> > [In his defense, the quality of the entire group is way off! There is > > almost nothing posted that is worth reading OR deserves much of a
response.]
> > Only Paul seems to be holding up a totally "above the fray" standard.
> > Thanks, Paul.
> i'm trying to get some things going. we'll see if the usual morons can be
> prodded into slobbering on themselves.
> mo_ntresor
If clavie or someone else (I forget who this was addressed to) would
answer this simple question that Alim asked it might get things going.
"I'll ask you the same question Clave dodged. What exactly did the
employees win when Hostess died?"
> > > [In his defense, the quality of the entire group is way off! There is > > > almost nothing posted that is worth reading OR deserves much of a
> response.]
> > > Only Paul seems to be holding up a totally "above the fray" standard.
> > > Thanks, Paul.
> > i'm trying to get some things going. we'll see if the usual morons can be
> > prodded into slobbering on themselves.
> > mo_ntresor
.> If clavie or someone else (I forget who this was addressed to) would
> answer this simple question that Alim asked it might get things going.
LOL at SS wanting others to 'answer questions' when she repeatedly refuses to do it herself.
.> "I'll ask you the same question Clave dodged.
WHA! HA~HA! The Chief dodger accuses others of dodging questions…
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:41:44 +0000 (UTC), Vince <vi...@hush.ai> wrote:
>Do the out of work union workers still have to pay their union >dues? Do the union leaders still get the same pay?
brattt wrote:
> On Nov 17 2012 8:01 AM, mo_ntresor wrote:
>> On Nov 17 2012 6:57 AM, da pickle wrote:
>>> A strange morning:
>>> 2:46
>>> 2:55
>>> 3:11
>>> 3:50
>>> 4:47
>>> [In his defense, the quality of the entire group is way off! There is
>>> almost nothing posted that is worth reading OR deserves much of a
> response.]
>>> Only Paul seems to be holding up a totally "above the fray" standard.
>>> Thanks, Paul.
>> i'm trying to get some things going. we'll see if the usual morons can be
>> prodded into slobbering on themselves.
>> mo_ntresor
> If clavie or someone else (I forget who this was addressed to) would
> answer this simple question that Alim asked it might get things going.
> "I'll ask you the same question Clave dodged. What exactly did the
> employees win when Hostess died?"
I answered it. Tell me this Susan, if you're getting raped over and over do you ever stand up to your abuser and say no more, no matter what the consequences, or do you keep taking it until there's nothing left of you but an empty shell?
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:00:22 -0800, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>I answered it. Tell me this Susan, if you're getting raped over and over >do you ever stand up to your abuser and say no more, no matter what the >consequences, or do you keep taking it until there's nothing left of you >but an empty shell?
wow,having to fund your own pension is now the equivalent to woman
being raped over and over?
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:00:22 -0800, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
> >I answered it. Tell me this Susan, if you're getting raped over and over > >do you ever stand up to your abuser and say no more, no matter what the > >consequences, or do you keep taking it until there's nothing left of you > >but an empty shell?
> wow,having to fund your own pension is now the equivalent to woman
> being raped over and over?
> you have sunk to a new low
> someone needs to teach you some manners
Let him have his fun - he thinks he is being clever.
> >>> [In his defense, the quality of the entire group is way off! There is
> >>> almost nothing posted that is worth reading OR deserves much of a
> > response.]
> >>> Only Paul seems to be holding up a totally "above the fray" standard.
> >>> Thanks, Paul.
> >> i'm trying to get some things going. we'll see if the usual morons can be
> >> prodded into slobbering on themselves.
> >> mo_ntresor
> > If clavie or someone else (I forget who this was addressed to) would
> > answer this simple question that Alim asked it might get things going.
> > "I'll ask you the same question Clave dodged. What exactly did the
> > employees win when Hostess died?"
