> I asked you for a cite weeks ago and all i got was crickets chirping. > Still hear them in fact.
You got them, you simply couldn’t address them. All you said was,
"Gasland, LOL." And therein were all the name, addresses, facts and
adjudications. Plus you never addressed why NY and Penn have stopped all
drilling. You got the facts, you just can't address them
> Bottom line is there is not one reported case of shale fracking fluid
> contaminating ground water.
Yet I provided a list and they named the courts and adjudications. You
even mentions some where "operators screwed up."
> Prove me wrong or STFU.
I did, you simply won't STFU and continue to dodge.
> > > > > > > > > > > > "Two months after the drilling began on two
hydrofracking
> > > wells
> > > > > > > within
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > mile of her property, Kim McEvoy of Evans City, PA
began
> to
> > > > > notice
> > > > > > > her
> > > > > > > > > > > > well water turning black and emitting a foul odor. The
> > > smell of
> > > > > > > rotten
> > > > > > > > > > > > eggs was so strong that it would wake me up when the
> shower
> > > was
> > > > > > > running
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > the next room, Kim said, adding that headaches,
constant
> > > > > fatigue and
> > > > > > > > > > > > growing health concerns followed. Referring to her
> pursuit
> > > of an
> > > > > > > > > > > > explanation for the high levels of toxic chemicals in
her
> > > well
> > > > > > > water, a
> > > > > > > > > > > > resident of Susquehanna County slated to take questions
> at
> > > the
> > > > > press
> > > > > > > > > > > > conference said, I felt helpless. Hopeless. Absolutely
> > > > > hopeless. . .
> > > > > > > > > > > > [Southwestern Energy] said, We are not going to help
> you. > > > It s
> > > > > just
> > > > > > > > me
> > > > > > > > > > > > up against a giant oil and gas corporation. My water is
> > > ruined,
> > > > > my
> > > > > > > > > > > > property value is totally done for.
> > > > > > > > > > > I looked at the first 5 hits googleing this story and not
> one
> > > > > mentioned
> > > > > > > > > > > Shale. Shale is way to deep to have been the issue. > Almost
> > > all
> > > > > gas
> > > > > > > > wells
> > > > > > > > > > > get fracked. Apples and oranges.
> > > > > > > > > > No, not apples and oranges. Fracking involves high pressure
> > > shocks.
> > > > > The
> > > > > > > > well
> > > > > > > > > casings going down from
> > > > > > > > > > the surface can crack or break. Poison leaks into the
> drinking
> > > > > water. The
> > > > > > > > > drinking water is
> > > > > > > > > > poisoned, and in some cases can be ignited. Do you deny
this
> has
> > > > > happened
> > > > > > > > > and is happening?
> > > > > > > > > > Jerry "The Real Truth" 'n Vegas
> > > > > > > > > As I said there have been frac problems in the past. I know
of
> a
> > > case
> > > > > > > > > where chicken feathers came out of a water well from
> fracking..
> > > But
> > > > > it is
> > > > > > > > > much safer to frac deep than shallow and shale is deep. > Therefore
> > > > > deep is
> > > > > > > > > safer than shallow.
> > > > > > > > Don't you have to chemically blast through the same rock
whether
> you
> > > are
> > > > > > > > going "deep" or "shallow"?
> > > > > > > The point is that in traditional recovery, oil and gas may be
> shallow
> > > and
> > > > > > > fracking can and has caused pollution of well water.
> > > > > > > Shale it so deep
> > > > > > > that that the water found is non drinkable anyway.
> > > > > > It's about the casings breaking at any depth and leaking the poison
> down
> > > the
> > > > > outside of the casings
> > > > > > and into water at any depth.
> > > > > > > It's salty and full of
> > > > > > > all kinds of nasty stuff. Look at the chemical compensation of
> steam
> > > from
> > > > > > > most geo-thermal wells. There are no reported cases of shale
> > > fracking
> > > > > > > polluting water wells from the actual fracking.
> > > > > > All evidence, proof and adjudicated court cases to the contrary.
> > > > > Try and keep up
> > > > I did. Now about that 'never happened' of yours.....
