Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Revised Ramashiva Stock Market Portfolio
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  12 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
ramashiva  
View profile  
 More options Jul 24 2012, 4:29 am
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
From: ramashiva <ramashiv...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 01:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jul 24 2012 4:29 am
Subject: Revised Ramashiva Stock Market Portfolio
I want to get exact numbers nailed down, so there can be no dispute in
the future.  One of the reasons I am doing this is to dispel the myth
that the individual investor can't do better than the market
averages.  This is pernicious propaganda from the mutual fund
industry.

Turns out Pickle was right about BAC being the dog of my four stocks
in my original portfolio.  I decided I wanted to increase the
weighting of F, and I wanted to replace BAC with WFC.  So I sold half
my GE stock, and all of my BAC stock.  I then doubled my holding of F,
and added WFC to the portfolio.  My original example used a weighting
system which must have been confusing, because Jason couldn't
understand it.  Instead, I will present a model portfolio with the
same stock weighting as my actual portfolio.  You can scale this model
portfolio up or down to suit your needs.

100 shares WFC

200 shares FCX

200 shares GE

800 shares F

First, let's compute my actual cost basis for this portfolio.

100 shares WFC @ $33.30/share = $3330

200 shares FCX @ $33.30/share = $6660

200 shares GE @ $19.83/share = $3966

800 shares F @ $9.13/share = $7304

So my cost basis for this portfolio is  $21260

Now, let's compute the value of the portfolio at the end of trading
Monday --

100 shares WFC @ 33.44/share = $3344

200 shares FCX @ $32.62/share =  $6524

200 shares GE @ $20.09/share = $4018

800 shares F @ $9.17/share =   $7336

So the current value of the portfolio is     $21222

DJIA closed Monday at 12721.

It makes sense to use Monday's closing prices, since I bought these
stocks at different times.

William "The Life" Coleman  (ramashiva)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
O-PGManager  
View profile  
 More options Jul 24 2012, 12:59 pm
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
From: "O-PGManager" <ad63...@webnntp.invalid>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:59:01 -0700
Local: Tues, Jul 24 2012 12:59 pm
Subject: Re: Revised Ramashiva Stock Market Portfolio
On Jul 24 2012 4:29 AM, ramashiva wrote:

> I want to get exact numbers nailed down, so there can be no dispute in
> the future.  One of the reasons I am doing this is to dispel the myth
> that the individual investor can't do better than the market
> averages.

Can't do better "on average".  There will always be exceptions.

Opie G. Manager
Rec.Gambling.Poker
Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator Emeritus (2009-2011)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
mo_ntresor  
View profile  
 More options Jul 24 2012, 1:07 pm
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
From: "mo_ntresor" <amontilladofortun...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:07:58 -0700
Local: Tues, Jul 24 2012 1:07 pm
Subject: Re: Revised Ramashiva Stock Market Portfolio
On Jul 24 2012 10:59 AM, O-PGManager wrote:

> > I want to get exact numbers nailed down, so there can be no dispute in
> > the future.  One of the reasons I am doing this is to dispel the myth
> > that the individual investor can't do better than the market
> > averages.

> Can't do better "on average".  There will always be exceptions.

https://www.magicformulainvesting.com/Home/AboutTheBook

read the book, start an account, use the screener, and follow the plan.

mo_ntresor


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
ramashiva  
View profile  
 More options Jul 24 2012, 1:12 pm
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
From: ramashiva <ramashiv...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jul 24 2012 1:12 pm
Subject: Re: Revised Ramashiva Stock Market Portfolio
On Jul 24, 9:59 am, "O-PGManager" <ad63...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

> On Jul 24 2012 4:29 AM, ramashiva wrote:
> > I want to get exact numbers nailed down, so there can be no dispute in
> > the future.  One of the reasons I am doing this is to dispel the myth
> > that the individual investor can't do better than the market
> > averages.
> Can't do better "on average".  There will always be exceptions.

An informed investor who knows what he is doing can most certainly
beat the market averages.  There are many examples of such informed
investors.  I am one of them.

