As much as I can't stand Obama, I actually felt very uncomfortable
watching that idiot who picked him up and gave him a bear hug at the
pizza parlor. What a retard, you don't put your hands on a president
like that. What was the Secret Service doing? Where were they? They
should have kicked that guy's ass. They should have turned the
cameras off and beat his fucking ass!
On 11 Sep, 15:14, popinjay999 <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> As much as I can't stand Obama, I actually felt very uncomfortable
> watching that idiot who picked him up and gave him a bear hug at the
> pizza parlor. What a retard, you don't put your hands on a president
> like that. What was the Secret Service doing? Where were they? They
> should have kicked that guy's ass. They should have turned the
> cameras off and beat his fucking ass!
lol Can you imagine someone did that to the queen. Very uncouth.
On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 7:14:00 AM UTC-7, popinjay999 wrote:
> As much as I can't stand Obama, I actually felt very uncomfortable
> watching that idiot who picked him up and gave him a bear hug at the
> pizza parlor. What a retard, you don't put your hands on a president
> like that. What was the Secret Service doing? Where were they? They
> should have kicked that guy's ass. They should have turned the
> cameras off and beat his fucking ass!
It was reported later that it was prearranged. (Razzo is correct)
Try watching something other than Fox.
On Sep 11, 2:37 pm, "Clave" <ChrisClav...@TheMonastery.com> wrote:
> I heard the guy interviewed on the radio this morning, and he sez that the
> Secret Service told him that his stop was one of the easiest they've had.
> On Sep 11, 2:37 pm, "Clave" <ChrisClav...@TheMonastery.com> wrote:
>> I heard the guy interviewed on the radio this morning, and he sez that >> the
>> Secret Service told him that his stop was one of the easiest they've had.
> Was anyone even talking to you?
I think you're the only drooling feeb here who's under the illusion that Usenet conversations are somehow private.
In any case, it gratifies me to no end that I'm able to irritate you without even addressing you directly.
> I think you're the only drooling feeb here who's under the illusion that
> Usenet conversations are somehow private.
I have never been under any illusion that usenet conversations are
private, but there is an implied protocol that should be followed when
you know you're not welcomed by the author of the thread.
>> I think you're the only drooling feeb here who's under the illusion that
>> Usenet conversations are somehow private.
> I have never been under any illusion that usenet conversations are
> private, but there is an implied protocol that should be followed when
> you know you're not welcomed by the author of the thread.
LOL -- I'll bet there's just enough room up your ass to fit that "implied protocol", right next to your head.
> >> I think you're the only drooling feeb here who's under the illusion that
> >> Usenet conversations are somehow private.
> > I have never been under any illusion that usenet conversations are
> > private, but there is an implied protocol that should be followed when
> > you know you're not welcomed by the author of the thread.
> LOL -- I'll bet there's just enough room up your ass to fit that "implied
> protocol", right next to your head.
> Jim
Insult me all you want, but you know that I am right. And you've been
on usenet much longer than I have, so I know that you know that I am
right.
>> >> I think you're the only drooling feeb here who's under the illusion >> >> that
>> >> Usenet conversations are somehow private.
>> > I have never been under any illusion that usenet conversations are
>> > private, but there is an implied protocol that should be followed when
>> > you know you're not welcomed by the author of the thread.
>> LOL -- I'll bet there's just enough room up your ass to fit that "implied
>> protocol", right next to your head.
> Insult me all you want, but you know that I am right...
>> I think you're the only drooling feeb here who's under the illusion that
>> Usenet conversations are somehow private.
>I have never been under any illusion that usenet conversations are
>private, but there is an implied protocol that should be followed when
>you know you're not welcomed by the author of the thread.
LOL. I've been trying to convince Jim that you're a funny guy. If
this post doesn't do it, nothing will.
On Sep 14, 9:32 am, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >I have never been under any illusion that usenet conversations are
> >private, but there is an implied protocol that should be followed when
> >you know you're not welcomed by the author of the thread.
> LOL. I've been trying to convince Jim that you're a funny guy. If
> this post doesn't do it, nothing will.
>> >I have never been under any illusion that usenet conversations are
>> >private, but there is an implied protocol that should be followed when
>> >you know you're not welcomed by the author of the thread.
>> LOL. I've been trying to convince Jim that you're a funny guy. If
>> this post doesn't do it, nothing will.
>I don't get it?
The idea that there's any such implied protocol on Usenet is
hilarious.
On Sep 16, 9:31 pm, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >> >I have never been under any illusion that usenet conversations are
> >> >private, but there is an implied protocol that should be followed when
> >> >you know you're not welcomed by the author of the thread.
> >> LOL. I've been trying to convince Jim that you're a funny guy. If
> >> this post doesn't do it, nothing will.
> >I don't get it?
> The idea that there's any such implied protocol on Usenet is
> hilarious.
Oh. I was looking for something more I guess. Nevermind.
Hey Pepe, did Paul ever tell you about the time he was driving, and it
was really misty, and then he pulled over, and he rolled a spliff, and
then he started smoking it and as the mist cleared he realised that he
was in a police parking lot!
On Sep 16, 3:13 pm, fffurken <fffur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Pepe, did Paul ever tell you about the time he was driving, and it
> was really misty, and then he pulled over, and he rolled a spliff, and
> then he started smoking it and as the mist cleared he realised that he
> was in a police parking lot!
> ROTFLMAO! That was hilarious.
I don't know what your problem is, or Pepe's problem either, but I
suspect you are both mocking me. Both accounts were true and nothing
was meant to be "funny". It wasn't funny. I am not a clown.
>> Hey Pepe, did Paul ever tell you about the time he was driving, and it
>> was really misty, and then he pulled over, and he rolled a spliff, and
>> then he started smoking it and as the mist cleared he realised that he
>> was in a police parking lot!
>> ROTFLMAO! That was hilarious.
>I don't know what your problem is, or Pepe's problem either, but I
>suspect you are both mocking me.
You're somewhat perceptive.
>Both accounts were true and nothing
>was meant to be "funny". It wasn't funny. I am not a clown.
On 17 Sep, 06:11, popinjay999 <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > Hey Pepe, did Paul ever tell you about the time he was driving, and it
> > was really misty, and then he pulled over, and he rolled a spliff, and
> > then he started smoking it and as the mist cleared he realised that he
> > was in a police parking lot!
> > ROTFLMAO! That was hilarious.
> I don't know what your problem is, or Pepe's problem either, but I
> suspect you are both mocking me.
I wasn't mocking you Paul, I was contrasting funny and not so funny. I
guess me and Pepe just have a different idea of what's hilarious.
> Hey Pepe, did Paul ever tell you about the time he was driving, and it
> was really misty, and then he pulled over, and he rolled a spliff, and
> then he started smoking it and as the mist cleared he realised that he
> was in a police parking lot!
> > Hey Pepe, did Paul ever tell you about the time he was driving, and it
> > was really misty, and then he pulled over, and he rolled a spliff, and
> > then he started smoking it and as the mist cleared he realised that he
> > was in a police parking lot!
> I think I saw that in a Cheech and Chong movie.
Which would be somewhat of a coincidence as it also happened to Paul.
True story, just ask him.