> > > > Peoples' ground water has been poisned and you know it.
> > > > > > > There have been chemical
> > > > > > > spills and illegal dumping of the used frack fluids just as there
> has
> > > been
> > > > > > > for decades of traditional fracking and production. Oil and gas
> > > > > > > production is and has always been a dirty business. But modern
> > > > > > > technology has reduced the danger to a very low level.
> > > > > > So how's that "Never happened" doing for you?
> > > > > Same as before, no reported cases
> > > > Bullshit and you know that, too.
> > > > So why have NY and Penn stopped it?
> > > > Jerry 'n Vegas
> > > > > > > Bad actors excluded
> > > > > > > (BP anyone?). Read the Yale study, the potential impact of a
> clean up
> > > is
> > > > > > > minor compared to the economic boost to the economy.
> > > > > > > The knee jerk side of this equation wants you to think that
> fracking
> > > will
> > > > > > > cause the end of drinking water.
> > > > > > Like it has in many locations.
> > > > > > > They base this on a sketchy computer
> > > > > > > model of fluids percolating up 2 miles into aquifers. The
> geology and
> > > > > > > economics of the shale plays are sound.
> > > > > > So why has New York and I believe Pennsylvania stopped it?
> > > > > > > Where wet gas and oil are found
> > > > > > > it's a good investment for operators. Where it's only dry gas
the
> > > profit
> > > > > > > is not there since shale gas has driven the MMBTU cost down so
far
> > > (from
> > > > > > > 7.00 in 2008 to 2.80ish today). It won't be until the wet gas
> plays
> > > out
> > > > > > > that dry gas will be economical to go after. As Chris Robin
points
> > > out,
> > > > > > > speculators have driven the cost per acre out of reach in many
> places
> > > and
> > > > > > > many investors were screwed but that has calmed way down. An
acre
> > > > > > > (mineral rights) in Haynesville has dropped from 13k down to a
> couple
> > > of
> > > > > > > thousand. Eagle Ford lease bonuses peeked at 26K but have been
> > > dropping
> > > > > > > now the hysteria has calmed own.
> > > > > > > This doesn't mean we shouldn't monitor the operators, there have
> always
> > > > > > > been issues with chemical spills and dumping in the industry.
> Shale
> > > is
> > > > > > > no different.
> > > > > > > Brian "The Truth" Spencer
> > > > > > GASLAND, it's fact.
> > > LOL at gasland.
> > Make that nervous laughter; it's what brought you down.
> > Now where is that statement of your? Remember?
> > "There is not one verified case of water contamination from shale
fracking."
> > Care to eat those words again? Care to even repost them after a few of us
> have proved it wrong? You
> > really have to find a better site for your information; you've been
> repeatedly lied to.
> > Jerry 'n Vegas
> > > I see you did not read the Colorado report debunking
> > > Gasland. Colorado know for it's strong environmental movement no less.
> > > Try this one Jerry
> > > "However, using the same investigative techniques, we concluded that Mike
> > > Markham’s and Renee McClure’s wells contained biogenic gas that was not
> > > related to oil and gas activity. Unfortunately,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "Two months after the drilling began on two
> hydrofracking
> > > > wells
> > > > > > > > within
> > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > mile of her property, Kim McEvoy of Evans City, PA
> began
> > to
> > > > > > notice
> > > > > > > > her
> > > > > > > > > > > > > well water turning black and emitting a foul odor. The
> > > > smell of
> > > > > > > > rotten
> > > > > > > > > > > > > eggs was so strong that it would wake me up when the
> > shower
> > > > was
> > > > > > > > running
> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the next room, Kim said, adding that headaches,
> constant
> > > > > > fatigue and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > growing health concerns followed. Referring to her
> > pursuit
> > > > of an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation for the high levels of toxic chemicals in
> her
> > > > well
> > > > > > > > water, a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > resident of Susquehanna County slated to take questions
> > at
> > > > the
> > > > > > press
> > > > > > > > > > > > > conference said, I felt helpless. Hopeless. Absolutely
> > > > > > hopeless. . .
> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Southwestern Energy] said, We are not going to help
> > you. > > > > It s
> > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > > me
> > > > > > > > > > > > > up against a giant oil and gas corporation. My water is
> > > > ruined,
> > > > > > my
> > > > > > > > > > > > > property value is totally done for.
> > > > > > > > > > > > I looked at the first 5 hits googleing this story and not
> > one
> > > > > > mentioned
> > > > > > > > > > > > Shale. Shale is way to deep to have been the issue. > > Almost
> > > > all
> > > > > > gas
> > > > > > > > > wells
> > > > > > > > > > > > get fracked. Apples and oranges.
> > > > > > > > > > > No, not apples and oranges. Fracking involves high pressure
> > > > shocks.
> > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > well
> > > > > > > > > > casings going down from
> > > > > > > > > > > the surface can crack or break. Poison leaks into the
> > drinking
> > > > > > water. The
> > > > > > > > > > drinking water is
> > > > > > > > > > > poisoned, and in some cases can be ignited. Do you deny
> this
> > has
> > > > > > happened
> > > > > > > > > > and is happening?
> > > > > > > > > > > Jerry "The Real Truth" 'n Vegas
> > > > > > > > > > As I said there have been frac problems in the past. I know
> of
> > a
> > > > case
> > > > > > > > > > where chicken feathers came out of a water well from
> > fracking..
> > > > But
> > > > > > it is
> > > > > > > > > > much safer to frac deep than shallow and shale is deep. > > Therefore
> > > > > > deep is
> > > > > > > > > > safer than shallow.
> > > > > > > > > Don't you have to chemically blast through the same rock
> whether
> > you
> > > > are
> > > > > > > > > going "deep" or "shallow"?
> > > > > > > > The point is that in traditional recovery, oil and gas may be
> > shallow
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > fracking can and has caused pollution of well water.
> > > > > > > > Shale it so deep
> > > > > > > > that that the water found is non drinkable anyway.
> > > > > > > It's about the casings breaking at any depth and leaking the poison
> > down
> > > > the
> > > > > > outside of the casings
> > > > > > > and into water at any depth.
> > > > > > > > It's salty and full of
> > > > > > > > all kinds of nasty stuff. Look at the chemical compensation of
> > steam
> > > > from
> > > > > > > > most geo-thermal wells. There are no reported cases of shale
> > > > fracking
> > > > > > > > polluting water wells from the actual fracking.
> > > > > > > All evidence, proof and adjudicated court cases to the contrary.
> > > > > > Try and keep up
> > > > > I did. Now about that 'never happened' of yours.....
> > > > > Peoples' ground water has been poisned and you know it.
> > > > > > > > There have been chemical
> > > > > > > > spills and illegal dumping of the used frack fluids just as there
> > has
> > > > been
> > > > > > > > for decades of traditional fracking and production. Oil and gas
> > > > > > > > production is and has always been a dirty business. But modern
> > > > > > > > technology has reduced the danger to a very low level.
> > > > > > > So how's that "Never happened" doing for you?
> > > > > > Same as before, no reported cases
> > > > > Bullshit and you know that, too.
> > > > > So why have NY and Penn stopped it?
> > > > > Jerry 'n Vegas
> > > > > > > > Bad actors excluded
> > > > > > > > (BP anyone?). Read the Yale study, the potential impact of a
> > clean up
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > minor compared to the economic boost to the economy.
> > > > > > > > The knee jerk side of this equation wants you to think that
> > fracking
> > > > will
> > > > > > > > cause the end of drinking water.
> > > > > > > Like it has in many locations.
> > > > > > > > They base this on a sketchy computer
> > > > > > > > model of fluids percolating up 2 miles into aquifers. The
> > geology and
> > > > > > > > economics of the shale plays are sound.
> > > > > > > So why has New York and I believe Pennsylvania stopped it?
