", or STFD and STFU. Or at the very least produce his own
> tax returns and offer to match the number of years that Reid does.
>
Last sentence is badly worded - it should say challenge Reid to produce
> If I were Romney, I'd tell Reid to produce either concrete evidence, his
> "anonymous source", or STFD and STFU. Or at the very least produce his own
> tax returns and offer to match the number of years that Reid does.
>
his tax returns and offer to produce as many years as Reid does.
brattt
Aug 8, 2012, 4:20:44 PM8/8/12
to
On Aug 8 2012 3:23 PM, phlash74 wrote:
> On Aug 8 2012 12:17 PM, phlash74 wrote:
>
>
> > If I were Romney, I'd tell Reid to produce either concrete evidence, his
> > "anonymous source", or STFD and STFU. Or at the very least produce his own
> > tax returns and offer to match the number of years that Reid does.
> >
>
>
> Last sentence is badly worded - it should say challenge Reid to produce
> his tax returns and offer to produce as many years as Reid does.
>
> Michael
And Pelosi's but just while she has been in office.
> On Aug 8 2012 12:17 PM, phlash74 wrote:
>
>
> > If I were Romney, I'd tell Reid to produce either concrete evidence, his
> > "anonymous source", or STFD and STFU. Or at the very least produce his own
> > tax returns and offer to match the number of years that Reid does.
> >
>
>
> Last sentence is badly worded - it should say challenge Reid to produce
> his tax returns and offer to produce as many years as Reid does.
>
> Michael
Think she has something to hide?
Nancy Pelosi Downplays Tax Return Demand
http://www.rollcall.com/news/nancy_pelosi_downplays_tax_return_demand-216283-1.html
---------------------------------------------------------------
Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator, rec.gambling.poker
Whose stated mission is to call out the Asses on RGP
Bradley K. Sherman
Aug 8, 2012, 4:50:18 PM8/8/12
to
8 August 2012:
|
| New poll suggests that President Obama's lead over Romney
| is growing
| ...
| The tax return issue has plagued the Romney campaign for
| weeks now and is not going away. As the media continues you
| to ask what it is in Romney's tax returns that he is so
| reluctant to reveal it may be that voters have begun to
| question whether Romney can be trusted once in the White
| House.
|
<http://thegrio.com/2012/08/08/new-poll-suggests-that-president-obamas-lead-over-romney-is-growing/>
All Romney has to do is release the returns. It's so simple
a child would understand the logic.
--bks
|
| New poll suggests that President Obama's lead over Romney
| is growing
| ...
| The tax return issue has plagued the Romney campaign for
| weeks now and is not going away. As the media continues you
| to ask what it is in Romney's tax returns that he is so
| reluctant to reveal it may be that voters have begun to
| question whether Romney can be trusted once in the White
| House.
|
<http://thegrio.com/2012/08/08/new-poll-suggests-that-president-obamas-lead-over-romney-is-growing/>
All Romney has to do is release the returns. It's so simple
a child would understand the logic.
--bks
brattt
Aug 8, 2012, 5:16:23 PM8/8/12
to
release his birth certificate.
And then I'd go tit for tat - show one year and ask to see Obama's college
admissions application. Show another year and see the scholarship forms
and end the speculation that he registered as a foreign student, and
received aid based on that. And then releasen another year and let us
read how much Obama hates white that he wrote about in his thesis.
That is logic that perhaps even you could understand.
Bradley K. Sherman
Aug 8, 2012, 5:24:02 PM8/8/12
to
brattt <af3...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>On Aug 8 2012 4:50 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>> |
>> | New poll suggests that President Obama's lead over Romney
>> | is growing
>> | ...
>> | The tax return issue has plagued the Romney campaign for
>> | weeks now and is not going away. As the media continues you
>> ...
>On Aug 8 2012 4:50 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>> |
>> | New poll suggests that President Obama's lead over Romney
>> | is growing
>> | ...
>> | The tax return issue has plagued the Romney campaign for
>> | weeks now and is not going away. As the media continues you
>> All Romney has to do is release the returns. It's so simple
>> a child would understand the logic.
>
>> a child would understand the logic.
>
>well now, I figure he should take at least as long as it took Obama to
>release his birth certificate.
>
>And then I'd go tit for tat - show one year and ask to see Obama's college
>admissions application. ...
>release his birth certificate.
>
>And then I'd go tit for tat - show one year and ask to see Obama's college
Obama was the only President, ever, forced to produce a birth
certificate. Was McCain forced to produce one ... we know that
he was not born with the borders of the USA?
Obama's tax returns are online. Is McCain's "college admissions
application" online?
You apparently have no idea what "tit for tat" even means.
--bks
mo_ntresor
Aug 8, 2012, 5:45:42 PM8/8/12
to
On Aug 8 2012 3:24 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
> >well now, I figure he should take at least as long as it took Obama to
> >release his birth certificate.
