Prominent white nationalist racists Peter Brimelow (whose VDARE website has been categorized as a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law Center) and Robert Vandervoort (executive director of ProEnglish, also deemed part of a network of related hate groups by SPLC) were welcomed with open arms as panelists at CPAC to spew their anti-immigrant, racist propaganda to eager young teabaggers and career politicians alike.
What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to anyone but susan and bub?
> Prominent white nationalist racists Peter Brimelow (whose VDARE website
> has been categorized as a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law
> Center) and Robert Vandervoort (executive director of ProEnglish, also
> deemed part of a network of related hate groups by SPLC) were welcomed
> with open arms as panelists at CPAC to spew their anti-immigrant, racist
> propaganda to eager young teabaggers and career politicians alike.
> What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
> tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
> at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to
> anyone but susan and bub?
> Prominent white nationalist racists Peter Brimelow (whose VDARE website > has been categorized as a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law > Center) and Robert Vandervoort (executive director of ProEnglish, also > deemed part of a network of related hate groups by SPLC) were welcomed > with open arms as panelists at CPAC to spew their anti-immigrant, racist > propaganda to eager young teabaggers and career politicians alike.
> What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist > tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform > at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to > anyone but susan and bub?
i sure hope they don't have any mexicans there, our fearless fat fuck from
canada may have to hide under a table!
> What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist > tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform > at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to > anyone but susan and bub?
Why does MSNBC promote Al Sharpton and give him so much air time?
>> What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
>> tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
>> at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to
>> anyone but susan and bub?
> Why does MSNBC promote Al Sharpton and give him so much air time?
Isn't she amazing? She is comparing Reverend Al Sharpton to a white nationalist racist scumbag pig. That is how they think.
To susan, anyone who points out the blatantly obvious, that blacks have been fucked over royally by white-America time and time and time again, or anyone who sticks up for black people in any way, shape or form, is a "racist."
> > What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist > > tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform > > at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to > > anyone but susan and bub?
> Why does MSNBC promote Al Sharpton and give him so much air time?
> You are asking a guy who believes that the SPLC defines racism?
I think *you* define racism, Dave. On every single issue imaginable, you, like susan, like most wingnuts, will come down against black people. That's as good a definition of racism as any.
But yes, I think it's very fair to say the Southern Poverty Law Group is considered *the* expert on hate groups in America. They've done a great job exposing them to the public, and in some cases ruining them in court, for many years.
> > You are asking a guy who believes that the SPLC defines racism?
> I think *you* define racism, Dave. On every single issue imaginable, > you, like susan, like most wingnuts, will come down against black > people. That's as good a definition of racism as any.
Show me just ONCE where I have come down against black people.
> On 2/12/2012 5:00 AM, bratt wrote:
> > On Feb 12 2012 1:01 AM, BillB wrote:
> >> What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
> >> tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
> >> at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to
> >> anyone but susan and bub?
> > Why does MSNBC promote Al Sharpton and give him so much air time?
> Isn't she amazing? She is comparing Reverend Al Sharpton to a white > nationalist racist scumbag pig. That is how they think.
So you are saying that Al Sharpton isn't racist? WOW back to the
racists only come in one color thingie. What about the Samuel L. Jackson
quote?
> To susan, anyone who points out the blatantly obvious, that blacks have > been fucked over royally by white-America time and time and time again, > or anyone who sticks up for black people in any way, shape or form, is a > "racist."
Talk about lying - I never said that. Good try though.
> Welcome to Tennessee.
Tell me oh special one - what is wrong with Tennessee? Doesn't stack up
to your levels? People too happy to fit into your world?
> Prominent white nationalist racists Peter Brimelow (whose VDARE website > has been categorized as a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law > Center) and Robert Vandervoort (executive director of ProEnglish, also > deemed part of a network of related hate groups by SPLC) were welcomed > with open arms as panelists at CPAC to spew their anti-immigrant, racist > propaganda to eager young teabaggers and career politicians alike.
> What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist > tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform > at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to > anyone but susan and bub?
>> Prominent white nationalist racists Peter Brimelow (whose VDARE website
>> has been categorized as a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law
>> Center) and Robert Vandervoort (executive director of ProEnglish, also
>> deemed part of a network of related hate groups by SPLC) were welcomed
>> with open arms as panelists at CPAC to spew their anti-immigrant, racist
>> propaganda to eager young teabaggers and career politicians alike.
>> What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
>> tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
>> at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to
>> anyone but susan and bub?