> > > > > > > > Where wet gas and oil are found
> > > > > > > > it's a good investment for operators. Where it's only dry gas
> the
> > > > profit
> > > > > > > > is not there since shale gas has driven the MMBTU cost down so
> far
> > > > (from
> > > > > > > > 7.00 in 2008 to 2.80ish today). It won't be until the wet gas
> > plays
> > > > out
> > > > > > > > that dry gas will be economical to go after. As Chris Robin
> points
> > > > out,
> > > > > > > > speculators have driven the cost per acre out of reach in many
> > places
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > many investors were screwed but that has calmed way down. An
> acre
> > > > > > > > (mineral rights) in Haynesville has dropped from 13k down to a
> > couple
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > thousand. Eagle Ford lease bonuses peeked at 26K but have been
> > > > dropping
> > > > > > > > now the hysteria has calmed own.
> > > > > > > > This doesn't mean we shouldn't monitor the operators, there have
> > always
> > > > > > > > been issues with chemical spills and dumping in the industry.
> > Shale
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > no different.
> So go ahead, ssS, entertain us with idiot references to Jessica Rabbit WETF
that's about. It shows
> just how out of touch you are with any thread you stalk me to.
> Jerry 'n Vegas
Sweetie - we all have been asking you to provide a cite - EXCEPT FOR A
MOVIE - to prove your point. Maybe you should site Blair Witch Project?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator, rec.gambling.poker
Whose stated mission is to call out the Asses on RGP
On Saturday, July 14, 2012 6:22:52 AM UTC-7, bratt wrote:
> On Jul 14 2012 7:17 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > So go ahead, ssS, entertain us with idiot references to Jessica Rabbit WETF
> that's about. It shows
> > just how out of touch you are with any thread you stalk me to.
> > > > Jerry 'n Vegas
> Sweetie - we all have been asking you to provide a cite - EXCEPT FOR A
> MOVIE - to prove your point. Maybe you should site Blair Witch Project?
EXCEPT I provided the ultimate site. An actual documentary that was made EXACTLY for that purpose. I could do the searching and name the actual people; document the actual court cases; give the dates times and places, but waste my time for what? Just to have you and dipshit say:
"Oh yea, well we asked for data and except for the data, you didn't show us any data."
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Two months after the drilling began on two
> > hydrofracking
> > > > > wells
> > > > > > > > > within
> > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > mile of her property, Kim McEvoy of Evans City, PA
> > began
> > > to
> > > > > > > notice
> > > > > > > > > her
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > well water turning black and emitting a foul
odor.. The
> > > > > smell of
> > > > > > > > > rotten
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > eggs was so strong that it would wake me up when
the
> > > shower
> > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > running
> > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the next room, Kim said, adding that headaches,
> > constant
> > > > > > > fatigue and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > growing health concerns followed. Referring to her
> > > pursuit
> > > > > of an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation for the high levels of toxic chemicals
in
> > her
> > > > > well
> > > > > > > > > water, a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > resident of Susquehanna County slated to take
questions
> > > at
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > press
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > conference said, I felt helpless. Hopeless.
Absolutely
> > > > > > > hopeless. . .
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Southwestern Energy] said, We are not going to
help
> > > you. > > > > > It s
> > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > > > me
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > up against a giant oil and gas corporation. My
water is
> > > > > ruined,
> > > > > > > my
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > property value is totally done for.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I looked at the first 5 hits googleing this story
and not
> > > one
> > > > > > > mentioned
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Shale. Shale is way to deep to have been the
issue.. > > > Almost
> > > > > all
> > > > > > > gas
> > > > > > > > > > wells
> > > > > > > > > > > > > get fracked. Apples and oranges.
> > > > > > > > > > > > No, not apples and oranges. Fracking involves high
pressure
> > > > > shocks.
> > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > well
> > > > > > > > > > > casings going down from
> > > > > > > > > > > > the surface can crack or break. Poison leaks into the
> > > drinking
> > > > > > > water. The
> > > > > > > > > > > drinking water is
> > > > > > > > > > > > poisoned, and in some cases can be ignited. Do you deny
> > this
> > > has
> > > > > > > happened
> > > > > > > > > > > and is happening?
> > > > > > > > > > > > Jerry "The Real Truth" 'n Vegas
> > > > > > > > > > > As I said there have been frac problems in the past. I
know
> > of
> > > a
> > > > > case
> > > > > > > > > > > where chicken feathers came out of a water well from
> > > fracking..
> > > > > But
> > > > > > > it is
> > > > > > > > > > > much safer to frac deep than shallow and shale is deep. > > > Therefore
> > > > > > > deep is
> > > > > > > > > > > safer than shallow.
> > > > > > > > > > Don't you have to chemically blast through the same rock
> > whether
> > > you
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > going "deep" or "shallow"?
> > > > > > > > > The point is that in traditional recovery, oil and gas may be
> > > shallow
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > fracking can and has caused pollution of well water.
> > > > > > > > > Shale it so deep
> > > > > > > > > that that the water found is non drinkable anyway.
> > > > > > > > It's about the casings breaking at any depth and leaking the
poison
> > > down
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > outside of the casings
> > > > > > > > and into water at any depth.
> > > > > > > > > It's salty and full of
> > > > > > > > > all kinds of nasty stuff. Look at the chemical compensation
of
> > > steam
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > most geo-thermal wells. There are no reported cases of
shale
> > > > > fracking
> > > > > > > > > polluting water wells from the actual fracking.
> > > > > > > > All evidence, proof and adjudicated court cases to the
contrary.
> > > > > > > Try and keep up
> > > > > > I did. Now about that 'never happened' of yours.....
> > > > > > Peoples' ground water has been poisned and you know it.
> > > > > > > > > There have been chemical
> > > > > > > > > spills and illegal dumping of the used frack fluids just as
there
> > > has
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > for decades of traditional fracking and production. Oil
and gas
> > > > > > > > > production is and has always been a dirty business. But
modern
> > > > > > > > > technology has reduced the danger to a very low level.
> > > > > > > > So how's that "Never happened" doing for you?
> > > > > > > Same as before, no reported cases
> > > > > > Bullshit and you know that, too.
> > > > > > So why have NY and Penn stopped it?
> > > > > > Jerry 'n Vegas
> > > > > > > > > Bad actors excluded
> > > > > > > > > (BP anyone?). Read the Yale study, the potential impact of a
> > > clean up
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > minor compared to the economic boost to the economy.
> > > > > > > > > The knee jerk side of this equation wants you to think that
> > > fracking
> > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > cause the end of drinking water.
> > > > > > > > Like it has in many locations.
> > > > > > > > > They base this on a sketchy computer
> > > > > > > > > model of fluids percolating up 2 miles into aquifers. The
> > > geology and
> > > > > > > > > economics of the shale plays are sound.
> > > > > > > > So why has New York and I believe Pennsylvania stopped it?
> > > > > > > > > Where wet gas and oil are found
> > > > > > > > > it's a good investment for operators. Where it's only dry
gas
> > the
> > > > > profit
> > > > > > > > > is not there since shale gas has driven the MMBTU cost down
so
> > far
> > > > > (from
> > > > > > > > > 7.00 in 2008 to 2.80ish today). It won't be until the wet
gas
> > > plays
> > > > > out
> > > > > > > > > that dry gas will be economical to go after. As Chris Robin
> > points
> > > > > out,
> > > > > > > > > speculators have driven the cost per acre out of reach in
many
> > > places
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > many investors were screwed but that has calmed way down. An
> > acre
> > > > > > > > > (mineral rights) in Haynesville has dropped from 13k down to
a
> > > couple
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > thousand. Eagle Ford lease bonuses peeked at 26K but have
been
> > > > > dropping
> > > > > > > > > now the hysteria has calmed own.
> > > > > > > > > This doesn't mean we shouldn't monitor the operators, there
On Saturday, July 14, 2012 9:22:26 AM UTC-7, BTSinAustin wrote:
> > > Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator, rec.gambling.poker
> > > Whose stated mission is to call out the Asses on RGP
> > > >
> > > > Well, well, Stupid Stocking Susan. You're right; he has to
> was wrong and now he
> > can't admit he was given bad information. Probably watching too
much FOX;
> they went to the Supreme
> > Court in order to get their TV employees to lie to him. > > > > What the hell does Brian think all the fuss was about; all those court
> cases; all those claims; all
> > the states that are now restricting or preventing more fracking; all
those
> poisoned wells; all those
> > settlements? Because there never was a spill or any wells poisoned? NY
and
> Penn stopped drilling
> > because the EPA was doing guess work on what never happened? He even
> mentioned spills himself. Yet
> > he'll still post that it's never happened?
