Sarah Wins Again

[Travel]

Nebraska Republican, U.S. Senate primary: Bruning had the most money, was Republican-establishment backed, and was endorsed by Santorum and huckabee. But, get this, lol: then, late in the campaign, Sarah endorsed Fischer and Fischer won!

Who has the power in the conservative movement, huh?


She would have creamed Romney if she ran. No doubt about it.

Without Sarah Palin, the Republican presidential primaries was like a "best actor contest" with all the Baldwin brothers running except, Alec.


http://nbcpolitics.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/15/11720335-republican-fischer-upsets-rivals-in-nebraska-senate-primary

[Mossingen]

"Travel" <trave...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:10677582.788.1337140837172.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yncd3...

> Without Sarah Palin, the Republican presidential primaries was like a
> "best actor contest" with all the Baldwin brothers running except, Alec.

You are a certifiable kook, but that there's funny, I don't care who you
are.

[ramashiva]

On May 16, 5:42 am, "Mossingen" <jhanki...@cox.net> wrote:

> "Travel" <travel9...@gmail.com> wrote in message

James, did you install my tweak? It looks like you have, judging from
the reformatting of the line length of Travel's post.

I noticed you replied to my OP in the Sensei Maverick thread, and the
quoting was correct. However, OE correctly quotes GG when the GG post
is the thread starter.

If you have installed my tweak, would you please reply to one of my
other posts in that thread so we can see whether the tweak is working
for you?


William "The Life" Coleman (ramashiva)

[da pickle]

> http://nbcpolitics.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/15/11720335-republican...

LOL. How come her magic didn't work with Newt?

[Clave]

"ramashiva" <ramas...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b08f5343-51bc-412f...@nw7g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

> On May 16, 5:42 am, "Mossingen" <jhanki...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> "Travel" <travel9...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:10677582.788.1337140837172.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yncd3...
>
>> > Without Sarah Palin, the Republican presidential primaries was like a
>> > "best actor contest" with all the Baldwin brothers running except,
>> > Alec.
>
>> You are a certifiable kook, but that there's funny, I don't care who you
>> are.
>
> James, did you install my tweak?

LOL@ "install"

[Mossingen]

"ramashiva" <ramas...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b08f5343-51bc-412f...@nw7g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

________________________________


I have not applied it yet.

[ramashiva]

On May 16, 10:09 am, "Clave" <clav...@the.monastery.com> wrote:

> "ramashiva" <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:b08f5343-51bc-412f...@nw7g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

> > James, did you install my tweak?

> LOL@ "install"

Here is what you recently said on the subject --

"Sorry, long past caring."

"Who cares? Let it fucking GO."

[Clave]

"ramashiva" <ramas...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:f88ac424-df18-4571...@nw7g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

> On May 16, 10:09 am, "Clave" <clav...@the.monastery.com> wrote:
>
>> "ramashiva" <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:b08f5343-51bc-412f...@nw7g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>
>> > James, did you install my tweak?
>
>> LOL@ "install"
>
> Here is what you recently said on the subject --
>
> "Sorry, long past caring."
>
> "Who cares? Let it fucking GO."

Neither of which prevent me from continuing to laugh at you.

Jim

[Travel]

On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 8:42:13 AM UTC-4, Mossingen wrote:
> "Travel" <trave...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:10677582.788.1337140837172.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yncd3...
>
>
> > Without Sarah Palin, the Republican presidential primaries was like a
> > "best actor contest" with all the Baldwin brothers running except, Alec.
>

Odd, that's what I usually, basically think about you, when I view your posts.

[Travel]

LOL, she didn't endorse Newt, nunbnuts.


(And thanks for teeing yourself up as a baboon, chortle)

[FL Turbo]

He will let it go -- as soon as he gets the last word.

-----------------------------------------------------------
" BARK! BARKBARK!!! YIPYIPYIP!!! "
Clave - 6/25/09

[Clave]

"FL Turbo" <noe...@notime.com> wrote in message
news:him8r71c4jvf1v200...@4ax.com...

> On Wed, 16 May 2012 12:03:19 -0700 (PDT), ramashiva
> <ramas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On May 16, 10:09 am, "Clave" <clav...@the.monastery.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "ramashiva" <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:b08f5343-51bc-412f...@nw7g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>> > James, did you install my tweak?
>>
>>> LOL@ "install"
>>
>>Here is what you recently said on the subject --
>>
>>"Sorry, long past caring."
>>
>>"Who cares? Let it fucking GO."
>>
>>
>>William "The Life" Coleman (ramashiva)
>
> He will let it go -- as soon as he gets the last word.

You're going to have to pull Pop-Tard out of his ass before you can climb
in, Francis.

Jim

[ramashiva]

On May 16, 6:54 pm, FL Turbo <noem...@notime.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 16 May 2012 12:03:19 -0700 (PDT), ramashiva
> <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >On May 16, 10:09 am, "Clave" <clav...@the.monastery.com> wrote:

> >> "ramashiva" <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:b08f5343-51bc-412f...@nw7g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

> >> > James, did you install my tweak?

> >> LOL@ "install"

> >Here is what you recently said on the subject --

> >"Sorry, long past caring."

> >"Who cares?  Let it fucking GO."

> He will let it go -- as soon as he gets the last word.

Clave the Netk00k is as bad or worse than Maggot the Faggot when it
comes to getting the last word.

Clave has 160,000 usenet posts, and is frequently up at 3am
anklebiting and threadstalking on RGP. But he has a life!

Can you imagine a married man with kids and a job up at 3 am
anklebiting on RGP?

[Clave]

"ramashiva" <ramas...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:a71abf47-f287-429a...@w24g2000vby.googlegroups.com...

Your obsession with me never ceases to amaze.

Jim

[ramashiva]

On May 16, 8:38 pm, "Clave" <clav...@the.monastery.com> wrote:
> "ramashiva" <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:a71abf47-f287-429a...@w24g2000vby.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 16, 6:54 pm, FL Turbo <noem...@notime.com> wrote:
>
> >> On Wed, 16 May 2012 12:03:19 -0700 (PDT), ramashiva
> >> <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >On May 16, 10:09 am, "Clave" <clav...@the.monastery.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> "ramashiva" <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >>news:b08f5343-51bc-412f...@nw7g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> >> > James, did you install my tweak?
>
> >> >> LOL@ "install"
>
> >> >Here is what you recently said on the subject --
>
> >> >"Sorry, long past caring."
>
> >> >"Who cares?  Let it fucking GO."
>
> >> He will let it go -- as soon as he gets the last word.
>
> > Clave the Netk00k is as bad or worse than Maggot the Faggot when it
> > comes to getting the last word.
>
> > Clave has 160,000 usenet posts, and is frequently up at 3am
> > anklebiting and threadstalking on RGP.  But he has a life!
>
> > Can you imagine a married man with kids and a job up at 3 am
> > anklebiting on RGP?
>
> Your obsession with me never ceases to amaze.

Huh? I am obsessed with you??? You are somewhat confused. I am not
following you around from thread to thread replying to your posts.
That is exactly what you are doing to me. I would estimate upwards of
90% of the interchanges between you and me are initiated by you.

That makes you the threadstalker. Deal with it.

I watched you start posting the other day, and your first three posts
were replies to me. Maggot does the same thing. Invariably, when he
starts posting, he looks up my posts first and replies to them. I
have watched him do it over and over. That's one thing I like about
Google Groups. When someone replies to a thread, that thread pops to
the top of the stack, and the last poster in that thread is
identified.

You and Maggot are both totally predictable.

You guys are trolled for life.

[Clave]

"ramashiva" <ramas...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:9ee5f9f1-b553-4058...@ns1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...

> On May 16, 8:38 pm, "Clave" <clav...@the.monastery.com> wrote:

<...>

>> Your obsession with me never ceases to amaze.
>
> Huh? I am obsessed with you???

Who else's posting history have you bothered to research (inaccurately
enough to be pretty entertaining) like this?

Who else but you would think that three posts yesterday constituted an
obsession with him? Project much?

Who else but you would think that if I'm up late that "anklebiting" his
Usenet posts is the reason?

Who else but someone with your *serious* ego problems thinks that
interjections into a public discussion constitute "threadstalking"?

You have issues, pal.

Jim

[Beldin the Sorcerer]

"ramashiva" <ramas...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:a71abf47-f287-429a...@w24g2000vby.googlegroups.com...

***
Fuck, you live in vegas, with casino tables available 24-7. Look at you

[Tad Perry]

We won't go into whether he's insane and all that shit, but W.C. ain't no
dummy. (The absolute smartest guy here? No. Cuz that's me, The Greater
Buddha. I mean, I'm even smarter than the fuckin' Buddha, so... ;-)

But anyhow, he seems to be releasing a hint that he may have found the same,
or similar, download that I did, in which case use of the word "install"
would be entirely correct.

*** Note ***

For those that may remember, I used to troll the hell out of Usenet about
being the return of The One Who Is to Come. (Kalkin, the Ninth Incarnation
of Vishnu.) Local authorities actually tried to institutionalize me out of
the belief that I meant it, so I had to back off! But now things have gotten
to the point that I can make this claim again and everyone just has to eat
it. I mean, if I come off as so smart that someone actually starts to
believe it, that's their problem, not mine! (But, of course, it is totally
true. ;-)

Ahhhh... Those were the days... (while they lasted)

Now, if imitation really is the sincerest form of flattery, then Ramashiva
is the sincerest flatterer I've ever had, if (as I've long suspected, but
never confirmed) he took his cue from my antics.

Tad "Always pick on the weak, the scared and the tilted" Perry

[Clave]

"Tad Perry" <tadp...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:jp4lpf$5au$1...@dont-email.me...

> Clave wrote:
>> "ramashiva" <ramas...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:b08f5343-51bc-412f...@nw7g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>>> On May 16, 5:42 am, "Mossingen" <jhanki...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Travel" <travel9...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:10677582.788.1337140837172.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yncd3...
>>>
>>>>> Without Sarah Palin, the Republican presidential primaries was
>>>>> like a "best actor contest" with all the Baldwin brothers running
>>>>> except, Alec.
>>>
>>>> You are a certifiable kook, but that there's funny, I don't care
>>>> who you are.
>>>
>>> James, did you install my tweak?
>>
>> LOL@ "install"
>
> We won't go into whether he's insane and all that shit, but W.C. ain't no
> dummy. (The absolute smartest guy here? No. Cuz that's me, The Greater
> Buddha. I mean, I'm even smarter than the fuckin' Buddha, so... ;-)
>
> But anyhow, he seems to be releasing a hint that he may have found the
> same, or similar, download that I did, in which case use of the word
> "install" would be entirely correct.

Of course it's correct. I also have no doubt that it was unintentional.

Jim

[Tad Perry]

I get it, now. I mis-interpreted why you were laughing.

tvp

[da pickle]

Not officially because she's afraid to ‘officially’ endorse someone
until she's sure they are going to win, but she did tell everybody
she'd vote for Newt and she also ordered her bimbo husband to
‘officially endorse’ him. Now that I think about it, isn't that about
the time the fat turd started to crash and burn in the polls?
(chortle)

[Travel]

[Mossingen]

Travel wrote:



> LOL, she didn't endorse Newt, nunbnuts.

Right. She just said that she'd vote for him, and she trotted out her
husband to say publicly that he was endorsing Newt. But, she didn't endorse
him. Sure.

[Travel]

She also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things about Santorum.

She didn't endorse, Newt, numbnuts, and that's a fact you can't escape. If she did endorse him, she could have held Tea Party rallies, got the various Tea Party voters to back Newt and away from Santorum, and raised money, etc. She didn't do that.

