Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

For Peg from Daniel N.

6 views
Skip to first unread message

Daniel Negreanu

unread,
Feb 19, 2003, 6:37:51 AM2/19/03
to
I get it now. You want me to explain why I dropped the whole UB
thing? Ahhh, ok. First of all, when I say, "I'll say whatever I feel
like sayin'" this certainly applies.

Nonetheless, let's appease Peg shall we? The reason I dropped the
whole UB thing was because I have friends who invested in the site so
I decided to just old dogs lie. I said my peace about it, and didn't
see the need to go into any more detail. Truth is though, if it
wasn't for them asking me to drop it, I probably wouldn't have.

Daniel Negreanu
kidp...@hotmail.com
www.fullcontactpoker.com

Gary Carson

unread,
Feb 19, 2003, 6:42:35 AM2/19/03
to
On 19 Feb 2003 03:37:51 -0800, kidp...@hotmail.com (Daniel Negreanu)
wrote:

>see the need to go into any more detail. Truth is though, if it
>wasn't for them asking me to drop it, I probably wouldn't have.
>

I see. So you're only censored if the people that loan you money have
a financial stake in it.

Gary Carson
http://www.garycarson.com

Peg Smith

unread,
Feb 19, 2003, 7:14:19 AM2/19/03
to
In article <7220404a.03021...@posting.google.com>,
kidp...@hotmail.com (Daniel Negreanu) writes:

>Nonetheless, let's appease Peg shall we? The reason I dropped the
>whole UB thing was because I have friends who invested in the site so
>I decided to just old dogs lie. I said my peace about it, and didn't
>see the need to go into any more detail. Truth is though, if it
>wasn't for them asking me to drop it, I probably wouldn't have.

As I recall, you didn't say much of a piece about it at all, you let Robert
Ladd do your talking (and take the heat) for you.

You then told me privately that your friends (UB investors) were pressuring you
to shut the hell up, but you would still tell the truth when asked about it.
I've since directed several pointed questions to you on RGP and
LiveActionPoker.com, and you've given new meaning to the term, "fancy dancing."


Your claims of independence and integrity are sounding more hollow every day,
Danny.

Peg

Daniel Negreanu

unread,
Feb 19, 2003, 7:47:05 AM2/19/03
to
On Feb 19 2003 4:14AM, Peg Smith wrote:
>
>
> Your claims of independence and integrity are sounding more hollow every day,
> Danny.
>
> Peg

You home girl where da love baby, daaaamn? Whaddya wan' from me
girl? I'm tellin' you on the level girl, I speak my minds and says
what I wanna. I don't wanna go on with dat whole UB smack y'know what
I'm sayin'? I covered that B. Next cause na i'm sayin'? Pee---ace.

Daniel Negreanu
kidp...@hotmail.com
www.fullcontactpoker.com

Daniel Negreanu

unread,
Feb 19, 2003, 8:03:28 AM2/19/03
to
On Feb 19 2003 4:37AM, Peg Smith wrote:

> In article <7220404a.03021...@posting.google.com>,
> kidp...@hotmail.com (Daniel Negreanu) writes:
>

> >...You a cheat, I'll say so.
> >You a bi-atch-- I'll say so.
> >You a angle shooter, I'll let my peoples know.
> >You a fraud? huh, I'll expose you and feel no way…y'understan?
>
> Fair enough.
>
> So...what happened in Aruba that your investor friends at UB don't want you to
> tell us about? Was Russ Hamilton's explanation on RGP the truth, the whole
> truth, and nothing but the truth? Why won't you tell the whole gang here what
> you told me in email?
>
> Peg


What do you want to know that hasn't already been said??? When I
said I'd travel to Timbuktu to play in a $250,000 freeroll, and didn't
go to Aruba, was that not clear enough? Spelled out, it means "They
had no plans of giving away $250,000 to their pros until the shit hit
the fan." That's the deal, this is like beating a dead horse. That's
the deal, that's what was being hidden. Are you done yet? or can I
get back to my Annie bashing, lol.