> >
> >And then I'd go tit for tat - show one year and ask to see Obama's college
> >admissions application. ...
>
> Obama was the only President, ever, forced to produce a birth
> certificate. Was McCain forced to produce one ... we know that
> he was not born with the borders of the USA?
>
> Obama's tax returns are online. Is McCain's "college admissions
> application" online?
>
> You apparently have no idea what "tit for tat" even means.
obama was forced to produce a birth certificate! he was forced to spend
> >well now, I figure he should take at least as long as it took Obama to
> >release his birth certificate.
> >
> >And then I'd go tit for tat - show one year and ask to see Obama's college
> >admissions application. ...
>
> Obama was the only President, ever, forced to produce a birth
> certificate. Was McCain forced to produce one ... we know that
> he was not born with the borders of the USA?
>
> Obama's tax returns are online. Is McCain's "college admissions
> application" online?
>
> You apparently have no idea what "tit for tat" even means.
$6T more than he took in. he was forced to not produce a budget. he was
forced to ignore his own debt and deficit commission.
who needs leadership and accountability when you've got a lying lawyer
(and blind partisan idiots in tow) and tons of excuses.
mo_ntresor
phlash74
Aug 8, 2012, 5:55:19 PM8/8/12
to
actually worried about Donald Trump? Please. That release changed exactly
zero minds - everyone with a functional brain already knew the President
was born in Hawai'i, and the birther retards were just going to claim it
was a fake birth certificate anyways.
Same with Romney's tax returns. None of the morons screaming from the
rooftops about amnesty or no taxes for 10 years were going to vote for him
anyways. He has literally nothing to gain by releasing them. Probably
doesn't have the balls to hold out that long, though. I expect he'll
probably cave and put them out shortly after the convention, hoping that
the story will dissipate over the month of September so by the time the
debates come around it will be largely a non-issue (as it should be in the
first place).
brattt
Aug 8, 2012, 6:03:16 PM8/8/12
to
On Aug 8 2012 5:24 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
> brattt <af3...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> >On Aug 8 2012 4:50 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
> >> |
> >> | New poll suggests that President Obama's lead over Romney
> >> | is growing
> >> | ...
> >> | The tax return issue has plagued the Romney campaign for
> >> | weeks now and is not going away. As the media continues you
> >> ...
> >> All Romney has to do is release the returns. It's so simple
> >> a child would understand the logic.
> >
> >well now, I figure he should take at least as long as it took Obama to
> >release his birth certificate.
> >
> >And then I'd go tit for tat - show one year and ask to see Obama's college
> >admissions application. ...
>
> Obama was the only President, ever, forced to produce a birth
> certificate. Was McCain forced to produce one ... we know that
> he was not born with the borders of the USA?
Let's compare - according to Obama's literary agent, "Acton & Dystel,
> brattt <af3...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> >On Aug 8 2012 4:50 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
> >> |
> >> | New poll suggests that President Obama's lead over Romney
> >> | is growing
> >> | ...
> >> | The tax return issue has plagued the Romney campaign for
> >> | weeks now and is not going away. As the media continues you
> >> ...
> >> All Romney has to do is release the returns. It's so simple
> >> a child would understand the logic.
> >
> >well now, I figure he should take at least as long as it took Obama to
> >release his birth certificate.
> >
> >And then I'd go tit for tat - show one year and ask to see Obama's college
> >admissions application. ...
>
> Obama was the only President, ever, forced to produce a birth
> certificate. Was McCain forced to produce one ... we know that
> he was not born with the borders of the USA?
which touts Obama as "born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii."
And John McCain was born of US military personnel on and American base.
Yep, sure sound like the same thing.
> Obama's tax returns are online. Is McCain's "college admissions
> application" online?
methods of obtaining scholarship aid I would be willing to bet he would
show them - not hide his records. Even dubya with his less than sterling
grades made his available.
> You apparently have no idea what "tit for tat" even means.
Bradley K. Sherman
Aug 8, 2012, 6:24:58 PM8/8/12
to
brattt <af3...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> ...
>That would be you
Brilliant. Speaking of brilliant, did you see this:
|
| Mitt Romney and his aides believe that -- despite loud and
| nagging calls for him to release his tax returns -- the
| candidate simply cannot afford to release his taxes now,
| even as some aides wish he would have put them out six
| months ago or more.
| ...
| "The complaining for more and more returns and the stories
| about how rich he is get old after a few weeks, but there
| aren't a few weeks left," the operative said. "Now we've
| got to keep doing what we're doing and hope it isn't too
| painful."
|
| "It makes Reid look crazy, but it's brilliant," the
| operative continued."
| ...