[da pickle]

I see, so she liked Newt and Santorum but not Romney. Hmmm, who won
the nomination. (chortle)..............

[FL Turbo]

As I've said for a long time now, Sarah's most valuable role
is to keep the Tea (Taxes Enough Already) Party energized to elect
Conservaties to Congressional Offices.

My friend Paul Popinjay had long contended that getting Conservative
elected to Congress should be the primary goal to stop our slide to a
Utopian Socialist Nightmare.

The only hope that I can see towards correct

[FL Turbo]

On Mon, 21 May 2012 01:19:01 -0500, FL Turbo <noe...@notime.com>
wrote:

Sorry, but this one got away from me before I finished

The only hope that I can see towards correcting that problem is
getting enough Conservative elected to Congress to stop that fatal
slide.

[Travel]

As I said from the beginning. If the vote is split, Romney can win. The vote was split and Romney won, just as I predicted; and stored in the archives.

I was right, you lose (chortle).

[da pickle]

==========================================

After Santorum dropped out who was the vote split with? Oh, archives?
Here's some stuff from the archives you said: (chortle)

==========================================

‘Whoa!’

‘Newt beats Mittens in every region, among every age group and with
the "men" and "women" vote.’

‘Note: Newt is even ahead of Mittens in the east.’

‘Newt's running the table on the "internal" polls. And, a 37% topline,
overall percentage being the highest of any candidate in Gallup polls
so far in this primary lead-up.’

‘Gallup has Newt creaming Romney among Republicans, and edging him on
Republican-voting independents.’

‘Oh, one other thing: Newt's surge to the lead over Romney is by FAR
the strongest of any of the other candidates, previously. And it's
less than a month until the primary contests begin, for the all
important "momentum" factor.’

‘The 75% conservatives of the Republican electorate are coalescing.
And unlike the others, Newt kicks-ass in the debates.’

‘Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).’

‘Has there ever been anyone more hate-obsessed than Risky Biz (who's
the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin? And now he's equally freak-hating
over Newt! Gotta luv that.’

‘As a dumbfuck, pickle has repeatedly posted-blithered about how he's
going to come out of his hole and gloat when, Romney, (who, according
to pickle, can't lose), is the nominee.’

‘Just wondering how confident pickle is exactly at this point
(chortle). I mean, it's really going to suck for pickle when I post,
repeatedly, all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts AFTER
ROMNEY LOSES, AFTER ROMNEY LOSES, AFTER ROMNEY LOSES.’

‘So, as everyone can clearly see, your statements of Romney winning
the nomination, is the very depth of publicly displayed idiocy.’

‘Newt with the momentum an gaining in South Carolina. And, the
multiple polls which will show the full effect of Monday's debate
aren't even out yet. Did you ever walk into that one, dumbass
(chortle).’

‘...And you know that because Newt is 8 points up on Romney,
nationally, and 65% to 28% up on Romney in the southern states
region. Iiiii seee, (chortle). And you wonder why you get your ass
kicked, daily.’

‘Check the polls, Risky Biz (chortle)’

‘Check the polls, Risky Biz (chortle)’

‘WOW! This is more fun than I could ever have hoped!!!’

‘WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA!’

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Travel A]

After Michigan it was over, numbnuts. It was the spilt vote that got
Romney to that point as the frontrunner. You lose.

Whatever I posted about Newt's surges, etc., was true. What's your
point? You lose.

[da pickle]

On May 21, 7:42 pm, nine...@webtv.net (Travel A) webTVed:

<After Michigan it was over, numbnuts.

No. It was over from day 1. I told you Romney was going to be the
nominee and I was right.

<I was right, you lose (chortle).

Read my sentence (above) over and over and over again until you
realize I didn't lose. I was right as usual.

[Travel A]

Discussrec.gambling.pokerHelp

[da pickle]

------------------------------------------------------------------

LOL. You just can’t face up to your pathetic display of stupidity. You
only started saying that ‘if the vote is split Romney could win’ line
after fat Newt started his crash and burn and it became clear to you
that I was right all along. Before that you were certain Romney would
NOT be the nominee.

Here’s a quote from a post you made on December 2, 2011. It doesn’t
say Romney could win, it says Romney IS going to LOSE and you were
planning/hoping to rub my nose in defeat.

================
On Dec 2, 8:53 am, nine...@webtv.net (Travel A) wrote:
“I mean, it's really going to suck for da pickle when I post,
repeatedly, all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts after
ROMNEY LOSES.”
------------------
see: “after ROMNEY LOSES.”


I could post lots more but who cares, I’m not one to gloat. (chortle)

change of subject: What do you think the odds are of Romney picking
Sarah Palin for his running mate? (snicker).....................

[Travel]

[Travel]

She also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things about Santorum.

She didn't endorse, Newt, numbnuts, and that's a fact you can't escape. If she did endorse him, she could have held Tea Party rallies, got the various Tea Party voters to back Newt and away from Santorum, and raised money, etc. She didn't do that. You lose (chortle).

[da pickle]

On May 23, 6:17 pm, Travel <travel9...@gmail.com> wrote:
> She also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things about Santorum.
>
> She didn't endorse, Newt, numbnuts, and that's a fact you can't escape. If she did endorse him, she could have held Tea Party rallies, got the various Tea Party voters to back Newt and away from Santorum, and raised money, etc. She didn't do that. You lose (chortle).

[Travel A]

[da pickle]

Who's talking about Cellulite Sarah? Now that it's clear she will
never be President or Vice President I couldn't care less about her.
I'm talking about YOUR absurdly stupid notion that fat adulterer Newt
Gingrich ever actually had a shot at the GOP nomination. ROFLMAO!

Remember what you were going "whoa! whoa! whoa!" at every little blip
in the polls. LOL. You have shown yourself to be an extreme political
lightweight yet again and I know you know it. That's why you have
resorted to your usual tactic of repasting non-related gibberish over
and over and over again. (chortle) ...................


from Travels greatest hits V.2
--------------

‘As a dumbfuck, pickle has repeatedly posted-blithered about how he's
going to come out of his hole and gloat when, Romney, (who, according
to pickle, can't lose), is the nominee.’

--------------

‘Just wondering how confident pickle is exactly at this point
(chortle). I mean, it's really going to suck for pickle when I post,
repeatedly, all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts AFTER
ROMNEY LOSES, AFTER ROMNEY LOSES, AFTER ROMNEY LOSES.’

--------------

[Travel A]

[Travel A]

[Travel A]

This post is about: "the boy who hides from the real Pickle."


Fact: Sarah Palin did not endorse anyone in the Nevada 2010 senate race.
Out of the countless ass-kickings and lies exposures of Risky Biz on a
daily basis, I've merely reposted a few of my favorites. Here's a few of
the countless many:


From: Travel A
Subject: Risky Biz "Own Ears"
Date: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:38 AM


This was to "da pickel no spam" (who's Risky Biz-the Fake Pickel) a
creep who, pathetically, is too dumb to even successfully hide behind a
phony username.

The fake, lying "da pickel no spam" (Risky Biz) claimed that Sarah Palin
endorsed Sharron Angle in the Nevada Repubican primary for the U.S.
senate election. He further, bogusly claimed that he "heard it with his
own ears" at Sarah Palin's Searchlight Nevada speech. He lied, and I
proved it.

So, you can see why the fake "pickel no spam" is so upset and can't
forget his public humiliation (chortle):

Re: ot: Sarah Palin's most embarrassing screw-up yet? Group:
rec.gambling.poker Date: Wed, Jul 7, 2010, 1:55am From: Travel A
<nin...@webtv.net>


Heard it with your "own ears," huh, lol. This is what we call a total
moron-ass-kicking.

http://www.examiner.com/x-44562-National-News-Headlines-Editor~y2010m6d9-Sarah-Palins-endorsement-is-the-winning-ticket-in-key-races-in-Calif-SC-and-Iowa

Toward the end of the article, note well that Sarah Palin endorsed no
one in the Nevada, Republican senate primary race. In fact, Sarah Palin
gave a"shout-out" to Sue Lowden (not Sharron Angle) at another Nevada
speech, elsewhere.

"Risky Biz" lied through his teeth and got caught.

.........................................

Group: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Fri, Nov 26, 2010, 8:29pm
From: da pickle nospam <jcpi...@hotmail.com>


On Nov 26, 8:58 pm, "Irish Mike" <ad7c...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

"Sarah Palin made a slip of the tongue, on one word, in an interview and
immediately corrected it."


Risky Biz (who's the fake pickel) blithered:

"Sorry to correct you because I know how easily you are annoyed by facts
but actually it was Glenn Beck interviewing her who corrected HER. Had
he not she would still believe that North Korea was a U.S. ally."


I wrote:
Here are the facts. The fact is that Sarah was fully prepared to discuss
North/South Korea and saying "North" was clearly just a slip of the
tongue. She first, correctly, referred to whether the White Houe has the
balls to sanction North Korea. So, clearly, she used the name "North
Korea" in the correct context BEFORE she, later, misspoke in using that
same name.

Let's see if you idiots can read a transcript and realize what I'm
talking about. I'll grade you on your reading comprehension "abilities."

This vindicates Sarah, entirely.

So, Risky Biz, it seems it's you who's afraid of the facts, doesn't it.


Here's the entire interview Q & A with regard to Korea:

Cite:http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/196/48554/

Quote, (relevant from the article):

PAT: And polls show that you would probably win the Republican
nomination. How would you handle a situation like just developed in
North Korea?

SARAH PALIN: Well, North Korea, this is stemming from I think a greater
problem when we're all sitting around asking, "Oh, no, what are we going
to do" and we're not having a lot of faith that the White House is going
to come out with a strong enough policy to sanction what it is that
North Korea's going to do. So this speaks to a bigger picture here that
certainly scares me in terms of our national security policies. But
obviously got to stand with our North Korean allies. We're bound to by
treaty. We're also bound to by ‑‑

STU: South Korea.

SARAH PALIN: Yeah. And we're also bound by prudence to stand with our
South Korean allies, yes. And, you know, to remind North Korea, well,
we're not going to reward bad behavior and we're not going to walk away
and we do need to press China to do more to increase pressure on that
arena.

GLENN: How do we press China? I mean, Sarah, I'm going to go way out on
a lunatic fringe here but I've talked to enough people are in this
missile business who say that was not an airplane contrail that we saw
off the coast of California. It is my belief that that was a
two‑stage missile launched by China telling, sending a signal
that the world has changed. They're dropping the dollar in their trade
with Russia today. I mean, they control the world. The world has
changed. We're no longer the superpower that we were even two years ago.

SARAH PALIN: Well, that's right. And China's going to own our notes
because we are becoming so beholden on them. And a lot of this has to do
with energy. When we're not allowed to responsibly exploit our own
natural resources, and that's, of course, one of the ways that America
grew into such a prosperous nation.

GLENN: Yes.

SARAH PALIN: We developed domestically our own energy supplies. Instead
as we're reliant on foreign sources of energy, here's one thing that we
can do in pressing China. They need to restrict energy exports to North
Korea. But do you think that the Obama administration gets that and
understands why we would need to? No, they do not because they're still
locking up the lands that are warehousing our own domestic supplies of
energy. So they have it all wrong on energy policy to start with.

.........................................


On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:

Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


...........................................
Re: "Machete"
Group: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Sun, Sep 5, 2010, 1:14am
From: Travel A <nin...@webtv.net>


Re: "Machete"
Group: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Sun, Sep 5, 2010, 1:50am (PDT+3)
From: jb <joe...@comcast.net>

(jb, Written to Risky Biz)
"You have listed many great movies and quite a few bad ones. What this
has to do with Tarantino is dubious at best. This list clearly proves
that you are gay by the way."


I wrote:
(Chortle)
.........................................