> Jerry, please. I’ve posted verified rebuttals to the points in Gasland.
Admit you were wrong and there have been wells poisoned.
> On Saturday, July 14, 2012 9:22:26 AM UTC-7, BTSinAustin wrote:
> > > > Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator, rec.gambling.poker
> > > > Whose stated mission is to call out the Asses on RGP
> > > Well, well, Stupid Stocking Susan. You're right; he has to
> 'give it up.' He
> > was wrong and now he
> > > can't admit he was given bad information. Probably watching too
> much FOX;
> > they went to the Supreme
> > > Court in order to get their TV employees to lie to him.
> > > What the hell does Brian think all the fuss was about; all those court
> > cases; all those claims; all
> > > the states that are now restricting or preventing more fracking; all
> those
> > poisoned wells; all those
> > > settlements? Because there never was a spill or any wells poisoned? NY
> and
> > Penn stopped drilling
> > > because the EPA was doing guess work on what never happened? He even
> > mentioned spills himself. Yet
> > > he'll still post that it's never happened?
> > Jerry, please. I ve posted verified rebuttals to the points in Gasland.
> Admit you were wrong and there have been wells poisoned.
> Jerry 'n Vegas
Whoosh, So you don't understand the issue at all. You must be getting
used to losing. You did not answer a single question
> > On Saturday, July 14, 2012 9:22:26 AM UTC-7, BTSinAustin wrote:
> > > > > Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator, rec.gambling.poker
> > > > > Whose stated mission is to call out the Asses on RGP
> > > > Well, well, Stupid Stocking Susan. You're right; he has to
> > 'give it up.' He
> > > was wrong and now he
> > > > can't admit he was given bad information. Probably watching too
> > much FOX;
> > > they went to the Supreme
> > > > Court in order to get their TV employees to lie to him.
> > > > What the hell does Brian think all the fuss was about; all those court
> > > cases; all those claims; all
> > > > the states that are now restricting or preventing more fracking; all
> > those
> > > poisoned wells; all those
> > > > settlements? Because there never was a spill or any wells poisoned? NY
> > and
> > > Penn stopped drilling
> > > > because the EPA was doing guess work on what never happened? He even
> > > mentioned spills himself. Yet
> > > > he'll still post that it's never happened?
> > > Jerry, please. I ve posted verified rebuttals to the points in Gasland.
> > Admit you were wrong and there have been wells poisoned.
> > Jerry 'n Vegas
> Whoosh, So you don't understand the issue at all. You must be getting
> used to losing. You did not answer a single question
He's going to the movies this afternoon and will get back to you after....
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator, rec.gambling.poker
Whose stated mission is to call out the Asses on RGP
> > > On Saturday, July 14, 2012 9:22:26 AM UTC-7, BTSinAustin wrote:
> > > > > > Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator, rec.gambling.poker
> > > > > > Whose stated mission is to call out the Asses on RGP
> > > > > Well, well, Stupid Stocking Susan. You're right; he has to
> > > 'give it up.' He
> > > > was wrong and now he
> > > > > can't admit he was given bad information. Probably watching too
> > > much FOX;
> > > > they went to the Supreme
> > > > > Court in order to get their TV employees to lie to him.
> > > > > What the hell does Brian think all the fuss was about; all those
court
> > > > cases; all those claims; all
> > > > > the states that are now restricting or preventing more fracking; all
> > > those
> > > > poisoned wells; all those
> > > > > settlements? Because there never was a spill or any wells poisoned?
NY
> > > and
> > > > Penn stopped drilling
> > > > > because the EPA was doing guess work on what never happened? He even
> > > > mentioned spills himself. Yet
> > > > > he'll still post that it's never happened?
> > > > Jerry, please. I�ve posted verified rebuttals to the points in
Gasland.
> > > Admit you were wrong and there have been wells poisoned.
