On 10/26/2012 4:45 PM, Vince wrote:
> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in
>
news:hn0rl9x...@news.ezprovider.com:
>
>> On Oct 26 2012 3:10 PM, Vince wrote:
>>> Why the different treatment for the two patients?
>>> ....... the FIRST is a Golden Retriever.
>>
>> Whose treatment will cost at most a couple grand and be paid
>> for at the time of service
>>> ...... the SECOND is a Senior Citizen.
>>
>> Whose treatment, thanks to the lib-tards' love of trial
>> lawyers, will cost $250,000 and will only be paid for after 9
>> months of wrangling with Medicare
>
> I was just looking at some payments to various Drs/hospitals for my
> recent pacemaker installation.
> One hospital billed about $14,000, but was paid less than $5,0000
> by the Govt.
>
Hospital charges are completely arbitrary and are different from what
they collect. Obviously, their contracted insurance companies never pay
the stated amount. They inflate the charges to catch the uninsured or
unsuspecting non-contracted patient.
For example, a couple years ago I was out of town for a month and needed
a few blood tests. I was given some verbal assurance by a local hospital
that my insurance was acceptable, though of course the multi-page
paperwork contained the disclaimer that the patient is responsible for
all charges, etc.
I went ahead and got the tests - nothing fancy, just a blood count and a
standard metabolic panel. Some weeks later, I got the bill for $2900, of
which my (expensive) insurance paid $500. The hospital went after me for
the $2400 balance to the point of collections. I have had similar tests
in the past elsewhere, and charges were less than the $500 my insurance
was willing to pay.
About the OP: Yeah, so what? human groceries are also more expensive
than dog food.