[da pickle]

‘As a dumbfuck, pickle has repeatedly posted-blithered about how he's
going to come out of his hole and gloat when, Romney, (who, according
to pickle, can't lose), is the nominee.’

“Look for Sarah to announce her candidacy at the Tea Party rally. ”

‘Just wondering how confident pickle is exactly at this point
(chortle). I mean, it's really going to suck for pickle when I post,
repeatedly, all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts AFTER

ROMNEY LOSES.

‘So, as everyone can clearly see, your statements of Romney winning

the nomination, is the very depth of publicly displayed idiocy. Check

the polls, Risky Biz (chortle)’

“Sarah will have enormous respect from world leaders when she's the
President.”

‘The 75% conservatives of the Republican electorate are coalescing.
And unlike the others, Newt kicks-ass in the debates.’

“Once Sarah announces and gets a campaign going, she'll blow this
primary out of the water.”

‘Newt beats Mittens in every region, among every age group and with
the "men" and "women" vote.’

“It's a very smart move by Sarah to wait.”

“Sarah will crush Mittens once she announces.”

“She'll walk away with this, once in.”

‘Gallup has Newt creaming Romney among Republicans, and edging him on
Republican-voting independents.’

‘Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back

where he started (chortle). WOW! This is more fun than I could ever

have hoped!!!’ ‘WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA!’

“The tea party will be going nuts when Sarah announces, and she'll
have a lock on South Carolina and be free free to work Iowa and
Florida. Romney's now ahead in Iowa, and Sarah will crush Mittens once
she announces.”

‘Oh, one other thing: Newt's surge to the lead over Romney is by FAR
the strongest of any of the other candidates, previously. And it's
less than a month until the primary contests begin, for the all
important "momentum" factor.’

“They should make a campaign video: the scene opens with an aerial
panorama across a vast, windswept Iowa field in the middle of a
snowstorm (the camera shot slowly zooms-in). A dog sled of loyal, hard-
driven huskies appears from out of the snowy, twilight gloom. It's
Sarah. She's waving, no! there's something written on the palms of her
mittens! They read ..."bye!"... "bye!" “

[da pickle]

[da pickle]

[Travel A]

[Travel A]

[Travel A]

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:

Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


..........................................

[da pickle]

More than five years after launching his first campaign for the
presidency, the former Massachusetts governor on Tuesday night
clinched the Republican nomination by winning the largely uncontested
Texas primary, the Associated Press projected.

source:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/05/29/romney-clinches-gop-nomination-with-texas-primary-win/?intcmp=trending#ixzz1wKij7gxs

[da pickle]

On May 27, 8:07 pm, nine...@webtv.net (Travel A) wrote:
> This post is about: "the boy who hides from the real Pickle."
>
> Fact: Sarah Palin did not endorse anyone in the Nevada 2010 senate race.
> Out of the countless ass-kickings and lies exposures of Risky Biz on a
> daily basis, I've merely reposted a few of my favorites. Here's a few of
> the countless many:
>
> From: Travel A
> Subject: Risky Biz "Own Ears"
> Date: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:38 AM
>

> 

> This was to "da pickel no spam" (who's Risky Biz-the Fake Pickel) a
> creep who, pathetically, is too dumb to even successfully hide behind a
> phony username.
>
> The fake, lying "da pickel no spam" (Risky Biz) claimed that Sarah Palin
> endorsed Sharron Angle in the Nevada Repubican primary for the U.S.
> senate election. He further, bogusly claimed that he "heard it with his
> own ears" at Sarah Palin's Searchlight Nevada speech. He lied, and I
> proved it.
>
> So, you can see why the fake "pickel no spam" is so upset and can't
> forget his public humiliation (chortle):
>

> Re: ot: Sarah Palin's most embarrassing screw-up yet? Group:

> rec.gambling.poker Date: Wed, Jul 7, 2010, 1:55am From: Travel A

> <nine...@webtv.net>

>
> Heard it with your "own ears," huh, lol. This is what we call a total
> moron-ass-kicking.
>

> http://www.examiner.com/x-44562-National-News-Headlines-Editor~y2010m...

>
> Toward the end of the article, note well that Sarah Palin endorsed no
> one in the Nevada, Republican senate primary race. In fact, Sarah Palin
> gave a"shout-out" to Sue Lowden (not Sharron Angle) at another Nevada
> speech, elsewhere.
>
> "Risky Biz" lied through his teeth and got caught.
>
> ........................................
>
> Group: rec.gambling.poker
> Date: Fri, Nov 26, 2010, 8:29pm

> From: da pickle nospam <jcpick...@hotmail.com>

> treaty. We're also bound to by ‑‑

>
> STU: South Korea.
>
> SARAH PALIN: Yeah. And we're also bound by prudence to stand with our
> South Korean allies, yes. And, you know, to remind North Korea, well,
> we're not going to reward bad behavior and we're not going to walk away
> and we do need to press China to do more to increase pressure on that
> arena.
>
> GLENN: How do we press China? I mean, Sarah, I'm going to go way out on
> a lunatic fringe here but I've talked to enough people are in this
> missile business who say that was not an airplane contrail that we saw
> off the coast of California. It is my belief that that was a

> two‑stage missile launched by China telling, sending a signal

> Re: "Machete"

> Group: rec.gambling.poker
> Date: Sun, Sep 5, 2010, 1:14am

> From: Travel A <nine...@webtv.net>

>
> Re: "Machete"
> Group: rec.gambling.poker
> Date: Sun, Sep 5, 2010, 1:50am (PDT+3)

> From: jb <joeb...@comcast.net>

>
> (jb, Written to Risky Biz)
> "You have listed many great movies and quite a few bad ones. What this
> has to do with Tarantino is dubious at best. This list clearly proves
> that you are gay by the way."
>
> I wrote:
>
> (Chortle)
> ........................................

[da pickle]

On May 27, 8:07 pm, nine...@webtv.net (Travel A) wrote:

> This post is about: "the boy who hides from the real Pickle."
>
> Fact: Sarah Palin did not endorse anyone in the Nevada 2010 senate race.
> Out of the countless ass-kickings and lies exposures of Risky Biz on a
> daily basis, I've merely reposted a few of my favorites. Here's a few of
> the countless many:
>
> From: Travel A
> Subject: Risky Biz "Own Ears"
> Date: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:38 AM
>

> 

> This was to "da pickel no spam" (who's Risky Biz-the Fake Pickel) a
> creep who, pathetically, is too dumb to even successfully hide behind a
> phony username.
>
> The fake, lying "da pickel no spam" (Risky Biz) claimed that Sarah Palin
> endorsed Sharron Angle in the Nevada Repubican primary for the U.S.
> senate election. He further, bogusly claimed that he "heard it with his
> own ears" at Sarah Palin's Searchlight Nevada speech. He lied, and I
> proved it.
>
> So, you can see why the fake "pickel no spam" is so upset and can't
> forget his public humiliation (chortle):
>

> Re: ot: Sarah Palin's most embarrassing screw-up yet? Group:

> rec.gambling.poker Date: Wed, Jul 7, 2010, 1:55am From: Travel A

> <nine...@webtv.net>

>
> Heard it with your "own ears," huh, lol. This is what we call a total
> moron-ass-kicking.
>

> http://www.examiner.com/x-44562-National-News-Headlines-Editor~y2010m...

>
> Toward the end of the article, note well that Sarah Palin endorsed no
> one in the Nevada, Republican senate primary race. In fact, Sarah Palin
> gave a"shout-out" to Sue Lowden (not Sharron Angle) at another Nevada
> speech, elsewhere.
>
> "Risky Biz" lied through his teeth and got caught.
>
> ........................................
>
> Group: rec.gambling.poker
> Date: Fri, Nov 26, 2010, 8:29pm

> From: da pickle nospam <jcpick...@hotmail.com>

> treaty. We're also bound to by ‑‑

>
> STU: South Korea.
>
> SARAH PALIN: Yeah. And we're also bound by prudence to stand with our
> South Korean allies, yes. And, you know, to remind North Korea, well,
> we're not going to reward bad behavior and we're not going to walk away
> and we do need to press China to do more to increase pressure on that
> arena.
>
> GLENN: How do we press China? I mean, Sarah, I'm going to go way out on
> a lunatic fringe here but I've talked to enough people are in this
> missile business who say that was not an airplane contrail that we saw
> off the coast of California. It is my belief that that was a

> two‑stage missile launched by China telling, sending a signal

> Re: "Machete"

> Group: rec.gambling.poker
> Date: Sun, Sep 5, 2010, 1:14am

> From: Travel A <nine...@webtv.net>

>
> Re: "Machete"
> Group: rec.gambling.poker
> Date: Sun, Sep 5, 2010, 1:50am (PDT+3)

> From: jb <joeb...@comcast.net>

>
> (jb, Written to Risky Biz)
> "You have listed many great movies and quite a few bad ones. What this
> has to do with Tarantino is dubious at best. This list clearly proves
> that you are gay by the way."
>
> I wrote:
>
> (Chortle)
> ........................................

[Travel A]

[Travel A]

[Travel A]

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:

Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


.........................................

[da pickle]

Todd did and Sarah said to vote for him. And there's another fact that
YOU can't escape. She couldn't stop Romney from getting the
nomination. (chortle)

[Travel A]

[Travel A]

[Travel A]

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:

Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


........................................

[da pickle]

Todd did and Sarah said to vote for him. And there's another fact that

you can't escape. She couldn't stop Romney from getting the
nomination. (chortle)

[Travel A]

[Travel A]

Re: Sarah Wins Again
Group: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Wed, Jun 6, 2012, 7:01am
From: Travel A <nin...@webtv.net>

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:

Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


.......................................

[Travel A]

[da pickle]

On Jun 8, 3:05 pm, nine...@webtv.net (Travel A) wrote:

<stupidity snipped>

[Travel A]

[Travel A]

[Travel A]

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:

Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


......................................

[da pickle]

On Jun 9, 9:32 am, nine...@webtv.net (Travel A) webTVed:

<stupidity snipped>

Todd did and Sarah said to vote for him. And there's another fact that
you can't escape. She couldn't stop Romney from getting the
nomination.

WEB TV! (chortle)

[Travel A]

[Travel A]

[Travel A]

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:

Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


.....................................

[da pickle]

‘As a dumbfuck, pickle has repeatedly posted-blithered about how he's
going to come out of his hole and gloat when, Romney, (who, according
to pickle, can't lose), is the nominee.’

“Look for Sarah to announce her candidacy at the Tea Party rally. ”

‘Just wondering how confident pickle is exactly at this point
(chortle). I mean, it's really going to suck for pickle when I post,
repeatedly, all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts AFTER
ROMNEY LOSES.

‘So, as everyone can clearly see, your statements of Romney winning
the nomination, is the very depth of publicly displayed idiocy. Check
the polls, Risky Biz (chortle)’

“Sarah will have enormous respect from world leaders when she's the
President.”

‘The 75% conservatives of the Republican electorate are coalescing.
And unlike the others, Newt kicks-ass in the debates.’

“Once Sarah announces and gets a campaign going, she'll blow this
primary out of the water.”

‘Newt beats Mittens in every region, among every age group and with
the "men" and "women" vote.’

“It's a very smart move by Sarah to wait.”

“Sarah will crush Mittens once she announces.”

“She'll walk away with this, once in.”

‘Gallup has Newt creaming Romney among Republicans, and edging him on
Republican-voting independents.’

‘Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle). WOW! This is more fun than I could ever
have hoped!!!’ ‘WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA!’

“The tea party will be going nuts when Sarah announces, and she'll
have a lock on South Carolina and be free free to work Iowa and
Florida. Romney's now ahead in Iowa, and Sarah will crush Mittens once
she announces.”

‘Oh, one other thing: Newt's surge to the lead over Romney is by FAR
the strongest of any of the other candidates, previously. And it's
less than a month until the primary contests begin, for the all
important "momentum" factor.’

“They should make a campaign video: the scene opens with an aerial
panorama across a vast, windswept Iowa field in the middle of a
snowstorm (the camera shot slowly zooms-in). A dog sled of loyal, hard-
driven huskies appears from out of the snowy, twilight gloom. It's
Sarah. She's waving, no! there's something written on the palms of her
mittens! They read ..."bye!"... "bye!" “

‘Has there ever been anyone more hate-obsessed than Risky Biz (who's
the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin? And now he's equally freak-hating
over Newt! Gotta luv that.’

[Travel A]

Prev Next Normal view To: nin...@webtv.net
From: Travel A
Subject: Risky Biz combo-Reply
Date: Sunday, June 10, 2012 7:31 PM



...............................................................................
..............................................................................

Sarah Palin also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things

.......................................................................


.........................................................................
Prev Next Normal view To: nin...@webtv.net
From: Travel A
Subject: Risky Biz-Sarah Obsession
Date: Friday, December 9, 2011 10:26 AM

 Wow, this is more fun that I could ever have hoped.

Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).

80% of my posts having to do with Sarah Palin have been in repsonse to
Risky Biz sputtering vitriol and tearing his hair out over her. That's
80% of the posts where I wouldn't be posting about Sarah Palin,
otherewise. But, note well, Risky Biz, DID: now there's your
obsession, folks.


Emotional investment? Holy shit! has there ever been anyone more hate-

obsessed than Risky Biz (who's the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin?

And now he's equally freak-hating over Newt! Gotta luv that.

....................................................................
..................................................................

From: Travel A
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 11:41 PM
To: nin...@webtv.net
Subject: Risky Biz- Romney "Definitely" Slam


Fake Pickel blithered:

and with Rick Perry
> leading in the polls you thought he would be the nominee.


I wrote:
I never said Rick Perry would be the nominee, I said Rick Perry would be
my choice in the current field (Risky Biz-lie #1).


Fake Pickel blithered:
> Next, you insisted that Herman Cain who was then leading in all the
> polls would be the nominee.

I wrote:
I never said Cain would be the nominee, only that I was okay with Cain
if he did win (Risky Biz-lie #2).

However, you, on the other hand, in your total ignorance say that Romney
is definitely the nominee: this idiocy is based on Romney with, not ever
getting out of the mid 20s percent, and 75% of the Republican electorate
rejecting Romney and speading their support around six other candiates;
of whom, with any drop-outs, their support wouldn't be going to Romney,
but would go to the remaining, leading conservative
alternative-candidate to Romney. I.e., as the lesser candidates drop
off, Romney goes down in the spread.

So, as everyone can clearly see, your statements of Romney -definitely-
winning the nomination (at this point) is the very depth of publicly
displayed idiocy.

As I say, you've already lost.

...........................................................................
.......................................................................

Prev Next Normal view To: Travel A
From: Travel A
Subject: Splashie (use) 5/3/12
Date: Thursday, May 3, 2012 5:38 AM

(This, of course, also applies to Risky Biz- who's the Fake Pickle)


May 2

I wrote:
- show quoted text -
Yes, that, as always, is quite easy: as I said from the beginning, if
the vote is split, Romney can win. The vote was split, and Romney won on
plurality contest wins.



Romney:
..........
Iowa: 25%
New Hampshire, (one of his big states) a lousy 39%.
South Carolina: 28% and lost.
Florida: 46%, another weak plurality.
Nevada: a huge Mormon state for Romney and a disappointing 50%.
Colorado: Romney lost.
Minnesota: Romney lost.
Missouri: Romney lost.
Maine: another lousy plurality @ 39%.
Michigan: Another lousy plurality in another of Romney's "big states"
with 41%
Arizona: Romney-41%


After these contests, it was de facto, over. With the Romney big-money,
the Romney "inevitability" set in. And, he still went on to lose states
in the south to a weak opponent with no money.

The vote was split as I just indisputably proved, and Romney won without
the majority of voters wanting him to be the nominee.

You lose. You're an imbecile.


May 2

I wrote:
Oh, and I'll destroy you on the "Romney 25% ceiling," again. This time
proved by the actual results.


Romney was at the mid 20s% throughout the many months and debates
leading up to the first contest in the Iowa caucus. Romney got 25% in
Iowa with ALL candidates in the race. I proved my point.


It was then, numbnuts, that Bachmann dropped out and Perry skipped New
Hampshire, giving Romney a smaller field-split to his advantage in New
Hampshire: his huge state, where he couldn't even get a majority of the
vote. Not even in the 40s%, coming in at 39%. This is in New Hampshire,
not a neutral state; where he clearly wouldn't have broken the 20s%.


Then Huntsman quit, giving Romney a boost in numbers and, even then,
Romney actually lost in South Carolina with 28%. That's in his 20s%
ceiling range, imbecile.


Romney squeaked by in the early states, which, these early states,
effectively gives a primary candidate the nomination.


After candidates start dropping out, and the remaining candidates'
contributions dry-up,the "frontrunner" gets votes that he wouldn't have
had otherwise: a significant percentage of voters will just give up on
their preferred candidate and turn to the frontrunner; therefore, after
the early contests, much of the Romney vote-percentage increase was just
merely by default after a certain point.


And the media beat-back Romney's conservative opponents (Herman
Caine,Rick Perry and Newt) as much as Romney's big Wall Street money.


Bottom line: Romney had 75% of the Republican electorate that didn't
want him as the nominee.

Just as I stated at the beginning, and just as I'm proving, now.

That's the trouble with imbeciles like, Splashie, (and, of course,
"Risky Biz") they're too dumb to know when they get an ass-kicking, and
one has to waste their time totally humiliating them in the end.

...............................................................................
..........................................................................

Unfortunately for you, you've already taken numerous, well detailed,
well witnessed ass-kickings on all of your blitherings.

But keep up what surely has to be a rather tedious obsession, with only
a humiliating result to show for it (chortle).
..................................................................
...................................................................


This post is about: "The boy who hides from the real Pickel." 

> On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

> > On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:


Susan wrote:

"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And
so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)

................................................

Re: "Machete"
Group: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Sun, Sep 5, 2010, 1:14am
From: Travel A <nin...@webtv.net>


Re: "Machete"
Group: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Sun, Sep 5, 2010, 1:50am (PDT+3)
From: jb <joe...@comcast.net>

(jb, Written to Risky Biz)
"You have listed many great movies and quite a few bad ones. What this
has to do with Tarantino is dubious at best. This list clearly proves
that you are gay by the way."


I wrote:
(Chortle)

............................................

[da pickle]

‘Has there ever been anyone more hate-obsessed than Risky Biz (who's

the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin? And now he's equally freak-hating

over Newt! Gotta luv that.’

[da pickle]

‘Has there ever been anyone more hate-obsessed than Risky Biz (who's

the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin? And now he's equally freak-hating

over Newt! Gotta luv that.’

[Travel A]

nin...@webtv.net From: Travel A Subject: Risky Biz combo-Reply Date:
Sunday, June 10, 2012 7:31 PM


After Michigan it was over, numbnuts. It was the spilt vote that got
Romney to that point as the frontrunner. You lose.

Whatever I posted about Newt's surges, etc., was true. What's your
point? You lose.

As I said from the beginning. If the vote is split, Romney can win. The
vote was split and Romney won, just as I predicted; and stored in the
archives. I was right, you lose (chortle).
.............................................
.............................................

Sarah Palin also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things
about Santorum.

She didn't endorse, Newt, numbnuts, and that's a fact you can't escape.
If she did endorse him, she could have held Tea Party rallies, got the
various Tea Party voters to back Newt and away from Santorum, and raised
money, etc. She didn't do that. You lose (chortle)

.............................................


.............................................

Prev Next Normal view To: nin...@webtv.net From: Travel A
Subject: Risky Biz-Sarah Obsession Date: Friday, December 9, 2011 10:26
AM

 Wow, this is more fun that I could ever have hoped.

Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).

80% of my posts having to do with Sarah Palin have been in repsonse to
Risky Biz sputtering vitriol and tearing his hair out over her. That's
80% of the posts where I wouldn't be posting about Sarah Palin,
otherewise. But, note well, Risky Biz, DID: now there's your obsession,
folks.


Emotional investment? Holy shit! has there ever been anyone more hate-
obsessed than Risky Biz (who's the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin?

And now he's equally freak-hating over Newt! Gotta luv that.

.............................................
.............................................

Prev Next Normal view To: Travel A From: Travel A Subject: Splashie
(use) 5/3/12 Date: Thursday, May 3, 2012 5:38 AM

(This, of course, also applies to Risky Biz- who's the Fake Pickle)


May 2

I wrote:
- show quoted text -
Yes, that, as always, is quite easy: as I said from the beginning, if
the vote is split, Romney can win. The vote was split, and Romney won on
plurality contest wins.



Romney:
.........

Unfortunately for you, you've already taken numerous, well detailed,
well witnessed ass-kickings on all of your blitherings.

But keep up what surely has to be a rather tedious obsession, with only
a humiliating result to show for it (chortle).
.............................................
.............................................

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:



Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


.............................................

[da pickle]

Travel A’s Greatest WebTV Hits
===============================

“Look for Sarah to announce her candidacy at the Tea Party rally. ”

“Also, Sarah isn't even an announced candidate: wait 'til she starts
campaigning.”

“Can't wait for her to kick-ass in the debates.”

“She'll have enormous respect from world leaders when she's the
President.”

“The left wing media and RINOs just said she wasn't running because it
reduced "buzz" and buzz increases poll numbers and can increase
contributions to her PAC.”

“Imagine what Sarah's numbers are going to be upon announcing.”

“Once Sarah announces and gets a campaign going, she'll blow this
primary out of the water.”

“Sarah wins again.”

“Rick doesn't stand a chance against Sarah once she's in. Rick's just
a "place holder. There'll barely be a vote left for anyone else once
Sarah gets in.”

“It's a very smart move by Sarah to wait.”

“Rick's just a "place holder" for Sarah.”

“Wait until you see her numbers when she announces.”

“A week or so ago, SarahPac sent out tens of thousands of e-mails for
contributions. Sarah will run away with this once she's in.”

“Sarah will crush Mittens once she announces.”

“She'll walk away with this, once in.”

“Sarah wins again.”

“There'll barely be a tea party vote left for anyone else once Sarah
gets in.”

“The tea party will be going nuts when Sarah announces, and she'll
have a lock on South Carolina and be free free to work Iowa and
Florida. Romney's now ahead in Iowa, and Sarah will crush Mittens once
she announces.”

“They should make a campaign video: the scene opens with an aerial
panorama across a vast, windswept Iowa field in the middle of a
snowstorm (the camera shot slowly zooms-in). A dog sled of loyal, hard-
driven huskies appears from out of the snowy, twilight gloom. It's
Sarah. She's waving, no! there's something written on the palms of her
mittens! They read ..."bye!"... "bye!" “

(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)

==============================================

This one’s my favorite:
“She'll have enormous respect from world leaders when she's the
President.”

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:)

[Travel A]


After Michigan it was over, numbnuts. It was the spilt vote that got
Romney to that point as the frontrunner. You lose.

Whatever I posted about Newt's surges, etc., was true. What's your
point? You lose.

As I said from the beginning. If the vote is split, Romney can win. The
vote was split and Romney won, just as I predicted; and stored in the
archives. I was right, you lose (chortle).
............................................
............................................

Sarah Palin also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things
about Santorum.

She didn't endorse, Newt, numbnuts, and that's a fact you can't escape.
If she did endorse him, she could have held Tea Party rallies, got the
various Tea Party voters to back Newt and away from Santorum, and raised
money, etc. She didn't do that. You lose (chortle)

............................................


............................................

Prev Next Normal view To: nin...@webtv.net From: Travel A
Subject: Risky Biz-Sarah Obsession Date: Friday, December 9, 2011 10:26
AM

 Wow, this is more fun that I could ever have hoped.

Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).

80% of my posts having to do with Sarah Palin have been in repsonse to
Risky Biz sputtering vitriol and tearing his hair out over her. That's
80% of the posts where I wouldn't be posting about Sarah Palin,
otherewise. But, note well, Risky Biz, DID: now there's your obsession,
folks.


Emotional investment? Holy shit! has there ever been anyone more hate-
obsessed than Risky Biz (who's the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin?

And now he's equally freak-hating over Newt! Gotta luv that.

............................................
............................................

Prev Next Normal view To: Travel A From: Travel A Subject: Splashie
(use) 5/3/12 Date: Thursday, May 3, 2012 5:38 AM

(This, of course, also applies to Risky Biz- who's the Fake Pickle)


May 2

I wrote:
- show quoted text -
Yes, that, as always, is quite easy: as I said from the beginning, if
the vote is split, Romney can win. The vote was split, and Romney won on
plurality contest wins.



Romney:
........

Unfortunately for you, you've already taken numerous, well detailed,
well witnessed ass-kickings on all of your blitherings.

But keep up what surely has to be a rather tedious obsession, with only
a humiliating result to show for it (chortle).
............................................
............................................

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:



Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


............................................

[da pickle]

‘As a dumbfuck, pickle has repeatedly posted-blithered about how he's
going to come out of his hole and gloat when, Romney, (who, according
to pickle, can't lose), is the nominee.’

“Look for Sarah to announce her candidacy at the Tea Party rally. ”

‘Just wondering how confident pickle is exactly at this point
(chortle). I mean, it's really going to suck for pickle when I post,
repeatedly, all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts AFTER
ROMNEY LOSES.

‘So, as everyone can clearly see, your statements of Romney winning
the nomination, is the very depth of publicly displayed idiocy. Check
the polls, Risky Biz (chortle)’

“Sarah will have enormous respect from world leaders when she's the
President.”

‘The 75% conservatives of the Republican electorate are coalescing.
And unlike the others, Newt kicks-ass in the debates.’

“Once Sarah announces and gets a campaign going, she'll blow this
primary out of the water.”

‘Newt beats Mittens in every region, among every age group and with
the "men" and "women" vote.’

“It's a very smart move by Sarah to wait.”

“Sarah will crush Mittens once she announces.”

“She'll walk away with this, once in.”

‘Gallup has Newt creaming Romney among Republicans, and edging him on
Republican-voting independents.’

‘Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle). WOW! This is more fun than I could ever
have hoped!!!’ ‘WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA!’

“The tea party will be going nuts when Sarah announces, and she'll
have a lock on South Carolina and be free free to work Iowa and
Florida. Romney's now ahead in Iowa, and Sarah will crush Mittens once
she announces.”

‘Oh, one other thing: Newt's surge to the lead over Romney is by FAR
the strongest of any of the other candidates, previously. And it's
less than a month until the primary contests begin, for the all
important "momentum" factor.’

“They should make a campaign video: the scene opens with an aerial
panorama across a vast, windswept Iowa field in the middle of a
snowstorm (the camera shot slowly zooms-in). A dog sled of loyal, hard-
driven huskies appears from out of the snowy, twilight gloom. It's
Sarah. She's waving, no! there's something written on the palms of her
mittens! They read ..."bye!"... "bye!" “

‘Has there ever been anyone more hate-obsessed than Risky Biz (who's

the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin? And now he's equally freak-hating

over Newt! Gotta luv that.’

[Travel A]


After Michigan it was over, numbnuts. It was the spilt vote that got
Romney to that point as the frontrunner. You lose.

Whatever I posted about Newt's surges, etc., was true. What's your
point? You lose.

As I said from the beginning. If the vote is split, Romney can win. The
vote was split and Romney won, just as I predicted; and stored in the
archives. I was right, you lose (chortle).
...........................................
...........................................

Sarah Palin also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things
about Santorum.

She didn't endorse, Newt, numbnuts, and that's a fact you can't escape.
If she did endorse him, she could have held Tea Party rallies, got the
various Tea Party voters to back Newt and away from Santorum, and raised
money, etc. She didn't do that. You lose (chortle)

...........................................


...........................................

Prev Next Normal view To: nin...@webtv.net From:
Travel A Subject: Risky Biz-Sarah Obsession Date: Friday, December 9,
2011 10:26 AM

 Wow, this is more fun that I could ever have hoped.

Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).

80% of my posts having to do with Sarah Palin have been in repsonse to
Risky Biz sputtering vitriol and tearing his hair out over her. That's
80% of the posts where I wouldn't be posting about Sarah Palin,
otherewise. But, note well, Risky Biz, DID: now there's your obsession,
folks.


Emotional investment? Holy shit! has there ever been anyone more hate-
obsessed than Risky Biz (who's the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin?

And now he's equally freak-hating over Newt! Gotta luv that.

...........................................
...........................................

Prev Next Normal view To: Travel A From: Travel A Subject: Splashie
(use) 5/3/12 Date: Thursday, May 3, 2012 5:38 AM

(This, of course, also applies to Risky Biz- who's the Fake Pickle)


May 2

I wrote:
- show quoted text -
Yes, that, as always, is quite easy: as I said from the beginning, if
the vote is split, Romney can win. The vote was split, and Romney won on
plurality contest wins.



Romney:
.......

Unfortunately for you, you've already taken numerous, well detailed,
well witnessed ass-kickings on all of your blitherings.

But keep up what surely has to be a rather tedious obsession, with only
a humiliating result to show for it (chortle).
...........................................
...........................................

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:



Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


...........................................

[da pickle]

‘Whoa!’

‘Newt beats Mittens in every region, among every age group and with
the "men" and "women" vote.’

‘Note: Newt is even ahead of Mittens in the east.’

‘Newt's running the table on the "internal" polls. And, a 37% topline,
overall percentage being the highest of any candidate in Gallup polls
so far in this primary lead-up.’

‘Gallup has Newt creaming Romney among Republicans, and edging him on
Republican-voting independents.’

‘Oh, one other thing: Newt's surge to the lead over Romney is by FAR
the strongest of any of the other candidates, previously. And it's
less than a month until the primary contests begin, for the all
important "momentum" factor.’

‘The 75% conservatives of the Republican electorate are coalescing.
And unlike the others, Newt kicks-ass in the debates.’

‘Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).’

‘Has there ever been anyone more hate-obsessed than Risky Biz (who's

the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin? And now he's equally freak-hating

over Newt! Gotta luv that.’

‘As a dumbfuck, pickle has repeatedly posted-blithered about how he's
going to come out of his hole and gloat when, Romney, (who, according
to pickle, can't lose), is the nominee.’

‘Just wondering how confident pickle is exactly at this point
(chortle). I mean, it's really going to suck for pickle when I post,
repeatedly, all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts AFTER

ROMNEY LOSES, AFTER ROMNEY LOSES, AFTER ROMNEY LOSES.’

‘So, as everyone can clearly see, your statements of Romney winning
the nomination, is the very depth of publicly displayed idiocy.’

‘Newt with the momentum an gaining in South Carolina. And, the
multiple polls which will show the full effect of Monday's debate
aren't even out yet. Did you ever walk into that one, dumbass
(chortle).’

‘...And you know that because Newt is 8 points up on Romney,
nationally, and 65% to 28% up on Romney in the southern states
region. Iiiii seee, (chortle). And you wonder why you get your ass
kicked, daily.’

‘Check the polls, Risky Biz (chortle)’

‘Check the polls, Risky Biz (chortle)’

‘WOW! This is more fun than I could ever have hoped!!!’

‘WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA!’

“Look for Sarah to announce her candidacy at the Tea Party rally. ”

“Also, Sarah isn't even an announced candidate: wait 'til she starts
campaigning.”

“Can't wait for her to kick-ass in the debates.”

“She'll have enormous respect from world leaders when she's the
President.”

“The left wing media and RINOs just said she wasn't running because it
reduced "buzz" and buzz increases poll numbers and can increase
contributions to her PAC.”

“Imagine what Sarah's numbers are going to be upon announcing.”

“Once Sarah announces and gets a campaign going, she'll blow this
primary out of the water.”

“Sarah wins again.”

“Rick doesn't stand a chance against Sarah once she's in. Rick's just
a "place holder. There'll barely be a vote left for anyone else once
Sarah gets in.”

“It's a very smart move by Sarah to wait.”

“Rick's just a "place holder" for Sarah.”

“Wait until you see her numbers when she announces.”

“A week or so ago, SarahPac sent out tens of thousands of e-mails for
contributions. Sarah will run away with this once she's in.”

“Sarah will crush Mittens once she announces.”

“She'll walk away with this, once in.”

“Sarah wins again.”

“There'll barely be a tea party vote left for anyone else once Sarah
gets in.”

“The tea party will be going nuts when Sarah announces, and she'll
have a lock on South Carolina and be free free to work Iowa and
Florida. Romney's now ahead in Iowa, and Sarah will crush Mittens once
she announces.”

“They should make a campaign video: the scene opens with an aerial
panorama across a vast, windswept Iowa field in the middle of a
snowstorm (the camera shot slowly zooms-in). A dog sled of loyal, hard-
driven huskies appears from out of the snowy, twilight gloom. It's
Sarah. She's waving, no! there's something written on the palms of her
mittens! They read ..."bye!"... "bye!" “

(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)

==============================================

This one’s my favorite:

“She'll have enormous respect from world leaders when she's the
President.”

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:)

[Travel A]

After Michigan it was over, numbnuts. It was the spilt vote that got
Romney to that point as the frontrunner. You lose.

Whatever I posted about Newt's surges, etc., was true. What's your
point? You lose.

As I said from the beginning. If the vote is split, Romney can win. The
vote was split and Romney won, just as I predicted; and stored in the
archives. I was right, you lose (chortle).
..........................................
..........................................

Sarah Palin also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things
about Santorum.

She didn't endorse, Newt, numbnuts, and that's a fact you can't escape.
If she did endorse him, she could have held Tea Party rallies, got the
various Tea Party voters to back Newt and away from Santorum, and raised
money, etc. She didn't do that. You lose (chortle)

..........................................


..........................................

Prev Next Normal view To:
nin...@webtv.net From: Travel A Subject: Risky Biz-Sarah Obsession
Date: Friday, December 9, 2011 10:26 AM

 Wow, this is more fun that I could ever have hoped.

Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).

80% of my posts having to do with Sarah Palin have been in repsonse to
Risky Biz sputtering vitriol and tearing his hair out over her. That's
80% of the posts where I wouldn't be posting about Sarah Palin,
otherewise. But, note well, Risky Biz, DID: now there's your obsession,
folks.


Emotional investment? Holy shit! has there ever been anyone more hate-
obsessed than Risky Biz (who's the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin?

And now he's equally freak-hating over Newt! Gotta luv that.

..........................................
..........................................

Prev Next Normal view To: Travel A From: Travel A Subject: Splashie
(use) 5/3/12 Date: Thursday, May 3, 2012 5:38 AM

(This, of course, also applies to Risky Biz- who's the Fake Pickle)


May 2

I wrote:
- show quoted text -
Yes, that, as always, is quite easy: as I said from the beginning, if
the vote is split, Romney can win. The vote was split, and Romney won on
plurality contest wins.



Romney:
......