> > > Jerry 'n Vegas
> > Whoosh, So you don't understand the issue at all. You must be getting
> > used to losing. You did not answer a single question
> He's going to the movies this afternoon and will get back to you after....
You know he's just a master troll. I can respect that
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 12:44:14 PM UTC-7, BTSinAustin wrote:
> On Jul 15 2012 3:23 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > On Saturday, July 14, 2012 9:22:26 AM UTC-7, BTSinAustin wrote:
> > > > > > > Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator, rec.gambling.poker
> > > > > Whose stated mission is to call out the Asses on RGP
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Well, well, Stupid Stocking Susan. You're right; he has to
> > 'give it up.' He
> > > was wrong and now he
> > > > can't admit he was given bad information. Probably watching too
> > much FOX;
> > > they went to the Supreme
> > > > Court in order to get their TV employees to lie to him. > > > > > > > > What the hell does Brian think all the fuss was about; all those court
> > > cases; all those claims; all
> > > > the states that are now restricting or preventing more fracking; all
> > those
> > > poisoned wells; all those
> > > > settlements? Because there never was a spill or any wells poisoned? NY
> > and
> > > Penn stopped drilling
> > > > because the EPA was doing guess work on what never happened? He even
> > > mentioned spills himself. Yet
> > > > he'll still post that it's never happened?
> >
> > > Jerry, please. I've posted verified rebuttals to the
> > > points in Gasland.
> > Admit you were wrong and there have been wells poisoned.
> > Jerry 'n Vegas
> Whoosh,
So you've relented. Noted.
> So you don't understand the issue at all.
You claiming "I'M" in denial?
>You must be getting used to losing.
GASLAND!
> You did not answer a single question
GASLAND! Learn to lose, kid; you're getting good at it.
> On Sunday, July 15, 2012 12:44:14 PM UTC-7, BTSinAustin wrote:
> > On Jul 15 2012 3:23 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > > On Saturday, July 14, 2012 9:22:26 AM UTC-7, BTSinAustin wrote:
> > > > > > Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator, rec.gambling.poker
> > > > > > Whose stated mission is to call out the Asses on RGP
> > > > > Well, well, Stupid Stocking Susan. You're right; he has to
> > > 'give it up.' He
> > > > was wrong and now he
> > > > > can't admit he was given bad information. Probably watching too
> > > much FOX;
> > > > they went to the Supreme
> > > > > Court in order to get their TV employees to lie to him.
> > > > > What the hell does Brian think all the fuss was about; all those
court
> > > > cases; all those claims; all
> > > > > the states that are now restricting or preventing more fracking; all
> > > those
> > > > poisoned wells; all those
> > > > > settlements? Because there never was a spill or any wells poisoned?
NY
> > > and
> > > > Penn stopped drilling
> > > > > because the EPA was doing guess work on what never happened? He even
> > > > mentioned spills himself. Yet
> > > > > he'll still post that it's never happened?
> > > > Jerry, please. I've posted verified rebuttals to the
> > > > points in Gasland.
> > > Admit you were wrong and there have been wells poisoned.
> > > Jerry 'n Vegas
> > Whoosh,
> So you've relented. Noted.
Fantasia
> > So you don't understand the issue at all.
> You claiming "I'M" in denial?
Sleeping Beauty
> >You must be getting used to losing.
Ice Age
> GASLAND!
Cars
> > You did not answer a single question
> GASLAND! Learn to lose, kid; you're getting good at it.
On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 9:51:58 AM UTC-7, ramashiva wrote:
> On Jul 17, 8:26 am, "BTSinAustin" <a1...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> > On Jul 16 2012 7:01 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > > GASLAND! Learn to lose, kid; you're getting good at it.
> > Sponge Bob
> Wow! This argument is still going on??? You cited definitive facts
> several days ago which ended the argument, but Jerry still wants to
> argue about it?
Not me. I proved him wrong by supplying the very data he requested. It was all contained in a documentry called Gasland. They PROVED that wells were poisned and that gas companies have paid damages.
> How Beldinic of him.
Says the by pulling a Beldin. Give it up fat man, you've already admitted you've read me.