> I answered it. Tell me this Susan, if you're getting raped over and over > do you ever stand up to your abuser and say no more, no matter what the > consequences, or do you keep taking it until there's nothing left of you > but an empty shell?
when did you answer it? Direct me to it please?
and if it meant the only way to keep food on the table for my kids I
probably would - even if it is one of your stupidest analogies.
apparently 3 out of the 4 unions involved agree with me - as from what I
have read only the baker's union disagreed.
bub wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:00:22 -0800, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>> I answered it. Tell me this Susan, if you're getting raped over and over
>> do you ever stand up to your abuser and say no more, no matter what the
>> consequences, or do you keep taking it until there's nothing left of you
>> but an empty shell?
> wow,having to fund your own pension is now the equivalent to woman
> being raped over and over?
> you have sunk to a new low
> someone needs to teach you some manners
It is equivalent. It is an abusive relationship, with one party holding power repeatedly taking advantage of a party with less power.
Did the vulture capital payout of $333 million escape your attention?
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:27:16 -0800, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>> wow,having to fund your own pension is now the equivalent to woman
>> being raped over and over?
>> you have sunk to a new low
>> someone needs to teach you some manners
>It is equivalent.
you're a disgusting little fucker who needs to get his teeth kicked
in
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:27:16 -0800, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>bub wrote:
>> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:00:22 -0800, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>> I answered it. Tell me this Susan, if you're getting raped over and over
>>> do you ever stand up to your abuser and say no more, no matter what the
>>> consequences, or do you keep taking it until there's nothing left of you
>>> but an empty shell?
>> wow,having to fund your own pension is now the equivalent to woman
>> being raped over and over?
>> you have sunk to a new low
>> someone needs to teach you some manners
>It is equivalent. It is an abusive relationship, with one party holding >power repeatedly taking advantage of a party with less power.
"Equivalent" is certainly the wrong word. I think you mean
"analogous".
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:27:16 -0800, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>> bub wrote:
>>> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:00:22 -0800, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>>> I answered it. Tell me this Susan, if you're getting raped over and over
>>>> do you ever stand up to your abuser and say no more, no matter what the
>>>> consequences, or do you keep taking it until there's nothing left of you
>>>> but an empty shell?
>>> wow,having to fund your own pension is now the equivalent to woman
>>> being raped over and over?
>>> you have sunk to a new low
>>> someone needs to teach you some manners
>> It is equivalent. It is an abusive relationship, with one party holding
>> power repeatedly taking advantage of a party with less power.
> "Equivalent" is certainly the wrong word. I think you mean
> "analogous".
> --
> Pepe "The Crapflooder" Papon
Only if you are unaware of the definition of either word.
<jcpick...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
>On 11/18/2012 1:37 AM, Pepe Papon wrote:
>> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:27:16 -0800, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>> bub wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:00:22 -0800, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>>>> I answered it. Tell me this Susan, if you're getting raped over and over
>>>>> do you ever stand up to your abuser and say no more, no matter what the
>>>>> consequences, or do you keep taking it until there's nothing left of you
>>>>> but an empty shell?
>>>> wow,having to fund your own pension is now the equivalent to woman
>>>> being raped over and over?
>>>> you have sunk to a new low
>>>> someone needs to teach you some manners
>>> It is equivalent. It is an abusive relationship, with one party holding
>>> power repeatedly taking advantage of a party with less power.
>> "Equivalent" is certainly the wrong word. I think you mean
>> "analogous".
>Only if you are unaware of the definition of either word.
Pepe Papon wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:56:07 -0600, da pickle
> <jcpick...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On 11/18/2012 1:37 AM, Pepe Papon wrote:
>>> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:27:16 -0800, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>>> bub wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:00:22 -0800, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I answered it. Tell me this Susan, if you're getting raped over and over
>>>>>> do you ever stand up to your abuser and say no more, no matter what the
>>>>>> consequences, or do you keep taking it until there's nothing left of you
>>>>>> but an empty shell?
>>>>> wow,having to fund your own pension is now the equivalent to woman
>>>>> being raped over and over?