Unfortunately for you, you've already taken numerous, well detailed,
well witnessed ass-kickings on all of your blitherings.

But keep up what surely has to be a rather tedious obsession, with only
a humiliating result to show for it (chortle).
..........................................
..........................................

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:



Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


..........................................

[da pickle]

check this:

http://youtu.be/wo60Qr-FExA

[Travel A]

After Michigan it was over, numbnuts. It was the spilt vote that got
Romney to that point as the frontrunner. You lose.

Whatever I posted about Newt's surges, etc., was true. What's your
point? You lose.

As I said from the beginning. If the vote is split, Romney can win. The
vote was split and Romney won, just as I predicted; and stored in the
archives. I was right, you lose (chortle).
.........................................
.........................................

Sarah Palin also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things
about Santorum.

She didn't endorse, Newt, numbnuts, and that's a fact you can't escape.
If she did endorse him, she could have held Tea Party rallies, got the
various Tea Party voters to back Newt and away from Santorum, and raised
money, etc. She didn't do that. You lose (chortle)

.........................................


.........................................

Prev
Next Normal view To:

nin...@webtv.net From: Travel A Subject: Risky Biz-Sarah Obsession
Date: Friday, December 9, 2011 10:26 AM

 Wow, this is more fun that I could ever have hoped.

Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).

80% of my posts having to do with Sarah Palin have been in repsonse to
Risky Biz sputtering vitriol and tearing his hair out over her. That's
80% of the posts where I wouldn't be posting about Sarah Palin,
otherewise. But, note well, Risky Biz, DID: now there's your obsession,
folks.


Emotional investment? Holy shit! has there ever been anyone more hate-
obsessed than Risky Biz (who's the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin?

And now he's equally freak-hating over Newt! Gotta luv that.

.........................................
.........................................

Prev Next Normal view To: Travel A From: Travel A Subject: Splashie
(use) 5/3/12 Date: Thursday, May 3, 2012 5:38 AM

(This, of course, also applies to Risky Biz- who's the Fake Pickle)


May 2

I wrote:
- show quoted text -
Yes, that, as always, is quite easy: as I said from the beginning, if
the vote is split, Romney can win. The vote was split, and Romney won on
plurality contest wins.



Romney:
.....

Unfortunately for you, you've already taken numerous, well detailed,
well witnessed ass-kickings on all of your blitherings.

But keep up what surely has to be a rather tedious obsession, with only
a humiliating result to show for it (chortle).
.........................................
.........................................

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:



Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


.........................................

[da pickle]

‘As a dumbfuck, pickle has repeatedly posted-blithered about how he's
going to come out of his hole and gloat when, Romney, (who, according
to pickle, can't lose), is the nominee.’

“Look for Sarah to announce her candidacy at the Tea Party rally. ”

‘Just wondering how confident pickle is exactly at this point
(chortle). I mean, it's really going to suck for pickle when I post,
repeatedly, all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts AFTER

ROMNEY LOSES.

‘So, as everyone can clearly see, your statements of Romney winning
the nomination, is the very depth of publicly displayed idiocy. Check

the polls, Risky Biz (chortle)’

“Sarah will have enormous respect from world leaders when she's the
President.”

‘The 75% conservatives of the Republican electorate are coalescing.
And unlike the others, Newt kicks-ass in the debates.’

“Once Sarah announces and gets a campaign going, she'll blow this
primary out of the water.”

‘Newt beats Mittens in every region, among every age group and with
the "men" and "women" vote.’

“It's a very smart move by Sarah to wait.”

“Sarah will crush Mittens once she announces.”

“She'll walk away with this, once in.”

‘Gallup has Newt creaming Romney among Republicans, and edging him on
Republican-voting independents.’

‘Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle). WOW! This is more fun than I could ever

have hoped!!!’ ‘WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA!’

“The tea party will be going nuts when Sarah announces, and she'll
have a lock on South Carolina and be free free to work Iowa and
Florida. Romney's now ahead in Iowa, and Sarah will crush Mittens once
she announces.”

‘Oh, one other thing: Newt's surge to the lead over Romney is by FAR
the strongest of any of the other candidates, previously. And it's
less than a month until the primary contests begin, for the all
important "momentum" factor.’

“They should make a campaign video: the scene opens with an aerial
panorama across a vast, windswept Iowa field in the middle of a
snowstorm (the camera shot slowly zooms-in). A dog sled of loyal, hard-
driven huskies appears from out of the snowy, twilight gloom. It's
Sarah. She's waving, no! there's something written on the palms of her
mittens! They read ..."bye!"... "bye!" “

‘Has there ever been anyone more hate-obsessed than Risky Biz (who's

the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin? And now he's equally freak-hating

over Newt! Gotta luv that.’

[Travel A]

After Michigan it was over, numbnuts. It was the spilt vote that got
Romney to that point as the frontrunner. You lose. Whatever I posted
about Newt's surges, etc., was true. What's your point? You lose.

As I said from the beginning. If the vote is split, Romney can win. The
vote was split and Romney won, just as I predicted; and stored in the
archives. I was right, you lose (chortle).
........................................
........................................

Sarah Palin also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things
about Santorum.

She didn't endorse, Newt, numbnuts, and that's a fact you can't escape.
If she did endorse him, she could have held Tea Party rallies, got the
various Tea Party voters to back Newt and away from Santorum, and raised
money, etc. She didn't do that. You lose (chortle)

........................................

...........................................

nin...@webtv.net

From: Travel A Subject: Risky Biz-Sarah Obsession Date: Friday, December
9, 2011 10:26 AM

 Wow, this is more fun that I could ever have hoped.

Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).

80% of my posts having to do with Sarah Palin have been in repsonse to
Risky Biz sputtering vitriol and tearing his hair out over her. That's
80% of the posts where I wouldn't be posting about Sarah Palin,
otherewise. But, note well, Risky Biz, DID: now there's your obsession,
folks.

Emotional investment? Holy shit! has there ever been anyone more hate-

obsessed than Risky Biz (who's the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin?

And now he's equally freak-hating over Newt! Gotta luv that.

........................................

winning the nomination (at this point) is the very depth of publicly
displayed idiocy.

As I say, you've already lost.

........................................
........................................

Prev Next Normal view To: Travel A From: Travel A Subject: Splashie
(use) 5/3/12 Date: Thursday, May 3, 2012 5:38 AM

(This, of course, also applies to Risky Biz- who's the Fake Pickle)


May 2

I wrote:
- show quoted text -
Yes, that, as always, is quite easy: as I said from the beginning, if
the vote is split, Romney can win. The vote was split, and Romney won on
plurality contest wins.



Romney:
....

Iowa: 25%

New Hampshire, (one of his big states) a lousy 39%.

South Carolina: 28% and lost.

Florida: 46%, another weak plurality.

Nevada: a huge Mormon state for Romney and a disappointing 50%.

Colorado: Romney lost.

Minnesota: Romney lost.

Missouri: Romney lost.

Maine: another lousy plurality @ 39%.

Michigan: Another lousy plurality in another of Romney's "big states"
with 41%

Arizona: Romney-41%

After these contests it was de facto, over. With the Romney big-money,

Unfortunately for you, you've already taken numerous, well detailed,
well witnessed ass-kickings on all of your blitherings.

But keep up what surely has to be a rather tedious obsession, with only
a humiliating result to show for it (chortle).
........................................
........................................

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:



Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


........................................

[da pickle]

Travel A’s Greatest WebTV Hits - ACT-1 [Palin (rerun)]
=========================================

“Look for Sarah to announce her candidacy at the Tea Party rally. ”

“Also, Sarah isn't even an announced candidate: wait 'til she starts
campaigning.”

“Can't wait for her to kick-ass in the debates.”

“She'll have enormous respect from world leaders when she's the
President.”

“The left wing media and RINOs just said she wasn't running because it
reduced "buzz" and buzz increases poll numbers and can increase
contributions to her PAC.”

“Imagine what Sarah's numbers are going to be upon announcing.”

“Once Sarah announces and gets a campaign going, she'll blow this
primary out of the water.”

“Sarah wins again.”

“Rick doesn't stand a chance against Sarah once she's in. Rick's just
a "place holder. There'll barely be a vote left for anyone else once
Sarah gets in.”

“It's a very smart move by Sarah to wait.”

“Rick's just a "place holder" for Sarah.”

“Wait until you see her numbers when she announces.”

“A week or so ago, SarahPac sent out tens of thousands of e-mails for
contributions. Sarah will run away with this once she's in.”

“Sarah will crush Mittens once she announces.”

“She'll walk away with this, once in.”

“Sarah wins again.”

“There'll barely be a tea party vote left for anyone else once Sarah
gets in.”

“The tea party will be going nuts when Sarah announces, and she'll
have a lock on South Carolina and be free free to work Iowa and
Florida. Romney's now ahead in Iowa, and Sarah will crush Mittens once
she announces.”

“They should make a campaign video: the scene opens with an aerial
panorama across a vast, windswept Iowa field in the middle of a
snowstorm (the camera shot slowly zooms-in). A dog sled of loyal, hard-
driven huskies appears from out of the snowy, twilight gloom. It's
Sarah. She's waving, no! there's something written on the palms of her
mittens! They read ..."bye!"... "bye!" “

(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)

==============================================

This one’s my favorite:

“She'll have enormous respect from world leaders when she's the
President.”

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:)

[Travel A]

After Michigan it was over, numbnuts. It was the spilt vote that got
Romney to that point as the frontrunner. You lose. Whatever I posted
about Newt's surges, etc., was true. What's your point? You lose.

As I said from the beginning. If the vote is split, Romney can win. The
vote was split and Romney won, just as I predicted; and stored in the
archives. I was right, you lose (chortle).
.......................................
.......................................

Sarah Palin also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things
about Santorum.

She didn't endorse, Newt, numbnuts, and that's a fact you can't escape.
If she did endorse him, she could have held Tea Party rallies, got the
various Tea Party voters to back Newt and away from Santorum, and raised
money, etc. She didn't do that. You lose (chortle)

.......................................
..........................................

nin...@webtv.net


From: Travel A Subject: Risky Biz-Sarah Obsession Date: Friday, December
9, 2011 10:26 AM

 Wow, this is more fun that I could ever have hoped.

Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).

80% of my posts having to do with Sarah Palin have been in repsonse to
Risky Biz sputtering vitriol and tearing his hair out over her. That's
80% of the posts where I wouldn't be posting about Sarah Palin,
otherewise. But, note well, Risky Biz, DID: now there's your obsession,
folks.


Emotional investment? Holy shit! has there ever been anyone more hate-
obsessed than Risky Biz (who's the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin?

And now he's equally freak-hating over Newt! Gotta luv that.

.......................................
.......................................

From: Travel A
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 11:41 PM
To: nin...@webtv.net
Subject: Risky Biz- Romney "Definitely" Slam


Fake Pickel blithered:

"...and with Rick Perry leading in the polls you thought he would be the

nominee."


I wrote:
I never said Rick Perry would be the nominee, I said Rick Perry would be
my choice in the current field (Risky Biz-lie #1).


Fake Pickel blithered:

"Next, you insisted that Herman Cain who was then leading in all the
polls would be the nominee."

I wrote:
I never said Cain would be the nominee, only that I was okay with Cain
if he did win (Risky Biz-lie #2).

However, you, on the other hand, in your total ignorance say that Romney
is definitely the nominee: this idiocy is based on Romney with, not ever
getting out of the mid 20s percent, and 75% of the Republican electorate
rejecting Romney and speading their support around six other candiates;
of whom, with any drop-outs, their support wouldn't be going to Romney,
but would go to the remaining, leading conservative
alternative-candidate to Romney. I.e., as the lesser candidates drop
off, Romney goes down in the spread.

So, as everyone can clearly see, your statements of Romney -definitely-
winning the nomination (at this point) is the very depth of publicly
displayed idiocy.

As I say, you've already lost.

.......................................
.......................................

Prev Next Normal view To: Travel A From: Travel A Subject: Splashie
(use) 5/3/12 Date: Thursday, May 3, 2012 5:38 AM

(This, of course, also applies to Risky Biz- who's the Fake Pickle)


May 2

I wrote:
- show quoted text -
Yes, that, as always, is quite easy: as I said from the beginning, if
the vote is split, Romney can win. The vote was split, and Romney won on
plurality contest wins.



Romney:
...

Unfortunately for you, you've already taken numerous, well detailed,
well witnessed ass-kickings on all of your blitherings.

But keep up what surely has to be a rather tedious obsession, with only
a humiliating result to show for it (chortle).
.......................................
.......................................

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:



Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


.......................................

[da pickle]

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/rec.gambling.poker/ot:$20Gingrich%E2%80%99s$20lead$20GONE!/rec.gambling.poker/l037bUWAedE/YUdBuX216igJ

60% down in thread-----------------------

======================================

On Monday, December 26, 2011 8:38:11 PM UTC-8, Travel webTVed:

“I wrote:

“However, you, on the other hand, in your total ignorance, say that

“Romney is definitely the nominee: this idiocy is based on Romney
with,

“not ever getting out of the mid 20s percent, 75% of the Republican

“electorate rejecting Romney and speading their support around six
“other candiates; of whom, with any drop-outs, their support wouldn't
“be going to Romney, but would go to the remaining, leading
“conservative alternative-candidate to Romney.

“I.e., as the lesser

“candidates drop off, Ronney goes down in the spread.

“
“So, as everyone can clearly see, your statements of Romney -

“definitely- winning the nomination, is the very depth of publicly
“displayed idiocy.

I don’t know, I still think Romney will be the nominee. (chuckle)

[Travel A]

After Michigan it was over, numbnuts. It was the spilt vote that got
Romney to that point as the frontrunner. You lose. Whatever I posted
about Newt's surges, etc., was true. What's your point? You lose.

As I said from the beginning. If the vote is split, Romney can win. The
vote was split and Romney won, just as I predicted; and stored in the
archives. I was right, you lose (chortle).
......................................
......................................

Sarah Palin also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things
about Santorum.

She didn't endorse, Newt, numbnuts, and that's a fact you can't escape.
If she did endorse him, she could have held Tea Party rallies, got the
various Tea Party voters to back Newt and away from Santorum, and raised
money, etc. She didn't do that. You lose (chortle)

......................................
.........................................

From: Travel A Subject: Risky Biz-Sarah Obsession Date: Friday, December
9, 2011 10:26 AM

 Wow, this is more fun that I could ever have hoped.

Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).

80% of my posts having to do with Sarah Palin have been in repsonse to
Risky Biz sputtering vitriol and tearing his hair out over her. That's
80% of the posts where I wouldn't be posting about Sarah Palin,
otherewise. But, note well, Risky Biz, DID: now there's your obsession,
folks.


Emotional investment? Holy shit! has there ever been anyone more hate-
obsessed than Risky Biz (who's the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin?

And now he's equally freak-hating over Newt! Gotta luv that.

......................................
......................................

From: Travel A
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 11:41 PM
To: nin...@webtv.net
Subject: Risky Biz- Romney "Definitely" Slam


Fake Pickel blithered:

"...and with Rick Perry leading in the polls you thought he would be the
nominee."


I wrote:
I never said Rick Perry would be the nominee, I said Rick Perry would be
my choice in the current field (Risky Biz-lie #1).


Fake Pickel blithered:

"Next, you insisted that Herman Cain who was then leading in all the
polls would be the nominee."

I wrote:
I never said Cain would be the nominee, only that I was okay with Cain
if he did win (Risky Biz-lie #2).

However, you, on the other hand, in your total ignorance say that Romney

is definitely the nominee: this idiocy is based on Romney with, not ever

getting out of the mid 20s percent, and 75% of the Republican electorate

rejecting Romney and speading their support around six other candiates;
of whom, with any drop-outs, their support wouldn't be going to Romney,
but would go to the remaining, leading conservative
alternative-candidate to Romney. I.e., as the lesser candidates drop

off, Romney goes down in the spread.

So, as everyone can clearly see, your statements of Romney -definitely-

winning the nomination (at this point) is the very depth of publicly
displayed idiocy.

As I say, you've already lost.

......................................
......................................

Prev Next Normal view To: Travel A From: Travel A Subject: Splashie
(use) 5/3/12 Date: Thursday, May 3, 2012 5:38 AM

(This, of course, also applies to Risky Biz- who's the Fake Pickle)


May 2

I wrote:
- show quoted text -
Yes, that, as always, is quite easy: as I said from the beginning, if
the vote is split, Romney can win. The vote was split, and Romney won on
plurality contest wins.



Romney:
..

Unfortunately for you, you've already taken numerous, well detailed,
well witnessed ass-kickings on all of your blitherings.

But keep up what surely has to be a rather tedious obsession, with only
a humiliating result to show for it (chortle).
......................................
......................................

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:



Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


......................................

[da pickle]

[Travel A]

After Michigan it was over, numbnuts. It was the spilt vote that got
Romney to that point as the frontrunner. You lose. Whatever I posted
about Newt's surges, etc., was true. What's your point? You lose.

As I said from the beginning. If the vote is split, Romney can win. The
vote was split and Romney won, just as I predicted; and stored in the
archives. I was right, you lose (chortle).
.....................................
.....................................

Sarah Palin also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things
about Santorum.

She didn't endorse, Newt, numbnuts, and that's a fact you can't escape.
If she did endorse him, she could have held Tea Party rallies, got the
various Tea Party voters to back Newt and away from Santorum, and raised
money, etc. She didn't do that. You lose (chortle)

.....................................
........................................

From: Travel A Subject: Risky Biz-Sarah Obsession Date: Friday, December
9, 2011 10:26 AM

 Wow, this is more fun that I could ever have hoped.

Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).

80% of my posts having to do with Sarah Palin have been in repsonse to
Risky Biz sputtering vitriol and tearing his hair out over her. That's
80% of the posts where I wouldn't be posting about Sarah Palin,
otherewise. But, note well, Risky Biz, DID: now there's your obsession,
folks.


Emotional investment? Holy shit! has there ever been anyone more hate-
obsessed than Risky Biz (who's the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin?

And now he's equally freak-hating over Newt! Gotta luv that.

.....................................
.....................................

Prev Next Normal view To: Travel A From: Travel A Subject: Splashie
(use) 5/3/12 Date: Thursday, May 3, 2012 5:38 AM

(This, of course, also applies to Risky Biz- who's the Fake Pickle)


May 2

I wrote:
- show quoted text -
Yes, that, as always, is quite easy: as I said from the beginning, if
the vote is split, Romney can win. The vote was split, and Romney won on
plurality contest wins.



Romney:
.

Unfortunately for you, you've already taken numerous, well detailed,
well witnessed ass-kickings on all of your blitherings.

But keep up what surely has to be a rather tedious obsession, with only
a humiliating result to show for it (chortle).
.....................................
.....................................

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:



Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


.....................................

[da pickle]

‘As a dumbfuck, pickle has repeatedly posted-blithered about how he's
going to come out of his hole and gloat when, Romney, (who, according
to pickle, can't lose), is the nominee.’

“Look for Sarah to announce her candidacy at the Tea Party rally. ”

‘Just wondering how confident pickle is exactly at this point
(chortle). I mean, it's really going to suck for pickle when I post,
repeatedly, all his "Romney can't lose the nomination" posts AFTER
ROMNEY LOSES.

‘So, as everyone can clearly see, your statements of Romney winning
the nomination, is the very depth of publicly displayed idiocy. Check
the polls, Risky Biz (chortle)’

“Sarah will have enormous respect from world leaders when she's the
President.”

‘The 75% conservatives of the Republican electorate are coalescing.
And unlike the others, Newt kicks-ass in the debates.’

“Once Sarah announces and gets a campaign going, she'll blow this
primary out of the water.”

‘Newt beats Mittens in every region, among every age group and with
the "men" and "women" vote.’

“It's a very smart move by Sarah to wait.”

“Sarah will crush Mittens once she announces.”

“She'll walk away with this, once in.”

‘Gallup has Newt creaming Romney among Republicans, and edging him on
Republican-voting independents.’

‘Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle). WOW! This is more fun than I could ever
have hoped!!!’ ‘WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! WHOA!’

“The tea party will be going nuts when Sarah announces, and she'll
have a lock on South Carolina and be free free to work Iowa and
Florida. Romney's now ahead in Iowa, and Sarah will crush Mittens once
she announces.”

‘Oh, one other thing: Newt's surge to the lead over Romney is by FAR
the strongest of any of the other candidates, previously. And it's
less than a month until the primary contests begin, for the all
important "momentum" factor.’

“They should make a campaign video: the scene opens with an aerial
panorama across a vast, windswept Iowa field in the middle of a
snowstorm (the camera shot slowly zooms-in). A dog sled of loyal, hard-
driven huskies appears from out of the snowy, twilight gloom. It's
Sarah. She's waving, no! there's something written on the palms of her
mittens! They read ..."bye!"... "bye!" “

‘Has there ever been anyone more hate-obsessed than Risky Biz (who's

the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin? And now he's equally freak-hating

over Newt! Gotta luv that.’

[Travel A]

After Michigan it was over, numbnuts. It was the spilt vote that got
Romney to that point as the frontrunner. You lose. Whatever I posted
about Newt's surges, etc., was true. What's your point? You lose.

As I said from the beginning. If the vote is split, Romney can win. The
vote was split and Romney won, just as I predicted; and stored in the
archives. I was right, you lose (chortle).
....................................
....................................

Sarah Palin also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things
about Santorum.

She didn't endorse, Newt, numbnuts, and that's a fact you can't escape.
If she did endorse him, she could have held Tea Party rallies, got the
various Tea Party voters to back Newt and away from Santorum, and raised
money, etc. She didn't do that. You lose (chortle)

....................................
.......................................

From:
Travel A Subject: Risky Biz-Sarah Obsession Date: Friday, December 9,
2011 10:26 AM

 Wow, this is more fun that I could ever have hoped.

Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).

80% of my posts having to do with Sarah Palin have been in repsonse to
Risky Biz sputtering vitriol and tearing his hair out over her. That's
80% of the posts where I wouldn't be posting about Sarah Palin,
otherewise. But, note well, Risky Biz, DID: now there's your obsession,
folks.

Emotional investment? Holy shit! has there ever been anyone more hate-

obsessed than Risky Biz (who's the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin?

And now he's equally freak-hating over Newt! Gotta luv that.

....................................

....................................

From: Travel A
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 11:41 PM
To: nin...@webtv.net
Subject: Risky Biz- Romney "Definitely" Slam


Fake Pickel blithered:

and with Rick Perry


leading in the polls you thought he would be the nominee.



I wrote:
I never said Rick Perry would be the nominee, I said Rick Perry would be
my choice in the current field (Risky Biz-lie #1).

Fake Pickel blithered:


Next, you insisted that Herman Cain who was then leading in all the
polls would be the nominee.

I wrote:
I never said Cain would be the nominee, only that I was okay with Cain
if he did win (Risky Biz-lie #2).

However, you, on the other hand, in your total ignorance say that Romney
is definitely the nominee: this idiocy is based on Romney with, not ever
getting out of the mid 20s percent, and 75% of the Republican electorate
rejecting Romney and speading their support around six other candiates;
of whom, with any drop-outs, their support wouldn't be going to Romney,
but would go to the remaining, leading conservative
alternative-candidate to Romney. I.e., as the lesser candidates drop
off, Romney goes down in the spread.

So, as everyone can clearly see, your statements of Romney -definitely-

winning the nomination (at this point) is the very depth of publicly
displayed idiocy.

As I say, you've already lost.

....................................
....................................

Prev Next Normal view To: Travel A From: Travel A Subject: Splashie
(use) 5/3/12 Date: Thursday, May 3, 2012 5:38 AM

(This, of course, also applies to Risky Biz- who's the Fake Pickle)


May 2

I wrote:
- show quoted text -
Yes, that, as always, is quite easy: as I said from the beginning, if
the vote is split, Romney can win. The vote was split, and Romney won on
plurality contest wins.



Romney:

Unfortunately for you, you've already taken numerous, well detailed,
well witnessed ass-kickings on all of your blitherings.

But keep up what surely has to be a rather tedious obsession, with only
a humiliating result to show for it (chortle).
....................................
....................................

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:



Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


....................................

[Travel A]


nin...@webtv.net
From: Travel A
Subject: Risky Biz: "Already Lost"
Date: Saturday, January 14, 2012 5:28 PM


Lol, back before the original "Newt Surge," you said that it was all
over and that Romney was definitely the nominee. I said that Newt had a
chance and further, predicted that, Newt, due to his debating skills and
rising to a more center debating
stage position, had a chance. He did, and he surged just as I
predicted. You lost. End of story.

Due to my, obviously, vastly superior analytical ability, I proved you
wrong and exposed you (not that it was really necessary) as a
media-parroting dumbfuck.

Trying to weasel and change your story to "who eventually wins the
nomination" won't save you: my stated position has always been that
Romney wins if the conservative field is split. And that's exactly
what's happening, just as I stated long ago.

You were, as usual, checkmated a long time ago.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: OT: Not that anyone except Travel is surprised, but... Group:
rec.gambling.poker Date: Wed, Oct 5, 2011, 5:08pm From: da pickle no
spam <jcpi...@hotmail.com>


On Oct 5, 4:28 pm, nine...@webtv.net (Travel A) wrote:

I wrote:
Lol, you merely had dumb luck on the up or down of Sarah running.

Also, with, within Sarah's numerous Fox commentaries stating that she's
thinking about running (stating she has "the fire in the belly" to run
for president in a Chris Wallace interview) and can beat Obama if she
does, the Rolling Thunder day, her historic America bus tour, her
documentary opening at a theater in Iowa, her big showing at the Iowa
State Fair/on Hannity's national television show, the professional
campaign video of it all, the big speech at Indianola Iowa, (organized
by a special tea party group for that purpose) huge tea party support
from all over the country and "owed" endorsements from those she put
into office in the 2010 mid-term elections, only a complete idiot like
Risky Biz would say she definitely wasn't running. Which Risky Biz did
say of course.

The left wing media and RINOs just said she wasn't running because it
reduced "buzz" and buzz increases poll numbers and can increase
contributions to her PAC.

So, one would either have to be a Sarah-hater or a dumb fuck or both to
declare she definitely wasn't running (rest assured that with Risky Biz,
all the above applies).

So, you still remain ass-kicked on every aspect that requires any
intelligent evaluation of the situation. What you "get out of it" is the
same as a broken clock being on the right time twice a day.

See how easy it is to kick your dumb ass. That's what you "get out of
it": another ass-kicking.

.........................................................
...........................................................

[da pickle no spam]

https://groups.google.com/group/rec.gambling.poker/browse_frm/thread/b98e4b603a44b0a9#

[Travel A]

nin...@webtv.net
From: Travel A
Subject: Risky Biz: "Already Lost"
Date: Saturday, January 14, 2012 5:28 PM


Lol, back before the original "Newt Surge," you said that it was all
over and that Romney was definitely the nominee. I said that Newt had a
chance and further, predicted that, Newt, due to his debating skills and
rising to a more center debating
stage position, had a chance. He did, and he surged just as I predicted.
You lost. End of story.

Due to my, obviously, vastly superior analytical ability, I proved you
wrong and exposed you (not that it was really necessary) as a
media-parroting dumbfuck.

Trying to weasel and change your story to "who eventually wins the
nomination" won't save you: my stated position has always been that
Romney wins if the conservative field is split. And that's exactly
what's happening, just as I stated long ago.

You were, as usual, checkmated a long time ago.


----------------------------------------------

After Michigan it was over, numbnuts. It was the spilt vote that got
Romney to that point as the frontrunner. You lose. Whatever I posted
about Newt's surges, etc., was true. What's your point? You lose.

As I said from the beginning. If the vote is split, Romney can win. The
vote was split and Romney won, just as I predicted; and stored in the
archives. I was right, you lose (chortle).
...................................
...................................

Sarah Palin also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things
about Santorum.

She didn't endorse, Newt, numbnuts, and that's a fact you can't escape.
If she did endorse him, she could have held Tea Party rallies, got the
various Tea Party voters to back Newt and away from Santorum, and raised
money, etc. She didn't do that. You lose (chortle)

...................................
......................................

From: Travel A Subject: Risky Biz-Sarah Obsession Date: Friday, December
9, 2011 10:26 AM
Wow,
this is more fun that I could ever have hoped.

Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).

80% of my posts having to do with Sarah Palin have been in repsonse to
Risky Biz sputtering vitriol and tearing his hair out over her. That's
80% of the posts where I wouldn't be posting about Sarah Palin,
otherewise. But, note well, Risky Biz, DID: now there's your obsession,
folks.


Emotional investment? Holy shit! has there ever been anyone more hate-
obsessed than Risky Biz (who's the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin?

And now he's equally freak-hating over Newt! Gotta luv that.

...................................
...................................

Unfortunately for you, you've already taken numerous, well detailed,
well witnessed ass-kickings on all of your blitherings.

But keep up what surely has to be a rather tedious obsession, with only
a humiliating result to show for it (chortle).
...................................
...................................

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:



Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


...................................

[da pickle no spam]

Travel A’s Greatest WebTV Hits - ACT-1 [Palin (rerun)]
=========================================

“Look for Sarah to announce her candidacy at the Tea Party rally. ”

“Also, Sarah isn't even an announced candidate: wait 'til she starts
campaigning.”

“Can't wait for her to kick-ass in the debates.”

“She'll have enormous respect from world leaders when she's the
President.”

“The left wing media and RINOs just said she wasn't running because it

reduced "buzz" and buzz increases poll numbers and can increase

contributions to her PAC.”

“Imagine what Sarah's numbers are going to be upon announcing.”

“Once Sarah announces and gets a campaign going, she'll blow this
primary out of the water.”

“Sarah wins again.”

“Rick doesn't stand a chance against Sarah once she's in. Rick's just
a "place holder. There'll barely be a vote left for anyone else once
Sarah gets in.”

“It's a very smart move by Sarah to wait.”

“Rick's just a "place holder" for Sarah.”

“Wait until you see her numbers when she announces.”

“A week or so ago, SarahPac sent out tens of thousands of e-mails for
contributions. Sarah will run away with this once she's in.”

“Sarah will crush Mittens once she announces.”

“She'll walk away with this, once in.”

“Sarah wins again.”

“There'll barely be a tea party vote left for anyone else once Sarah
gets in.”

“The tea party will be going nuts when Sarah announces, and she'll
have a lock on South Carolina and be free free to work Iowa and
Florida. Romney's now ahead in Iowa, and Sarah will crush Mittens once
she announces.”

“They should make a campaign video: the scene opens with an aerial
panorama across a vast, windswept Iowa field in the middle of a
snowstorm (the camera shot slowly zooms-in). A dog sled of loyal, hard-
driven huskies appears from out of the snowy, twilight gloom. It's
Sarah. She's waving, no! there's something written on the palms of her
mittens! They read ..."bye!"... "bye!" “

(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)
(“AND SHE HASN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED!”)

==============================================

This one’s my favorite:

“She'll have enormous respect from world leaders when she's the
President.”

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:)

[Travel A]

After Michigan it was over, numbnuts. It was the spilt vote that got
Romney to that point as the frontrunner. You lose. Whatever I posted
about Newt's surges, etc., was true. What's your point? You lose.

As I said from the beginning. If the vote is split, Romney can win. The
vote was split and Romney won, just as I predicted; and stored in the
archives. I was right, you lose (chortle).
..................................
..................................

Sarah Palin also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things
about Santorum.

She didn't endorse, Newt, numbnuts, and that's a fact you can't escape.
If she did endorse him, she could have held Tea Party rallies, got the
various Tea Party voters to back Newt and away from Santorum, and raised
money, etc. She didn't do that. You lose (chortle)

..................................
.....................................

From: Travel A Subject: Risky Biz-Sarah Obsession Date: Friday, December
9, 2011 10:26 AM
Wow,
this is more fun that I could ever have hoped.

Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).

80% of my posts having to do with Sarah Palin have been in repsonse to
Risky Biz sputtering vitriol and tearing his hair out over her. That's
80% of the posts where I wouldn't be posting about Sarah Palin,
otherewise. But, note well, Risky Biz, DID: now there's your obsession,
folks.


Emotional investment? Holy shit! has there ever been anyone more hate-
obsessed than Risky Biz (who's the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin?

And now he's equally freak-hating over Newt! Gotta luv that.

..................................
..................................

Unfortunately for you, you've already taken numerous, well detailed,
well witnessed ass-kickings on all of your blitherings.

But keep up what surely has to be a rather tedious obsession, with only
a humiliating result to show for it (chortle).
..................................
..................................

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:



Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


..................................

[da pickle no spam]

Travel A’s Greatest WebTV Hits - ACT-1 [Palin (rerun)]
=========================================

“Look for Sarah to announce her candidacy at the Tea Party rally. ”

“Also, Sarah isn't even an announced candidate: wait 'til she starts
campaigning.”

“Can't wait for her to kick-ass in the debates.”

“She'll have enormous respect from world leaders when she's the
President.”

“The left wing media and RINOs just said she wasn't running because it

reduced "buzz" and buzz increases poll numbers and can increase

[Travel A]

After Michigan it was over, numbnuts. It was the spilt vote that got
Romney to that point as the frontrunner. You lose. Whatever I posted
about Newt's surges, etc., was true. What's your point? You lose.

As I said from the beginning. If the vote is split, Romney can win. The
vote was split and Romney won, just as I predicted; and stored in the
archives. I was right, you lose (chortle).
.................................
.................................

Sarah Palin also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things
about Santorum.

She didn't endorse, Newt, numbnuts, and that's a fact you can't escape.
If she did endorse him, she could have held Tea Party rallies, got the
various Tea Party voters to back Newt and away from Santorum, and raised
money, etc. She didn't do that. You lose (chortle)

.................................
....................................

From: Travel A Subject: Risky Biz-Sarah Obsession Date: Friday, December
9, 2011 10:26 AM
Wow,
this is more fun that I could ever have hoped.

Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).

80% of my posts having to do with Sarah Palin have been in repsonse to
Risky Biz sputtering vitriol and tearing his hair out over her. That's
80% of the posts where I wouldn't be posting about Sarah Palin,
otherewise. But, note well, Risky Biz, DID: now there's your obsession,
folks.


Emotional investment? Holy shit! has there ever been anyone more hate-
obsessed than Risky Biz (who's the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin?

And now he's equally freak-hating over Newt! Gotta luv that.

.................................
.................................

Unfortunately for you, you've already taken numerous, well detailed,
well witnessed ass-kickings on all of your blitherings.

But keep up what surely has to be a rather tedious obsession, with only
a humiliating result to show for it (chortle).
.................................
.................................

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:



Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


.................................