Daniel Negreanu
kidp...@hotmail.com
www.fullcontactpoker.com

NWBurbsCouple

unread,
Feb 19, 2003, 10:04:44 AM2/19/03
to
English only, please.

Craig Permenter

unread,
Feb 19, 2003, 11:12:58 AM2/19/03
to
I didn't know Daniel was a wanna' be.


"Daniel Negreanu" <kidp...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7220404a.03021...@posting.google.com...

Newgca

unread,
Feb 19, 2003, 2:00:34 PM2/19/03
to
> What do you want to know that hasn't already been said??? When I
>said I'd travel to Timbuktu to play in a $250,000 freeroll, and didn't
>go to Aruba, was that not clear enough? Spelled out, it means "They
>had no plans of giving away $250,000 to their pros until the shit hit
>the fan." That's the deal, this is like beating a dead horse. That's
>the deal, that's what was being hidden. Are you done yet? or can I
>get back to my Annie bashing, lol.
>
>
>Daniel Negreanu
>kidp...@hotmail.com
>www.fullcontactpoker.com


It may be fun to beat a dead horse. Noe fess up to the e mail you sent me. You
know Doyle is a cheat, as most others who play for a living do also.

Russ Georgiev

AlwaysAware

unread,
Feb 19, 2003, 2:46:24 PM2/19/03
to
Russ:

Let's stick to one conspiracy at a time, shall we? What is particuriarly
interesting on this one is how you come on this newsforum and "inform us" (even
though someone who was there beat you to the punch) then after a phone call
here and there you back off of this one, that is interesting, your style of
firing until you hit something isn't (all that interesting).

Joan

Louis F.

unread,
Feb 19, 2003, 3:44:19 PM2/19/03
to
>
>So...what happened in Aruba that your investor friends at UB don't
want you >to tell us about? Was Russ Hamilton's explanation on RGP the
truth, the whole
>truth, and nothing but the truth? Why won't you tell the whole gang
here >whatyou told me in email?

> >
> > Peg
>
>
> What do you want to know that hasn't already been said??? When I
> said I'd travel to Timbuktu to play in a $250,000 freeroll, and didn't
> go to Aruba, was that not clear enough? Spelled out, it means "They
> had no plans of giving away $250,000 to their pros until the shit hit
> the fan."

"Calling coincidence after coincidence after coincidence a coincidence
is just plain stupid."

LF

Octo the Genarian

unread,
Feb 19, 2003, 6:12:48 PM2/19/03
to
>your style of
> firing until you hit something isn't (all that interesting).
>

Yes. People with short memories may not realize how often Russ has been dead
wrong. For a pleasant refresher, they should google his Nostrodamus-like
predictions about the WSOP being fixed for X. No wait make that Y. No, no...
Z.

And of course if either X, Y, or Z had one, we would never have heard the
end of it.


AlwaysAware

unread,
Feb 19, 2003, 6:35:31 PM2/19/03
to
PegSmithNow wrote:

> So...what happened in Aruba that your investor friends at UB don't want you
>to
>> tell us about? Was Russ Hamilton's explanation on RGP the truth, the whole
>> truth, and nothing but the truth? Why won't you tell the whole gang here
>what
>> you told me in email?

Daniel responded in part:

>What do you want to know that hasn't already been said???


OK, I'll take a guess... Shortly before this hit rgp I had heard about it from
someone that was there with access. Since I have no first hand knowledge there
was no reason for me to jump in on this forum...

But, once Russ H. made the PR post, I closed (or should say tried too) my
Ultimate Bet account, with reason.

Now Peg is asking you a question, though be it in the style of "A Few Good Men"
(smile) in reference to that PR post AND something you told her in an email.
So, my guess would be if you put the two of them together, surely you can
figure out what she is asking you.


Joan

0 new messages