>>>>> you have sunk to a new low
>>>>> someone needs to teach you some manners
>>>> It is equivalent. It is an abusive relationship, with one party holding
>>>> power repeatedly taking advantage of a party with less power.
>>> "Equivalent" is certainly the wrong word. I think you mean
>>> "analogous".
>> Only if you are unaware of the definition of either word.
> Content-free snark noted.
I did use an analogy, so analogous is a better term, but I was just repeating bub's word back to him.
bub wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:27:16 -0800, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>> wow,having to fund your own pension is now the equivalent to woman
>>> being raped over and over?
>>> you have sunk to a new low
>>> someone needs to teach you some manners
>> It is equivalent.
> you're a disgusting little fucker who needs to get his teeth kicked
> in
> fuck off
Why the violent reaction? I didn't rape anyone or suggest that anyone be raped. I didn't cut the wages and benefits of a work force or suggest that anyone should do that. However having one's wages and pensions cut feels similar to being robbed, to the victim, and robbery victims often describe feeling like "I was raped". I would be very surprised as a matter of fact if the phrase "taking it in the ass, again" did not come up frequently in discussions among workers.
> Pepe Papon wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:56:07 -0600, da pickle
>> <jcpick...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/18/2012 1:37 AM, Pepe Papon wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:27:16 -0800, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>>>> bub wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:00:22 -0800, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> I answered it. Tell me this Susan, if you're getting raped over
>>>>>>> and over
>>>>>>> do you ever stand up to your abuser and say no more, no matter
>>>>>>> what the
>>>>>>> consequences, or do you keep taking it until there's nothing left
>>>>>>> of you
>>>>>>> but an empty shell?
>>>>>> wow,having to fund your own pension is now the equivalent to woman
>>>>>> being raped over and over?
>>>>>> you have sunk to a new low
>>>>>> someone needs to teach you some manners
>>>>> It is equivalent. It is an abusive relationship, with one party
>>>>> holding
>>>>> power repeatedly taking advantage of a party with less power.
>>>> "Equivalent" is certainly the wrong word. I think you mean
>>>> "analogous".
>>> Only if you are unaware of the definition of either word.
>> Content-free snark noted.
> I did use an analogy, so analogous is a better term, but I was just
> repeating bub's word back to him.
> > On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:27:16 -0800, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
> >> bub wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:00:22 -0800, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
> >>>> I answered it. Tell me this Susan, if you're getting raped over and over
> >>>> do you ever stand up to your abuser and say no more, no matter what the
> >>>> consequences, or do you keep taking it until there's nothing left of you
> >>>> but an empty shell?
> >>> wow,having to fund your own pension is now the equivalent to woman
> >>> being raped over and over?
> >>> you have sunk to a new low
> >>> someone needs to teach you some manners
> >> It is equivalent. It is an abusive relationship, with one party holding
> >> power repeatedly taking advantage of a party with less power.
> > "Equivalent" is certainly the wrong word. I think you mean
> > "analogous".
> > --
> > Pepe "The Crapflooder" Papon
> Only if you are unaware of the definition of either word.
On Nov 19, 11:22 pm, da pickle <jcpick...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/19/2012 4:15 PM, fffurken wrote:
> > On Nov 19, 9:34 pm, da pickle <jcpick...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.
> > Yes, well done picktard, B+
> YW
Thanks pickass but you dodgeted the question - "Why don't you think
it's an analogy?"
So all you've left me with now is speculation. I thought perhaps
you're such an ignoramus that you can only recognise an analogy if
it's delivered to you in a sort of nursery rhyme format like "A woman
needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle". Then I thought, maybe you
don't think it's an analogy because you don't agree with the truth
it's supposed to represent, which would also make you a dumbass. And
then I thought, you're so stupid, you didn't even get to the
metaphorical part and you took it quite literally like bub did and you
just had your knickers in a twist.
lol But who knows why you were stupid on this occasion picktard!
You're multifaceted like that.