<http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/why-romney-wont-release-his-taxes>
So, 89 more days of Senator Reid and President Obama dogging
Romney about whatever it is that he's hiding. Erick Erickson,
capo di tutti capi of RedState.com is washing his hands of
Romney:
|
| The Moment All the Doubts About Romney Resurfaced on the
| Right
|
| The "Read My Lips" Moment of Betrayal At Least Comes Before
| the Election This Time
|
<http://www.redstate.com/erick/2012/08/08/the-moment-all-the-doubts-about-romney-resurfaced-on-the-right/>
It's ulcers all the way till November for Romney defenders.
Enjoy!
--bks
> ...
>That would be you
Brilliant. Speaking of brilliant, did you see this:
|
| Mitt Romney and his aides believe that -- despite loud and
| nagging calls for him to release his tax returns -- the
| candidate simply cannot afford to release his taxes now,
| even as some aides wish he would have put them out six
| months ago or more.
| ...
| "The complaining for more and more returns and the stories
| about how rich he is get old after a few weeks, but there
| aren't a few weeks left," the operative said. "Now we've
| got to keep doing what we're doing and hope it isn't too
| painful."
|
| "It makes Reid look crazy, but it's brilliant," the
| operative continued."
| ...
<http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/why-romney-wont-release-his-taxes>
So, 89 more days of Senator Reid and President Obama dogging
Romney about whatever it is that he's hiding. Erick Erickson,
capo di tutti capi of RedState.com is washing his hands of
Romney:
|
| The Moment All the Doubts About Romney Resurfaced on the
| Right
|
| The "Read My Lips" Moment of Betrayal At Least Comes Before
| the Election This Time
|
<http://www.redstate.com/erick/2012/08/08/the-moment-all-the-doubts-about-romney-resurfaced-on-the-right/>
It's ulcers all the way till November for Romney defenders.
Enjoy!
--bks
mo_ntresor
Aug 8, 2012, 6:48:00 PM8/8/12
to
On Aug 8 2012 4:47 PM, mo_ntresor wrote:
> ann coulter's weighed in (democrats' ideal voter: illegal alien, single
> mother, convicted felon):
http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-07-18.html
mo_ntresor
> ann coulter's weighed in (democrats' ideal voter: illegal alien, single
> mother, convicted felon):
http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-07-18.html
mo_ntresor
mo_ntresor
Aug 8, 2012, 6:47:12 PM8/8/12
to
charitable brilliance? the man's a hero for suffering through you idiots.
we've got the most overqualified candidate this country's ever seen, and
he's running EVEN with an imbecile who's racked up $6T in debt. it's
truly amazing.
ann coulter's weighed in (democrats' ideal voter: illegal alien, single
mother, convicted felon):
with Mitt Romney?
The answer is: It's not the same country.
Similarly, when two successful, attractive multimillionaire women in
California can't beat a geriatric leftist like Jerry Brown or an old prune
like Barbara Boxer, that's not the same state that elected Ronald Reagan
twice, either.
The same process that has already destroyed California is working its way
through the entire country.
While conservatives have been formulating carefully constructed arguments,
liberals have been playing a long-term game to change the demographics of
America to get an electorate more to their liking.
They will do incalculable damage to the nation and to individual citizens,
but Democrats will have an unbeatable majority. Just like California, the
United States is on its way to becoming a Third World, one-party state. "
mo_ntresor
Clave
Aug 8, 2012, 6:50:16 PM8/8/12
to
"mo_ntresor" <amontillad...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gs6bf9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
LOL -- you people have done little else for weeks.
Jim
news:gs6bf9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
Jim
Clave
Aug 8, 2012, 6:50:54 PM8/8/12
to
"mo_ntresor" <amontillad...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0u6bf9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
Jim
mo_ntresor
Aug 8, 2012, 6:50:38 PM8/8/12
to
On Aug 8 2012 4:48 PM, mo_ntresor wrote:
> > ann coulter's weighed in (democrats' ideal voter: illegal alien, single
> > mother, convicted felon):
>
> http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-07-18.html
ann's got a good left jab:
> > ann coulter's weighed in (democrats' ideal voter: illegal alien, single
> > mother, convicted felon):
>
> http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-07-18.html
"According to recent polls, Obama has a negative job approval rating of 45
to 49 percent. The reason the polls are tied between Obama and Romney is
that single women support Obama by a 2-to-1 margin. The Democrats' siren
song to single women is: Don't worry, the government will be your husband.
Our prisons are overflowing with the results of the Democrats' experiment
of subsidizing illegitimacy. Children raised by a single mothers commit 72
percent of juvenile murders, 60 percent of rapes, have 70 percent of
teenaged births, commit 70 percent of suicides and are 70 percent of high
school dropouts.
Controlling for socioeconomic status, race and place of residence, the
strongest predictor of whether a person will end up in prison is being
raised by a single parent. (The second strongest predictor is having a
tattoo.)