William "The Life" Coleman  (ramashiva)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
double.down.now@hotmail.c om  
View profile  
 More options Jul 24 2012, 1:32 pm
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
From: "double.down....@hotmail.com" <double.down....@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jul 24 2012 1:32 pm
Subject: Re: Revised Ramashiva Stock Market Portfolio
Most of the stock market's gains happen during just 3 months of the
year: Nov, Dec, and Jan. That is why I am 99% in cash until after the
election in Nov. Currently the only two stocks I own are CZR and MGM,
just a coupla hundred shares each which I started buying last week as
CZR's broke below $9 and MGM under $10. I believe within 3-6 mos of
the election we will see an federal internet-poker law passed which
will be a boon to both these companies, especially CZR since they own
the WSOP brand. Of course I may be wrong.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
ramashiva  
View profile  
 More options Jul 24 2012, 1:42 pm
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
From: ramashiva <ramashiv...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jul 24 2012 1:42 pm
Subject: Re: Revised Ramashiva Stock Market Portfolio
On Jul 24, 10:32 am, "double.down....@hotmail.com"

<double.down....@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Most of the stock market's gains happen during just 3 months of the
> year: Nov, Dec, and Jan. That is why I am 99% in cash until after the
> election in Nov. Currently the only two stocks I own are CZR and MGM,
> just a coupla hundred shares each which I started buying last week as
> CZR's broke below $9 and MGM under $10. I believe within 3-6 mos of
> the election we will see an federal internet-poker law passed which
> will be a boon to both these companies, especially CZR since they own
> the WSOP brand. Of course I may be wrong.

Friday night I crashed your party
Saturday I said i'm sorry
Sunday came and trashed me out again
I was only having fun
Wasn't hurting any one
And we all enjoyed the weekend for a change
I've been stranded in the combat zone
I walked through Bedford Stuy alone
Even rode my motorcycle in the rain
And you told me not to drive
But I made it home alive
So you said that only proves that i'm insane
You may be right
I may be crazy
But it just may be a lunatic you're looking for
Turn out the light
Don't try to save me
You may be wrong for all I know
But you may be right
Remember how I found you there
Alone in your electric chair
I told you dirty jokes until you smiled
You were lonely for a man

I said take me as I am
Cause you might enjoy some madness for a while
Now think of all the years you tried to
Find someone to satisfy you
I might be as crazy as you say
If i'm crazy then it's true
That it's all because of you
And you wouldn't want me any other way
You may be right
I may be crazy
But it just may be a lunatic you're looking for
It's too late to fight
It's too late to change me
You may be wrong for all I know
But you may be right
You may be right
I may be crazy
But it just may be a lunatic you're looking for
Turn out the light
Don't try to save me
You may be wrong for all I know
But you may be right
You may be wrong but you may be right
You may be wrong but you may be right

-- Billy Joel

Your suggestions on how to capitalize on legalization of internet
poker are excellent.

William "The Life" Coleman  (ramashiva)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
QN  
View profile  
 More options Jul 24 2012, 2:09 pm
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
From: "QN" <hidingfrom...@example.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:09:31 -0700
Local: Tues, Jul 24 2012 2:09 pm
Subject: Re: Revised Ramashiva Stock Market Portfolio
I looked at CZR and found that they are an 8 dollar stock that lost over 6
dollars in the most recent quarter. They also have huge debt (20 billion).

They are projected to lose another 4 dolars per share in the next quarter.
IMHO -get out asap.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
O-PGManager  
View profile  
 More options Jul 24 2012, 3:21 pm
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
From: "O-PGManager" <ad63...@webnntp.invalid>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:21:48 -0700
Local: Tues, Jul 24 2012 3:21 pm
Subject: Re: Revised Ramashiva Stock Market Portfolio
On Jul 24 2012 1:12 PM, ramashiva wrote:

> On Jul 24, 9:59 am, "O-PGManager" <ad63...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

> > On Jul 24 2012 4:29 AM, ramashiva wrote:

> > > I want to get exact numbers nailed down, so there can be no dispute in
> > > the future. One of the reasons I am doing this is to dispel the myth
> > > that the individual investor can't do better than the market
> > > averages.

> > Can't do better "on average". There will always be exceptions.

Of course you "can".  Everyone "can" beat the house at blackjack too. The
question is for how long?

Opie G. Manager
Rec.Gambling.Poker
Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator Emeritus (2009-2011)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
ramashiva  
View profile  
 More options Jul 24 2012, 3:35 pm
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
From: ramashiva <ramashiv...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:35:11 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jul 24 2012 3:35 pm
Subject: Re: Revised Ramashiva Stock Market Portfolio
On Jul 24, 12:21 pm, "O-PGManager" <ad63...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

> On Jul 24 2012 1:12 PM, ramashiva wrote:

> > On Jul 24, 9:59 am, "O-PGManager" <ad63...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

> > > On Jul 24 2012 4:29 AM, ramashiva wrote:

> > > > I want to get exact numbers nailed down, so there can be no dispute in
> > > > the future. One of the reasons I am doing this is to dispel the myth
> > > > that the individual investor can't do better than the market
> > > > averages.

