Hey Chris Robins how's that Iranian Nuclear thing going?
Juan Tanamera
Some pearls from the Iranian apologist Chris Robins:
"Obama's efforts to engage Iran over their nuclear ambitions has led
the Iranians to offer to ship their nuclear material to Russia for
re-processing (meaning they will not have the materials, equipment, or
know-how to refine their stockpile to weapons grade). Diplomacy
works."
"I don't necessarily "trust" anyone. However, Iran has honored their
obligations under the NNPT, including allowing IAEA inspections of
theirnuclear facilities � something that U.S. allies Israel and India
haverefused to submit to. Despite propaganda from the likes of
Krauthammer, Iran has been extremely forthcoming about their nuclear
activities. As far as I'm concerned, they get the benefit of the doubt
until proven otherwise."
"Feel free to challenge me on any of the facts. Otherwise, STFU
already. You're in over your head here, Lucky Charms."
Chris If you haven't notice your buddies over in Iran are making you
look very foolish to the point where you owe Irish Mike an apology,
but we all know that won't happen. Be a man Chris, step up to the
plate and admit Irish Mike was right and you were wrong.
"Diplomacy Works" --- ROFLMFAO
ChrisRobin
Iran is making ME look foolish because it refuses to accept a deal that
interferes with its clear right to enrich uranium for civilian purposes
under the NNPT? Ha!
Iran is still in accordance with its treaty obligations. As long as it
continues to honor them, the United States has no legal basis for
strong-arming Iran into giving up its right to uranium enrichment.
Negotiations are still ongoing. Perhaps it would behoove you to save your
ignorant taunting until the details have been hammered out?
----�
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
risky biz
Hey, Juano, why doesn't the United States ship all it's nuclear material
to someone else to be reprocessed?
--------�
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
Paul Popinjay
news:gd6ft6x...@recgroups.com...
>
> Iran is still in accordance with its treaty obligations. As long as it
> continues to honor them, the United States has no legal basis for
> strong-arming Iran into giving up its right to uranium enrichment.
>
Treaties are like pie crusts, you tool.
ChrisRobin
Flaky and delicious?
________________________________________________________________________�
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
ChrisRobin
Indeed. Perhaps Juan could explain to us exactly how the United States has
any moral or legal justification in determining who does/doesn't have
nuclear capabilities. And why this same standard isn't applied to Israel,
which refuses to discuss its nuclear arsenal publicly and has totally
refused to be inspected by the IAEA or to sign the NNPT.
What say you, foreign policy genius?
risky biz
Juano's mental faculties have apparently been overloaded.
----�
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
Juan Tanamera
I don't know you but it seems to me that a lot of people in this
newsgroup perceive you as a dope, now I know why.
Juan Tanamera
Had to go away on business for 2 days, but let it be known right here
and now I can win an argument on any topic, against any opponent.
People know this, and thus steer clear of me at parties. Often as a
sign of their great respect, they don't even invite me.
Juan Tanamera
Well, first off compared to you, the current administration and Bush
too, just about everybody is a foreign policy genius.
If you want Iran, the world's primary state sponsor of terrorism and
the regime that has been targeting and killing Americans for some 30
years to have nuclear capabilities then what exactly does that say
about your intellect and sanity.
You know Chris, I have read a number of your post and what you call
facts, seem to me to be nothing more than the opinions of some obscure
radical left wing blogger that you read somewhere. So let me give you
some absolute facts:
1- On 9/17/2009 the AP reported on a secret IAEA document that stated
Iran now has the ability to make a nuclear bomb and is working to
build the delivery system needed for the weapon
2- In its offical August 28th report the IAEA in unusually forthright
language said the intelligence was too consistent, comprehensive and
detailed, coming from multiple sources at different times, for Iran to
keep dodging scrutiny with blanket denials.
3- The IAEA report indicated Iran will have sufficient quantities of
uranium to build two atomic bombs by February
I'm telling you Chris, you're here in a poker newsgroup so I figure
your a poker player yet you can't read your opponents at all. Can't
you see the game Iran is playing. What short of Tel Aviv being a pile
of ashes is going to convince you? But then again that seems to be
what you want.
brewmaster
> Well, first off compared to you, the current administration and Bush
> too, just about everybody is a foreign policy genius.
>
> If you want Iran, the world's primary state sponsor of terrorism and
> the regime that has been targeting and killing Americans for some 30
> years to have nuclear capabilities then what exactly does that say
> about your intellect and sanity.
>
> You know Chris, I have read a number of your post and what you call
> facts, seem to me to be nothing more than the opinions of some obscure
> radical left wing blogger that you read somewhere. So let me give you
> some absolute facts:
>
> 1- On 9/17/2009 the AP reported on a secret IAEA document that stated
> Iran now has the ability to make a nuclear bomb and is working to
> build the delivery system needed for the weapon
>
> 2- In its offical August 28th report the IAEA in unusually forthright
> language said the intelligence was too consistent, comprehensive and
> detailed, coming from multiple sources at different times, for Iran to
> keep dodging scrutiny with blanket denials.