A 1990 study by the Progressive Policy Institute showed that after
controlling for single motherhood, the difference in black and white crime
disappeared."
mo_ntresor
Bradley K. Sherman
Aug 8, 2012, 6:57:24 PM8/8/12
to
mo_ntresor <amontillad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
Ronald Reagan never tried to buy the election in California.
Speaking of trying to buy the election, did Romney say
anything today about releasing his tax returns?
--bks
> ...
>Similarly, when two successful, attractive multimillionaire women in
>California can't beat a geriatric leftist like Jerry Brown or an old prune
>like Barbara Boxer, that's not the same state that elected Ronald Reagan
>twice, either.
> ...
>California can't beat a geriatric leftist like Jerry Brown or an old prune
>like Barbara Boxer, that's not the same state that elected Ronald Reagan
>twice, either.
Ronald Reagan never tried to buy the election in California.
Speaking of trying to buy the election, did Romney say
anything today about releasing his tax returns?
--bks
Clave
Aug 8, 2012, 7:03:24 PM8/8/12
to
"mo_ntresor" <amontillad...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:u27bf9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
> On Aug 8 2012 4:48 PM, mo_ntresor wrote:
>
>> > ann coulter's weighed in (democrats' ideal voter: illegal alien,
>> > single
>> > mother, convicted felon):
>>
>> http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-07-18.html
>
> ann's got a good left jab:
>
> "According to recent polls...
>
>> > ann coulter's weighed in (democrats' ideal voter: illegal alien,
>> > single
>> > mother, convicted felon):
>>
>> http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-07-18.html
>
> ann's got a good left jab:
>
Obama 332, Romney 206
http://electoral-vote.com/
brattt
Aug 8, 2012, 8:02:34 PM8/8/12
to
You people who don't give a shit about slandering a man, possibly the next
POTUS with zero proof and applauding the Senate Majority Leader for doing
so are the LOL ones.
mo_ntresor
Aug 8, 2012, 8:02:15 PM8/8/12
to
On Aug 8 2012 4:57 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
> >Similarly, when two successful, attractive multimillionaire women in
> >California can't beat a geriatric leftist like Jerry Brown or an old prune
> >like Barbara Boxer, that's not the same state that elected Ronald Reagan
> >twice, either.
> > ...
>
> Ronald Reagan never tried to buy the election in California.
>
> Speaking of trying to buy the election, did Romney say
> anything today about releasing his tax returns?
all tax documents should be made public, that way we (the government) know
> >Similarly, when two successful, attractive multimillionaire women in
> >California can't beat a geriatric leftist like Jerry Brown or an old prune
> >like Barbara Boxer, that's not the same state that elected Ronald Reagan
> >twice, either.
> > ...
>
> Ronald Reagan never tried to buy the election in California.
>
> Speaking of trying to buy the election, did Romney say
> anything today about releasing his tax returns?
who has stuff to take.
mo_ntresor
brattt
Aug 8, 2012, 8:04:00 PM8/8/12
to
source?
Bradley K. Sherman
Aug 8, 2012, 8:13:14 PM8/8/12
to
brattt <af3...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>On Aug 8 2012 6:57 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>
>> mo_ntresor <amontillad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > ...
>> >Similarly, when two successful, attractive multimillionaire women in
>> >California can't beat a geriatric leftist like Jerry Brown or an old prune
>> >like Barbara Boxer, that's not the same state that elected Ronald Reagan
>> >twice, either.
>> > ...
>>
>> Ronald Reagan never tried to buy the election in California.
>>
>> Speaking of trying to buy the election, did Romney say
>> anything today about releasing his tax returns?
>>
>On Aug 8 2012 6:57 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>
>> mo_ntresor <amontillad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > ...
>> >Similarly, when two successful, attractive multimillionaire women in
>> >California can't beat a geriatric leftist like Jerry Brown or an old prune
>> >like Barbara Boxer, that's not the same state that elected Ronald Reagan
>> >twice, either.
>> > ...
>>
>> Ronald Reagan never tried to buy the election in California.
>>
>> Speaking of trying to buy the election, did Romney say
>> anything today about releasing his tax returns?
>>
>Speaking of trying to buy the electon, did Reid name his *anonymous*
>source?
It's irrelevant. Even if Reid did name his source we'd *still
>source?
need to see the tax returns*. It's neither necessary nor
sufficient for Reid to name his contact at Bain.
--bks
brattt
Aug 8, 2012, 8:34:47 PM8/8/12
to
brattt
Aug 8, 2012, 8:38:00 PM8/8/12
to
and should have named his source weeks ago?
I believe he (Romney) should show his tax returns, and have never
indicated otherwise.
bub
Aug 8, 2012, 8:57:32 PM8/8/12
to
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:04:00 -0700, "brattt" <af3...@webnntp.invalid>
wrote:
>
>Speaking of trying to buy the electon, did Reid name his *anonymous*
>source?
