> > Fuckhead (and you are one) miranda only applies to CRIMINAL proceedings....
> > not shit you WANT
> > It is NOT remotely comperable, YOU ASSHOLE
> Did you ever wonder why a guy like you, who had almost every conceivable > advantage right from birth onward -- white, male, American, heterosexual > (presumably), upper-middle class parents, 66 IQ, college education, blue > state, etc. -- ended up in middle age living in a ramshackle house under > a smokestack in a crappy little town, with an obese girlfriend, Captain > Highliner furniture and a wizard collection, enduring a long commute in > a POS car to a night shift job in a fucking grocery store? Do you think > it might have more to do with your complete lack of common sense, or > your repulsive personality, or is it really a fairly equal combination > of both?
i can't figure out why nobody sympathizes with you and your wife's health
problems. who could wish ill of this guy?
On Oct 14 2012 4:04 AM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
> > By the way, when Ramashiva posted the name of your store where you
> > work, I googled it. I saw that newspaper article with a picture of
> > your boss and the retarded kid you two boss around. I laughed so
> > fucking hard.
> > Chain of Command at Beldin's store:
> You know, only a cocksucking monkey would make fun of a mentally disabled > adult.
> Want a banana?
what a piece of shit. he spends hours talking about chance and the
disadvantaged then makes endless fun of others for things largely out of
their control.
> That was perhaps a touch OTT, not that I'm giving out or anything. I
> would like to congratulate both you and BillB for making this thread a
> bunch of laughs. I suppose some thanks should go to the unwitting
> retard for the role he played in it too.
> Btw, I noticed Maggot was already in there with his phony outrage
> about 'David', which is a little funny as every second sentence out of
> him is fucked in the ass retard this and fucked in the ass retard
> that, so please don't give him any more leverage.
bashing guys with down's syndrome, autism ... HILARIOUS!
On Oct 14, 4:19 pm, "mo_ntresor" <amontilladofortun...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Oct 14 2012 7:07 AM, fffurken wrote:
> > That was perhaps a touch OTT, not that I'm giving out or anything. I
> > would like to congratulate both you and BillB for making this thread a
> > bunch of laughs. I suppose some thanks should go to the unwitting
> > retard for the role he played in it too.
> > Btw, I noticed Maggot was already in there with his phony outrage
> > about 'David', which is a little funny as every second sentence out of
> > him is fucked in the ass retard this and fucked in the ass retard
> > that, so please don't give him any more leverage.
> bashing guys with down's syndrome, autism ... HILARIOUS!
> mo_ntresor
Get to the back of the phony outrage queue, retard.
> > bashing guys with down's syndrome, autism ... HILARIOUS!
> Get to the back of the phony outrage queue, retard.
i'm not outraged over the sentiment. i sort of expected this from you
phony cocksuckers, but i have to say, i was still surprised to read it. at least you heartless, murderous pieces of shit are showing your true
colors.
> > Get to the back of the phony outrage queue, retard.
> i'm not outraged over the sentiment. i sort of expected this from you
> phony cocksuckers, but i have to say, i was still surprised to read it.
> at least you heartless, murderous pieces of shit are showing your true
> colors.
I'm sorry, what?
What the fuck are you talking about? "heartless, murderous pieces of
shit" like me? Did anyone say phony outrage!!
> > Get to the back of the phony outrage queue, retard.
> i'm not outraged over the sentiment. i sort of expected this from you
> phony cocksuckers, but i have to say, i was still surprised to read it.
> at least you heartless, murderous pieces of shit are showing your true
> colors.
> mo_ntresor
OIC.
From your other recent post in the thread entitled "ATTN: Beldim,
Biden Is a Religious Nut", I'm guessing you're jumping to describing
me as a "heartless, murderous piece of shit" because of my pro-choice
belief.
Very insightful (or is that inciteful?) of you. But I do prefer to
keep the people I've murdered a secret.
> >> hahaha...this from the sick cunt who mocked my wife repeatedly for
> >> having ovarian cancer.
> >> They really have no shame.
> > No B-BillB -
> No, what? No, you didn't mock my wife having ovarian cancer? You are > denying this now? LOL!
> Let me guess....it was your daughter posting on your account again, right?
> This is a case of susan being violently repulsed when she sees a glimpse > of herself in the mirror. Yes, susan, that's really you.
You opened your wife up to being ridiculed. Until you called my kids fat
pigs, and me a racist I left your wife out of it. I even expressed
condolences for both you and your wife. You are a pig.
On Oct 14, 5:23 pm, "brattt" <af3...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> You opened your wife up to being ridiculed. Until you called my kids fat
> pigs, and me a racist I left your wife out of it. I even expressed
> condolences for both you and your wife. You are a pig.
I won't question the accuracy of your statement, but how do you equate
someone criticising you for being a racist (which I think you probably
are so you can KF me after this post) or your kids being overweight
with mocking someone you don't know (other than she's BillB's wife)
with a potentially life threatening disease?
Uh, I opened my wife up to being ridiculed for having cancer, how exactly??
Until you called my kids fat
> pigs,
No, I didn't. You've already admitted once that you were 100% wrong about that. I think you have brain damage.
I don't know anything about you kids, except that your (ahem) daughter supposedly logs into your account occasionally to say vile things about me that you don't want to take responsibility for.
> and me a racist
I called you a racist only to mock you for calling ME a racist first, you dummy.
I left your wife out of it. I even expressed
> condolences for both you and your wife. You are a pig.
No, you wished death on my wife.
Don't get me wrong, I couldn't care less. I think it's funny that many of the right-wingers here have shown themselves to be EXACTLY what I've claimed alll along. Don't run from it. You are a right-winger. It's who you are. A near-sociopathic disregard for the pain and suffering of others is just part of the profile. Celebrate it.
> Uh, I opened my wife up to being ridiculed for having cancer, how exactly??
> Until you called my kids fat
> > pigs,
> No, I didn't. You've already admitted once that you were 100% wrong > about that. I think you have brain damage.
> I don't know anything about you kids, except that your (ahem) daughter > supposedly logs into your account occasionally to say vile things about > me that you don't want to take responsibility for.
Occasionally? One time, which she admitted to. Why would I give a
ratsass what you think I take responsibility for or not? Are you gonna
send the bogeyman down to get me? Or call the pizzeria again to check up
on me
> > I left your wife out of it. I even expressed
> > condolences for both you and your wife. You are a pig.
> No, you wished death on my wife.
Not at first sweetie - and not until I realized that death might be a good
out for your wife as opposed to living with you
Gee B-BillB - what do you think of people with less than average brain
capabilities?
Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
> BillB wrote:
>> On 10/13/2012 4:12 PM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
>>> BillB wrote:
>>>> On 10/13/2012 10:00 AM, brattt wrote:
>>>>> he will never understand Mo -
>>>> No? Maybe try explaining it to me in a way even a five year old
>>>> could understand. It must be all the big words you are using.
>>>> Why shouldn't every citizen in a wealthy country have a right to
>>>> quality health care, as expressed in the UDHR and the ICESCR?
>>> Because nobody should have a right to unlimited free stuff
>> Go away. Nothing in those documents calls for "unlimited free stuff."
>> Come back when you want to talk like a serious person.
> Show me in those documents where a person's right to health care is capped
Health care is not just "stuff" according to the vast majority of civilized nations, i.e. all but the US, it is a right of citizenship. In your case it could easily fall under the constitution as necessary for the pursuit of happiness.
BillB wrote:
> On 10/14/2012 12:59 AM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
>> Fuckhead (and you are one) miranda only applies to CRIMINAL
>> proceedings....
>> not shit you WANT
>> It is NOT remotely comperable, YOU ASSHOLE
> And just for the record, what he said there made absolutely no sense. He
> had it bass ackwards, as usual. First, of course they are comparable.
> They are both kinds of enumerated rights, and Beldin the dummy thinks
> when it comes to rights, we should just *read in* the stipulation that
> they are TOTALLY UNLIMITED and without any reasonable parameters
> whatsoever, unless the conferring document specifically states
> otherwise. This is why Beldin works in a grocery store.
> The reason I say Beldumb had it bass ackwards, again, is because it is
> trite to say that when it comes to rights, whether you are pointing to
> the Constitution or a treaty or a declaration or an ordinary statute or
> the common law or whatever, nowhere are they to be interpreted more
> liberally in favor of the right-holder than in the context of a criminal
> law setting where his personal liberty is at stake. So, if you believe
> that because a right is enumerated a United Nations declaration of human
> rights it must be totally and completely UNLIMITED in scope, beyond all
> common sense and reason (unless stipulated otherwise), then certainly
> you'd have to have the same attitude when it comes to the rights of an
> accused in a criminal law setting, where his physical liberty is in
> jeopardy.
> I know, it was just Beldumb being Beldumb, why do I bother. I'm still
> hoping susan will come around and explain, in terms even I can
> understand, why it's a bad idea to guarantee all citizens access to
> quality health care, even if it costs her absolutely nothing.
Beldin believes that fairness dictates that those without medical insurance should be relegated to limited, second rate health care as a way of punishing them for being so useless. A lot of right wingers think that way, although Beldin doesn't admit to being a right winger.
Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
> I have a guy working for me almost as dumb as you, though.
> He spent 20 minutes insisting diet soda (0 calorie, not that pepsi blend out
> now) has sugar.
> So I'm glad I have my training of speaking to morons like you to help me
> communicate with that guy.
You just made fun of a guy with mental limitations.
> > And just for the record, what he said there made absolutely no sense. He
> > had it bass ackwards, as usual. First, of course they are comparable.
> > They are both kinds of enumerated rights, and Beldin the dummy thinks
> > when it comes to rights, we should just *read in* the stipulation that
> > they are TOTALLY UNLIMITED and without any reasonable parameters
> > whatsoever, unless the conferring document specifically states
> > otherwise. This is why Beldin works in a grocery store.
> > The reason I say Beldumb had it bass ackwards, again, is because it is
> > trite to say that when it comes to rights, whether you are pointing to
> > the Constitution or a treaty or a declaration or an ordinary statute or
> > the common law or whatever, nowhere are they to be interpreted more
> > liberally in favor of the right-holder than in the context of a criminal
> > law setting where his personal liberty is at stake. So, if you believe
> > that because a right is enumerated a United Nations declaration of human
> > rights it must be totally and completely UNLIMITED in scope, beyond all
> > common sense and reason (unless stipulated otherwise), then certainly
> > you'd have to have the same attitude when it comes to the rights of an
> > accused in a criminal law setting, where his physical liberty is in
> > jeopardy.
> > I know, it was just Beldumb being Beldumb, why do I bother. I'm still
> > hoping susan will come around and explain, in terms even I can
> > understand, why it's a bad idea to guarantee all citizens access to
> > quality health care, even if it costs her absolutely nothing.
> Beldin believes that fairness dictates that those without medical > insurance should be relegated to limited, second rate health care as a > way of punishing them for being so useless. A lot of right wingers think > that way, although Beldin doesn't admit to being a right winger.
nobody thinks that. the only way you can defend your idiot view is to
make shit up.
on my honey moon, my wife and i ate dinner a few nights with a middle aged
norwegian couple. the wife asked me why america doesn't give everybody
healthcare. later on the trip, we ate lunch with some french canadians
and a couple from idaho. the guy from idaho restored and collected old
guns. the canadians couldn't understand why anybody would want to own a
gun. the world is packed full of ignoramuses. it's remarkable that there
are only 100m intelligent people left, and that they all live in america.
mo_ntresor wrote:
> On Oct 14 2012 4:52 PM, Dutch wrote:
[..]
>> Beldin believes that fairness dictates that those without medical
>> insurance should be relegated to limited, second rate health care as a
>> way of punishing them for being so useless. A lot of right wingers think
>> that way, although Beldin doesn't admit to being a right winger.
> nobody thinks that.
It's what most right wing assholes believe. People like you are worse, you think those too unlucky or unmotivated to afford adequate health care can just rot. You think that's just natural selection in action.
Dutch wrote:
> mo_ntresor wrote:
>> On Oct 14 2012 4:52 PM, Dutch wrote:
> [..]
>>> Beldin believes that fairness dictates that those without medical
>>> insurance should be relegated to limited, second rate health care
>>> as a way of punishing them for being so useless. A lot of right
>>> wingers think that way, although Beldin doesn't admit to being a
>>> right winger.
>> nobody thinks that.
> It's what most right wing assholes believe. People like you are worse,
> you think those too unlucky or unmotivated to afford adequate health
> care can just rot. You think that's just natural selection in action.
Dutch, you did a great job being an ignorant moron in your initial post.
This follow-up is almost as good