> > > Can't do better "on average". There will always be exceptions.

> Of course you "can".  Everyone "can" beat the house at blackjack too. The
> question is for how long?

No, Opie. Stop showing your ignorance.  Everyone can't beat 21.  Most
experienced card counters can't beat the game.  Why?  There are
several reasons --

Because they are undercapitalized and eventually get wiped out by a
bad losing streak.

Because they have no emotional control, and they lose it when the
cards run against them.

Because they are being cheated by a seconds dealer or a bottoms
dealer.

Some people beat the market over extended periods, not because they
are lucky, but because they know what they are doing.

Did you read Mo Ron's link upthread?

Here is the Amazon review --

Two years in MBA school won't teach you how to double the market's
return. Two hours with The Little Book That Beats the Market will.

In The Little Book, Joel Greenblatt, Founder and Managing Partner at
Gotham Capital (with average annualized returns of 40% for over 20
years), does more than simply set out the basic principles for
successful stock market investing. He provides a "magic formula" that
is easy to use and makes buying good companies at bargain prices
automatic. Though the formula has been extensively tested and is a
breakthrough in the academic and professional world, Greenblatt
explains it using 6th grade math, plain language and humor. You'll
learn how to use this low risk method to beat the market and
professional managers by a wide margin. You'll also learn how to view
the stock market, why success eludes almost all individual and
professional investors, and why the formula will continue to work even
after everyone "knows" it.

In 2005, Joel Greenblatt published a book that is already considered
one of the classics of finance literature. In The Little Book that
Beats the Market—a New York Times bestseller with 300,000 copies in
print—Greenblatt explained how investors can outperform the popular
market averages by simply and systematically applying a formula that
seeks out good businesses when they are available at bargain prices.
Now, with a new Introduction and Afterword for 2010, The Little Book
that Still Beats the Market updates and expands upon the research
findings from the original book. Included are data and analysis
covering the recent financial crisis and model performance through the
end of 2009. In a straightforward and accessible style, the book
explores the basic principles of successful stock market investing and
then reveals the author’s time-tested formula that makes buying above
average companies at below average prices automatic. Though the
formula has been extensively tested and is a breakthrough in the
academic and professional world, Greenblatt explains it using 6th
grade math, plain language and humor. He shows how to use his method
to beat both the market and professional managers by a wide margin.
You’ll also learn why success eludes almost all individual and
professional investors, and why the formula will continue to work even
after everyone “knows” it.
While the formula may be simple, understanding why the formula works
is the true key to success for investors. The book will take readers
on a step-by-step journey so that they can learn the principles of
value investing in a way that will provide them with a long term
strategy that they can understand and stick with through both good and
bad periods for the stock market.

As the Wall Street Journal stated about the original edition, “Mr.
Greenblatt…says his goal was to provide advice that, while
sophisticated, could be understood and followed by his five children,
ages 6 to 15. They are in luck. His ‘Little Book’ is one of the best,
clearest guides to value investing out there.”

An Exclusive Q&A with Author Joel Greenblatt
It's been five years since you first published The Little Book That
Beats the Market. Have your thoughts changed at all about the
effectiveness of value investing?

In my mind, the principles of value investing have not changed. As
we've learned yet again, markets can be volatile and emotional. They
often go to extremes of pessimism and optimism, and prices can and
often do fluctuate wildly and significantly over short periods of
time. As a result, Mr. Market can provide some excellent opportunities
to purchase bargain priced stocks when people are unduly pessimistic.
This is where value investing comes in. Buying companies below their
true value is the road to being a successful investor. The magic
formula found in the Little Book seeks to buy a group of above average
companies but only when they are available at below average prices.
Because it is a formula, it seeks to do this in an unemotional way
that can take advantage of the market's mood swings. Ben Graham taught
us these lessons in the 1930s and the principles still hold as well
today as when he first wrote them down more than 70 years ago.

Do you think individual investors should re-think their investment
strategy as a result of the recent market crash and recession?