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator, rec.gambling.poker
> Whose stated mission is to call out the Asses on RGP
it was either 'tommy' who reid said called him regarding amnesty for
illegals in 2007 or the kid who came up to reid in a restaurant and
told him he was proud of reid and he wanted to grow up to be like him.
wrote:
>
>Speaking of trying to buy the electon, did Reid name his *anonymous*
>source?
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator, rec.gambling.poker
> Whose stated mission is to call out the Asses on RGP
illegals in 2007 or the kid who came up to reid in a restaurant and
told him he was proud of reid and he wanted to grow up to be like him.
Clave
Aug 8, 2012, 9:08:16 PM8/8/12
to
"brattt" <af3...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:q9bbf9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
Was I responding to you, idiot?
Jim
Not Sure
Aug 8, 2012, 9:35:06 PM8/8/12
to
On Aug 8, 3:57 pm, b...@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) wrote:
No but he did mention this, and devastatingly so:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/08/steelworker-in-super-pac-ad-previously-appeared-in-obama-ads/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/08/steelworker-in-super-pac-ad-previously-appeared-in-obama-ads/
mo_ntresor
Aug 8, 2012, 9:41:29 PM8/8/12
to
On Aug 8 2012 6:38 PM, brattt wrote:
> > It's irrelevant. Even if Reid did name his source we'd *still
> > need to see the tax returns*. It's neither necessary nor
> > sufficient for Reid to name his contact at Bain.
>
> > It's irrelevant. Even if Reid did name his source we'd *still
> > need to see the tax returns*. It's neither necessary nor
> > sufficient for Reid to name his contact at Bain.
>
> so you are coming around to admitting that Reid should name his source?
> and should have named his source weeks ago?
>
> I believe he (Romney) should show his tax returns, and have never
> indicated otherwise.
once romney releases those critical tax returns, democrats can start
> and should have named his source weeks ago?
>
> I believe he (Romney) should show his tax returns, and have never
> indicated otherwise.
talking about how they're creating train ticket punching jobs for democrat
idiots again. the lawyering of the nation, that's what's really
important, but romney keeps forcing them to harp on this.
mo_ntresor
mo_ntresor
Aug 8, 2012, 9:44:10 PM8/8/12
to
On Aug 8 2012 6:34 PM, brattt wrote:
> > all tax documents should be made public, that way we (the government) know
> > who has stuff to take.
>
> > all tax documents should be made public, that way we (the government) know
> > who has stuff to take.
>
> I'm sure there's a logical argument against that, but I don't know one.
the way forward has always been the same: the state comes up with the
good ideas, and all the people work hard for their equal share.
mo_ntresor
Clave
Aug 8, 2012, 10:07:10 PM8/8/12
to
"Not Sure" <fred1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bd2d4f91-6e38-45dd...@c15g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
To which the Romney campaign AGAIN shot itself in the foot thusly:
"If people had been in Massachusetts, under Governor Romney's
health-care plan, they would have had health care."
- Andrea Saul, Romney's Press Secretary
"If I were an Obama advisor, I'd be looking at Saul's comment
as an escape hatch from the rolling clusterfark that is the
steelworker ad. It's a twofer. On the one hand, it lets them
grind Romney's face in the one policy "accomplishment" more
than any other that irritates his base, and on the other, it
gives them an excuse to tout ObamaCare as a solution to
situations like Soptic's. I'd be surprised if O's Super PAC
isn't working up a new ad about it already, assuming they're
not backlogged with spots accusing Romney of causing cancer or
whatever.
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/08/romney-spokesman-on-steelworker-ad-in-massachusetts-he-would-have-been-covered-under-romneycare/
I'm seeing in quite a few places that history may point to this exact moment
as the point Romney lost the election.
Jim
news:bd2d4f91-6e38-45dd...@c15g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
"If people had been in Massachusetts, under Governor Romney's
health-care plan, they would have had health care."
- Andrea Saul, Romney's Press Secretary
"If I were an Obama advisor, I'd be looking at Saul's comment
as an escape hatch from the rolling clusterfark that is the
steelworker ad. It's a twofer. On the one hand, it lets them
grind Romney's face in the one policy "accomplishment" more
than any other that irritates his base, and on the other, it
gives them an excuse to tout ObamaCare as a solution to
situations like Soptic's. I'd be surprised if O's Super PAC
isn't working up a new ad about it already, assuming they're
not backlogged with spots accusing Romney of causing cancer or
whatever.
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/08/romney-spokesman-on-steelworker-ad-in-massachusetts-he-would-have-been-covered-under-romneycare/
I'm seeing in quite a few places that history may point to this exact moment
as the point Romney lost the election.
Jim
brattt
Aug 8, 2012, 10:28:44 PM8/8/12
to
with you about this issue I incorrectly assumed you mean me as one of the
*people*. you might note, idiot, that I questioned when I was one of the
*people*.
I gotta tell you clavie, for someone who never goes on tilt you sure a
flinging a lot of shit around here.
Your friend,
Clave
Aug 8, 2012, 11:50:54 PM8/8/12
to
"brattt" <af3...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:srjbf9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
<...>
> I gotta tell you clavie, for someone who never goes on tilt you sure a
> flinging a lot of shit around here.
It's been a rather entertaining few days.
Jim
VegasJerry
Aug 9, 2012, 10:39:17 AM8/9/12
to
On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 5:38:00 PM UTC-7, brattt wrote:
> On Aug 8 2012 8:13 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>
>
>
> > brattt <af3...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>
> > >On Aug 8 2012 6:57 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > >> mo_ntresor <amontillad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> > ...
>
> > >> >Similarly, when two successful, attractive multimillionaire women in
>
> > >> >California can't beat a geriatric leftist like Jerry Brown or an old
>
> prune
>
> > >> >like Barbara Boxer, that's not the same state that elected Ronald Reagan
>
> > >> >twice, either.
>
> > >> > ...
>
> > >>
>
> > >> Ronald Reagan never tried to buy the election in California.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> Speaking of trying to buy the election, did Romney say
>
> > >> anything today about releasing his tax returns?
>
> > >>
>
> > >Speaking of trying to buy the electon, did Reid name his *anonymous*
>
> > >source?
>
> >
>
> > It's irrelevant. Even if Reid did name his source we'd *still
>
> > need to see the tax returns*. It's neither necessary nor
>
> > sufficient for Reid to name his contact at Bain.
>
> >
>
> > --bks
>
>
>
> so you are coming around to admitting that Reid should name his source?
> and should have named his source weeks ago?
And what would you do when you found out his name?
> On Aug 8 2012 8:13 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>
>
>
> > brattt <af3...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>
> > >On Aug 8 2012 6:57 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > >> mo_ntresor <amontillad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> > ...
>
> > >> >Similarly, when two successful, attractive multimillionaire women in
>
> > >> >California can't beat a geriatric leftist like Jerry Brown or an old
>
> prune
>
> > >> >like Barbara Boxer, that's not the same state that elected Ronald Reagan
>
> > >> >twice, either.
>
> > >> > ...
>
> > >>
>
> > >> Ronald Reagan never tried to buy the election in California.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> Speaking of trying to buy the election, did Romney say
>
> > >> anything today about releasing his tax returns?
>
> > >>
>
> > >Speaking of trying to buy the electon, did Reid name his *anonymous*
>
> > >source?
>
> >
>
> > It's irrelevant. Even if Reid did name his source we'd *still
>
> > need to see the tax returns*. It's neither necessary nor
>
> > sufficient for Reid to name his contact at Bain.
>
> >
>
> > --bks
>
>
>
> so you are coming around to admitting that Reid should name his source?
> and should have named his source weeks ago?
VegasJerry
Aug 9, 2012, 10:38:03 AM8/9/12
to
How did they do that? How did they divert your attention from them trying to screw you, to trying to protect the guy that's apparently paying NO taxes and was protected, by IRS amnesty, from hiding all that money in foreign accounts?
JFC you wing-nuts are gullible. They simply tug on your nose ring…
Jerry
Adam Russell
Aug 9, 2012, 10:47:01 AM8/9/12
to
brattt
Aug 9, 2012, 11:01:46 AM8/9/12
to
On Aug 9 2012 10:38 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> I've already pointed out the fact you'd do nothing if you DID know his name.
WOW talk about making up a position for me.
> I've already pointed out the fact you'd do nothing if you DID know his name.
Show me one thing I've said that would indicate that.
brattt
Aug 9, 2012, 11:05:32 AM8/9/12
to
I would question why the informants name hadn't been released till now,
after weeks of speculation over whether there actually is one of not.
I would like to see the returns and see that he did indeed not pay taxes
for 10 years.
I would like to see him called on the carpet and explain just how his
accountants figured this out, and how the IRS let this get by them.
I would like to know that every thing in those returns was LEGAL.
And I still wouldn't vote for him.
Travel A
Aug 9, 2012, 4:36:34 PM8/9/12
to
Susan wrote:
so you are coming around to admitting that Reid should name his source?
and should have named his source weeks ago?
And what would you do when you found out his name?
I wrote:
Demand that he/she present proof of their assertions.
VegasJerry
Aug 9, 2012, 5:01:10 PM8/9/12
to
On Thursday, August 9, 2012 8:01:46 AM UTC-7, brattt wrote:
> On Aug 9 2012 10:38 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > I've already pointed out the fact you'd do nothing if you DID know his name.
> WOW talk about making up a position for me.
Now answer the question again if you like.
Jerry.