On Feb 11, 11:01 pm, BillB <bo...@shaw1.ca> wrote:
> Prominent white nationalist racists Peter Brimelow (whose VDARE website
> has been categorized as a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law
> Center) and Robert Vandervoort (executive director of ProEnglish, also
> deemed part of a network of related hate groups by SPLC) were welcomed
> with open arms as panelists at CPAC to spew their anti-immigrant, racist
> propaganda to eager young teabaggers and career politicians alike.
> What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist
> tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform
> at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to
> anyone but susan and bub?
I listened to Romney's speech at CPAC on TV the other day. OMG! The
world might be in big trouble.
If Romney had been speaking Arabic and used the word "Allah" (praise
be His name) instead of "God", the same people cheering would instead
be demanding more troops in the Middle East.
This group seems to want to make the US a therocracy, with Biblical
law and confrence with religous leaders on how to proceed in every
endevour.
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:25:04 -0800, BillB <bo...@shaw1.ca> wrote:
>On 2/12/2012 6:16 AM, Dave the Clueless wrote:
>> You are asking a guy who believes that the SPLC defines racism?
>I think *you* define racism, Dave. On every single issue imaginable, >you, like susan, like most wingnuts, will come down against black >people. That's as good a definition of racism as any.
>But yes, I think it's very fair to say the Southern Poverty Law Group is >considered *the* expert on hate groups in America. They've done a great >job exposing them to the public, and in some cases ruining them in >court, for many years.
March 25, 2010
Southern Poverty Law Center officially declared "left-wing hate group"
By J. Matt Barber
Though always left of center, the Alabama-based Southern Poverty Law
Center (SPLC) once had a reputation as a fairly objective civil rights
group. Founded by direct-marketing millionaire Morris Dees and partner
Joseph Levin Jr. in 1971, the SPLC made important and honorable
contributions to many of the historic civil rights gains of the 20th
Century. According to its own materials, the SPLC was "internationally
known for tracking and exposing the activities of hate groups."
Alas, "power corrupts," as it goes, and the SPLC, having amassed
tremendous power and wealth over the years, has regrettably become
corrupt to its core. By way of an ever-escalating wave of
"us-versus-them" money-grubbing schemes, Today's SPLC has morphed into
a far-left political activist outfit, famous for promoting a panoply
of extreme liberal causes.
Ken Silverstein, writing for Harper's Magazine, addressed this
untoward metamorphosis in 2000: "Today's SPLC spends most of its time
— and money — on a relentless fund-raising campaign, peddling
memberships in the church of tolerance with all the zeal of a circuit
rider passing the collection plate. 'He's the Jim and Tammy Faye
Bakker of the civil rights movement,' renowned anti-death-penalty
lawyer Millard Farmer says of Dees, his former associate, 'though I
don't mean to malign Jim and Tammy Faye.'
"The American Institute of Philanthropy gives the Center one of the
worst ratings of any group it monitors," continued Silverstein.
"Morris Dees doesn't need your financial support. The SPLC is already
the wealthiest civil rights group in America, though [its fundraising
literature] quite naturally omits that fact. ... 'Morris and
I...shared the overriding purpose of making a pile of money,' recalls
Dees's business partner, a lawyer named Millard Fuller (not to be
confused with Millard Farmer). 'We were not particular about how we
did it; we just wanted to be independently rich.'" (You say Fuller. I
say Farmer. The two Millards say "call the whole thing off.")
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----
---------------------------------
I can see where you're getting your fixation on white raaaaaacism.
Bill maher and the SPLC.
<giggle, snort>
> > You are asking a guy who believes that the SPLC defines racism?
> I think *you* define racism, Dave. On every single issue imaginable, > you, like susan, like most wingnuts, will come down against black > people. That's as good a definition of racism as any.
That is only because you are a moron. An educated moron, but a moron
nonetheless.
> But yes, I think it's very fair to say the Southern Poverty Law Group is > considered *the* expert on hate groups in America. They've done a great > job exposing them to the public, and in some cases ruining them in > court, for many years.
Using the work "think" to describe the fatally flawed process that leads
to your conclusions demeans the word.
-------
Canada, keeping the brown people to a minimum for 80 years!
BillB wrote:
> Prominent white nationalist racists Peter Brimelow (whose VDARE website > has been categorized as a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law > Center) and Robert Vandervoort (executive director of ProEnglish, also > deemed part of a network of related hate groups by SPLC) were welcomed > with open arms as panelists at CPAC to spew their anti-immigrant, racist > propaganda to eager young teabaggers and career politicians alike.
> What I'm wondering...if conservatives don't *really* have racist > tendencies, why are they giving white-nationalist hate groups a platform > at one of their most important conferences? Does that make any sense to > anyone but susan and bub?
Hmmm, let's see. First, I doubt that CPAC accepts the SPLC
characterizations. Second, it appears that CPAC is more tolerant of
diverse views than you.
bratt wrote:
> On Feb 12 2012 7:46 AM, BillB wrote:
>> Welcome to Tennessee.
> Tell me oh special one - what is wrong with Tennessee? Doesn't stack up
> to your levels? People too happy to fit into your world?
It is so funny how much BillB professes to not be a bigot, when he
displays it so openly so often.
> "Morris Dees doesn't need your financial support. The SPLC is already
> the wealthiest civil rights group in America, though [its fundraising
> literature] quite naturally omits that fact.
That's like saying, "the American Cancer Society doesn't need your money...they have lots of money." It's the argument of an idiot (or in this case, a liar pandering to idiots).
... 'Morris and
> I...shared the overriding purpose of making a pile of money,' recalls
> Dees's business partner, a lawyer named Millard Fuller (not to be
> confused with Millard Farmer). 'We were not particular about how we
> did it; we just wanted to be independently rich.'" (You say Fuller. I
> say Farmer. The two Millards say "call the whole thing off.")
Most people want to be rich. Lawyers are no different. This is the weakest ad hominem attack I've ever seen.
> I can see where you're getting your fixation on white raaaaaacism.
> Bill maher and the SPLC.
My concern about racism comes primarily from cold, hard statistics and my natural inclination to care about injustice and human suffering.
>>> Tell me oh special one - what is wrong with Tennessee? Doesn't stack up
>>> to your levels? People too happy to fit into your world?
>> It is so funny how much BillB professes to not be a bigot, when he
>> displays it so openly so often.
> big tough cannuck has been quivering in fear for a decade over a trip to
> puerto vallarta. LMAO! scary mexicans!!!
Why do you keep saying this? I didn't say anything about being scared of going to Mexico. I said my wife was.
Aren't you the one who criss-crosses the street when you spot a scary looking black teenager? Seriously, I wouldn't be talking about cowards if I were you.
> > big tough cannuck has been quivering in fear for a decade over a trip to
> > puerto vallarta. LMAO! scary mexicans!!!
> Why do you keep saying this? I didn't say anything about being scared of > going to Mexico. I said my wife was.
> Aren't you the one who criss-crosses the street when you spot a scary > looking black teenager? Seriously, I wouldn't be talking about cowards > if I were you.
you'd strut through chicago's west side with your shirt off, but keep the
tough cannuck away from ... PUERTO VALLARTA!!!!
LMFAO!!! what a goddamn laughing stock you are.
this must be so embarrassing. tell us, bill, what about mexico scares you
silly? not knowing how to order an extra large pizza with extra extra
cheese and meat? the little brown people who talk funny? WHAT IS IT
that's kept you quivering for a decade now?
> > > big tough cannuck has been quivering in fear for a decade over a trip to
> > > puerto vallarta. LMAO! scary mexicans!!!
> > Why do you keep saying this? I didn't say anything about being scared of
> > going to Mexico. I said my wife was.
> > Aren't you the one who criss-crosses the street when you spot a scary
> > looking black teenager? Seriously, I wouldn't be talking about cowards
> > if I were you.
> you'd strut through chicago's west side with your shirt off, but keep the
> tough cannuck away from ... PUERTO VALLARTA!!!!
> LMFAO!!! what a goddamn laughing stock you are.
> this must be so embarrassing. tell us, bill, what about mexico scares you
> silly? not knowing how to order an extra large pizza with extra extra
> cheese and meat? the little brown people who talk funny? WHAT IS IT
> that's kept you quivering for a decade now?
> mo_ntresor
> --------
BillB, look at this quote and show your wife,
"As 13 year residents of Puerto Vallarta, we can attest to the safety
of this magnificent resort destination south of the border where the
possession of hand guns is prohibited and violent crime is virtually
nonexistent. For proof of this claim, we'll first determine the number
of US citizens that visit PV annually and then get the facts related
to violent crime in the area." http://banderasnews.com/1001/edop-therealfacts.htm
Seems as if the violence is only in places with lots of guns
(surprise!!!), and not in some of the gun controlled resort areas.
Bet you could get a pretty good deal on escaping the Canadian Artic
winter.