>
> 3- The IAEA report indicated Iran will have sufficient quantities of
> uranium to build two atomic bombs by February
>
> I'm telling you Chris, you're here in a poker newsgroup so I figure
> your a poker player yet you can't read your opponents at all. Can't
> you see the game Iran is playing. What short of Tel Aviv being a pile
> of ashes is going to convince you? But then again that seems to be
> what you want.
Juan,
Chris (and his buddy Risky) wants the Muslim countries to develop nuclear
weapons so they can eradicate Israel from the earth. Both of them see
Israel as the great evil of the world. They are both huge Muslim
apologists. In their eyes, Muslims can do no wrong.
Brew
--
Hatred is purity...weakness is disease!
FEAR - Foreign Policy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOCcbKAhlY0
--------�
risky biz
If Iran is doing so much wrong, Brew, why does Mo have to post totally
unadulterated bullshit to back up his opinion? Not that I think facts mean
anything to someone who said a few inches away that he would like to see a
neutron bomb dropped on Afghanistan because . . . well, because they're
different from beautiful Americans and Israelis, I guess.
________________________________________________________________________�
risky biz
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:55:15 -0800, "risky biz"
> <risk...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >Hey, Juano, why doesn't the United States ship all it's nuclear material
> >to someone else to be reprocessed?
> >
> I don't know you but it seems to me that a lot of people in this
> newsgroup perceive you as a dope, now I know why.
Well, I guess that's easier than answering a simple question. Which proves
how smart you are.
Juan Tanamera
<risk...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On Nov 20 2009 5:50 PM, Juan Tanamera wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:55:15 -0800, "risky biz"
>> <risk...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> >Hey, Juano, why doesn't the United States ship all it's nuclear material
>> >to someone else to be reprocessed?
>> >
>> I don't know you but it seems to me that a lot of people in this
>> newsgroup perceive you as a dope, now I know why.
>
>Well, I guess that's easier than answering a simple question. Which proves
>how smart you are.
>
>_____________________________________________________________________�
>* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
Your question doesn't warrant an answer. It's an illogical anti
American rant which makes absolutely no sense thus earning you your
apt reputation. And the sad part is you have no idea why it makes no
sense, in your mind it's a brillant retort, which just goes to show
how screwed up you really are.
Paul Popinjay
news:mjteg55tpe5dv6neu...@4ax.com...
> And the sad part is you have no idea why it makes no
> sense, in your mind it's a brillant retort, which just goes to show
> how screwed up you really are.
Risky is one sick puppy. Woof!
risky biz
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:25:50 -0800, "risky biz"
> <risk...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >On Nov 20 2009 5:50 PM, Juan Tanamera wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:55:15 -0800, "risky biz"
> >> <risk...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >
> >> >Hey, Juano, why doesn't the United States ship all it's nuclear material
> >> >to someone else to be reprocessed?
> >> >
> >> I don't know you but it seems to me that a lot of people in this
> >> newsgroup perceive you as a dope, now I know why.
> >
> >Well, I guess that's easier than answering a simple question. Which proves
> >how smart you are.
> >
> Your question doesn't warrant an answer. It's an illogical anti
> American rant which makes absolutely no sense thus earning you your
> apt reputation. And the sad part is you have no idea why it makes no
> sense, in your mind it's a brillant retort, which just goes to show
> how screwed up you really are.
"Hey, Juano, why doesn't the United States ship all it's nuclear material
to someone else to be reprocessed?"
That's an anti-American rant, Juano? Jesus, you're weak.
_______________________________________________________________________�
risky biz
That's it. Go ahead. Pile on and jump in the dunce wagon with Juano.
Paul Popinjay
news:nmjlt6x...@recgroups.com...
> On Nov 20 2009 11:08 PM, Paul Popinjay wrote:
>
>> "Juan Tanamera" <noe...@noemail.com> wrote in message
>> news:mjteg55tpe5dv6neu...@4ax.com...
>>
>> > And the sad part is you have no idea why it makes no
>> > sense, in your mind it's a brillant retort, which just goes to show
>> > how screwed up you really are.
>>
>>
>>
>> Risky is one sick puppy. Woof!
>
> That's it. Go ahead. Pile on and jump in the dunce wagon with Juano.
>
That's ridiculous. Juan is no more a dunce than I am.
risky biz
But he doesn't realize it. That's extra points.
-----�
Paul Popinjay
>
> Had to go away on business for 2 days, but let it be known right here
> and now I can win an argument on any topic, against any opponent.
> People know this, and thus steer clear of me at parties. Often as a
> sign of their great respect, they don't even invite me.
You tell 'em, Juan! I'm impressed so far. Bitch-slap the ever-loving fuck
out of them!