VegasJerry
Aug 9, 2012, 4:58:50 PM8/9/12
to
Jerry
Pepe Papon
Aug 10, 2012, 5:15:11 AM8/10/12
to
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 14:16:23 -0700, "brattt" <af3...@webnntp.invalid>
wrote:
>>
>> All Romney has to do is release the returns. It's so simple
>> a child would understand the logic.
>>
>> --bks
>
>well now, I figure he should take at least as long as it took Obama to
>release his birth certificate.
Obama was asked to do something no other president has ever been asked
to do. Romney is refusing to do something that every presidential
candidate has done for decades. See the difference?
--
Pepe "The Revelation" Papon
wrote:
>>
>> All Romney has to do is release the returns. It's so simple
>> a child would understand the logic.
>>
>> --bks
>
>well now, I figure he should take at least as long as it took Obama to
>release his birth certificate.
Obama was asked to do something no other president has ever been asked
to do. Romney is refusing to do something that every presidential
candidate has done for decades. See the difference?
--
Pepe "The Revelation" Papon
Pepe Papon
Aug 10, 2012, 5:26:44 AM8/10/12
to
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:47:12 -0700, "mo_ntresor"
<amontillad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>romney "defenders"? what to defend, his academic, professional, and
>charitable brilliance? the man's a hero for suffering through you idiots.
> we've got the most overqualified candidate this country's ever seen, and
>he's running EVEN with an imbecile who's racked up $6T in debt. it's
>truly amazing.
http://tinyurl.com/93cyeao
<amontillad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>romney "defenders"? what to defend, his academic, professional, and
>charitable brilliance? the man's a hero for suffering through you idiots.
> we've got the most overqualified candidate this country's ever seen, and
>he's running EVEN with an imbecile who's racked up $6T in debt. it's
>truly amazing.
http://tinyurl.com/93cyeao
Pepe Papon
Aug 10, 2012, 5:30:56 AM8/10/12
to
On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 04:21:06 -0700, "Dave the Clueless"
<a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>On Aug 7 2012 5:25 AM, Pepe Papon wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 13:13:09 -0700, "Dave the Clueless"
>> <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> >On Aug 6 2012 5:02 PM, Clave wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>> >> news:a5k5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>> >> >
>> >> > For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Politician Engages in Politics During Election Year
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Qute the scoop you've got there, Clark.
>> >>
>> >> Jim
>> >
>> >Liberals reduce the stupidity rampant in their party leaders to a bumper
>> >sticker phrase. Typical.
>>
>> Kinda like:
>>
>> "For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack"
*YOU* posted it here.
<a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>On Aug 7 2012 5:25 AM, Pepe Papon wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 13:13:09 -0700, "Dave the Clueless"
>> <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> >On Aug 6 2012 5:02 PM, Clave wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>> >> news:a5k5f9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>> >> >
>> >> > For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Politician Engages in Politics During Election Year
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Qute the scoop you've got there, Clark.
>> >>
>> >> Jim
>> >
>> >Liberals reduce the stupidity rampant in their party leaders to a bumper
>> >sticker phrase. Typical.
>>
>> Kinda like:
>>
>> "For Reid, this is yet another brazen and tasteless partisan attack"
>>
>> --
>>
>> Pepe "The Revelation" Papon
>
>Which was written by a lifelong liberal.
>> --
>>
>> Pepe "The Revelation" Papon
>
*YOU* posted it here.
Clave
Aug 10, 2012, 5:55:13 AM8/10/12
to
"Pepe Papon" <hitme...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:rtk92811k334tok1a...@4ax.com...
Romney's actual policy plans fail EVERYWHERE they're actually looked at:
http://taxpolicycenter.org/taxtopics/romney-plan.cfm
http://www.heraldonline.com/2012/08/09/4177653/romneys-tax-plan-gets-a-failing.html
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-a-budget/242963-romneys-tax-plan-doesnt-encourage-growth-fairness
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-08-06/news/sns-rt-us-usa-campaign-obama-robinhoodbre876033-20120806_1_romney-tax-plan-romney-campaign-spokesman-mitt-romney
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/robert-j-samuelson-romneys-tax-plan-makes-no-sense/2012/08/08/8a5d2096-e16a-11e1-a25e-15067bb31849_story.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/08/04/romney-tax-plan-on-table-debt-collapses-table/
news:rtk92811k334tok1a...@4ax.com...
http://taxpolicycenter.org/taxtopics/romney-plan.cfm
http://www.heraldonline.com/2012/08/09/4177653/romneys-tax-plan-gets-a-failing.html
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-a-budget/242963-romneys-tax-plan-doesnt-encourage-growth-fairness
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-08-06/news/sns-rt-us-usa-campaign-obama-robinhoodbre876033-20120806_1_romney-tax-plan-romney-campaign-spokesman-mitt-romney
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/robert-j-samuelson-romneys-tax-plan-makes-no-sense/2012/08/08/8a5d2096-e16a-11e1-a25e-15067bb31849_story.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/08/04/romney-tax-plan-on-table-debt-collapses-table/
Travel A
Aug 10, 2012, 6:35:03 AM8/10/12
to
Poupon blithered:
Romney released two years of tax returns, just like McCain did in 2008.
See how there's no difference?
Where are the "Fast and Furious" documents, required by congress? See
the difference?
Obama was asked to do something no other president has ever been asked
to do. Romney is refusing to do something that every presidential
candidate has done for decades. See the difference?
I wrote:
to do. Romney is refusing to do something that every presidential
candidate has done for decades. See the difference?
Romney released two years of tax returns, just like McCain did in 2008.
See how there's no difference?
Where are the "Fast and Furious" documents, required by congress? See
the difference?
double....@hotmail.com
Aug 10, 2012, 10:06:30 AM8/10/12
to
Reid will lower the boom after the convention when it'll be too late
to pick someone else.
to pick someone else.
Pepe Papon
Aug 11, 2012, 2:29:58 AM8/11/12
to
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:02:34 -0700, "brattt" <af3...@webnntp.invalid>
wrote:
>
>You people who don't give a shit about slandering a man, possibly the next
>POTUS with zero proof and applauding the Senate Majority Leader for doing
>so are the LOL ones.
"Slandering" is an interesting choice of words. In order for it to
be slander, it has to be false. You, of course, have no way of
knowing that it's false.
If it were, in fact, false, then Reid could be sued by Romney. So
far, there's been no mention of any plans for a lawsuit.
wrote:
>
>You people who don't give a shit about slandering a man, possibly the next
>POTUS with zero proof and applauding the Senate Majority Leader for doing
>so are the LOL ones.
be slander, it has to be false. You, of course, have no way of
knowing that it's false.
If it were, in fact, false, then Reid could be sued by Romney. So
far, there's been no mention of any plans for a lawsuit.
Pepe Papon
Aug 11, 2012, 2:40:47 AM8/11/12
to
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 02:55:13 -0700, "Clave"
<cla...@the.monastery.com> wrote:
>"Pepe Papon" <hitme...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
>news:rtk92811k334tok1a...@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:47:12 -0700, "mo_ntresor"
>> <amontillad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>romney "defenders"? what to defend, his academic, professional, and
>>>charitable brilliance? the man's a hero for suffering through you idiots.
>>> we've got the most overqualified candidate this country's ever seen, and
>>>he's running EVEN with an imbecile who's racked up $6T in debt. it's
>>>truly amazing.
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/93cyeao
>
>Romney's actual policy plans fail EVERYWHERE they're actually looked at:
Yes, I know. The link I provided, however, seems like it should have
<cla...@the.monastery.com> wrote:
>"Pepe Papon" <hitme...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
>news:rtk92811k334tok1a...@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:47:12 -0700, "mo_ntresor"
>> <amontillad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>romney "defenders"? what to defend, his academic, professional, and
>>>charitable brilliance? the man's a hero for suffering through you idiots.
>>> we've got the most overqualified candidate this country's ever seen, and
>>>he's running EVEN with an imbecile who's racked up $6T in debt. it's
>>>truly amazing.
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/93cyeao
>
>Romney's actual policy plans fail EVERYWHERE they're actually looked at:
special significance to mo, since it was written by Erskine Bowles,
co-author of the Simpson-Bowles plan that he jumps up and down about.
It'll be interesting to see how he tries to resolve the cognitive
dissonance. My guess is he'll completely ignore the article.
>
>http://taxpolicycenter.org/taxtopics/romney-plan.cfm
>
>http://www.heraldonline.com/2012/08/09/4177653/romneys-tax-plan-gets-a-failing.html
>
>http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-a-budget/242963-romneys-tax-plan-doesnt-encourage-growth-fairness
>
>http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-08-06/news/sns-rt-us-usa-campaign-obama-robinhoodbre876033-20120806_1_romney-tax-plan-romney-campaign-spokesman-mitt-romney
>
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/robert-j-samuelson-romneys-tax-plan-makes-no-sense/2012/08/08/8a5d2096-e16a-11e1-a25e-15067bb31849_story.html
>
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/08/04/romney-tax-plan-on-table-debt-collapses-table/
>
>
>
Travel A
Aug 11, 2012, 7:39:57 AM8/11/12
to
Uh, Poupon, Reid's immune from a lawsuit, as he stated it on the senate
floor, retard.
floor, retard.
TruthSeeker
Aug 12, 2012, 1:23:35 AM8/12/12
to
On 11/8/12 5:39 AM, Travel A wrote:
> Uh, Poupon, Reid's immune from a lawsuit, as he stated it on the senate
> floor.
> Uh, Poupon, Reid's immune from a lawsuit, as he stated it on the senate
A favorite place for politicians of both parties to spout their lies,
due to their immunity.
--
TruthSeeker
"On the Internet, no one knows you're a dog."
0 new messages