I think the best lesson that can be learned from the recent price drop
and partial recovery is that stocks are volatile. For most people,
stocks should represent a portion of their investment portfolio
because I still believe that over the long term they will provide
superior returns relative to most alternative investments. However,
whether that portion of an investment portfolio devoted to stock
investments should be 40% of an investor's portfolio or 80% is a very
individual decision. How much are you willing (or able) to lose before
you panic out? There's no sense investing such a large portion of your
assets in a long-term strategy if you can't take the pain when your
chosen strategy doesn't work out for a period of years. The "magic
formula" found in the book can underperform the market for years. It
can also lose money if the market goes down. But it is also a strategy
that makes a lot of sense and that should work well for investors over
the long term.

Can you explain the Magic Formula's basic strategy in one sentence?

The Magic Formula strategy is a long-term investment strategy designed
to help investors buy a group of above-average companies but only when
they are available at below-average prices.

You make reference in the new afterword to receiving a number of
emails from readers after the The Little Book That Beats the Market
was published. Could you share with us some of the comments you
received?

I received many emails after the first edition of the book was
published. Some suggested that the strategy was working great for them
while others reported that they had waited over a year and the
strategy was underperforming. These results and emails are consistent
with the message of the book. Over the five years since the book was
published, the strategy earned very nice returns for investors, but
the ride was bumpy. Not only did the formula underperform for a period
of time, in 2008 it lost money along with the market. Overall, the
formula performed quite well but only for those who maintained a true
long-term perspective. This is easier said than done. In the new
afterword, I try to give more facts, color and information about the
strategy that I hope will help investors be successful in taking full
advantage of the magic formula over the long term. Of course, I also
got plenty of emails where investors just asked us to do it all for
them. Other emails asked us to apply the formula internationally. As a
result, we have worked on both of these projects over the last several
years.

 In the new afterword, you write "Beating the market isn't the same
thing as making money." Can you elaborate on this and why it's a
difficult concept to swallow at times?

Since the strategy involves buying a portfolio that is 100% long the
stock market, if the stock market goes down, our portfolio may well go
down, too. If the market drops 40% and we beat the market by losing
only 38%, this is small consolation. As I say in the afterword, while
I firmly believe that for most people an investment in the stock
market should represent a substantial portion of your investment
portfolio, how big that portion should be can vary widely. For some it
can be well over half of assets, for others well less than half might
be appropriate. The magic formula strategy is a wonderful strategy for
that portion of your portfolio that you choose to invest in the stock
market. In fact, I truly believe that the magic formula remains one of
your best options. How much to invest in the stock market, however, is
a very personal decision that should be partially based on your
ability to withstand short-term negative price movements. One
encouraging fact, though, discussed in the afterword is the
performance of our large cap portfolio over the last decade. Over that
period, the market as measured by the S&P 500 was actually down, yet
our backtests showed that following the formula over those same ten
years would have resulted in a more than tripling of your money.
Unfortunately, those great long-term returns came with plenty of
bumps, including some not so short periods of losses and
underperformance. But once again, if the formula worked every day,
every month and ...

read more »


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
O-PGManager  
View profile  
 More options Jul 24 2012, 7:42 pm
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
From: "O-PGManager" <ad63...@webnntp.invalid>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:42:14 -0700
Local: Tues, Jul 24 2012 7:42 pm
Subject: Re: Revised Ramashiva Stock Market Portfolio
On Jul 24 2012 3:35 PM, ramashiva wrote:

Everyone can sit down one night and beat the game.

Opie G. Manager
Rec.Gambling.Poker
Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator Emeritus (2009-2011)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Clave  
View profile  
 More options Jul 25 2012, 1:29 am
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
From: "Clave" <clav...@the.monastery.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:29:06 -0500
Local: Wed, Jul 25 2012 1:29 am
Subject: Re: Revised Ramashiva Stock Market Portfolio
"ramashiva" <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:48f739b5-a3b2-4a8d-ba7b-ef302c42ae28@nw7g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

> I want to get exact numbers nailed down, so there can be no dispute in
> the future...

Do you need group approval to take a dump too?

Jim


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
double.down.now@hotmail.c om  
View profile  
 More options Jul 25 2012, 9:58 pm
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
From: "double.down....@hotmail.com" <double.down....@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Jul 25 2012 9:58 pm
Subject: Re: Revised Ramashiva Stock Market Portfolio
On Jul 24, 12:42 pm, ramashiva <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote:

Another GREAT one from Joel:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-CQk2U0LAE&feature=related


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »